Collaborative Networks for Conducting Comparative Effectiveness Research Tuesday September 9, 2008 8:00 – 9:30 am.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Financing of OAS Activities Sources of cooperation Cooperation modalities Cooperation actors Specific Funds management models and resources mobilization.
Advertisements

Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.
Engaging Patients and Other Stakeholders in Clinical Research
Introduction to the User’s Guide for Developing a Protocol for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research.
Building the Digital Infrastructure for Vermont’s Learning Health System ONC HIT Policy Committee Testimony September 14, 2011 Hunt Blair, Deputy Commissioner.
Determining Your Program’s Health and Financial Impact Using EPA’s Value Proposition Brenda Doroski, Director Center for Asthma and Schools U.S. Environmental.
RARE ACTION NETWORK ® Presentation by NORD June 16, 2014.
700: Moving Through the Collaboration Continuum to Improve Permanency Outcomes Wednesday, March 20, 2013.
RTI-UNC EPC Issues Exploration Forum (IEF):. Serious Mental Illness Dan Jonas, MD, MPH.
The Promise & Challenge of Health Care IT in Community Clinics: Insights from the California Community Clinics Initiative Prepared for the convening on.
BIG DATA AND THE HEALTHCARE REVOLUTION FORD+SSPG 2014.
Topic Generation and Research Prioritization Joe V. Selby, MD, MPH, Executive Director Rachael Fleurence, PhD, Scientist Rick Kuntz, MD, MSc, Chair, PDC.
HIT Policy Committee Accountable Care Workgroup – Kickoff Meeting May 17, :00 – 2:00 PM Eastern.
Stakeholder Engagement and Transparency in The Effective Health Care Program Supriya Janakiraman MD MPH AHRQ.
AHRQ’s Role in Comparative Effectiveness Carolyn M. Clancy, MD Director Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Alliance for Health Reform Briefing.
Health Care Reform: Where are the Pharmacists? Opportunities and Challenges for Pharmacists in Health Care Reform Anthony D. Rodgers CMS Deputy Administrator.
DON MARIANOS, DDS, MPH ORAL HEALTH 2014 INITIATIVE WEBINAR MAY 11, 2012 Prevention & Dental Public Health (DPH) Infrastructure: A State Oral Health Program.
Andrew Gettinger, MD, FCCP, FCCM CMIO, Office of the National Coordinator for HIT Director (acting), Office of Clinical Quality and Safety Health IT Safety.
NCI Review of the Clinical Trials Process 6 th Annual National Forum on Biomedical Imaging in Oncology James H. Doroshow M.D. April 7, 2005 Bethesda, Maryland.
From Data to Decisions: The Power of Analytics October 10, 2012.
Sue Huckson Program Manager National Institute of Clinical Studies Improving care for Mental Health patients in Emergency Departments.
CBR 101 An Introduction to Community Based Research.
Why Use MONAHRQ for Health Care Reporting? May 2014 Note: This is one of seven slide sets outlining MONAHRQ and its value, available at
What makes Clinical Research Ethical? Dr Enoka Corea Co-secretary, ERC Faculty of Medicine, Colombo.
HIT Policy Committee Quality Measures Workgroup October 28, 2010 Fred D Rachman, MD.
Copyright © 2006 Elsevier, Inc. All rights reserved Chapter 24 Using Nursing Research in Practice.
CMS as a Public Health Agency: Effective Health Care Research Barry M. Straube, M.D. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services January 11, 2006.
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
Chapter 6 – Data Handling and EPR. Electronic Health Record Systems: Government Initiatives and Public/Private Partnerships EHR is systematic collection.
Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment Program (DSRIP), Transforming the Medicaid Health Care System.
State HIE Program Chris Muir Program Manager for Western/Mid-western States.
ROLE OF INFORMATION IN MANAGING EDUCATION Ensuring appropriate and relevant information is available when needed.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
HIT Policy Committee NHIN Workgroup Recommendations Phase 2 David Lansky, Chair Pacific Business Group on Health Danny Weitzner, Co-Chair Department of.
Why Use MONAHRQ for Health Care Reporting? March 2015 Note: This is one of eight slide sets outlining MONAHRQ and its value, available at
Public Health Tiger Team we will start the meeting 3 min after the hour DRAFT Project Charter April 15, 2014.
America Responds: An HHS 2009-H1N1 Retrospective to Advance All Hazards Preparedness Discussion with the National Vaccine Advisory Committee June 3, 2010.
DANA L. RILEY, PHD POSTDOCTORAL FELLOW, UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA MAY 28, 2014 CPHA PUBLIC HEALTH 2014 CONFERENCE An implementation evaluation of the National.
EPA Geospatial Segment United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information Enterprise Architecture Program Segment Architecture.
Aligning Forces for Quality National Meeting The State of Partnering with States May 9, 2013.
The HMO Research Network (HMORN) is a well established alliance of 18 research departments in the United States and Israel. Since 1994, the HMORN has conducted.
Disease Management and the AHRQ Research Agenda David Atkins, MD, MPH Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Disease Management Colloquium, 2006.
Unit 8.2: Effective Implementation Planning HIT Implementation Planning for Quality and Safety Component 12/Unit 81 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Advancing Excellence in Health Care The “Centers for Education & Research on Therapeutics” (CERTs)
The Science of Public Reporting September 10, 2012 AHRQ 2012 Annual Conference Lunch & Learn Session Celeste Torio, PhD, MPH Staff Service Fellow AHRQ.
Electronic Clinical Quality Measures – Session #1 ONC Resource Center.
1 National Forum on Biomedical Imaging in Oncology CMS UPDATE Steve Phurrough MD, MPA Director, Coverage and Analysis Group.
The NEKIA Business Development Initiative Overview Annual Retreat Scottsdale, Arizona November 19-21, 2003.
Slide 1 Achieving National Quality Reporting Progress? Elliott S. Fisher, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine Center for the Evaluative Clinical Sciences Dartmouth.
Component 1: Introduction to Health Care and Public Health in the U.S. 1.9: Unit 9: The evolution and reform of healthcare in the US 1.9c: Quality Indicators.
Cardiovascular Consortium Effective Health Care Program Art Sedrakyan, MD, PhD Center for Outcomes & Evidence, AHRQ.
Uses of the NIH Collaboratory Distributed Research Network Jeffrey Brown, PhD for the DRN Team Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical.
The Workforce, Education Commissioning and Education and Learning Strategy Enabling world class healthcare services within the North West.
Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) and Patient- Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy.
The Status of the Nation’s Emergency Management System Gail L. Warden Chair, Committee on The Future of Emergency Care in the United States Health System.
Interoperability Measurement for the MACRA Section 106(b) ONC Briefing for HIT Policy and Standards Committee April 19, 2016.
Birch Foundation, South West London & St
Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
Birch Foundation, South West London & St
CDRH 2010 Strategic Priorities
2017 Health care Preparedness and Response Draft Capabilities
Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
September 7, 2018 Courtney Baird, MS
Get Connected Knowledge Forum
Marie Crosson, Executive Director
For PUBLIC SECTOR HEALTHCARE ROUNDTABLE NOVEMBER 2, 2017
State and Regional Demonstrations of Health IT
The Evolving Role Of Medical Affairs (MA)
Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
Lenya Robinson, Behavioral Health and Managed Care Section Manager
Presentation transcript:

Collaborative Networks for Conducting Comparative Effectiveness Research Tuesday September 9, :00 – 9:30 am

Session Outline 8:00 – 8:15 AHRQ introduction – George Neyarapally 8:00 – 8:15 AHRQ introduction – George Neyarapally 8:15 – 8:50 CO Distributed Research Network (DRN) project – Wilson Pace, David West 8:15 – 8:50 CO Distributed Research Network (DRN) project – Wilson Pace, David West 8:50 – 9:25 HMORN Distributed Research Network (DRN) project – Rich Platt, David Magid 8:50 – 9:25 HMORN Distributed Research Network (DRN) project – Rich Platt, David Magid 9:25 – 9:30 Questions 9:25 – 9:30 Questions

Introduction: AHRQ’s Distributed Research Network Initiative in DEcIDE George Neyarapally PharmD, MPH, RPh AHRQ, Center for Outcomes and Evidence 3

Outline Background Background Rationale for Distributed Research Network Initiative Rationale for Distributed Research Network Initiative Goals of the Task Order Goals of the Task Order Benchmarks of Success Benchmarks of Success

DEcIDE Research Network Established as part of MMA in 2005 and incorporated in the Effective Health Care program. Established as part of MMA in 2005 and incorporated in the Effective Health Care program. 13-center research network that is designed to be a data and scientific resource to external public & private health organizations (particularly CMS) to provide unbiased, actionable information to inform decision makers. 13-center research network that is designed to be a data and scientific resource to external public & private health organizations (particularly CMS) to provide unbiased, actionable information to inform decision makers. Main goal of DEcIDE is to develop new knowledge about the clinical and comparative effectiveness and safety of treatments and technologies in a valid, transparent, and scientifically rigorous manner. Main goal of DEcIDE is to develop new knowledge about the clinical and comparative effectiveness and safety of treatments and technologies in a valid, transparent, and scientifically rigorous manner.

Distributed Research Network Prototypes for Population-based Studies Two pilot project models of distributed research networks will be created & evaluated. Two pilot project models of distributed research networks will be created & evaluated. The aim is to develop a distributed network prototype that supports secure analyses of electronic information across multiple organizations to study risks, effects, and outcomes of various medical therapies. The aim is to develop a distributed network prototype that supports secure analyses of electronic information across multiple organizations to study risks, effects, and outcomes of various medical therapies. The long-term goal is a coordinated partnership of multiple research networks that provide information that can be quickly queried and analyzed. The long-term goal is a coordinated partnership of multiple research networks that provide information that can be quickly queried and analyzed.

Unique Aspects of Effective Health Care Program User-driven research & systematic reviews. User-driven research & systematic reviews. Transparent methods, with process for reviewing COI with every project. Transparent methods, with process for reviewing COI with every project. Research for public health: Research for public health: – Focused on improving quality of Medicaid, Medicare, SCHIP. – Programs with rising costs. Partnership with stakeholders & public nomination. Partnership with stakeholders & public nomination.

