M.D. Nov 27th 2002M0' analysis workshop1 Monitoring system : lessons from M0’  Contents : Monitoring electronics Laser APD electronics Conclusions & requirements.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INFN Milano, Universita` degli Studi Milano Bicocca Siena IPRD May Testbeam results of the CMS electromagnetic calorimeter Alessio Ghezzi.
Advertisements

ATLAS Tile Calorimeter Performance Henric Wilkens (CERN), on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
Adil Khan Kyungpook National university Korea-Japan Joint ScECAL Group Meeting kobe University Japan 3 rd September 2010.
May 14, 2015Pavel Řezníček, IPNP Charles University, Prague1 Tests of ATLAS strip detector modules: beam, source, G4 simulations.
WACH4 26/11/2002Julien Cogan CERN/EP/CMA-1- M0 COOLING IN H4 Cooling is a key issue : –APD gain : ~ -2.4 % /  C –XTAL response (scintillation) : ~ -1.9.
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Toyoko J. Orimoto, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group 10th ICATPP Conference on Astroparticle,
TileCal Electronics A Status Report J. Pilcher 17-Sept-1998.
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Toyoko J. Orimoto, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group High-resolution, high-granularity.
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Toyoko J. Orimoto, California Institute of Technology On behalf othe CMS ECAL Collaboration High-resolution, high-granularity.
29 June 2004Paul Dauncey1 ECAL Readout Tests Paul Dauncey For the CALICE-UK electronics group A. Baird, D. Bowerman, P. Dauncey, C. Fry, R. Halsall, M.
Checking the Acd hardware veto setting The hardware veto is generated in the front-end electronics Discriminator with coarse and fine settings Both are.
GLAST LAT Project Instrument Analysis Workshop 6 – 06/02/27 F. Piron & E. Nuss (LPTA) 1 Trending CAL performance and mapping crystals Gamma-ray Large Area.
GLAST LAT Project IA weekly meeting, February 3, 2006 ACD subsystem Alex Moiseev 1 ACD Pedestals ACD Team at Goddard: Alex Moiseev Dave Thomspon Bob Hartman.
ECAL Testbeam Meeting, Rome 28 March 2007 Toyoko Orimoto Adolf Bornheim, Chris Rogan, Yong Yang California Institute of Technology Lastest Results from.
GLAST LAT Project Instrument Analysis Workshop 5 – 05/08/29 F. Piron & E. Nuss (IN2P3/LPTA – Montpellier) 1 Comprehensive review of CAL calibrations Gamma-ray.
Octal ASD Certification Tests at Michigan J. Chapman, Tiesheng Dai, & Tuan Bui August 30, CERN.
1 HLT – a source of calibration data One of the main tasks of HLT (especially in the first years) –Monitoring of the detector performance –Analysing calibration.
FPIX0 Electronic Test Marina Artuso Paul Gelling Jianchun Wang  The system works fine with charge injection calibration  Gain curve, threshold, and noise.
ECAL TIMING. 20/04/092 Ratios’ Method Basics Position of pulse maximum parameterized using the ratio of two consecutive samples, i.e., R = A(t)/A(t+1)
Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur Linéaire (IN2P3-CNRS et Université Paris-Sud 11), Orsay, France Olivier Callot 21 September 2005 Calorimeter Configuration.
ECAL electronics Guido Haefeli, Lausanne PEBS meeting 10.Jan
2011 HV scan SF6 flow-meter accident 2011 Results comparison RPC HV efficiency scan Pigi Paolucci on behalf of RPC collaboration.
Feb 20, 2009 CALICE meeting, Daegu, Korea QRL in Magnetic Field 1 QRLed Driver in Magnetic Field Jaroslav Zalesak Institute of Physics of the ASCR, Prague.
1 TPC online  offline calibration November 2002.
Leroy Nicolas, HESS Calibration results, 28 th ICRC Tsukuba Japan, August Calibration results of the first two H·E·S·S· telescopes Nicolas Leroy.
Status of scintillator KLM study P. Pakhlov (ITEP)
1 HBD Commissioning (II) Itzhak Tserruya HBD group meeting November 28, 2006 Progress from October 3 to November 28, 2006.
06/03/06Calice TB preparation1 HCAL test beam monitoring - online plots & fast analysis - - what do we want to monitor - how do we want to store & communicate.
B. IlleWACH /11/20021 WELCOME to WACH I am happy to introduce this ‘Workshop Analysis Calorimetry H4’ dedicated to M0’ data analysis and the.
14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.
C. Seez Imperial College November 28th, 2002 ECAL testbeam Workshop 1 Pulse Reconstruction Worth considering the experience of other experiments using.
