02 Truth and Rationality Philosophy. 2 Part I: Sentences and Propositions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reasons for (prior) belief in Bayesian epistemology
Advertisements

Utterance By: Shorooq Al-Masoudi.
Anselm On the Existence of God. “Nor do I seek to understand so that I can believe, but rather I believe so that I can understand. For I believe this.
Meditation IV God is not a Deceiver, Truth Criterion & Problem of Error.
Hypotheticals: The If/Then Form Hypothetical arguments are usually more obvious than categorical ones. A hypothetical argument has an “if/then” pattern.
Kaplan’s Theory of Indexicals
EPM: Ch II Pete Mandik Chairman, Department of Philosophy Coordinator, Cognitive Science Laboratory William Paterson University, New Jersey USA.
Today’s Outline Hume’s Problem of Induction Two Kinds of Skepticism
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 21 More About Tests and Intervals.
René Descartes ( ) Father of modern rationalism. Reason is the source of knowledge, not experience. All our ideas are innate. God fashioned us.
Chapter 1 Critical Thinking.
NOTE: CORRECTION TO SYLLABUS FOR ‘HUME ON CAUSATION’ WEEK 6 Mon May 2: Hume on inductive reasoning --Hume, Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, section.
Probability Abney Elementary.
THERE IS NO GENERAL METHOD OR FORMULA WHICH IS ‘CORRECT’. YOU CAN PROBABLY IGNORE SOME OF THIS ADVICE AND STILL WRITE A GOOD ESSAY… BUT FOLLOWING IT MAY.
Phil 160 Kant.
Moral Relativism, Cultural Differences and Bioethics Prof. Eric Barnes.
Testing Hypotheses About Proportions Chapter 20. Hypotheses Hypotheses are working models that we adopt temporarily. Our starting hypothesis is called.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 6 Ayer and Emotivism By David Kelsey.
Rights and Wrongs of Belief Clifford, James. W.K. Clifford This short essay remains quite famous today. Clifford is worried about cases it’s.
CAS LX 502 Semantics 8b. Propositional attitudes 7, 9.
CAS LX 502 Semantics 1b. The Truth Ch. 1.
Me Talk Good One Day When Language and Logic Fail to Coincide.
Logic. what is an argument? People argue all the time ― that is, they have arguments.  It is not often, however, that in the course of having an argument.
Saying the Same Thing. Concepts Counting by –Sentence token –Sentence type –Proposition –Statement Synonomy Ambiguity Context Dependence Sense Reference.
The Problem of Knowledge. What new information would cause you to be less certain? So when we say “I’m certain that…” what are we saying? 3 things you.
The Problem of Induction Reading: ‘The Problem of Induction’ by W. Salmon.
SAT Prep: Improving Paragraphs AVID III Spring 2012.
Chapter 8 Hypothesis testing 1. ▪Along with estimation, hypothesis testing is one of the major fields of statistical inference ▪In estimation, we: –don’t.
Defending The Faith Series
KNOWLEDGE What is it? How does it differ from belief? What is the relationship between knowledge and truth? These are the concerns of epistemology How.
Lecture 2: The nature and value of knowledge. Two kinds of knowledge Both philosophy and common sense draw a distinction between knowing how, and knowing.
Lecture 4: The nature and value of truth. What is truth? Like the questions “What is knowledge?” and “What turns a true belief into knowledge?” asked.
Poetry Analysis.
Confirmation Bias. Critical Thinking Among our critical thinking questions were: Does the evidence really support the claim? Is there other evidence that.
More About Tests and Intervals Chapter 21. Zero In on the Null Null hypotheses have special requirements. To perform a hypothesis test, the null must.
Rationality Through Reasoning John Broome. When someone believes she ought to F, often her belief causes her to intend to F. How does that happen? Call.
{ The writing process Welcome. In the prewriting stage the follow must be considered:   factual information pertaining to topic   clear definition.
Persuasive Essay: writing to convince others of your opinion.
Extending the Definition of Exponents © Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved next #10 Taking the Fear out of Math 2 -8.
Socratic Seminars EXPECTATIONS FOR A SUCCESSFUL DISCUSSION.
The Problem of Knowledge 2 Pages Table of Contents Certainty p – Radical doubt p Radical doubt Relativism p Relativism What should.
Am I doing what I am suppose to be doing in this life?! By: Kyle Brown.
LOGIC AND ONTOLOGY Both logic and ontology are important areas of philosophy covering large, diverse, and active research projects. These two areas overlap.
Philosophy 2803 – Health Ethics Andrew Latus. Introduction Ethics Study of right and wrong/good and bad A Branch of Philosophy Central Question = “How.
Sept. 13, 2006Math 3621 Propositions. Sept. 13, 2006Math 3622 Propositions One way that mathematical language differs from ordinary everyday English (OEE)
Chapter 21: More About Test & Intervals
Sight Words.
Christopher Jay Department of Philosophy University of York.
Argument & Counter- Argument Adopted from Baetty Language Centre – Andalas University.
Please feel free to chat until the seminar begins at the top of the hour!
Philosophy and Logic The Process of Correct Reasoning.
Updating your Phone Messages. Don’t start with your name first Every phone message starts the same way: “Hi, this is Sharon from Original Works”. When.
Epistemology (How do you know something?)  How do you know your science textbook is true?  How about your history textbook?  How about what your parents.
1. Don’t criticize, condemn, or complain about people. There’s no faster way create resentment toward you than to criticize or complain about a person.
Knowledge LO: To understand the distinction between three different types of knowledge. To learn some basic epistemological distinctions. To understand.
 All examples are taken from student answers to the Timed Writing question about George Bernard Shaw's letter concerning his mother's cremation.
This week’s aims  To test your understanding of substance dualism through an initial assessment task  To explain and analyse the philosophical zombies.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 21 More About Tests and Intervals.
Questions.
Unit 5 – Chapters 10 and 12 What happens if we don’t know the values of population parameters like and ? Can we estimate their values somehow?
Michael Lacewing Mackie’s error theory Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Problems for Identity Theory
Remember these terms? Analytic/ synthetic A priori/ a posteriori
Today’s Outline Discussion of Exercise VI on page 39.
Philia Sophia The Love of Wisdom
Fact v. Opinion How do you tell?.
01 4 Ethical Language 4.1 Meta-Ethics.
Introduction to Logic Lecture 1 What is Critical Reasoning?
Validity and Soundness, Again
Presentation transcript:

02 Truth and Rationality Philosophy

2 Part I: Sentences and Propositions

3 Consider the following two sentences: (1) “snow is white” (2) “snow is white” Are these the same sentence?

4 Consider the following two sentences: (1) “snow is white” (2) “snow is white” Are these the same sentence? Yes and No.

5 Consider the following two sentences: (1) “snow is white” (2) “snow is white” They are different “tokens” of the same sentence “type”.

6 Consider the following two sentences: (1) “snow is white” (2) “snow is white” They are different “tokens” of the same sentence “type”. They are two different physical instances of the same one abstract pattern of symbols.

7 The distinction between a type and its tokens is a metaphysical distinction between a single abstract thing and its many concrete and particular instances.

8 Tokens are individual physical things that exist at a time and place and are composed of thinks like ink, chalk, vibrations in sound, and so on..

9 The distinction between a type and its tokens is a metaphysical distinction between a single abstract thing and its many concrete and particular instances. Tokens are individual physical things that exist at a time and place and are composed of thinks like ink, chalk, vibrations in sound, and so on. Types aren't composed of anything. They are not physical nor do they exist in time. They are abstract.

10 EXAMPLE: The number of words in the Gertrude Stein line from her poem Sacred Emily:

11 EXAMPLE: The number of words in the Gertrude Stein line from her poem Sacred Emily: Rose is a rose is a rose is a rose.

12 EXAMPLE: The number of words in the Gertrude Stein line from her poem Sacred Emily: Rose is a rose is a rose is a rose. In one sense of ‘word’ we may count three different words; in another sense we may count ten different words.

13 EXAMPLE: The number of words in the Gertrude Stein line from her poem Sacred Emily: Rose is a rose is a rose is a rose. In one sense of ‘word’ we may count three different words; in another sense we may count ten different words. Three different types, ten different tokens.

14 Consider the following two sentences: (1) “snow is white” (2) “neigh est blanc” Are these the same sentence?

15 Consider the following two sentences: (1) “snow is white” (2) “neigh est blanc” They are different sentence tokens and types. However, they do have something in common.