Rationale for Task Order Silo investigators and databases. Lack of coordination of research across multiple institutions. Silo investigators and databases. Lack of coordination of research across multiple institutions. Researchers and decision-makers are disconnected, often working independent of each other. Researchers and decision-makers are disconnected, often working independent of each other. Small studies often with limited external validity / generalizability which constrains good decision making. Small studies often with limited external validity / generalizability which constrains good decision making. Vast collections of data that are infrequently shared. Vast collections of data that are infrequently shared. Length to study completion does not meet the needs of policymakers, providers or patients. Length to study completion does not meet the needs of policymakers, providers or patients. Perceived inability of government to respond quickly to emerging clinical questions & public health problems that face regulators, payers, providers, & individual patients. Perceived inability of government to respond quickly to emerging clinical questions & public health problems that face regulators, payers, providers, & individual patients. Current Research Paradigm?

Rationale for AHRQ’s Distributed Research Network Initiative Leverage existing resources including intellectual (scientists) and data resources. Leverage existing resources including intellectual (scientists) and data resources. Create a pipeline for conducting rapid cycle research related to clinical effectiveness and comparative effectiveness. Create a pipeline for conducting rapid cycle research related to clinical effectiveness and comparative effectiveness. Reduce the timeline for providing valid evidence that can inform clinical decisions and public health problems. Reduce the timeline for providing valid evidence that can inform clinical decisions and public health problems. Prepare for the future needs of federal government to address questions of public policy in real time. Prepare for the future needs of federal government to address questions of public policy in real time.

Examples Simple: Simple: – How many patients receive carotid stents as compared to medical management? More complex: More complex: – Are patients who take dual therapy with ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers at increased risk for adverse outcomes? – What is the balance of risks and benefits of combination therapy?

Major Components of AHRQ’s DRNI Two pilot projects Two pilot projects – HMORN – University of Colorado & AAFP Internal working group including HIT staff and coordination with FDA and other federal health agencies. Internal working group including HIT staff and coordination with FDA and other federal health agencies.

General Goals of RFTO Develop a scalable, evolvable, model that initially differentiates itself from other distributed networks by its capability to support user-driven research on the safety, clinical effectiveness, and comparative effectiveness of treatments. Develop a scalable, evolvable, model that initially differentiates itself from other distributed networks by its capability to support user-driven research on the safety, clinical effectiveness, and comparative effectiveness of treatments. Develop a research cooperative and governance structure that advances the traditional model to assist decision makers. Develop a research cooperative and governance structure that advances the traditional model to assist decision makers. – This advancement is essential for the continuation of public trust and funding from public and private payers.

General Goals of RFTO Understand the extent to which the distributed research paradigm can be applied to problems facing policymakers, clinicians, & patients. Understand the extent to which the distributed research paradigm can be applied to problems facing policymakers, clinicians, & patients. – Where does the model exist in the continuum of research? Establish program governance. Establish program governance. – Not only address the technical aspects but the “sociologic” aspects of a research cooperative – Minimize barriers to collaboration and close coordination with scientific staff at AHRQ. – Relationship building.

Four Phases of Projects Technical Specifications – Spring to Fall 2008 Technical Specifications – Spring to Fall 2008 Pilot testing – Spring 2008 to Winter 2008 Pilot testing – Spring 2008 to Winter 2008 Research Study – Summer 2008 to early 2009 Research Study – Summer 2008 to early 2009 Blueprint Prospectus – Spring 2009 Blueprint Prospectus – Spring 2009

Elements of the Ideal System Create an open architecture that is technically and socially scalable to extend participation and collaboration with other AHRQ programs to meet the MMA mandates. Create an open architecture that is technically and socially scalable to extend participation and collaboration with other AHRQ programs to meet the MMA mandates. Develop a system which allows timely access to real time information and ensure a rapid response to questions facing clinicians, patients, and policy makers. Develop a system which allows timely access to real time information and ensure a rapid response to questions facing clinicians, patients, and policy makers. Make technical and procedural burdens as light as possible without sacrificing scientific integrity. Make technical and procedural burdens as light as possible without sacrificing scientific integrity. Closer connection between researchers and decision makers. Closer connection between researchers and decision makers. Low-cost, lightweight system that requires modest infrastructure, easy maintenance, and a coordinated research agenda. Low-cost, lightweight system that requires modest infrastructure, easy maintenance, and a coordinated research agenda.

Short-term Benchmarks Provide new information that helps advance a distributed model in health care research. Provide new information that helps advance a distributed model in health care research. Enrich AHRQ’s current capacity to conduct observational research on CE, specifically in DEcIDE & CERTs. Enrich AHRQ’s current capacity to conduct observational research on CE, specifically in DEcIDE & CERTs. Form a close partnership with AHRQ and stakeholders so that useful information is derived from this large investment of resources. Form a close partnership with AHRQ and stakeholders so that useful information is derived from this large investment of resources.

DRN Projects 2.0 Future DRN projects – how will we build upon these pilot projects? Future DRN projects – how will we build upon these pilot projects?