KM3NeT Status Report Uli Katz ANTARES Meeting CERN, 11. December What happened since last collaboration meeting 2. The FP6 Design Study proposal 3. A review of the KM3NeT talk in Munich

U. Katz, ANTARES meeting, CERN 2 KM3NeT events after September 2003 Amsterdam, October 2003 –VLVNT workshop –3. KM3NeT co-ordination meeting Munich, November 2003 –ApPEC Design Study Workshop –4. KM3NeT co-ordination meeting Athens, January 2004 –KM3NeT writing group meeting Rome, February 2004 –KM3NeT meeting(s) before Design Study deadline Brussels, 4. March 2004, 17:00 MET DS deadline!

U. Katz, ANTARES meeting, CERN 3 VLVnT Workshop, Amsterdam 3 very intense days of presentations and discussion, strong participation from almost (?) all active institutes. Topics particularly selected for KM3NeT objectives (i.e. leave out “far-future topics”, such as acoustics). Numerous new & interesting ideas — need careful investigation. Strong interest from industry. Information under proceedings under preparation.

U. Katz, ANTARES meeting, CERN 4 KM3Net Meeting, Amsterdam, Participants: John Carr, Greg Hallewell, Uli Katz, Leo Resvanis, Ion Siotis, Tonino Capone, Emilio Migneco, Maarten de Jong, Els de Wolf Agree on characteristics of Design Study proposal  choose project name: KM3NeT  choose project coordinator: Uli Katz  submit pre-notification data to EU (see next page) Agree on rough time schedule for Design Study: –End of 2003: Data collection, consolidation, first draft –End of Jan. 2004: Quasi-final draft, including administrative and budget details (meeting in Athens). –End of Feb. 2004: Final touches (meeting in Rome) Install proposal writing group: G.Hallewell, L.Moscoso, U.Katz (coordinator), I.Siotis, T.Capone, M.de Jong, E.de Wolf

U. Katz, ANTARES meeting, CERN 5 KM3NeT DS pre-notification to EU Title:Design Study for a Deep Sea Facility in the Mediterranean for Neutrino Astronomy and Environmental Sciences Short abstract: A Design Study is proposed to accelerate and focus existing national and international efforts for the construction of a deep-sea research infrastructure in the Mediterranean sea, accommodating a cubic-kilometre cosmic neutrino telescope (KM3NeT) and providing long-term access for biological, environmental and other investigations. The proponents, representing the current Mediterranean neutrino telescope projects, have agreed to combine their efforts to aim at a unique European facility. Instrument type: DS-SSA Call identifier: FP Infrastructures-4 FP6 keyword codes: Astrophysics Experimental physics Deep-sea technology Participants: wait a moment...

U. Katz, ANTARES meeting, CERN 6 The ApPEC Workshop in Munich, Presentation of intended Design Study proposals to the ApPEC Steering Committee: A Cherenkov telescope array at large height –KM3NeT –European gravitational wave observatory –2 dark matter / 0  projects. Our presentation was well received by the audience and, reportedly, also by the ApPEC SC Comments / criticism: –strengthen “credibility” of physics case –make sure the Design Study is one coherent and coordinated effort. ApPEC role in Design Studies is unclear!

U. Katz, ANTARES meeting, CERN 7 KM3NeT meetings, Munich, Long & detailed discussions on ApPEC presentation –many controversial topics touched and clarified to some extent –agreement on a set of objectives and on work packages –progress on the definition of the relation between current projects and KM3NeT Steps towards self-organisation: –established a group of contact persons to collect information from participants (= institutes) and coordinate administrative and management issues of DS –requested information on desired contributions and budgets –suggested consortium contract (DS management structure) Writing group meetings Participants: John Carr, Greg Hallewell, Luciano Moscoso, Uli Katz, Alexander Kappes, Ion Siotis, Tonino Capone, Elisa Falchini, Paolo Piattelli, Mauro Taiuti, Maarten de Jong, Els de Wolf, Juanjo Hernandez, Joachim Rose