28 th ICRC Tsukuba Conor Masterson, H.E.S.S. Observations of Galactic Sources with H.E.S.S. Conor Masterson, MPI-K, for the H.E.S.S. Collaboration.
Photodetection EDIT Internal photoelectric effect in Si Band gap (T=300K) = 1.12 eV (~1100 nm) More than 1 photoelectron can be created by light in silicon.
David BAILLEUX US CMS on behalf of the Caltech group Laser Monitoring System - Electronics review 20 March Overview Overview Laser control Laser.
A.Chekhtman1 GLAST LAT ProjectBeam test meeting, September 27, 2006 CsI afterglow - possible explaination of pedestal drift and excess of energy. Alexandre.
MPPC update including plastic connector T2K experiment collaboration meeting 2007/4/18 (Wed) S.Gomi T.Nakaya M.Yokoyama ( Kyoto University ) T.Nakadaira.
P. Denes Page 1 FPPA-Rad1 UHF1x and FPPA Radiation Hardness Radiation studies performed at OPTIS (PSI) with 72 MeV p and at 88” (LBL) with 55 MeV.
A. Gibson, Toronto; Villa Olmo 2009; ATLAS LAr Commissioning October 5, 2009 Commissioning of the ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Adam Gibson University.
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group High-resolution, high-granularity.
28 June 2010 LHCb week St Petersburg M.N Minard 1 Calorimeter status Hardware status Controls & monitoring Timing alignment Calorimeters calibration Pending.
1 P.Rebecchi (CERN) “Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL” “Advanced Technology and Particle.
DESY BT analysis - MPPC Saturation Correction - S. Uozumi Feb Sci-ECAL meeting 1.MPPC Gain Measurement (with LED data) 2.Inter-calibration of readout.
TTF - ECAL Plenary in CMS week ECAL Stability Contacts: Marc Dejardin, Julie Malcles (laser)
Status of the PSD upgrade - Status of the PSD cooling and temperature stabilization system - MAPD gain monitoring system - PSD readout upgrade F.Guber,
Studies of Electroweak Interactions and Searches for New Physics Using Photonic Events with Missing Energy at the Large Electron-Positron Collider Marat.
SPD VFE installation and commissioning (status and plans) I.Status of VFE test at Barcelona II.First commissioning experience at CERN (15 th -16 th March)
G. Eigen, Paris, Introduction The SiPM response is non-linear and depends on operating voltage (V-V bd ) and temperature  SiPMs need monitoring.
WACH4 26/11/2002Julien Cogan CERN/EP/CMA-1- THERMAL STEPS ANALYSIS Goals & Means : –apply a “step function” on the cooling water –look at : APD response.
S.MonteilPS COMMISSIONING1 MaPMT-VFE-FE ELECTRONICS COMMISSIONING AND MONITORING. OUTLINE 1)Ma-PMT TEST BENCHES MEASUREMENTS 2)VFE AND FE ELECTRONICS FEATURES.
R&D status of the very front end ASIC Tilecal week (7 October 2011) François Vazeille Jacques Lecoq, Nicolas Pillet, Laurent Royer and Irakli Minashvili.
Laser Measurements (as comparison to test beam data) Florian Lütticke University of Bonn 9 th VXD Belle 2 Workshop Valencia,
M.D. Nov 27th 2002M0' workshop1 M0’ linearity study  Contents : Electronic injection Laser injection Beam injection Conclusion.
3/06/06 CALOR 06Alexandre Zabi - Imperial College1 CMS ECAL Performance: Test Beam Results Alexandre Zabi on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group CMS ECAL.
Proposal for the after-pulse effect suppression  Observation of pulses and after-pulses  Shape measurement  Algorithm  Results  Efficiencies for after-pulse.
Laser System Status and Plans November 20 th, 2008 R.Febbraro / S. Viret LPC TileCal Operations 1. Diode 4 study 2. Stability preliminary results 3. Next.
Operation, performance and upgrade of the CMS Resistive Plate Chamber system at LHC Marcello Abbrescia Physics Department - University of Bari & INFN,
Pre-calibration of PM gain by photo-statistics
EZDC spectra reconstruction and calibration
Solving pedestal problem
The Silicon Drift Detector of the ALICE Experiment
Preliminary Performance of the L2 Chamber (Side A)
HLT & Calibration.
Design of Digital Filter Bank and General Purpose Digital Shaper
CMS ECAL Calibration and Test Beam Results
Instrumentation for Colliding Beam Physics 2017
UCSB Testing 3 Stereo Modules Tested 1 SS6 Module Tested
High Rate Photon Irradiation Test with an 8-Plane TRT Sector Prototype
Stability of Calibration Data
CAL crosstalk issues and their implications
The MPPC Study for the GLD Calorimeter Readout
Presentation transcript:

