ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Basic Concepts in Planar Kinematics 3.1, 3.2 September 18, 2013 Radu Serban University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ME751 Advanced Computational Multibody Dynamics Section 9.3 February 18, 2010 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME751, UW-Madison Discontent is the first necessity of.
Advertisements

© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
ME751 Advanced Computational Multibody Dynamics Section 9.2 February 2, 2010 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME751, UW-Madison “My own business always bores me to death;
ME751 Advanced Computational Multibody Dynamics Inverse Dynamics Equilibrium Analysis Various Odd Ends March 18, 2010 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME751, UW-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Relative Kinematic Constraints, Composite Joints – 3.3 October 4, 2011 © Dan Negrut, 2011 ME451, UW-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Cam-Follower Constraints – 3.3 Driving Constraints – 3.5 October 11, 2011 © Dan Negrut, 2011 ME451, UW-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems (Gears) Cam-Followers and Point-Follower 3.4.1, September 27, 2013 Radu Serban University of Wisconsin-Madison.
CSCE 641: Forward kinematics and inverse kinematics Jinxiang Chai.
CSCE 641: Forward kinematics and inverse kinematics Jinxiang Chai.
Ch. 4: Velocity Kinematics
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Initial Conditions for Dynamic Analysis Constraint Reaction Forces October 23, 2013 Radu Serban University.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems
Velocities and Static Force
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Review of Elements of Calculus – 2.5 Vel. and Acc. of a Point fixed in a Ref Frame – 2.6 Absolute vs.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Review of Matrix Algebra – 2.2 Review of Elements of Calculus – 2.5 Vel. and Acc. of a point fixed in.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Review of Matrix Algebra – 2.2 September 13, 2011 Dan Negrut University of Wisconsin-Madison © Dan Negrut,
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems
ME/ECE Professor N. J. Ferrier Forward Kinematics Professor Nicola Ferrier ME Room 2246,
ME751 Advanced Computational Multibody Dynamics Review Calculus Starting Chapter 9 of Haug book January 26, 2010 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME751, UW-Madison "Motivation.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Review of Linear Algebra 2.1 through 2.4 Th, Sept. 08 © Dan Negrut, 2011 ME451, UW-Madison TexPoint fonts.
Constrained Motion of Connected Particles
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems
CONSTRAINTS. TOPICS TO BE DISCUSSED  DEFINITION OF CONSTRAINTS  EXAMPLES OF CONSTRAINTS  TYPES OF CONSTRAINTS WITH EXAMPLES.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Numerical Solution of DAE IVP Newmark Method November 1, 2013 Radu Serban University of Wisconsin-Madison.
A PPLIED M ECHANICS Lecture 02 Slovak University of Technology Faculty of Material Science and Technology in Trnava.
Outline: 5.1 INTRODUCTION
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems November 11, , 6.1.4, 6.2, starting 6.3 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME451,
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems December 1, 2011 Solving Index 3 DAEs using Newmark Method © Dan Negrut, 2011.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Review of Linear Algebra 2.1 through 2.4 Tu, Sept. 07 © Dan Negrut, 2009 ME451, UW-Madison TexPoint fonts.
ME751 Advanced Computational Multibody Dynamics Section 9.3 February 16, 2010 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME751, UW-Madison “Courage is fear holding on a minute.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Review of Linear Algebra 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 September 06, 2013 Radu Serban University of Wisconsin-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Vel. And Acc. of a Fixed Point in Moving Frame Basic Concepts in Planar Kinematics February.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Generalized Forces 6.2 October 16, 2013 Radu Serban University of Wisconsin-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Driving Constraints 3.5 October 19, 2010 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME451, UW-Madison.
Sect. 1.3: Constraints Discussion up to now  All mechanics is reduced to solving a set of simultaneous, coupled, 2 nd order differential eqtns which.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Introduction to Dynamics 6.1 October 09, 2013 Radu Serban University of Wisconsin-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Singular Configurations 3.7 October 07, 2013 Radu Serban University of Wisconsin-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Driving Constraints 3.5 September 30, 2013 Radu Serban University of Wisconsin-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Review of Differential Calculus 2.5, 2.6 September 11, 2013 Radu Serban University of Wisconsin-Madison.
M. Zareinejad 1. 2 Grounded interfaces Very similar to robots Need Kinematics –––––– Determine endpoint position Calculate velocities Calculate force-torque.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems November 10, , starting 6.3 © Dan Negrut, 2011 ME451, UW-Madison TexPoint.
1 Dynamics Differential equation relating input torques and forces to the positions (angles) and their derivatives. Like force = mass times acceleration.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Composite Joints – 3.3 Gears and Cam Followers – 3.4 February 17, 2009 © Dan Negrut, 2009 ME451, UW-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems May 07, 2009 EOM in non-Cartesian Reference Frames ~ not in textbook~ Quote.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems November 16, , starting 6.3 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME451, UW-Madison TexPoint.
INTRODUCTION TO DYNAMICS ANALYSIS OF ROBOTS (Part 4)
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems December 6, 2011 Equilibrium Analysis & Inverse Dynamics Analysis ME451 Wrap.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Relative Kinematic Constraints, Composite Joints – 3.3 October 6, 2011 © Dan Negrut, 2011 ME451, UW-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Numerical Integration October 28, 2013 Radu Serban University of Wisconsin-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems December 9, 2010 Solving Index 3 DAEs using Newmark Method © Dan Negrut, 2010.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Driving Constraints 3.5 Start Position, Velocity, and Acc. Analysis 3.6 February 26, 2009 © Dan Negrut,
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Start Position, Velocity, and Acc. Analysis 3.6 October 21, 2010 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME451, UW-Madison.
ME 440 Intermediate Vibrations Tu, Feb. 3, 2009 Sections , © Dan Negrut, 2009 ME440, UW-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Composite Joints – 3.3 Gears and Cam Followers – 3.4 October 5, 2010 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME451, UW-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Absolute Constraints 3.2 September 20, 2013 Radu Serban University of Wisconsin-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Newton-Euler EOM 6.1.2, October 14, 2013 Radu Serban University of Wisconsin-Madison.
ME751 Advanced Computational Multibody Dynamics Section 9.4 February 23, 2010 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME751, UW-Madison “When You Come to a Fork in the Road,
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Relative Constraints 3.3 September 23, 2013 Radu Serban University of Wisconsin-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Review of Linear Algebra 2.1 through 2.4 Th, Jan. 22 © Dan Negrut, 2009 ME451, UW-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems November 4, 2010 Chapter 6 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME451, UW-Madison TexPoint fonts.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems December 9, 2010 Solving Index 3 DAEs using Newmark Method © Dan Negrut, 2010.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems
© Sharif University of Technology - CEDRA By: Professor Ali Meghdari
CHAPTER 3-2. Planar Cartesian Kinematics
Presentation transcript:

ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Basic Concepts in Planar Kinematics 3.1, 3.2 September 18, 2013 Radu Serban University of Wisconsin-Madison

2 Before we get started… Last time: Velocity and acceleration of a point fixed in a moving frame Discussed and contrasted absolute and relative generalized coordinates Today: Set the framework for kinematics analysis: Define basic concepts Pose the kinematics analysis problem Start the systematic derivation of kinematic constraints: Absolute constraints Assignments: HW 3 Problems , , 2.6.1, 3.1.1, Due Friday, September 20 Matlab 2 and ADAMS 1 Due Wednesday, September 25 Submitted at

Basic Concepts in Planar Kinematics 3.1

4 What is Kinematics? Study of the position, velocity, and acceleration of a system of interconnected bodies that make up a mechanism, independent of the forces that produce the motion  (kinema): movement, motion

5 Why is Kinematics Important? It can be an end in itself… Kinematic Analysis - Interested how components of a certain mechanism move when motion(s) are applied Kinematic Synthesis – Interested in finding how to design a mechanism to perform a certain operation in a certain way NOTE: we only focus on Kinematic Analysis It is also an essential ingredient when formulating the Kinetic problem (so called Dynamics Analysis, discussed in Chapter 6) In general, people are more interested in the Dynamic Analysis rather than in the Kinematic Analysis

6 First things First Before getting lost in the details of Kinematics Analysis: Present a collection of terms that will help understand the “language” of Kinematics Give a high-level overview of things to come and justify the need for the material presented over the next few lectures Among the concepts introduced today, here are the more important ones: Constraint equations (as a means to defining the geometry associated with the motion of a mechanism) Jacobian matrix (or simply, the Jacobian)

7 Nomenclature Rigid body Body-fixed Reference Frame (also called Local Reference Frame, LRF) Generalized coordinates Cartesian generalized coordinates NOTE: for a mechanism with nb bodies, the number of Cartesian generalized coordinates:

8 Constraints (1) What are they, and what role do they play? A collection of equations which, if satisfied, coerce the bodies in the model to move like the bodies of the mechanism Most important thing in relation to constraints: For each joint in the model, the constraint equations you use must imply the relative motion allowed by the joint Keep in mind: the way you model should resemble and imply the physical system Taxonomy of constraints: Holonomic vs. Nonholonomic  (holos): all, the whole, entire Scleronomic (aka Kinematic) vs. Rheonomic (aka Driving)  (skleros): hard  (rheos): stream, flow, current

9 Constraints (2) Holonomic constraints are expressed as algebraic equations in terms of the generalized coordinates Most constraints fall under this category All constraints we’ll deal with in ME451 Nonholonomic constraints: are more general constraints (can involve inequalities and/or generalized velocities) Example: roll without slip constraint Scleronomic (kinematic) constraints are time-independent constraints (meaning they do not depend explicitly on time) Rheonomic (driver) constraints depend explicitly on time; they are typically used to prescribe motion

