(Mt/Ag/EnSc/EnSt 404/504 - Global Change) Future Directions (for the AR5) Future Directions in Globally Coordinated Climate Change Research Primary Sources:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WCRP polar climate predictability initiative Vladimir Ryabinin
Advertisements

CMIP6 and how observations can inform evaluation
IPCC AR4 to AR5. Terminology Unchanged – GCMs – General Circulation Models AR4 – SRES – Special Report on Emissions Scenarios AR5 – SSPs – Shared Socioeconomic.
CMIP5: Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5
Challenges and Needs in Research Views of Japan -emerging challenges and policy needs- Hiroki Kondo Advisor to the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports,
MOC, Hurricanes and the IPCC AR5 Gerald A. Meehl NCAR.
The Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISI-MIP) Coordination team: Katja Frieler, Veronika Huber, Franziska Piontek,
11 Steps Leading to Amsterdam and Beyond A much greater emphasis on frameworks for planned adaptation, and also to robust approaches to decision-making.
What is the point of this session? To use the UK’s experience to give ideas about creating and using climate change scenarios in other countries and situations.
Master Narratives & Global Climate Change Charlie Vars Dave Bella Court Smith IPCC January 29, 2013.
1/18 Long-term Scenarios for Climate Change-Implications for Energy, GHG Emissions and Air Quality Shilpa Rao, International Institute of Applied Systems.
Liu, J. et al., PNAS, 2012 World Weather Open Science Conference, Montreal, Canada, August 17, 2014 Jiping Liu University at Albany, State University of.
Overview of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) and IPCC AR5 Activities Ronald J Stouffer Karl Taylor, Jerry Meehl and many others June 2009.
(a selection of) Important data and modeling activities sponsored by WCRP in Major findings, recommendations and actions.
Components of the climate system, interactions, and changes (Source: IPCC AR4 WG1 Ch.1, FAQ 1.2, Figure 1)
CORDEX Scope, or What is CORDEX?  Provide a set of regional climate scenarios (including uncertainties) covering the period , for the majority.
The Decadal Climate Prediction Project (DCPP) G.J. Boer CANSISE WEST Victoria, May 9, 2014.
International CLIVAR Working Group for Seasonal-to- Interannual Prediction (WGSIP) Ben Kirtman (Co-Chair WGSIP) George Mason University Center for Ocean-Land-Atmosphere.
WCRP update WDAC3 Galway, Ireland, 6-7 May 2014 M. Rixen, WCRP JPS.
CORDEX South-Asia 2 nd Science and Training Workshop Katmandu, Nepal M. Rixen, WCRP JPS 27 August
Modelling Theme White Paper G. Flato, G. Meehl and C. Jakob.
Climate Modeling Jamie Anderson May Monitoring tells us how the current climate has/is changing Climate Monitoring vs Climate Modeling Modeling.
World Climate Research Programme Climate Information for Decision Making Ghassem R. Asrar Director, WCRP.
Decadal prediction  Scientific interest  Meetings and Workshops  Organizational aspects  WGSIP role and activities.
Innovative Program of Climate Change Projection for the 21st century (KAKUSHIN Program) Innovative Program of Climate Change Projection for the 21st century.
IPCC WG1 AR5: Key Findings Relevant to Future Air Quality Fiona M. O’Connor, Atmospheric Composition & Climate Team, Met Office Hadley Centre.
(Mt/Ag/EnSc/EnSt 404/504 - Global Change) Climate Models (from IPCC WG-I, Chapter 10) Projected Future Changes Primary Source: IPCC WG-I Chapter 10 - Global.
© Crown copyright Met Office AR5 Proposed runs for CMIP5 John Mitchell, after Karl Taylor, Ron Stouffer and others ENES, arch 2009.
Climate Change Working Group (CCWG) July, 2004 Co-chairs: Gerald A. Meehl, Ben Santer, and Warren Washington.
Evaluation and simulation of global terrestrial latent heat flux by merging CMIP5 climate models and surface eddy covariance observations Yunjun Yao 1,
WP11 highlights: introduction and overview EU FP6 Integrated Project CARBOOCEAN ”Marine carbon sources and sinks assessment” 5 th Annual & Final Meeting.
Regional climate modeling, update on the TFRCD and CORDEX Filippo Giorgi*, Colin Jones** *Abdus Salam ICTP **SMHI JSC-31, Antalya, February, 2010.
SRES Approach to Scenario Formation Linda O. Mearns NCAR/ICTP GECAFS Meeting Reading, UK August 2003.
ESM Perspectives on IAV and Coordination with Other Groups Gerald A. Meehl National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) The IPCC is the leading international body for the assessment of climate change. It was established by.
Future Air Quality in Representative Concentration Pathway Scenarios: Relationships Between Economic Wellbeing and Air Quality J. Jason West Steven J.
Presented by LCF Climate Science Computational End Station James B. White III (Trey) Scientific Computing National Center for Computational Sciences Oak.
Coordinated climate change experiments to be assessed as part of the IPCC AR5 Gerald A. Meehl National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colorado.
(Mt/Ag/EnSc/EnSt 404/504 - Global Change) Future Directions (for the AR5) Future Directions in Globally Coordinated Climate Change Research Primary Sources:
Approach We use CMIP5 simulations and specifically designed NCAR/DOE CESM1-CAM5 experiments to determine differential impacts at the grid-box levels (in.
CMIP6, CORDEX, and related activities in Hamburg/Germany
New Socioeconomic Pathways for Climate Change Research.
A41I-0105 Supporting Decadal and Regional Climate Prediction through NCAR’s EaSM Data Portal Doug Schuster and Steve Worley National Center for Atmospheric.
The WCRP strategic framework : Coordinated Observation and Prediction of the Earth System (COPES) Peter Lemke (AWI), David Carson (WMO) and members.
RAL, 2012, May 11 Research behaviour Martin Juckes, 11 May, 2012.
EC-Earth = ECMWF S4 NEMO3.6 LIM3 TM5 LPJ-Guess PISCES (test phase) COSP 2014: ESM technically running Early 2015: consolidation, portability Mid 2015:
CMIP6 Catherine Senior C Senior, WGRC Montevideo, 14th March 2014
Global Impacts and Consequences of Climate Change
I) Brief Overview of CMIP6
Overview Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6)
Coordinated Regional Downscaling Experiment:
Australian CMIP6 Modelling Plans ACCESS-CM2/ESM2
Intro to CMIP, the WHOI CMIP5 community server, and planning for CMIP6
“IIASA Community Services” in the context of the IPCC
Head, WGI Technical Support Unit
Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6): Experimental Design and Organization Veronika Eyring, Jerry Meehl, Bjorn Stevens, Ron Stouffer,
WORLD CLIMATE RESEARCH PROGRAMME
USAEE Conference 2016, October 26, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
Ronald J Stouffer Karl Taylor, Jerry Meehl and many others
Future emissions (ScenarioMIP)
GMD paper.
WORLD CLIMATE RESEARCH PROGRAMME
CCSM3’s IPCC Simulations and Lessons Learned
The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) - a new scenario framework to provide key narratives for different climate futures Alexander Nauels, Zebedee Nicholls.
WCRP update DCPP meeting, Barcelona, 12 May 2016 M. Rixen,
Enabling future Land-Use Harmonization scenarios
National Center for Atmospheric Research
Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis
Proposed WCRP Grand Challenge on Near Term Climate Prediction
What is our Vision for Decadal
Presentation transcript:

(Mt/Ag/EnSc/EnSt 404/504 - Global Change) Future Directions (for the AR5) Future Directions in Globally Coordinated Climate Change Research Primary Sources: IPCC Expert Meeting on New Scenarios + CMIP5/CMIP6/SSP Plans

(Mt/Ag/EnSc/EnSt 404/504 - Global Change) Future Directions (for the AR5) Approaches to Scenario Development Previous (SRES)Current (RCPs)

(Mt/Ag/EnSc/EnSt 404/504 - Global Change) Future Directions (for the AR5) Representative Concentration Pathways RCP8.5 > 8.5 W/m 2 in 2100 > 8.5 W/m 2 in 2100 rising risingRCP6 ~ 6 W/m 2 in 2100 ~ 6 W/m 2 in 2100 stabilization stabilizationRCP W/m 2 in W/m 2 in 2100 stabilization stabilizationRCP2.6 peak 3 W/m 2 before 2100 peak 3 W/m 2 before 2100 decline after peak decline after peak

(Mt/Ag/EnSc/EnSt 404/504 - Global Change) Future Directions (for the AR5) (Now the previous plan)

(Mt/Ag/EnSc/EnSt 404/504 - Global Change) Future Directions (for the AR5) (K.E. Taylor, 2009)

(Mt/Ag/EnSc/EnSt 404/504 - Global Change) Future Directions (for the AR5) (K.E. Taylor, 2009)

Veronika Eyring, Jerry Meehl, Bjorn Stevens, Ron Stouffer, Karl Taylor (CMIP Panel) Sandrine Bony and Cath Senior (WGCM Co-chairs) V. Balaji (WGCM Infrastructure Panel co-chair with K. Taylor) 16 January 2015 (updates to CMIP6 Data Request Timeline on Slide 9) Please see the CMIP Panel website for additional information and updates: climate.org/index.php/wgcm-cmip/about-cmiphttp:// climate.org/index.php/wgcm-cmip/about-cmip Contact for questions: CMIP Panel Chair Veronika Eyring ( The final CMIP6 Design, possibly with small modifications to the here presented figures and wording, will be published in a GMD Special Issue together with a description of the CMIP6-Endorsed MIPs and the forcing datasets. This Special Issue will open 30 April Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6): Design and Organization

The scientific backdrop for CMIP6 is the six WCRP Grand Challenges, and an additional theme encapsulating questions related to biogeochemical forcings and feedbacks. 1.Clouds, Circulation and Climate Sensitivity 2.Changes in Cryosphere 3.Climate Extremes 4.Regional Climate Information 5.Regional Sea-level Rise 6.Water Availability 7.Biogeochemical forcings and feedbacks (AIMES & WGCM) The specific experimental design is focused on three broad scientific questions: 1.How does the Earth System respond to forcing? 2.What are the origins and consequences of systematic model biases? 3.How can we assess future climate changes given climate variability, predictability and uncertainties in scenarios? CMIP6 Design: Scientific Focus BUT NOTE: These are under review and evolving!

