CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Choosing a Trial Court Choosing a Trial Court (Federal or State Court) Subject Matter Jurisdiction Personal (Territorial) Jurisdiction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction/Civil procedure
Advertisements

”If a matter is a federal question” Cément BESOMBES Emelie LUNDBERG Alma BLAKE EMWALL.
Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Litigation & Procedure Introduction To Litigation Litigation & Procedure Introduction.
Quackenbush & The Final Judgment Rule. Quackenbush – Proceedings Below Who was the plaintiff? State Insurance Commissioner In what capacity? Trustee of.
CHAPTER 4 THE AMERICAN LEGAL SYSTEM AND COURT JURISDICTION DAVIDSON, KNOWLES & FORSYTHE Business Law: Cases and Principles in the Legal Environment (8.
P A R T P A R T Foundations of American Law The Nature of Law The Resolution of Private Disputes Business and The Constitution Business Ethics, Corporate.
TODAY’S CLASS Announcements Where We Are & What We’re Doing Skills: Reading Cases Washington Equip. Mfg. p. 145 Skills: Arguing From Precedent Burnham,
Civil Litigation. 2  CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT ◦ 7 JUSTICES  CALIFORNIA APPELLATE COURTS ◦ 6 DISTRICTS  CALIFORNIA TRIAL COURTS—SUPERIOR COURTS ◦ ONE.
CIVIL PROCEDURE – LA 310. FEDERAL AND STATE COURT SYSTEMS.
Slides developed by Les Wiletzky Wiletzky and Associates Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. Traditional, Alternative, and.
Actg 6100 Legal Issues Chapter 3 Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution.
American Tort Law Carolyn McAllaster Clinical Professor of Law Duke University School of Law.
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Choosing a Trial Court Choosing a Trial Court (Federal or State Court) Subject Matter Jurisdiction Personal (Territorial) Jurisdiction.
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Choosing a Trial Court
WHERE WE ARE & WHAT WE’RE DOING
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Choosing a Trial Court Choosing a Trial Court (Federal or State Court) Subject Matter Jurisdiction Personal Jurisdiction Venue Venue.
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Choosing a Trial Court Choosing a Trial Court (Federal or State Court) Subject Matter Jurisdiction Personal Jurisdiction Venue Venue.
Legal Environment of Business (Management 518) Professor Charles H. Smith The Court System (Chapter 2) Spring 2005.
THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESS A Critical Thinking Approach Fourth Edition Nancy K. Kubasek Bartley A. Brennan M. Neil Browne Nancy K. Kubasek Bartley.
Thurs. Sept. 13. constitutional restrictions on service.
Unit 2 Seminar Jurisdiction. General Questions Any general questions about the course so far?
Tuesday, Nov. 13. necessary parties Rule 19. Required Joinder of Parties (a) Persons Required to Be Joined if Feasible. (1) Required Party. A person.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 42 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Dec 2, 2005.
Agenda for 24th Class Name plates out Subject matter jurisdiction
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Choosing a Trial Court Choosing a Trial Court (Federal or State Court) Subject Matter Jurisdiction Personal Jurisdiction Venue Venue.
Tuesday, Aug. 26. Civil Procedure Law 102 Section 1.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 17 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America September 30, 2005.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 4 SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION I – Federal Question Jurisdiction Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University.
1 Agenda for 24th Class Name plates out Fee Shifting Diversity Jurisdiction Introduction to Erie.
Chapter 3 Traditional and Online Dispute Resolution.
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Choosing a Trial Court Choosing a Trial Court (Federal or State Court) Subject Matter Jurisdiction Personal Jurisdiction Venue Venue.
Declining Supplemental Jurisd. Standard of Appellate Review “Standard of review” What mean?
1 Agenda for 14th Class Admin – Handouts – Name plates Midsemester feedback Class actions Intro to subject matter jurisdiction.
Civil Procedure 2005 Class 28: Subject Matter Jurisdiction: Aggregation and Supplemental Jurisdiction Oct. 31, 2005 HAPPY HALLOWEEN!!
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 26 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 25, 2002.
CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTIONS C & F Fall 2005 August Class 5 Subject Matter Jurisdiction: Diversity and Alienage.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 39 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America November 21, 2005.
1 Agenda for 25th Class Name plates out Venue Mock mediation. Friday Nov 2, 11-12:30 Court visit either Monday October 29 or Nov 5. 9:30-12:30 –LLV conflict.
WHERE WE ARE & WHAT WE’RE DOING Overlapping jurisdiction Cases arising under state law Concurrent state & federal jurisdiction Diversity cases What law.
The Judicial System The Courts and Jurisdiction. Courts Trial Courts: Decides controversies by determining facts and applying appropriate rules Appellate.
Tues., Oct. 29. consolidation separate trials counterclaims.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 28 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America November 29, 2001.
WHERE WE ARE Complaint Answer 12(b) Motions Amended Pleadings Pre-Trial Trial & Post-Trial Appeal.
Civil Procedure 2003 Class 30: Subject Matter Jurisdiction: Aggregation and Supplemental Jurisdiction Nov
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Choosing a Trial Court Choosing a Trial Court (Federal or State Court) Subject Matter Jurisdiction Personal Jurisdiction Venue Venue.
2-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Law for Business, 15e by Ashcroft Chapter 2: Courts and Court Procedures Law for Business, 15e, by Ashcroft, © 2005 West Legal Studies in Business,
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Choosing a Trial Court Choosing a Trial Court (Federal or State Court) Subject Matter Jurisdiction Personal (Territorial) Jurisdiction.
Civil Procedure 2005 Class 31: Subject Matter Jurisdiction: Supplemental Jurisdiction II, Removal Nov. 2, 2005.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 39 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America November 24, 2003.
Tues. Sept. 11. service service on individuals 4(c) Service. … (2) By Whom. Any person who is at least 18 years old and not a party may serve a summons.
1 Agenda for 34th Class Slide handout Next week –Monday. No class –Wednesday. Regular class 10-11:15, Rm. 103 –Friday. Rescheduled class. 1:20-2:35, Rm.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 4 SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION I – Federal Question Jurisdiction Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University.
A Question of Jurisdiction Jiwon Kang Seong Yeon Kim Heather Wogden IES10244.
CHAPTER The Court System and Jurisdiction 2. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Legal Environment of Business in the Information Age © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
 Before filing suit, the plaintiff must decide in which of the Texas trial courts the lawsuit should be filed  That decision is made by choosing the.
INTRODUCTION TO THE COURT SYSTEM
Wed., Aug. 30.
Course Introduction Review
Access to Judicial Review
CIVIL PROCEDURE ESSAY SERIES ESSAY QUESTION #4 MODEL ANSWER
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Choosing a Trial Court
Wed., Oct. 17.
Conflict of laws Today we will talk about Conflict of Laws, which occurs when the laws of two or more different jurisdictions could apply to a particular.
Wed., Sept. 5.
Sources of Law Legislature – makes law Executive – enforces law
§ 10.1 Judicial Remedies Part I.
Professor Keith Rizzardi Part 1 Slides Jurisdiction
Jurisdiction Original vs. Appellate jurisdiction
Introduction to the Legal System
Presentation transcript:

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Choosing a Trial Court Choosing a Trial Court (Federal or State Court) Subject Matter Jurisdiction Personal (Territorial) Jurisdiction Venue Venue Transfer Forum non conveniens

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Federal Court SMJ Subject Matter Jurisdiction Federal question 28 U.S.C. §1331 Diversity of citizenship 28 U.S.C. §1332 Supplem. 28 U.S.C. §1367 Removal 28 U.S.C. §1441

SKILLS: READING CASES Basic Case Reading Louisville & Nashville RR. v. Mottley, p. 229 Substantive Claim Plaintiff? Explain the caption “Specific performance”

SKILLS: READING CASES Basic Case Reading Procedural posture What happened below? Who raised the smj issue? ?!?!?!

SKILLS: READING STATUTES Method 28 U.S.C. § 1331 The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States

SKILLS: READING STATUTES Ambiguity What ambiguities? “arising under”

SKILLS: READING STATUTES Protocols Louisville & Nashville RR v. Mottley What protocols does court use to resolve the ambiguity?

SKILLS: READING CASES Rule Choice Mottley court What does “arising under” mean? What’s an alternative to the rule adopted in Mottley?

BLACK LETTER LAW: “Well-pleaded complaint rule” Key doctrinal point Mottley Significant, controlling issue of federal law Not enough to create fed question jurisdiction Federal issue must be part of “claim”

SKILLS: Connecting Substance and Procedure Key practice point Can’t know whether have federal question smj Unless know what means to state a claim

SKILLS: Connecting Substance and Procedure 1 st Year Courses Tort, Contracts, Property Teach elements of claim Duty (tort) or Formation (contract) Breach Causation Damages

SKILLS: Arguing “Policy” Policy Defend rule of Mottley “well-pleaded complaint” rule What would world look like if adopt alternative?

BLACK LETTER LAW Challenging SMJ Summary Motion to dismiss 12(b)(1) Objection never waived: 12(b)(h)(3) Court can raise “sua sponte” Either party can raise Even on appeal

BLACK LETTER LAW Challenging SMJ Relationship between smj & stating a claim Jurisdiction to decide jurisdiction

TAKEAWAYS Skills Conceptual Frameworks Federal court subject matter jurisdiction Statute Reading MAP Case Briefing Rule Choice

TAKEAWAYS Black Letter Law Black Letter Law “Well-pleaded complaint” rule Federal questions Part of pl’s claim Not anticipate defence Objecting to federal court smj SMJ never waived