Coaching in a Culture of Common Core Thursday October 2, 9:15-10:15 Robert H. Plonka.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Year 2 Formative Progress Review
Advertisements

Importance of Questioning and Feedback Technique in developing 3 Cs
June 20, Your Presenters  Ken Mattingly – Rockcastle County  Jessica Addison – Todd County/KDE.
Mentoring Conversations
USING THE INSTRUCTIONAL BLUEPRINT TO GUIDE TIER I WORK.
The Blueprint Your SIP (School Improvement Plan) A living, breathing, document.
Primary Reading Focus Group
Implementing the CCSS Through Coaching Atomic Conference December 2, 2014.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Copyright © 2012 Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center & North Central Comprehensive Center at McRel.
General Notes for Facilitator 1.Depending on the number of participants that you have you may need two decks of cards. You will need a stack of cards that.
Best Practices. Overview of Best Practices Literacy Best Practice Documents: Were developed by curriculum staff and area specialists, with coaches’ and.
What should be the basis of
Coaching the Reluctant Teacher Britt Humphries, EdS. Literacy Instructional Facilitator Fort Smith Public Schools brittsliteracyworkshops.pbworks.com.
Interactive Science Notebooks: Putting the Next Generation Practices into Action
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
1 Confidential to Shelby County Schools and Memphis City Schools Reflective Practice Theory of Action.
Math AP Meeting January 20, 2015 Presenter: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, CFN204.
Introduction to digiCOACH Empowering Instructional Leaders Common Core Edition.
Tools for Instruction and Assessment for the Maryland College- and Career-Ready Standards Time to Revisit Tools that will Inform Instruction.
June 19 th – PLC Day June 19 th – PLC Day Year In Review – Year In Preview District Road Map District Road Map TPEP Early Release Collaboration Early Release.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
1 Reading First Action Seminar Los Angeles Unified Schools Thursday, October 28, 2004.
“Just can’t live that negative way… Make way for the positive day.” -Bob Marley Positive Vibration.
Protocols for Mathematics Performance Tasks PD Protocol: Preparing for the Performance Task Classroom Protocol: Scaffolding Performance Tasks PD Protocol:
The Power of Formative Assessment to Advance Learning.
February 10, 2012 Session 3: Effective Leadership in the Common Core February 10, 2012 Session 3: Effective Leadership for the Common Core NYSED Principal.
Technology in the classroom. UM weather Great way to begin a day or class –Links to 300 weather sites –Links to 700 web cams to view weather –Radar and.
A significant and historic opportunity for states to collectively develop and adopt a core set of academic standards in Mathematics and English/Language.
Branching Out September 26, Welcome Back! Where are we now? Where are we going? PLN! Introductions…
Got Citizenship? September 12, 2013 Common Core: Close Reading.
1 PLCi Common Core Standards Initiative (CCSI) Oakland PLCi November 1, 2012.
Top Ten List of Coaching Beliefs Jackie Suchanek.
Peer coaching is a strategy where one or more teachers form a partnership with one another for the purpose of observing, recording, and providing feedback.
Professionally Speaking : Qualitative Research and the Professions. Using action research to gauge the quality of feedback given to student teachers while.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental I: Core Curriculum & Instruction.
The Coaching Cycle: Before, during, after
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
Fall 2011 Peer Observation Training. Agenda Process for Peer Observations What am I looking for during the Peer Observation and how do I rate it? How.
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
Successes to Date. Fastest improving state in the nation on 4 th and 8 th grade NAEP Consistent gains on TCAP every year since new assessments in 2010.
Candidate Assessment of Performance Conducting Observations and Providing Meaningful Feedback Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
A Signature Tool of The Institute for Learning
Activity 5a Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
Module 1 Peer Coaching on Paper Peer Coach Training.
Supervisor Training PEER Centers April/May
Reflective Teaching Practices
Intentional - Purposeful - Explicit NOT SCRIPT Don’t need more prescription but more precision. Precision requires: 1.Teachers know students 2.Teachers.
Activity 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
CCRS Quarterly Meeting CCRS Quarterly Meeting English Language Arts
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental I: Core Curriculum & Instruction Session 2.
February 19, 2013 EXPLICIT INSTRUCTION.  After achieving a working knowledge and components of explicit instruction, teachers will self-assess their.
Using simulations as tools to promote more powerful learning Instructor: Ming-Puu Chen Presenter: Yu-ting Tsai Roberta, L. (2005). Using simulations.
Peer Coaching for Effective Professional Learning.
Adult Learning for Student Success. Clear vision within a supportive network While primary responsibility for student success lies within the classroom,
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
Learning Management System
Recertification TEAM Teacher Evaluation Process.
Conceptual Change Theory
Lesson Plan Construction (K-12)
COMMON CORE FOR THE NOT-SO-COMMON LEARNER
New Goal Clarity Coach Training October 27, 2017
Daily 5/Café Assessment
Reflective Teaching Practices
Twenty Questions Competency 10.
Core Competencies for Primary School Teachers in Crisis Contexts
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Core Competencies for Primary School Teachers in Crisis Contexts
Presentation transcript:

Coaching in a Culture of Common Core Thursday October 2, 9:15-10:15 Robert H. Plonka

Introduction  High School English teacher  English teacher/Literacy Coach  Interventionist/Reading Teacher  Literacy Coach/Interventionist

Objective  Encourage modeling to promote teachers taking risks in the classroom  Begin a plan of coaching for a specific teacher