16 Consider the following two sentences: (1) “snow is white” (2) “neigh est blanc” They are different sentence tokens and types. However, they do have something in common. They share the same “meaning”.

17 Consider the following two sentences: (1) “snow is white” (2) “neigh est blanc” They are different sentence tokens and types. However, they do have something in common. They share the same “meaning” (a.k.a. They express the same “proposition”).

18 The distinction between a sentence and its meaning is a distinction between the proposition someone is expressing and the mere physical sentence token they are using to express it.

19 The distinction between a sentence and its meaning is a distinction between the proposition someone is expressing and the mere physical sentence token they are using to express it. Sentences are individual physical things (sentence tokens) that are instances of a certain language's pattern (sentence types).

20 The distinction between a sentence and its meaning is a distinction between the proposition someone is expressing and the mere physical sentence token they are using to express it. Sentences are individual physical things (sentence tokens) that are instances of a certain language's pattern (sentence types). Propositions aren't composed of anything nor are they in any language. They are not physical nor do they exist in time. They are abstract. Propositions don't have tokens, but they can be “expressed” by sentence tokens.

21 Consider the following sentences: (1) “Jane is taller than Ann.” (2) “Jane is taller than Ann.” (3) “Ann is shorter than Jane.” (4) “Jane est plus grand que Ann.”

22 Consider the following sentences: (1) “Jane is taller than Ann.” (2) “Jane is taller than Ann.” (3) “Ann is shorter than Jane.” (4) “Jane est plus grand que Ann.” How many sentence tokens? How many sentence types? How many propositions are expressed?

23 Consider the following sentences: (1) “Jane is taller than Ann.” (2) “Jane is taller than Ann.” (3) “Ann is shorter than Jane.” (4) “Jane est plus grand que Ann.” How many sentence tokens? Four. How many sentence types? Three. How many propositions are expressed? One.

24 Consider the following sentences: (1) “I am hungry.” (2) “I am hungry.” (3) “He is hungry.”

25 Consider the following sentences: (1) “I am hungry.” (2) “I am hungry.” (3) “He is hungry.” How many sentence tokens? Three. How many sentence types? Two. How many propositions are expressed? ???

26 Sentence types do not literally express propositions (i.e. sentence types do not have meanings).

27 Sentence types do not literally express propositions (i.e. sentence types do not have meanings). Only sentence tokens express propositions (i.e. have meanings).

28 Consider the following sentences: (1) “I am hungry.” (2) “I am hungry.” (3) “He is hungry.” How many sentence tokens? Three. How many sentence types? Two. How many propositions are expressed? ???

29 Consider the following sentences: (1) “I am hungry.” (2) “I am hungry.” (3) “He is hungry.” How many sentence tokens? Three. How many sentence types? Two. How many propositions are expressed? ??? To know the propositions expressed we need the “context” of each of the three sentence tokens.

30 Consider the following sentences: (1) “I am hungry.” (2) “I am hungry.” (3) “He is hungry.”

31 Consider the following sentences: (1) “I am hungry.” (2) “I am hungry.” (3) “He is hungry.” It is only from the context in which each of the three sentence tokens occurred that we can determine who is being said to be hungry and when it is being claimed that they are hungry.

32 Consider the following sentences: (1) “I am hungry.” (2) “I am hungry.” (3) “He is hungry.”

33 Consider the following sentences: (1) “I am hungry.” (2) “I am hungry.” (3) “He is hungry.” Can you imagine a context for these three sentence tokens such that they all express the same proposition? What about a context where they all express different propositions?

34 What feature of the context in which the following sentences are said could help you determine what proposition they express?

35 What feature of the context in which the following sentences are said could help you determine what proposition they express? (a)“I am sleepy.” (b) “You will not be here tomorrow.” (c) “It is sunny today.” (d) “We will not tolerate any more of your abuse.” (e) “Tiffany will be here by noon.” (d) “No.”

36 Consider the following sentences: (1) “Jane is taller than Ann.” (2) “Jane is taller than Ann.” (3) “Ann is shorter than Jane.” (4) “Jane est plus grand que Ann.” How many sentence tokens? How many sentence types? How many propositions are expressed?

37 Consider the following sentences: (1) “Jane is taller than Ann.” (2) “Jane is taller than Ann.” (3) “Ann is shorter than Jane.” (4) “Jane est plus grand que Ann.” How many sentence tokens? Four. How many sentence types? Three. How many propositions are expressed? ???

