Using Mathematics Think Alouds: A Field-Identified Teaching Strategy for English Language Learners with Disabilities Martha Thurlow, Manuel Barrera, Kristi.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DC Responses Received WA OR ID MT WY CA NV UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX ND SD NE KS OK MN IA MO AR LA WI IL MI IN OH KY TN MS AL GA FL SC NC VA WV PA NY VT NH.
Advertisements

National Center on Educational Outcomes N C E O Leaving No Child Behind: Are English Language Learners With Disabilities Considered? Martha Thurlow, Jane.
National Center on Educational Outcomes N C E O Reporting Assessment Results for Students with Disabilities Martha Thurlow National Center on Educational.
National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) Achieving Literacy in English Language Learners Introductions and a Few Comments Martha L. Thurlow.
NICS Index State Participation As of 12/31/2007 DC NE NY WI IN NH MD CA NV IL OR TN PA CT ID MT WY ND SD NM KS TX AR OK MN OH WV MSAL KY SC MO ME MA DE.
Agencies’ Participation in PBMS January 20, 2015 PA IL TX AZ CA Trained, Partial Data Entry (17) Required Characteristics & 75% of Key Indicators (8) OH.
Medicaid Eligibility for Working Parents by Income, January 2013
House Price
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 240 sessions with 8,187 participants
House price index for AK
Children's Eligibility for Medicaid/CHIP by Income, January 2013
NJ WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NH NV
Medicaid Costs are Shared by the States and the Federal Government
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, May 2018 WY WI WV◊ WA VA^ VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Share of Births Covered by Medicaid, 2006
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 386 sessions with 11,336 participants
Non-Citizen Population, by State, 2011
Share of Women Ages 18 – 64 Who Are Uninsured, by State,
Coverage of Low-Income Adults by Scope of Coverage, January 2013
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA1 OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH2
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA OR OK OH1 ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
Mobility Update and Discussion as of March 25, 2008
Current Status of the Medicaid Expansion Decision, as of May 30, 2013
IAH CONVERSION: ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES BY STATE
WAHBE Brokers / QHPs across the country as of
619 Involvement in State SSIPs
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2015
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2018
HHGM CASE WEIGHTS Early/Late Mix (Weighted Average)
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 386 sessions with 11,336 participants
Status of State Participation in Medicaid Expansion, as of March 2014
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 394 sessions with 11,460 participants
Percent of Women Ages 19 to 64 Uninsured by State,
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 392 sessions with 11,432 participants
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
10% of nonelderly uninsured 26% of nonelderly uninsured
22% of nonelderly uninsured 10% of nonelderly uninsured
Medicaid Income Eligibility Levels for Parents, January 2017
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2017
S Co-Sponsors by State – May 23, 2014
Seventeen States Had Higher Uninsured Rates Than the National Average in 2013; Of Those, 11 Have Yet to Expand Eligibility for Medicaid AK NH WA VT ME.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 396 sessions with 11,504 participants
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Average annual growth rate
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 250 sessions with 8,352 participants
Market Share of Two Largest Health Plans, by State, 2006
Uninsured Rate Among Adults Ages 19–64, 2008–09 and 2019
Percent of Children Ages 0–17 Uninsured by State
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 402 sessions with 11,649 participants
How State Policies Limiting Abortion Coverage Changed Over Time
United States: age distribution family households and family size
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 402 sessions with 11,649 participants
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Percent of Adults Ages 18–64 Uninsured by State
States’ selected SIMRs for Part C FFY 2013 ( )
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 401 sessions with 11,639 participants
States including quality standards in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including quality standards in their SSIP.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
10% of nonelderly uninsured 26% of nonelderly uninsured
States including their fiscal systems in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including their fiscal systems in their.
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 416 sessions with 11,878 participants
Current Status of State Individual Marketplace and Medicaid Expansion Decisions, as of September 30, 2013 WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Income Eligibility Levels for Children in Medicaid/CHIP, January 2017
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 429 sessions with 12,141 participants
22% of nonelderly uninsured 10% of nonelderly uninsured
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 436 sessions with 12,254 participants
Presentation transcript:

Using Mathematics Think Alouds: A Field-Identified Teaching Strategy for English Language Learners with Disabilities Martha Thurlow, Manuel Barrera, Kristi Liu National Center on Educational Outcomes

Welcome and Introduction Martha Thurlow, Director National Center on Educational Outcomes

National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) What Do We Know About ELLs with Disabilities? An estimated 357,325 students K-12 in % of all ELLs have disabilities Roughly 80% identified with a learning disability or a speech language impairment Spanish language speakers highly represented

National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) States Reporting Reading Test Participation and Performance on Regular Assessments No data Has participation and performance (Does not include accommodated data for regular assessment or other language versions) HI MA WAMTND OR NV CA ID WY UT AZ CO NM SD NE KS TX OK MN IA MO AR LA WI IL MI OH KY MS TN FL GA SC NC VA NY ME WV AK VT NH CT NJ DE IN RI AL MD PA

