Air Toxics Monitoring in the Houston- Galveston Area David Brymer, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tony Walker, REM DFW Regional Director Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Texas Commission on Environmental Quality – DFW Region Office.
Advertisements

Directive 2008/50/EC of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe These slides do not provide a complete description of the requirements.
Advanced Sampling and Data Analysis for Source Attribution of Ambient Particulate Arsenic and Other Air Toxics Metals in St. Louis Missouri Department.
Interpolations of Ambient Air Pollution Concentrations in Austin and Houston Heather Simon.
Nez Perce Tribe Air Quality Program Air Toxics Monitoring.
Air Toxics Monitoring Results in the Houston-Galveston Area David Brymer, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
Modeling Guidance and Examples for Commonly Asked Questions (Part II) Reece Parker and Justin Cherry, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental.
Air Pollutant Watch List (APWL) Darrell D. McCant, B.S. Chief Engineer’s Office - Toxicology Section Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
EPA Air Toxics Programs Ruben R. Casso Toxics Coordinator EPA Region 6 Phone
REDUCTION OF HIGHLY REACTIVE VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS & VARIABLE EMISSIONS IN HOUSTON/GALVESTON: MONITORING, MODELING, MEASURING, RULEMAKING David Allen.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master subtitle style 1 Modeling of 1,3-Butadiene for Urban and Industrial Areas B. Rappenglück and B. Czader.
Harris County Public Health and Environmental Services Pollution Control Division Air Monitoring Activities Bob Allen
Update: National Ambient Air Quality Standards Association of California Airports September 15, 2010 Phil DeVita.
Houston Regional Monitoring HRM Houston Regional Monitoring Network Overview.
Air toxics measurements in a Seattle neighborhood Doris Montecastro and Hal Westberg Laboratory for Atmospheric Research Dept. of Civil and Environmental.
A History and Status of CEMS Applications in USEPA Regulations Dale Evarts US EPA December 16, 2002 Better Air Quality in Asian Cities 2002
Solutions: Preventing and Reducing Air Pollution
1 THE ENVIRONMENT AND MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS. 2 Motor vehicle emissions are major contributors to health risks and environmental damage at the local,
Personal Monitoring for Air Pollution Exposure Philip M. Fine, Ph.D. Atmospheric Measurements Manager South Coast Air Quality Management District CAPCOA.
Introduction to Air Pollution John Atkinson and Dr. Mark Rood Environmental Engineering and Science Program Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
The Vertical Distribution and Stratification of VOC in the Atmosphere at Kaohsiung Area 2012 International Conference on Environmental Quality Concern,
TCEQ/NUATRC Air Toxics Workshop: Session V – Human Health Effects Nathan Pechacek, M.S. Toxicology Section Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Texas Rural Air Monitoring Sites Sonia Uribe November 16, 2004.
David A. Ramirez Area Director for Border and Permian Basin Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Border to Border Transportation Conference November.
Zhihua (Tina) Fan Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute Sponsored by RWJMS-UMDNJ and Rutgers University Piscataway, NJ NUATRC Air Toxics.
Lakeshore Air Toxics Study (LATS) Jeff Stoakes Senior Environmental Manager Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM ) 1.
1 One facility, two very different emissions. Module 5. Air Pollutant Emissions in the Mid-Atlantic United States by K.G. Paterson, Ph.D., P.E. © 2007.
Community Air Risk Evaluation (CARE) Program Philip Martien, Ph.D. Senior Advanced Projects Advisor Bay Area Air Quality Management District CAPCOA Conference.
RICE Air Toxics Health Effects and Development of Standards Matt Fraser Civil and Environmental Engineering Department.
Western Region Pesticide Meeting Air Monitoring Studies for Agriculture-Urban Interfaces Carl A. Brown, Ph.D. Idaho Department of Environmental Quality.
June 12 &13, 2007 Mickey Leland National Urban Air Toxics Workshop II – Houston, Texas 1 Albuquerque, New Mexico Community Scale Ambient Air Monitoring.
Overview of the Air Toxics Program Jeff Whitlow U.S. EPA May 15-18, 2007.
UPDATE ON OIL AND GAS ACTIVITIES IN TEXAS TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT Susan Jablonski, P.E. Area Director.
Air Toxics Study Prepared in collaboration with the University of Louisville, School of Public Health Depts. Epidemiology and Clinical Investigation Sciences.
Emergency Response: Perspective of a Large Air District South Coast Air Quality Management District South Coast Air Quality Management District CARPA Summit.
Investigation of Spatial Variation of Air Toxics in Three Houston-Area Neighborhoods Using Passive Sampling Thomas H. Stock, Maria T. Morandi, Masoud Afshar,
Next Generation Air Monitoring: An Overview of US EPA Activities National Air Quality Conference RTP, NC February 12, 2014 Tim Watkins US EPA/Office of.
Citizen Air Monitoring in the Houston Area Jane Laping, Executive Director Mothers for Clean Air
Shelby County Health Department Pollution Control Section May 21, 2013.
Urban Air Pollution GISAT 112. Learning Objectives Regions of the atmosphere Amount, composition of air we breathe Names of selected air pollutants Health.
Icfi.com April 30, 2009 icfi.com © 2006 ICF International. All rights reserved. AIR TOXICS IN MOBILE COUNTY, ALABAMA: A MONITORING AND MODELING STUDY WEBINAR:
Talking About Air Toxics John D. Wilson Galveston-Houston Association for Smog Prevention
HRM Houston Regional Monitoring 1 Hazardous Air Pollutants Ambient Air Monitoring Data Review Air Toxics: What We Know, What We Don’t Know, and What We.
ChemRisk Houston Air Quality: Modeling, Monitoring and Risk Associated with Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) Mark Harris, PhD Principal Health Scientist.
Houston Air Quality Challenges John D. Wilson Galveston-Houston Association for Smog Prevention
Indoor Air Quality Update June 27, Indoor air quality reflects outdoor and indoor air pollution sources Improving outdoor air quality reduces indoor.
Ozone Transport that Impacts on Tribal Land: Case Study Stan Belone Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community.
1. How is model predicted O3 sensitive to day type emission variability and morning Planetary Boundary Layer rise? Hypothesis 2.
Analytical Laboratories - Potential and Restricted Emissions Kevin Tyson, Air Quality Analyst Wednesday, December 10, 2014.
Air Quality in Texas Birnur Guven Houston Advanced Research Center June 23, 2010 – Johnson Space Center.
PARTICULATE MATTER: REGULATORY RESPONSE Presented by: Karl Loos.
Air Toxics & Public Health Committee Update Heidi Hales Monitoring and Assessment Committee Meeting Troy, NH April 24, 2007.
Air Quality Division Emissions Inventories SAW: May 3, 2016 Page 1 Point Source Emissions Inventories Air Quality Division Susan Wampler May 3,
EPA Methane Regulations Details on the Final Rules and Summary of Impacts May 16, 2016 Producer: Claire Carter Edited by: Afzal Bari Director: Afzal Bari.
Imperial County 2013 State Implementation Plan for the Hour PM2.5 Moderate Non-attainment Area December 2, 20141, 2014.
AIR CLIMATE & ENERGY RESEARCH PROGRAM B U I L D I N G A S C I E N T I F I C F O U N D A T I O N F O R S O U N D E N V I R O N M.
Garfield County Air Quality Monitoring Network Cassie Archuleta Project Scientist Board of County Commissioners – Regular Meeting.
The Clean Air Act (CAA) is the comprehensive federal law that regulates air emissions from stationary and mobile sources.
Statewide Compliance Monitoring and Local Monitoring Projects
Clean Air Act Glossary.
Air Pollution Prevention
Shell Center for Sustainable Development Seminar
WORKING BETWEEN THE LINES: ONE CITY’S APPROACH TO REDUCING AIR TOXICS
National Monitoring Steering Committee Report
Air Monitoring Trends in New Jersey
PMcoarse , Monitoring Budgets, and AQI
TCEQ AMBIENT Air Monitors in Corpus christi
Air Toxics Program Laura McKelvey.
EPA FY2008 Air Monitoring Budget Guidance
ECHO Clean Air Tracking Tool (ECATT)
Presentation transcript:

Air Toxics Monitoring in the Houston- Galveston Area David Brymer, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

General Monitoring Information >140 monitors (not including weather) at >45 fixed air monitoring sites in the Houston-Galveston area >25,000,000 air quality measurements This represents almost a third of the fixed site air monitoring done in the State of Texas

Continuous Monitoring Sites

Topics of Discussion Who is doing this monitoring? Where are we monitoring Air Toxics? –Network Design (why are we monitoring where we are?) What compounds are we monitoring? How are we monitoring Air Toxics? –Types of monitoring –Technology used/ Sampling frequency

Who Does this Monitoring? Governmental Agencies –EPA –TCEQ –Local Governments (HCPC, GCHD, etc..) Citizen Groups Industry –Consortiums (HRM) –Individual facility fenceline and/or on-site monitoring

Network Design Fixed sites –Sited to address a specific monitoring objective Mobile sites –Screening or addressing a specific concern/ incident –Upwind/downwind

Fixed Air Toxics Monitoring Sites in the Greater Houston-Galveston Area EISM Sites HRM Sites TCEQ Sites Other

Air Toxics Related Projects with Fixed Sites National Air Toxics Trends Sites (NATTS) – EPA Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS) – EPA Community Air Toxics Monitoring Network (CATMN) – State Houston Regional Monitoring Network – Industry Supplemental Environmental Projects/Agreed Order Monitoring – Gov’t/Industry

CATMN Legislative directive in 1992 Assess community exposure to VOC concentrations Determine potential long-term health effects Data used to assess temporal/spatial variability

