Apr 17-22, 20061 NAOJ SOT optical performance Focus stability in orbit Y. Katsukawa (NAOJ) and SOT team.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
P3 Revision. How do forces have a turning effect? The turning effect of a force is called the moment. Distance from force to pivot – perpendicular to.
Advertisements

OTA Status Report K.Ichimoto/Y.Suematsu, NAOJ Following institutes/companies are in collaboration. J-side:ISAS (Institute of Space and Astronautical Science)
Application of FBG sensors to monitoring of CFRP influenced by physical aging Shin-ichi Takeda a, Jun Koyanagi b, Shin Utsunomiya a, Yoshihiko Arao c,
Surveying I. Lecture 2..
SXC meeting SRON, July 19-20, SXC meeting 19-20/07/2007 Alignment Positioning of mirror with respect to detector (internal). Positioning of total.
Sandy desert Modifications of the surface radiation budget.
1 Estimate on SOT light level in flight with throughput measurements in SOT sun tests T. Shimizu 1, T. Tarbell 2, Y. Suematsu 3, M. Kubo 1, K. Ichimoto.
Chapter 4 Waves in Plasmas 4.1 Representation of Waves 4.2 Group velocity 4.3 Plasma Oscillations 4.4 Electron Plasma Waves 4.5 Sound Waves 4.6 Ion Waves.
Lecture 23 Mirrors Lens.
Lenses.
Currently: 3 year ( ) NSF-supported UF/IAP collaborative project "Methods and Instruments for High-Precision Characterization of LIGO Optical Components"
Initial Calibration and Stability Results from the LiCAS RTRS FSI System John Dale for the LiCAS Collaboration IWAA February 2008.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 32 Light: Reflection and Refraction.
Double Slit Interference. Intensity of Double Slit E= E 1 + E 2 I= E 2 = E E E 1 E 2 = I 1 + I 2 + “interference”
1.B – Solar Dynamo 1.C – Global Circulation 1.D – Irradiance Sources 1.H – Far-side Imaging 1.F – Solar Subsurface Weather 1.E – Coronal Magnetic Field.
Constellation Orion Visible Light Constellation Orion Infrared Light.
Chapter 23 Mirrors and Lenses.
Oct 17, 2001SALT PFIS PDR - Structure1 Structure Interface/ constraints Loads Structure design rationale Truss Weight and CG Finite Element Analysis/ Image.
ISAT 303-Lab3-1  Measurement of Condition: Lab #3 (2005):  List of parameters of condition: –Linear distance, angular displacement, vibration, displacement,
Physics Subject Area Test WAVES LIGHT & OPTICS.
The Refraction of Light: Lenses and Optical Instruments
SAM PDR1 SAM LGS Mechanical Design A. Montane, A. Tokovinin, H. Ochoa SAM LGS Preliminary Design Review September 2007, La Serena.
Apr 17-22, NAOJ Dopplergram from Filtergram (FG) Observation Y. Katsukawa (NAOJ) SOT Team.
Chapter 23 Mirrors and Lenses.
Effective lens aperture Deff
Apr 17-22, NAOJ SOT Initial Operation in Commissioning Phase Y. Katsukawa (NAOJ) SOT team.
Apr 17-22, Tunable filter wavelength scan and calibration of intensity ripple Y. Katsukawa (NAOJ) and SOT team.
Refraction is the change of direction of a light wave caused by a change in speed as the wave crosses a boundary between materials.
“Joint planning” session Preliminary instrument operation & science plans of SOT/XRT/EIS for several months after the launch. Instrument checkout and Performance.
Optics Gabrielle DePetro Amy Chang Tiffany Chau. Introduction to Optics Optics- study of how light behaves Speed of light- 3 x 10^8 m/s Speed of sound-
Space Distances using Parallax 1. Your “telescope” is a box with a small pinhole on one side. The pinhole represents the lens on the outside of the telescope.
1 of 28 A design study of a Cryogenic High Accurate Derotator.
Lecture 15 Refraction, Lenses, Aberrations Chapter 23.4  23.7 Outline Atmospheric Refraction Thin Lenses Aberrations.