38 Terminology - Type / Token -Sentence -Proposition -Meaning -Context

39

40 Part I: Sentences and Propositions Part II: Propositional Attitudes

41 Sentence tokens express propositions, but sentence tokens aren't the only thing that involve propositions (a.k.a. meanings).

42 Sentence tokens express propositions, but sentence tokens aren't the only thing that involve propositions (a.k.a. meanings). We can also hope that a proposition is true, wish that a proposition were true, believe a proposition is true, wonder if a proposition is true, imagine a proposition is true, etc.

43 Belief, wondering, imagining, hoping, wishing, etc. are all examples of “mental states” that are called “propositional attitudes”. That is, they are mental states about a proposition.

44 Belief, wondering, imagining, hoping, wishing, etc. are all examples of “mental states” that are called “propositional attitudes”. That is, they are mental states about a proposition. By contrast feeling pain, seeing red, hearing a high pitched sound, etc. are all mental states that aren't about propositions. They are not propositional attitudes.

45 EXAMPLE: Experiencing the feeling of pain after being stabbed and wishing that I hadn't been stabbed.

46 EXAMPLE: Experiencing the feeling of pain after being stabbed and wishing that I hadn't been stabbed. Both are mental states. But the feeling of pain from the stabbing isn't about a proposition while the wish is about the proposition “I've been stabbed.”

47 EXAMPLE: Experiencing the feeling of pain after being stabbed and wishing that I hadn't been stabbed. Both are mental states. But the feeling of pain from the stabbing isn't about a proposition while the wish is about the proposition “I've been stabbed.” Pain is just a feeling/experience, but a wish is always a wish about a proposition. When I wish, I always that a proposition. But I don't pain that a proposition.

48 At this point we know that a belief is (1) a mental state, and (2) a propositional attitude.

49 At this point we know that a belief is (1) a mental state, and (2) a propositional attitude. So, like wishing and experiencing pain, belief is a mental state. Unlike pain but similar to a wish, a belief is a propositional attitude. That is, like a wish, a belief is about a proposition.

50 So what is unique about the mental state/propositional attitude of belief? How does belief differ from other mental states/propositional attitudes like wishing, imagining, wondering, hoping, and so on?

51 When someone thinks a proposition is true, that means they believe that proposition. A belief is the mental state of thinking that a proposition is true.

52 When someone thinks a proposition is true, that means they believe that proposition. A belief is the mental state of thinking that a proposition is true. And thinking a proposition is true ranges from just barely thinking a proposition is more likely true than false (51% likelihood) up to being absolutely certain that it is (100% likelihood).

53 Furthermore, since belief covers the range from thinking a proposition is just barely more likely to be true than false all the way up to being absolutely convinced that it is true rather than false (51-100% likelihood), we should note that belief really comes in degrees.

54 Furthermore, since belief covers the range from thinking a proposition is just barely more likely to be true than false all the way up to being absolutely convinced that it is true rather than false (51-100% likelihood), we should note that belief really comes in degrees. We don't just believe or don't believe, we believe to a certain degree.

55 Lastly, we should note that once I consider a proposition I must then either belief it (think that it has a % likelihood of being true), disbelief it (think that it has a 0- 49% likelihood of being true; that it is likely false), or suspend belief about it (think that it is 50-50% whether it is true or false).

56 Lastly, we should note that once I consider a proposition I must then either belief it (think that it has a % likelihood of being true), disbelief it (think that it has a 0- 49% likelihood of being true; that it is likely false), or suspend belief about it (think that it is 50-50% whether it is true or false). There are many propositions I don't believe, disbelieve, or even suspend judgment about. But those are only the propositions I have never considered.

57 Terminology - Mental State -Propositional Attitude -Belief

58 Part I: Sentences and Propositions Part II: Propositional Attitudes Part III: Truth

59 A belief is the mental state of thinking that a proposition is true.

60 A belief is the mental state of thinking that a proposition is true. But thinking a proposition is true is one thing, that proposition being true is another.

61 A proposition is true when it “corresponds to” or “matches” the way the world is, otherwise the proposition is false.

62 A proposition is true when it “corresponds to” or “matches” the way the world is, otherwise the proposition is false. Only propositions (a.k.a. meanings) are truth- bearers. That is, only propositions can be true or false. But we might informally call a belief a true belief if the proposition someone *thinks* is true also happens to be a true proposition.