WCRP Grand Challenges: (1) Clouds, circulation and climate sensitivity, (2) Changes in cryosphere, (3) Climate extremes, (4) Regional climate information, (5) Regional sea-level rise, and (6) Water availability, plus an additional theme on “Biogeochemical forcings and feedbacks” DECK (entry card for CMIP) i.AMIP simulation (~ ) ii.Pre-industrial control simulation iii.1%/yr CO 2 increase iv.Abrupt 4xCO 2 run CMIP6 Historical Simulation (entry card for CMIP6) v.Historical simulation using CMIP6 forcings ( ) Note: The themes in the outer circle of the figure might be slightly revised at the end of the MIP endorsement process (DECK & CMIP6 Historical Simulation to be run for each model configuration used in the subsequent CMIP6-Endorsed MIPs) With proto-DECK experiments (LMIP,OMIP etc.) in CMIP6 Tier1

CMIP Continuity Note: The themes in the outer circle of the figure might be slightly revised at the end of the MIP endorsement process

(1) What are the criteria for the DECK? The DECK experiments are chosen 1.to provide continuity across past and future phases of CMIP, 2.to evolve as little as possible over time, 3.to be well-established, 4.to be part of the model development cycle. (2) What are the criteria for the CMIP Phase X Historical Simulation? The CMIP Phase X Historical Simulation is chosen 1.to serve as a benchmark for CMIP6-Endorsed MIPs 2.to use the specific forcings consistent with Phase X of CMIP 3.to be decoupled from model development cycle if needed. Criteria for DECK and CMIP6 Historical Simulation (DECK = Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Characterization of Klima)

ScenarioMIP: Current Status Brian O’Neill, NCAR Scenario MIP Co-chairs: Brian O’Neill, Claudia Tebaldi, Detlef van Vuuren Members: Pierre Friedlingstein, George Hurtt, Reto Knutti, Jean-Francois Lamarque, Jason Lowe, Jerry Meehl, Richard Moss, Ben Sanderson Contributions/feedback from additional IAM researchers: Kate Calvin, Shinichiro Fujimori, Elmar Kriegler, Keywan Riahi Other MIPs: esp. LUMIP, AerChemMIP, C4MIP IAV Community: ICONICS, TGICA

CMIP6 Design

ScenarioMIP Objectives mips/scenario-mip Define and recommend an experimental design for future scenarios to be run by climate models as part of CMIP6 Also: Coordinate the provision of IAM scenario information to climate modeling groups Coordinate the production of climate model simulations and facilitate provision of output

ScenarioMIP Goals 1.Facilitating integrated research across climate science, IAM and IAV communities – Span wide forcing range and intermediate levels – Continuity with CMIP5 – Include new forcing pathways of interest 2.Anchoring targeted experiments to answer questions about specific forcings – Include scenarios with forcings (land use, aerosols) useful to other MIPs

CMIP5 Pattern scaling The Scenario Process: CMIP6 and Scenario MIP RCPs O’Neill & Schweizer, 2011; based on Moss et al. (2010). SSPs IAM, IAV studies CMIP6 More IAM, IAV studies CMIP6 Scenarios IAM scenarios

Forcing level (W/m 2 ) SSP1 Sustainability SSP2 Middle of the Road SSP3 Regional Rivalry Shared Socioeconomic Pathways SSP4 Inequality SSP5 Fossil-fueled Development ScenarioMIP design: Specific scenarios SRES Infeasible SSP ref. scens. CMIP5 RCP sims ~7 ~3.7 Tier 1 (H/M/L) Long-term extensions Overshoot Ensemble Tier 2 (H/M/L)

Forcing level (W/m 2 ) SSP1 Sustainability SSP2 Middle of the Road SSP3 Regional Rivalry Shared Socioeconomic Pathways SSP4 Inequality SSP5 Fossil-fueled Development ScenarioMIP design: Specific scenarios SRES Infeasible SSP ref. scens. CMIP5 RCP sims ~7 ~3.7 Tier 1 (H/M/L) Long-term extensions Overshoot Tier 2 (H/M/L) Ensemble

(Mt/Ag/EnSc/EnSt 404/504 - Global Change) Future Directions (for the AR5) END Future Directions in Globally Coordinated Climate Change Research