Prosecution Luncheon November 2014 (No December luncheon)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Brand Creation: From Conception to Protection Part II: Presented by: Daliah Saper.
Advertisements

Prosecution Lunch October Trademark Bullies? USPTO is requesting feedback from U.S. trademark owners, practitioners, and others regarding their.
Trademark Group Luncheon March, TM Announcements New version of TBMP due online by end of March Eliminating step of furnishing printed copy of published.
Prosecution Group Luncheon Trademark Updates November, 2011.
Prosecution Group Luncheon June, 2011 Trademarks.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association COST COMPARISON OF INTER PARTES PROCEEDINGS IN THE USPTO AND INFRINGEMENT ACTION IN.
Civil Litigation.  Provides basis of lawsuit  In California, complaint must state facts that constitute a c/a  At trial, attorneys must prove facts.
African Dialogue Livingstone Zambia Charles Harwood U.S. Federal Trade Commission.
Welcome U.S. Trademark Registration: The Attorney's Role from Clearance to Renewals Presented by Attorney Courtney Dunn Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor.
Heartland Surgical Specialty Hospital, LLC v. Midwest Division, Inc. (D. Kan. Apr. 9, 2007) Andrew S. Lo E-Discovery 10/6/09.
COPYRIGHT NOTICE: This presentation contains copyrighted and/ or trademarked material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by.
Maintaining Trademark Rights: Policing and Educational Efforts April 7, 2011.
Prosecution Group Luncheon Trademarks April, 2011.
Product Liability When goods cause injury, there is a question of product liability. There are three main issues related to product liability cases: –
Patents Copyright © Jeffrey Pittman. Pittman - Cyberlaw & E- Commerce 2 Legal Framework of Patents The U.S. Constitution, Article 1, Section 8:
WHAT IS AN INJUNCTION? Injunction = Court order requiring that a party do or refrain from doing something. 3 basic kinds of injunctions in terms of timing.
1 OSHA Compliance Inspections INSY 6010 FALL 2003.
Patents 101 April 1, 2002 And now, for something new, useful and not obvious.
EBay vs. MercExchange IEOR 190 G 3/16/2009Rani. eBay vs. MercExchange (May 2006) With eBay, (Supreme Court unanimously decided that) Injunctions should.
T5-1ENT Tools for Innovation: Intro to Intellectual Property Jonathan Weaver UDM Mechanical Engineering Department
© 2010 Hodgson Russ LLP IEEE Southern Area Entrepreneur’s Day Overview Of The Patent Process R. Kent Roberts Hodgson Russ LLP (716)
John B. Pegram Fish & Richardson P.C. U.S. Federal Court Rule Changes 1 © AIPLA 2015.
The Legal Implications of Safety and Health Presented by: Louis A. Ferreira Katherine K. Rosenbaum Joan P. Snyder Stoel Rives LLP 900 SW Fifth Avenue Suite.
February 19, Recent Changes and Developments in USPTO Practice Prepared by: Office of Patent Legal Administration (OPLA) Robert J. Spar, DirectorJoni.
© 2013 Kilpatrick Townsend Presented to Selected Topics in Trademark Law William Bryner Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
I DENTIFYING AND P ROTECTING I NTELLECTUAL P ROPERTY Tyson Benson
Trademark and Copyright Updates July USPTO TMEP Update July 2015 TBMP Update July 2015 Final rule relating to Changes in Requirements for Collective.
Trademark Prosecution Luncheon October USPTO – New Guide for Service Specimens “in direct association with” the services –Used in advertisements.
Model Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 3.3 Candor Toward The Tribunal (a) A lawyer shall not knowingly: (1) make a false statement of fact or law to.
Preparing a Provisional Patent Application Hay Yeung Cheung, Ph.D. Myers Wolin, LLC March 16, 2013 Trenton Computer Festival 1.
Patents, Trademarks and Entrepreneurship Slow Money Maine Rita Heimes University of Maine School of Law.
Prosecution Group Luncheon January Nice Agreement 10 th ed. Version 2013 developed to classify, most entries are not sufficiently definite to use.
Class Seven: Intellectual Property Patents, Trademarks and Copyrights.
Prosecution Lunch September Trademark Public Advisory Mtg. Concerns about unauthorized practice of law by document mgmt services and others eFiling-
September 23, 2011 Maury M. Tepper, III Tepper & Eyster, PLLC © Tepper & Eyster 2011.
In re Phoseon Technology Inc., 103 U.S.P.Q.2d 1822 (TTAB 2012) 1 Failure To Function As Mark SEMICONDUCTOR LIGHT MATRIX.
Patent Prosecution Luncheon February Defective Priority Claim Means No Priority Claim Each intermediate application in the chain of priority must.
Trademark Prosecution Luncheon August 21, USPTO – Enhanced Assignment Filing New Conveyance Types –Entity conversion –Merger and change of name.
Cache La Poudre Feeds, LLC v. Land O’Lakes, Inc. 224 F.R.D. 614 (D. Colo. 2007) By: Sara Alsaleh Case starts on page 136 of the book!
Trademark Prosecution Luncheon March Are You A Canadian John Doe? February 2014, Federal Court of Canada ordered an ISP to release the names and.
Trademark Prosecution Luncheon May 15, USPTO April 2014 version of TMEP published – clarifications/ revisions regarding: –Trade dress examination.
BioTechnologies MD, Inc. CRM Review by Brent M. MacDonald.
Law 227: Trademarks & Unfair Competition Registration & Clearance June 18, 2009 Jefferson Scher.
Prosecution Group Luncheon May, General Announcements Version 3 of TBMP now available online; copies in the print rooms USPTO submits “Trademark.
WHAT IS AN INJUNCTION? Injunction = Court order requiring that a party do or refrain from doing something. 3 basic kinds of injunctions in terms of timing.
Prosecution Luncheon February 13, USPTO – TM Withdrawal Form may use form to request withdrawal. Removes info from the attorney and correspondence.
Indiana’s Access to Public Records Act Heather Willis Neal Indiana Public Access Counselor Presented to Indiana Networking for Documents and Information.
Prosecution Lunch Trademark January NEXT MEETING – ONE WEEK Friday, February 4, 2011 Imogen Wiseman Cleveland IP - London Discussing recent developments.
Data Practices in Minnesota December Outline for this presentation Minnesota data practices laws Classification of government data Government entity.
Prosecution Group Luncheon Trademarks August, 2011.
Chapter 41 Corporations: Securities and Investor Protection McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Patent Cases IM 350 Lamoureux & Baron Sept. 6, 2009.
Trademarks II Establishment of Trademark Rights Class 20 Notes Law 507 | Intellectual Property | Spring 2004 Professor Wagner.
Fundamentals of Intellectual Property
Trademark Prosecution Luncheon May 15, USPTO April 2014 version of TMEP published – clarifications/ revisions regarding: –Trade dress examination.
Heartland Surgical Specialty Hospital, LLC v. Midwest Division, Inc 2007 WL (D. Kan. Apr. 9, 2007)
Prosecution Group Luncheon Trademark Updates October, 2011.
Trademark Law1  Sept. 25, 2006  Week 5 Finish Chapter 3 Start Chapter 4 (Registration of Trademarks  Reading: Pgs , suppl. pgs
Trademark Law1  Week 8 Chapter 6 – Infringement (cont.)
Entrepreneurship CHAPTER 8 SECTION 1.  When you develop a new product or service, you create an asset that must be protected.  Intellectual property.
Brady Act Requirements In November 1993, the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act of 1993 (Brady Act), Public Law , was signed into law requiring.
International Trademark Association U.S. Roundtable Program
© 2015 Messing, Rudavsky & Weliky, P.C.
Prosecution Luncheon July 2016.
Intellectual Property, Patents, Trademarks, Copyright, and Franchising
Proceedings.
Samsung vs. Apple, Inc. First US trial verdict – Aug 24, 2012
Prosecution Luncheon Trademark
Chapter 4: Patents and Trade Secrets in the Information Age.
What are the types of intellectual property?
Presentation transcript:

Prosecution Luncheon November 2014 (No December luncheon)

USPTO Next Generation Identification of Goods and Services Manual (IDM-NG) – advanced searching. Oct version of TMEP New searchable version of the TBMP Jan. ’15: courtesy s of TM maintenance reminders

Is “THE EGG” Descriptive? THE EGG for "facial toning machines for cosmetic use" "a word which describes the form or shape of a product falls under the proscription of Section 2(e)(1) of the Trademark Act." TTAB” THE EGG is merely descriptive because it "immediately and directly informs prospective purchasers and users of the shape or form of Applicant’s goods." In re Flageoli Classic Limited, LLC, Serial No (October 30, 2014) [not precedential].

Proving Bona Fide ITU Opp: ITU for HARD CANDY void b/c no bona fide intent to use for leather goods when filed –No pre-filing documentation –applicant's "pattern" of abandoned ITU apps App: pre-filing offering various goods under HARD CANDY to Wal-Mart; post-filing eventually used for sunglasses, cosmetic bags and apparel  credible intent Hard Candy Cases, LLC v. Hard Candy, LLC, Opposition No (November 13, 2014) [not precedential].

Keep Your Distance – for 5 Hours? 5-Hour Energy sued N2G for selling “6 Hour Energy Shot”  TM and trade dress infringement  permanent injunction –N2G violated in various ways (bad actor) In contempt proceedings, Ct. Applied the “Safe Distance Rule” – “prevents known infringers from using trademarks whose use by non-infringers would not necessarily be actionable.” –Ct. found modified products were too close to originals and violated injunction –Rule is equitable part of Ct’s remedial tool kit Innovation Ventures, LLC v. N2G Distrib., Inc., (6th Cir., 8/14/14)

Discover the Copyright SOL? 7 th Cir: © "Discovery rule" – SOL starts when π discovers, or with due diligence should have discovered, injury Employee of π noticed blueprints in City Offices, but City denied request for a copy "inquiry notice," may help identify time at which reasonable plaintiff can be expected to start investigating, but does not itself trigger statute of limitations Chi. Bldg. Design, PC v. Mongolian House, Inc., (7th Cir., 10/23/14)