63 A belief is the mental state of thinking that a proposition is true. A true belief is the mental state of thinking that a proposition is true and that proposition matches the way the world is.

64 Suppose I tell you that I believe that “The Earth is spherical” but then say “But I have no idea if my belief is true.” Am I correct in saying this or am I confused?

65 Suppose I tell you that I believe that “The Earth is spherical” but then say “But I have no idea if my belief is true.” Am I correct in saying this or am I confused? Well, whether my belief is true or not depends upon the shape of the Earth, and the Earth could be shaped differently than I believe or have evidence for.

66 Suppose I tell you that I believe that “The Earth is spherical” but then say “But I have no idea if my belief is true.” Am I correct in saying this or am I confused? Well, whether my belief is true or not depends upon the shape of the Earth, and the Earth could be shaped differently than I believe or have evidence for. But then again, if I believe a proposition, then I think that proposition is true. Therefore, I must also think that any belief in that proposition is a belief in a true proposition (“true belief”). So, what's the answer; Am I confused or not?

67 Suppose I tell you that I believe that “The Earth is spherical” but then say “But I have no idea if my belief is true.” Am I correct in saying this or am I confused?

68 Suppose I tell you that I believe that “The Earth is spherical” but then say “But I have no idea if my belief is true.” Am I correct in saying this or am I confused? I must be confused. If I believe something, then of course I can't have “no idea” whether my belief is a true one.

69 Suppose I tell you that I believe that “The Earth is spherical” but then say “But I have no idea if my belief is true.” Am I correct in saying this or am I confused? I must be confused. If I believe something, then of course I can't have “no idea” whether my belief is a true one. I must believe that my original belief is true to the same degree as my original belief. If I believe very strongly that “The Earth is flat” then I also believe very strongly—and for the same reasons—that “A belief that the Earth is flat is a true belief.”

70 Suppose I tell you that I believe that “The Earth is spherical” but then say “But I have no idea if my belief is true.” Am I correct in saying this or am I confused? I must be confused. If I believe something, then of course I can't have “no idea” whether my belief is a true one. I must believe that my original belief is true to the same degree as my original belief. If I believe very strongly that “The Earth is flat” then I also believe very strongly—and for the same reasons—that “A belief that the Earth is flat is a true belief.” I don't believe 100% that the Earth is flat and so I can admit as an unlikely possibility that my belief could still be false, but that is very different than having “no idea” whether my belief is a true one.

71 A point worth noting about how beliefs work:

72 A point worth noting about how beliefs work: If you believe that proposition P is true (think that P has a X% likelihood of being true, where X>50%), then you must also believe that any belief in proposition P is true (think that a belief in P has a X% likelihood of being true).

73 Why is this important?

74 Why is this important? Because the fact that the truth of my beliefs isn't up to me and instead depends upon how the world is often leads people to be mistakenly timid in asserting, defending, or thinking that their own beliefs are true.

75 Why is this important? Because the fact that the truth of my beliefs isn't up to me and instead depends upon how the world is often leads people to be mistakenly timid in asserting, defending, or thinking that their own beliefs are true. Yes, we should realize that whether our beliefs are true or not depends upon how the world is and not upon what we think or have evidence for. But all this entails is that we should limit the degree of confidence with which we think anything is true; in considering whether our beliefs are true, we should still “believe our beliefs” to the same limited degree that we have those beliefs in the first place.

76 Terminology - True / Truth -False / Falsity -Truth-bearer -True Belief

77 Part I: Sentences and Propositions Part II: Propositional Attitudes Part III: Truth Part IV: Rationality

78 A belief is the mental state of thinking that a proposition is true. A true belief is the mental state of thinking that a proposition is true and that proposition matches the way the world is.

79 A belief is the mental state of thinking that a proposition is true. A true belief is the mental state of thinking that a proposition is true and that proposition matches the way the world is. Question: What beliefs should we have?

80 Question: What beliefs should we have? The answer seems obvious: “true beliefs”.

81 Question: What beliefs should we have? The answer seems obvious: “true beliefs”. But whenever we think about what we “should” do in our actions or in our beliefs, we have to consider whether we can guide our actions or beliefs to live up to what we should do.