IP-BSM Improvement Work N. Terunuma 2012/6/26 ATF2 Project Meeting.
Science - Coronal heating - Coronal structure / dynamics - Elementary processes in Magnetic Reconnection Mission instruments - Optical Telescope / Vector.
1 On-orbit SOT performance Kiyoshi Ichimoto and SOT-team Hinode workshop, , Beijing.
SAM PDR1 S OAR Adaptive Module LGS LGSsystem Andrei Tokovinin SAM LGS Preliminary Design Review September 2007, La Serena.
Solar-B SOT/FPP 1 SOT April 2006Ted Tarbell FPP CCD Camera Performance Ted Tarbell 17-Apr-2006.
XRT’s Observational Parameters R. Kano (NAOJ). Contents FOV & Full Disk Imaging Time Cadence & Observation Table New Items as Solar X-ray Telescopes –Pre-flare.
Calibration of the Polarization Property of SOT K.Ichimoto, Y.Suematsu, T.Shimizu, Y.Katsukawa, M.Noguchi, M.Nakagiri, M.Miyashita, S.Tsuneta (National.
Apr 17-22, NAOJ External alignment with X-Ray Telescope (XRT) and EUV Imaging Spectrometer (EIS) Y. Katsukawa (NAOJ) and SOT team.
1/10 Tatsuya KUME Mechanical Engineering Center, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-off meeting (Oct. 10, 2006) Phase.
Introduction to Imaging with Lenses Jiefei Wang OPTI 521 December 02, 2008.
Lower Baffle Robert Besuner 26 August Background/Purpose This study follows on to 12 August study of the Spacecraft Interface/Handling Ring. —In.
Examples of SOT Observation in Performance Verification Phase M. Kubo (JAXA/ISAS) and SOT team.
LASER FRAME: Straightness monitor (Tentative results of resolution test) Third Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF May 30-31,2005 KEK Nano BPM Group Y.Higashi,
On the Evaluation of Optical Performace of Observing Instruments Y. Suematsu (National Astronomical Observatory of Japan) ABSTRACT: It is useful to represent.
Contamination Analysis of Optical Telescope Assembly (OTA) April Electronic, Mechanical Components and Materials Engineering Group, Institute of.
SuperNova / Acceleration Probe Thermal System Wes Ousley November 16, 2001.
GEOMETRICAL OPTICS. Laws of Reflection Laws of Refraction.
BSRT UPDATE LMC 02-OCT-2012 F.Roncarolo on behalf of the BSRT team W.Andreazza, E.Bravin, A.Boccardi, J-J.Gras, A.Goldblatt, M.Hamani, T.Lefevre, R.Jones,
Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Drawing of the Space Infrared Telescope for Cosmology and Astrophysics (SPICA)
25/05/2007POSIPOL FOUR MIRRORS Fabry Perot resonator at LAL-Orsay Y. Fedala With help of F. Zomer, R.Cizeron.
Date of download: 6/22/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Synopsis of the pyramidal surface parametrization. Figure Legend: From: Modeling.
Refraction & Lenses. Refraction of Light When a ray of light traveling through a transparent medium encounters a boundary leading into another transparent.
Recap- Optical extensometer
Introduction to Imaging with Lenses
Chapter 23 Mirrors and Lenses © 2014 A. Dzyubenko.
Laser Beam Welding LIGHT AMPLIFICATION by STIMULATED EMISSION of RADIATION. Coalescence of heat is produced by the Laser beam which is having high energy.
From: Microtube Laser Forming for Precision Component Alignment
Ch. 30 Lenses.
Examinations of the relative alignment of the instruments on SOT
Manuel Marchiò, Raffaele Flaminio, Shunshi Kuroki
A. WAVE OPTICS B. GEOMETRIC OPTICS Light Rays
Thermo-mechanical simulations jaws + tank
First Experiments Testing the Working Hypothesis in HSX:
Free-Response-Questions
T. J. Okamoto (NAOJ/Kyoto Univ.)
Optics Alan Title, HMI-LMSAL Lead,
CHEOPS - CHaracterizing ExOPlanet Satellite
Presentation transcript:

Apr 17-22, NAOJ SOT optical performance Focus stability in orbit Y. Katsukawa (NAOJ) and SOT team

Apr 17-22, NAOJ2 OTA is designed to provide collimated beam into FPP in air, and provides a weakly converging beam (f  200m) in vacuum. Air-to- vacuum difference of the focus position of OTA and FPP are adjusted by initial setting of the “re-imaging lens” position. The 4 optical paths (BFI, NFI, SP, and CT) are designed to be kept in co-focal without any focus adjustment. SOT focus design

Apr 17-22, NAOJ3 Focus adjustment by the re-imaging lens Focus shift originating in OTA and FPP can be compensated by movement of the re-imaging lens along the optical axis during the mission operation. We plan to adjust the focus position occasionally to compensate seasonal variation. No need to adjust the position within one orbital cycle because orbital variation is supposed to be negligible. Mechanisms for the motion of the re-imaging lens have the specifications shown below. Reimaging lens M1 M2 Specifications Stroke range  25 mm Resolution0.17mm /step

Apr 17-22, NAOJ4 Focus shift in orbit Focus shift is caused by displacement of optical elements along the optical axis. The change of M1-M2 distance is most sensitive to the focus shift. Mechanical environmental (vibration and acoustic) tests showed no significant change in focus position. The thermal environment in orbit is very different from that on the ground. In order to predict the focus shift in orbit, we performed thermal-optical test of the telescope, and determined the defocus sensitivity for major components experimentally. Focus errors (including margins) are controlled by a focus error budget table. The focus position is confirmed to be well within adjustable range by the re- imaging lens for the mission period.

Apr 17-22, NAOJ5 Focus position in the first light phase After the telescope top-door is opened, the temperatures inside the telescope increase, and are settled within several hours. The telescope main structure is made of CFRP (carbon fiber reinforced plastic). The dehydration of CFRP makes M1-M2 distance smaller in vacuum. The speed of the shrinkage is temperature dependent. Focus pos (mm) Just after door opening Focus pos (mm) 1 month (?) later OTACFRP dehydration  (0.8 ) Temperature change-2.5 Initial offset (-2.3 ) (CLU air-vac. diff)(+4.7) FPPInitial offset00 (reimaging lens air-vac. diff) (+1.0) Total

Apr 17-22, NAOJ6 Focus shift by CFRP dehydration 1 month (?) laterJust after launch M1 M2 M1 M2 -8.3mm  -4.2mm  0mm

Apr 17-22, NAOJ7 Temperature dependence of CFRP dehydration 2 nd test on May 2004 OTA temperature was kept  20C during the test. Time (hour) A20 (lambda, DP) Time (hour) Cold modeHot mode 4 th test on Mar 2005 Focus position did not change during the cold mode. Time constant  400hrs

Apr 17-22, NAOJ8 Orbital variation by temperature ripple The temperature prediction in orbit tells that there is 1-2  C temperature ripple within one orbital cycle especially around M2. The focus shift within one orbital cycle is expected to be around 0.2mm at the re-imaging lens focus. This corresponds to one or two steps of the focus adjustment, and is within focal depth. M1-M2 sensitivity (  m/  C) Temperature ripple  T (  C) M2 support HDM spider Ring plate Top ring Upper truss Lower truss M1 support Focus pos at reimaging lens (mm) 0.22 Temperature and focus ripple within one orbital cycle (Only major components are shown in the table.)

Apr 17-22, NAOJ9 Focus change between DC and Limb obs. In limb observations, heat inputs to the telescope become smaller than those in DC obs. This makes the temperatures  C lower. This temperature change causes small focus shift, but the shift is expected to be about 0.1mm, and is negligible. M1-M2 sensitivity (  m/  C) Temperature (  BOL Disk centerLimb M2 support HDM spider Ring plate Top ring Upper truss Lower truss M1 support Focus pos at reimaging lens (mm) Temperature and focus change between DC and Limb obs. (Only major components are shown in the table.)

Apr 17-22, NAOJ10 Long-term focus shift Because of the contamination on the mirror surface, the temperature inside the telescope tends to increase gradually through the mission life. The temperature increase causes gradual focus shift, and will be compensated by the re-imaging lens. M1-M2 sensitivity (  m/  C) Temperature (  DC obs. Beginning of life End of life M2 support HDM spider Ring plate Top ring Upper truss Lower truss M1 support Focus pos at reimaging lens (mm) Temperature and focus change through the mission life (Only major components are shown in the table.)

Apr 17-22, NAOJ11 Summary The orbital and DC-Limb variation are expected to be 1-2 steps of the focus adjustment, and well within focal depth. We should verify orbital and DC-Limb variation in the first light phase. The seasonal and long-term focus shift will be compensated by occasional adjustment of the re- imaging lens position.