Make a list of issues or frustrations that a coach encounters when working with a teacher.  Teachers feel apprehensions of an outsider coming in  Sometimes reluctance to collaborate  There’s not a relationship of trust  Little implementation and professional growth  Confusion and feeling over-whelmed  Disorganization  Feel stressed out  Assessments  Mandates  Common core  Evaluations

What problems do teachers face with the CCSS?  Fear of unknown  Don’t know the standards  Grade-level  Spectrum or continuum  Pressure to perform on PARCC

Modeling Cycle 3 Session  Pre-lesson Conversation  Model Lesson  Post-lesson Conversation 5 Session  Pre-lesson Conversation  Model Lesson  Post-lesson and Co- planning Conversation  Assessment Observation  Modeling Cycle Debrief

Coaching Models  Facilitative – You do  Collaborative – We do  Instructive – I do

Pre-lesson Conversation (Session 1)  Coaching Log  Strength-based  Begin with celebrations  Determine a focus  Co-plan  Coach may take on more responsibility and assume the instructive role  Use primary documents!!!  CCSS  REACH - rubric  Clarifying  Goal – Next Steps – Roles  Teacher – Scripted notes and write down the questions I ask students  Coach – Modeling

Model Lesson (Session 2)  Why model?  Adult learning theory  It’s the reality and not the “perfect” environment  As a coach, where’s your classroom cred? Have you taught under the demands of CCSS?  Ever-changing state of education  Puts coach back in classroom  Provide a lesson plan  Goal/skill/standard on LP  Prompt teachers to follow and take observable notes (Teacher’s role)  Utilize observation tool  Have teachers record

Model Lesson (Session 2)  Model the skill(s) or strategies trying to be implemented  Have a piece of evidence to analyze  Video  Alternatives  Audio – phone  Scripted notes  Immediate debrief the day-of

Post-lesson and Co-planning Conversation (Session 3) Post-lesson Conversation (part 1)  Self-selected (Coach) points of interest from the lesson to review  Aligned to the teacher’s goal  Discuss lesson success within the context of the pre-lesson conversation  Model self-reflection (Think-Aloud)  Lay out explicit metacognition throughout the lesson  Strengths and weakness from the data  Weaknesses show reality and risk  Prompt the teacher  Focus on teacher, not students  Share ideas for improvement  Adjust plan

Post-lesson and Co-planning Conversation (Session 3) Co-planning Conversation (Part 2)  Plan for the follow-up lesson that you will observe  Teacher takes more responsibility  Facilitative or collaborative role  Use primary documents  CCSS  REACH - rubric  3 Session Vs. 5 Session  Determine observation date

Assessment Observation (Session 4)  Observe the teachers’ implementation  Script notes or video tape  Keep an evidence based focus

Modeling Cycle Debrief (Session 5)  Use the data you gathered to have the teacher self-assess their implementation  Utilize primary documents to create that measurement  Debrief on the cycle as a whole

What the teacher said…  “I really liked using that lesson template! It made it much easier to plan.”  “The conversations are becoming so rich and deep.”  “When they answer their questions, the discussion is so deep because they’ve looked at it so closely.”  “Oh yeah, I love that hand-out.” (accountable language stems)  This is the end of the cycle  “Success.” with two thumbs up

Lessons Learned (Session 1)  Align to the current content  Check with the teacher to make sure it’s new  Clarify teacher’s role!!!  Scripting notes  Observation form  Video taping  Determine measurement/rubric together

Lessons Learned (Session 2)  Be sure the planning is tight  Builds that trust and credibility  You can’t hide with video

Lessons Learned (Session 3)  Be sure you are gauging your role and the readiness of the teacher  Don’t let this be your first time in a classroom  To help guide your goal setting with the teacher so you have background knowledge  New teachers may need more instructional approaches

Lessons Learned (Session 4)  Keep it positive and concentrate on growth and risk-taking  Determine how you are going to measure implementation early!  Use the rubrics or standards to create that form of measurement

Lessons Learned (Session 5)  Make sure the teacher knows how you will both be measuring success of implementation  Keep it positive and concentrate on growth and risk-taking  Motivation is key!

3 Session Modeling Cycle Pre-lesson Conversation Model Lesson Post-lesson and Co- planning Conversation

5 Session Modeling Cycle Pre-lesson Conversation Model Lesson Post-lesson and Co- planning Conversation Assessment Observation Modeling Cycle Debrief

What did this accomplish? Issues  Teachers feel apprehensions of an outsider coming in  Sometimes reluctance to collaborate  There’s not a relationship of trust  Little implementation and professional growth  Confusion and feeling over-whelmed  Disorganization  Feel stressed out  Assessments  Mandates  Common core  Evaluations Solutions  You have met at least 5 times consistently  You provided them with a break from the day-to-day grind in order to allow for real reflection  Builds trust and credibility  You’ve scaffolded your coaching to gradually release responsibility  If there was a particular skill/strategy they were confused about, you have spent days-months studying it  There is a breakdown of the unknown and it becomes less intimidating

Solutions  Gets rid of “that won’t work with these kids”  Gives opportunity to model reflective teaching and metacognition in practice  Promotes risk taking in teachers  New strategies  Video taping themselves for analysis  Being observed  Welcoming outsiders  Critically reflecting based on standards or rubric (REACH)  Engaging in CCSS-based planning

If coaches take more risks to collaborate in modeling good instruction and critical reflection, teachers will be more likely to take risks in the classroom and try new strategies.

Questions? Comments? Suggestions?