U. Katz, ANTARES meeting, CERN 8 Some financial issues related to DS’s EU only covers up to 50% of the overall DS budget –participants either need additional funding or possibility to contribute with their own salaries etc. (depends on EU cost model) –needs to be sorted our and agreed internally asap! Overall amount of funding requested from EU should be 1-10% of project cost  6-8 million € appears to be right volume KM3NeT Design Study must not appear to be a continuation of existing projects  keep KM3NeT requests separate from ongoing activities (explicitly decided so by INFN groups)

The KM3NeT Project Design Study for a Deep Sea Facility in the Mediterranean for Neutrino Astronomy and Environmental Sciences Physics Perspectives of KM3NeT Status of Current Deep-Sea Projects Objectives and Time Schedule for KM3NeT Associated Sciences Management and Status of Proposal Uli Katz, University of Erlangen for the KM3NeT Project Group ApPEC Workshop Munich,

U. Katz, ApPEC Munich10 Institutes participating in the Design Study: Cyprus: Univ. Cyprus France: CEA/Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3 Marseille, CNRS/IN2P3 Strasbourg, Univ. Haute Alsace Germany: Univ. Erlangen Greece: Hellenic Open Univ., NCSR “Demokritos”, NOA/Nestor Inst., Univ. Athens, Univ. Crete, Univ. Patras Italy: INFN (Bari, Bologna, Catania, LNS Catania, LNF Frascati, Genova, Messina, Pisa, Roma-1) Netherlands: NIKHEF (Univ. Amsterdam, Free Univ., Univ. Utrecht, Univ. Nijmegen) Spain: IFIC (CSIC, Univ. Valencia), U.P. Valencia United Kingdom: Univ. Leeds, Univ. Sheffield, Univ. Liverpool? Introduction (i) Coordinator: Uli Katz, Erlangen

U. Katz, ApPEC Munich11 Introduction (ii) What is our aim: a deep-sea km 3 -scale observatory for high energy neutrino astronomy and associated platform for deep-sea science Why we need an FP6 Design Study: to enable the European neutrino astronomy community to prepare for the timely and cost-effective construction of the next- generation neutrino telescope Why we need it now: “... both in view of the size of the enterprise and of a timely competition with IceCube, the Committee finds it urgent that a single coherent collaboration be formed,...” Recommendation from ApPEC peer review meeting, Amsterdam, 3-4 July 2003

U. Katz, ApPEC Munich12 Present and Future of Neutrino Telescopes Lake Baikal demonstrated the concept of water Cherenkov neutrino telescopes ANTARES, NESTOR first data from prototype installations NEMO R&D towards km 3 neutrino telescope AMANDA data taking IceCube km 3 project; under construction Fresh water Salt water Ice The Mediterranean Sea offers optimal conditions water quality, depth, temperature,... existing infrastructure current expertise for sea water  telescopes concentrated in European countries a perfect stage for a large Europe-led science project Common effort needed to realise a future km 3  telescope in the Mediterranean Sea operated and constructed by an international collaboration

Physics Perspectives of KM3NeT HENAP Report to PaNAGIC, July 2002: “The observation of cosmic neutrinos above 100 GeV is of great scientific importance....“ “... a km 3 -scale detector in the Northern hemisphere should be built to complement the IceCube detector being constructed at the South Pole.” “The detectors should be of km 3 -scale, the construction of which is considered technically feasible.”