82 Question: What beliefs should we have? The answer seems obvious: “true beliefs”. But whenever we think about what we “should” do in our actions or in our beliefs, we have to consider whether we can guide our actions or beliefs to live up to what we should do. Can I follow the rule: Only adopt true beliefs?

83 Question: What beliefs should we have? The answer seems obvious: “true beliefs”. But whenever we think about what we “should” do in our actions or in our beliefs, we have to consider whether we can guide our actions or beliefs to live up to what we should do. Can I follow the rule: Only adopt true beliefs? No.

84 Question: What beliefs should we have? What I can do, is ensure that I only adopt beliefs whose truth is supported by my evidence.

85 Question: What beliefs should we have? What I can do, is ensure that I only adopt beliefs whose truth is supported by my evidence. Whether my beliefs are true beliefs depends on how the world is and that isn't something I can check. But what I can do is make sure that the propositions I believe are ones I have evidence for their truth.

86 Question: What beliefs should we have? I should believe propositions my evidence shows are probably true (51-100%), I should disbelieve those propositions my evidence shows are probably false (0- 49%), and I should suspend judgment towards those propositions my evidence leaves it completely in the air whether they are true or false (50-50%).

87 A belief is the mental state of thinking that a proposition is true. A true belief is the mental state of thinking that a proposition is true and that proposition matches the way the world is. A rational belief is the mental state of thinking that a proposition is true and the likely truth of that proposition is supported by the person's evidence.

88 Truth is a relationship between a proposition and the world. Rationality is a relationship between a proposition and a particular person's evidence.

89 Truth is a relationship between a proposition and the world. Rationality is a relationship between a proposition and a particular person's evidence. These are different relationships and while a proposition can have both, a proposition can also have one without the other.

Fallibilism and Improbable Truths Let’s say you believe the procedure will work for mom. Belief is rational because supported by evidence. But, let’s imagine the worst: the procedure killed mom. 90

Fallibilism and Improbable Truths Let’s say you believe the procedure will work for mom. Belief is rational because supported by evidence. But, let’s imagine the worst: the procedure killed mom. Fallibilism: Rational beliefs can be false. Also sad, but true: Irrational beliefs can be true. Example: Given the odds, it is irrational for any contestant on American Idol to believe she will win. However, one irrational person will turn out to be right. 91

Rationality vs. Truth Why try to have rational belief if rational belief can be false? 92

Rationality vs. Truth Why try to have rational belief if rational belief can be false? Rational beliefs are based on evidence that give us reason to think a proposition is true. But evidence can’t guarantee the truth of a proposition. 93

94 Terminology - Rational Belief -Evidence

95 Part I: Sentences and Propositions Part II: Propositional Attitudes Part III: Truth Part IV: Rationality Part V: Relativism

96 Is truth the same for everyone or does it change from person to person, from time to time, from place to place, and so on?

97 Is truth the same for everyone or does it change from person to person, from time to time, from place to place, and so on? Is a proposition true. Period. Full stop. Or are propositions only true for a particular person, time, place, and so on?

98 We often talk about how truth can change relative to a time, place, or person. This is called “relativism about truth”.

99 We often talk about how truth can change relative to a time, place, or person. This is called “relativism about truth”. However, this is a misconception about truth due to a failure to keep clear about the subtle distinctions we have been discussing.

100 Some of the confusion stems from overlooking the differences between belief, true belief, and rational belief.

101 A belief is the mental state of thinking that a proposition is true. A true belief is the mental state of thinking that a proposition is true and that proposition matches the way the world is. A rational belief is the mental state of thinking that a proposition is true and the likely truth of that proposition is supported by the person's evidence.

102 But some of the confusion stems from overlooking the difference between a sentence and a proposition.

A proposition is true just in case it describes things as they actually are. A proposition is false just in case it fails to describe things as they actually are. (A true proposition corresponds to the facts. A false proposition does not.) Relativism is the claim that truth is relative to an individual person’s perspective or experiences, a particular time, or a particular place. - Confusion between sentences and propositions. - Confusion between belief and true belief. -Confusion between true belief and rational belief. 103

104 Terminology - Relativism about truth - “True for...”

105 Part I: Sentences and Propositions Part II: Propositional Attitudes Part III: Truth Part IV: Rationality Part V: Relativism Questions?