M.D. Nov 27th 2002M0' analysis workshop1 Monitoring system : lessons from M0’  Contents : Monitoring electronics Laser APD electronics Conclusions & requirements for 2003

M.D. Nov 27th 2002M0' analysis workshop2 Monitoring system description

M.D. Nov 27th 2002M0' analysis workshop3  MEM stability : Use self measurement of Vinj (stabilized at / year)  Stability better than 50  V / 500 mV over 1 month Monitoring electronics

M.D. Nov 27th 2002M0' analysis workshop4  FE-Asic stability : Use electronics injection pulse  Rather good stability over 2 months (1/1000 drift) Monitoring electronics 2002/08/08

M.D. Nov 27th 2002M0' analysis workshop5  PN stability : Compare PN0 with PN2 (level1 fan-out) :  Not stable at all (2.5 % over 2 months) ! Monitoring electronics 2002/08/08

M.D. Nov 27th 2002M0' analysis workshop6  PN stability : Look in archives : Accelerated aging in oven in 2001  degrees  PN2 should have never been put on M0’ !  Zero quality control on PN diodes at this time. Monitoring electronics 2001/03/06 PN0PN2 PN3PN1

M.D. Nov 27th 2002M0' analysis workshop7  Energy stability :  Huge variation with time (short term and long term)  “Raison d’être” of monitoring system  OK Laser

M.D. Nov 27th 2002M0' analysis workshop8  Pulse width stability :  Huge variation with time (short term and long term)  Huge effect on APD/PN0  Need to be monitored ! Laser d(fppa)/d  Nanogreen laser Particles Quantronix laser nominal Quantronix laser 2002

M.D. Nov 27th 2002M0' analysis workshop9  Electronics stability : Small dependence on T  No problem with present regulation Dependence with LV :  No significant change in gain up to now  Pedestals affected  Regular pedestal runs Dependence with VFE mode :  Pedestal affected Free vs Forced mode  Hard to monitor for hidden gains (G9, G5 and G1 in frre mode) Dependence with laser energy  Pedestals affected  Compute dynamic pedestals Dependence with laser pulse width  Convolution with FPPA shaping time  Need to monitor laser pulse width event by event APD line

M.D. Nov 27th 2002M0' analysis workshop10  Electronics stability : Dependence with HV :  A priori big dependence of APD gain with HV  Need to checked stability of APD response with present HV system On good channels : VFE electronics  = 1.4/1000

M.D. Nov 27th 2002M0' analysis workshop11  Back to crystal 1142 : Calibration drift by 5-6/1000 in 2 weeks :  Compare with electron runs APD line Calibration 120 GeV

M.D. Nov 27th 2002M0' analysis workshop12 Conclusions  Monitoring system : Need to implement an efficient quality control on PN diodes Electronics very stable but :  Need to clarify pedestal puzzle (fppa 200x) Need to monitor laser pulse width event by event  Requirement for 2003 Residual instabilities seems physical  Parasitic irradiations  HV fluctuation ?  Red laser required for next year To-do :  Reprocess irradiation data with all the correction  Should be able to get S/R curves with PN diodes as only reference  Fine study of HV data