10 Degrees of Freedom The number of degrees of freedom of a mechanism is qualitatively related to the difference between the number of generalized coordinates and the number of constraints that these coordinates must satisfy Kinematic Degrees of Freedom (KDOF): the difference between the number of generalized coordinates and the number of Kinematic (Scleronomic) constraints It is an attribute of the model, and it is independent of generalized coordinates used to represent the time evolution of the mechanism Net Degrees of Freedom (NDOF): the difference between the number of generalized coordinates and the total number of constraints, be them Kinematic (Scleronomic) or Driving (Rheonomic) Depends on how many motions you decide to specify for the parts of the mechanism IMPORTANT OBSERVATION: For carrying out Kinematic Analysis, a number of KDOF motions should be specified so that in the end we have NDOF=0

11 Motion: Causes How can one set a mechanical system in motion? For a system with KDOF degrees of freedom, specify KDOF additional driving constraints (one per degree of freedom) that uniquely determine q(t) as the solution of an algebraic problem (Kinematic Analysis) Specify/Apply a set of forces acting upon the mechanism, in which case q(t) is found as the solution of a differential problem (Dynamic Analysis) Ignore this for now…

12 Example A pin (revolute) joint present at point O A motion is applied to the pendulum Specify the set of constraints associated with this model Use Cartesian coordinates Write down the Kinematic and Driving constraints Specify the value of KDOF and NDOF Formulate the velocity analysis problem Formulate the acceleration analysis problem

13 Kinematic Analysis Stages Position Analysis Stage Challenging Velocity Analysis Stage Simple Acceleration Analysis Stage OK To take care of all these stages, ONE step is critical: Write down the constraint equations associated with the joints present in your mechanism Once you have the constraints, the rest is boilerplate

14 Once you have the constraints… Each of the three stages of Kinematics Analysis: position analysis, velocity analysis, and acceleration analysis, follow very similar recipes for finding the position, velocity and acceleration, respectively, of every body in the system. All stages crucially rely on the Jacobian matrix  q  q – the partial derivative of the constraints w.r.t. the generalized coordinates All stages require the solution of linear systems of equations of the form: What is different between the three stages is the expression for the RHS b.

15 The Details… As we pointed out, it all boils down to this: Step 1: Write down the constraint equations associated with the model Step 2: For each stage, construct  q and the specific b, then solve for x So how do you get the position configuration of the mechanism? Kinematic Analysis key observation: The number of constraints (kinematic and driving) should be equal to the number of generalized coordinates In other words, NDOF=0 is a prerequisite for Kinematic Analysis IMPORTANT: This is a nonlinear systems with: nc equations and nc unknowns that must be solved for q

16 Velocity and Acceleration Analysis Position analysis: The generalized coordinates (positions) are solution of the nonlinear system: Take one time derivative of constraints  (q,t) to obtain the velocity equation: Take yet one more time derivative to obtain the acceleration equation:

17 Producing the RHS of the Acceleration Equation

Systematic Derivation of Constraints 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5

19 [What comes next:] Focus on Geometric Constraints Learn how to write kinematic constraints that specify that the location and/or orientation of a body w.r.t. the global (or absolute) RF is constrained in a certain way A.k.a. absolute constraints Learn how to write kinematic constraints that restrict the relative motion of two bodies A.k.a. relative constraints

20 The Drill… Step 1: Identify a kinematic constraint (revolute, translational, relative distance, etc., i.e., the physical thing) acting between two components of a mechanism Step 2: Formulate the algebraic equations that capture that constraint,  (q)=0 This is the actual modeling stage in Kinematics Step 3: Compute the Jacobian  q Step 4: Compute, the right side of the velocity equation Step 5: Compute , the right side of the acceleration equation (ugly…) This is what we do almost exclusively in Chapter 3

Absolute Constraints 3.2

22 Absolute Constraints (1) Called “Absolute” since they express constraint between a body in a system and the absolute (global, ground) reference frame. Types of Absolute Constraints: Absolute position constraints Absolute orientation constraints Absolute distance constraints

23 Absolute Constraints (2) Absolute position constraints x -coordinate of P i y -coordinate of P i Absolute orientation constraint Orientation  of body

24 Absolute x-constraint Step 1: the absolute x component of the location of a point P on body i stays constant and equal to some known value c 1 Step 2: Identify  ax(i) =0 Step 3:  ax(i) q = ? Step 4: ax(i) = ? Step 5:  ax(i) = ? NOTE: The same approach is used to get the y - and angle-constraints

25 Example An example using absolute coordinate constraints: simple pendulum

26 Example An example using an absolute angle constraint: slider along x-axis