CATMN Site Considerations Magnitude of pollution emissions within 10 km radius Predominant wind direction/wind rose Population density Traffic patterns Degree of public concern Logistical considerations –40 CFR Part 58, App. D & E –Access to the site Available data – mobile monitoring

Toxics Monitoring Sites Air Toxics Monitoring Sites

Houston/Beaumont CATMN

PAMS Monitoring –Monitoring required in non-attainment areas (1990 CAA Section 182[c][1]) –Enhanced monitoring of ozone, its precursors (VOCs which include some air toxics & NOx) and influencing factors (meteorology and solar radiation) –In the Houston area this requirement includes upwind (Galveston), area of anticipated max VOC emissions (Clinton Dr), and downwind (Aldine)

National Air Toxics Monitoring Strategy Urban Air Toxics Strategy (UATS) Attain substantial reduction of Non-cancer HAPs Attain 75% reduction of cancer drivers from 1993 levels Monitoring Goals –Trends –Exposure Assessments (ambient measurements as a surrogate for actual human exposure) –Air Quality Model Evaluation

22 NATTS sites –15 urban (1 in Tx – Deer Park) –7 rural (1 in Tx – Karnac)

What Compounds are Being Monitored? Criteria Pollutants (ozone, particulate, CO, SO2, NO2, and lead) Volatile Organic Compounds –1 to over 150 compounds at a given site –Includes HRVOCs and air toxics at most sites –Dependent upon monitoring method and project/site objectives

What are Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs)? Hazardous air pollutants are those pollutants that are known or suspected to cause cancer or other serious health effects or adverse environmental effects, Source: EPA. EPA classified 188 compounds as HAPs in the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments The National Air Toxics Assessment (NATA) study done by EPA in 1990 identified 6 risk drivers of particular interest nationwide. –VOCs – benzene, 1,3-butadiene, acrolein, formaldehyde –Metals – chromium* and arsenic The 1999 NATA study using 1996 data did not identify 1,3-butadiene and arsenic as national risk drivers

Sources of Air Toxics Mobile sources Stationary point sources Indoor sources Area sources such as lawn mowing, heavy machinery, dry cleaners, and printing operations Atmospheric reaction products

Where are HAPs Monitored in Houston? There are 32 TCEQ or industry-funded ambient air toxics monitors in the HGB area (not including SEP & Agreed Order monitoring) Source: TCEQ

Houston-Galveston Area HAP Monitors Legend TCEQ & EISM sites HRM sites

How are We Doing Fixed Site Monitoring? VOCs (including benzene, 1,3-butadiene) –Automated Gas Chromatographs (11sites) –Passivated Canisters (24 sites)

How are we Doing Fixed Site Monitoring? Carbonyls ( including formaldehyde, acrolein) –DNPH cartridge collection and HPLC analysis –3 sites Metals –Filter collection and ICP analysis –8 sites

VOC Monitoring Approaches AutoGC’s –Provide hourly measurements –Provide sub ppbV detection limits –Preliminary data available within 2 hrs –Provides data on HRVOCs and air toxics –Limited target list (non-polar compounds) –Only 1 shot at the analysis –Large capital investment –Generates approx. 500,000 data points/yr

VOC Monitoring Approaches Canisters –Can be configured for a wide variety of sample collection times ( 1 day). We generally use 24 hr samples collected every 6 th day. –Can be analyzed for a wide variety of compounds (>100 target compounds). –Lower initial and on-going costs. –Provide sub ppbV level detection limits with the ability to reanalyze or dilute a sample –Samples sent back to a lab for analysis. Results are not available in real-time or near real-time.

VOC Monitoring with Canisters

Event Triggered Can Sampler

Mobile Site Monitoring Mobile Laboratory Monitoring (In Field) –TCEQ Screening/Incident Monitoring –EPA –TCEQ HCPC GCPC Citizen groups

Mobile Laboratory Capabilities Volatile Organics –Screening with portable GC/MS and other handheld instrumentation (soon to include IR camera) –In field analysis using GC/PID/FID –Confirmational sampling via canisters and GC/MS analysis

What is TCEQs Mobile Laboratories Role? Find contributors to elevated ambient concentrations measured at fixed sites Determine compliance with H2S/SO2/particulate Regulations Respond to ongoing complaints that appear to match monitoring capabilities Collect enforcement quality data Identify/quantify air toxics in specific areas

When Roles Do TCEQs Mobile Laboratories not Fill? Emergency response (timing, safety, response time) General odor complaints (don’t do nuisance odor investigations - can analyze for H2S/SO and organics) Source sampling (in most cases) Not great at monitoring intermittent or batch operations

Screening/Incident Investigation Agency investigators can use screening tools (IR cameras, TVA, OVA,etc) or collect samples (e.g. canisters) that can be sent to lab for analysis Citizen group screening