National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) One State’s Performance Data Students Proficient on Regular Reading Assessment Grade 4Grade 8Grade 10 ELLs with Disabilities 12% (N=585) 7% (N=402) 2% (N=268) All students with disabilities 42% (N=8015) 22% (N=7470) 18% (N=7057) All ELLs31% (N=5162) 26% (N=3875) 18% (N=3796) All students71% (N=57,891) 63% (62,927) 62% (N=65,396)

Kristi Liu National Center on Educational Outcomes

Our projects funded by the Office of Special Education Programs Study 1: LEP/IEP Instruction Project ( Grant #H324D010023) Study 2: LEP/IEP Strategies Project (#H324C040171) Investigate instructional strategy use for ELLs with disabilities by middle school teachers in one state Conduct research on top- weighted strategies in reading and math Follow up on results of LEP/IEP instruction project with successful middle school teachers and principals nationwide

Identifying strategies to improve mathematics achievement for ELLs with disabilities Obtain teacher beliefs Turn beliefs into strategies Verify with other practitioners Research Verified Mathematics Think Aloud

Top weighted strategies according to teachers in one Midwestern state… ContentStrategy MathTactile, concrete experiences of mathematics Daily re-looping of previously learned material Problem solving instruction and task analysis strategies Teacher “think-alouds” Student “think-alouds” ReadingTeaching pre-, during-, and post-reading strategies Fluency building (high frequency words) Direct teaching vocabulary through listening, seeing, reading, and writing in short time segments Relating reading to student experiences Chunking and questioning aloud (reading mastery)

Think-alouds Explaining and teaching the steps of problem solving through self-reflection and review; that is, demonstrating how to say aloud the steps used in problem solving

Related Research Single-subject research with general think aloud procedures for students with disabilities in mathematics (Braten & Throndsen, 1998; Case, Harris, & Graham, 1992; Davis & Hajicek, 1985; Leon & Pepe, 1983; ) Research on “Self-instructional strategy development” (SI) or “self-regulated learning” (SRL) (Leon and Pepe, 1983; Moore, Reith, & Ebeling, 1993)

Students in Math Think Aloud Study StudentGradeAgeEthnicity/ Language Oral English Proficiency Reading Level Math Level M815HmongIntermediate2.5Low T1613Mexican- American/ Spanish Proficient44 T2613Mexican- American/ Spanish Proficient33 T3612Mexican- American/ Spanish BeginningDid not meet standard

Manuel Barrera National Center on Educational Outcomes Metropolitan State University

Mathematics Think-Aloud Strategy Teacher determines the standards-based mathematics concept or skill to learn: ◦ Example: representing fractions and their equivalents Determine Pre-requisite skills ◦ Example: student recognizes part-to-whole relationships, understands key vocabulary terms (numerator, denominator, digit, single digit, two-digit) and symbols (=, /) ◦ Conduct Pre-requisite skill assessment (CBM & CBA to verify PrS) Teacher modeling of strategy (I do it) ◦ Example: “first, I need to [factor the numerator with the denominator to the lowest number, next, I need to [verify that both fractions are equal], finally, I need to [start the next fraction and complete the steps] Teacher and Student use the Mathematics Prompt Sheet to teach/learn the strategy (we do it) Student Guided and Independent Practice (You do it)

Monitor and Evaluate Strategy Use, Progress, and Student Check-in Use of systematic teaching process ◦ Explain what will be done and why ◦ Determine and verify vocabulary needed ◦ Describe strategy steps ◦ Modeling and Prompting of steps ◦ Provide exemplars & visuals Collect strategy and achievement during instruction & practice Provide student opportunities to verify comprehension of strategy and process (student check-in) See fault.html for published descriptions fault.html

11/11/2015Manuel Barrera, Ph.D.16 Model for Progress Monitoring (cf. Salvia & Hughes, 1990) Collect Data Organize Data Summarize Data Interpret Data Display Data Prepare What will you assess? How will you assess?

Applications for ELLs with disabilities in Group and ESL Settings Evidence for use of think-alouds with ELLs in ESL settings ◦ Use in conjunction with the CALLA (Chamot, Dale, O’Malley, & Spanos, 1992)  For review of Chamot, et al., paper go to ◦ A think-aloud procedure was used as a step in preparing for understanding the problem-solving steps, as a guide during problem solving and as a reflective (“retrospective”) process after solving the problem ◦ Students with language and mathematics ability challenges (“low ability”) had more difficulty and could benefit from procedures used in our study (cf. Liu, Barrera, & Thurlow, 2009)

References Thurlow, M., Albus, D., Shyyan, V., Liu, K., & Barrera, M. (2004). Educator perceptions of instructional strategies for standards-based education of English language learners with disabilities (ELLs with Disabilities Report 7) Barrera, M. Liu, K., Thurlow, M., Shyyan, V., Yan, M., & Chamberlain, S. (2006). Math Strategy Instruction for Students with Disabilities who are Learning English-ELLs with Disabilities Report Chamot, A. U., Dale, M., O'Malley, J. M., & Spanos, G. A. (1992). Learning and Problem Solving Strategies of ESL Students, f f For additional NCEO research reports on strategies for ELLs with Disabilities, please visit our website: Go to “publications” and look for “ELLs with Disabilities” series