U. Katz, ApPEC Munich14 Scientific Goals of KM3NeT Astronomy via high-energy neutrino observation –Production mechanisms of high-energy neutrinos in the universe (acceleration mechanisms, top-down scenarios,... ) –Investigation of the nature of astrophysical objects –Origin of cosmic rays Indirect search for dark matter Associated science

U. Katz, ApPEC Munich15 Point Sources Allows for association of neutrino flux to specific astrophysical objects Energy spectrum, time structure and combination with multi-messenger observations provides insight into physical processes inside source Profits from very good angular resolution of water Cherenkov telescopes GRBs, if simultaneously observed by space-based experiments, allow for lower thresholds and larger efficiency

U. Katz, ApPEC Munich16 Sky Observable by Neutrino Telescopes (Region of sky seen in galactic coordinates assuming 100% efficiency for 2  down) Not seen Mkn 501 Mkn 421 CRAB SS433 Mkn 501 GX339-4 SS433 CRAB VELA Galactic Centre Need Neutrino Telescopes in both hemispheres to see whole sky South PoleMediterranean

U. Katz, ApPEC Munich17 Point Sources - Sensitivities Ch. Spiering, astro-ph/ MACRO + SK + AMANDA-B10 AMANDA AMANDA + IceCube + ANTARES + NESTOR IceCube + KM3NeT

U. Katz, ApPEC Munich18 Diffuse Flux Energy spectrum will provide important constraints on models of particle acceleration and energy budget at cosmological scales Present theoretical upper limits are at the edge of current experiments’ sensitivities => Precise flux measurement needs km 3 -scale detector Accessible energy range limited by atmospheric neutrino flux (~10 5 GeV) and detector size (~10 8 GeV) Measurements at these energies require sensitivity for neutrinos from above due to opacity of Earth Cosmic neutrinos arrive in democratic flavour mix Sensitivity to e,  and NC reactions important

U. Katz, ApPEC Munich19 Dark Matter Neutrinos produced in co-annihilation of WIMPs gravitationally trapped in Earth, Sun or Galactic Centre provide sensitivity of telescopes to Dark Matter May solve long-standing questions of both particle- and astrophysics KM3NeT will observe Galactic Centre => exciting prospects

U. Katz, ApPEC Munich20 Dark Matter - Sensitivity WIMP mass = upper limit of Neutrino energy spectrum Detection requires sensitivity at low energies KM3NeT scenario: maximise efficiency in direction of potential signal sources Results complementary to direct searches Future direct detection experiments (10 -9 pb at best mass). J. Edsjö, HENA workshop 2003 Paris

U. Katz, ApPEC Munich21 Additional Topics Particle physics (flavour oscillations, cross sections) Top-down scenarios Magnetic monopoles The Unexpected

Status of Current Deep-Sea Projects 3 ongoing projects 2 detectors (ANTARES, NESTOR) and 1 prototype (NEMO) under construction – different technologies – will provide feasibility proof 3 possible sites identified and being further explored Existing installations can provide test bed for future R&D activities

U. Katz, ApPEC Munich23 ANTARES - Layout String based detector Underwater connections by deep-sea submarine Downward looking PM axis at 45 O to vertical 2400 m deep

U. Katz, ApPEC Munich24 ANTARES - Status

U. Katz, ApPEC Munich25 ANTARES - Results Junction box successfully deployed and continuously operating for over 11 months in stable condition Detector line and instrumentation line successfully deployed, connected and recovered Data taking over 5 months (rate monitoring and environmental data) Important conclusions for future detector operation; analysis is ongoing Problems (timing signal, water leak) prohibited data taking at ns precision => no muons reconstructed ( modest design modifications will avoid these failures)

U. Katz, ApPEC Munich26 ANTARES - Rates Strong variability of bioluminescence rates

U. Katz, ApPEC Munich27 NESTOR - Layout Tower based detector (titanium structures) Dry connections (recover - connect - re-deploy) Up- and downward looking PMs 4000 m deep

U. Katz, ApPEC Munich28 NESTOR - Status January 2002: deployment of LAERTIS at 4200 m depth; successfully taking of environmental data March 2003: deployment of first prototype floor (reduced size) Acquisition of > 5 million event triggers; data taking suspended due to cable problems Muon tracks identified and reconstructed

U. Katz, ApPEC Munich29 NESTOR - Results Muons identified and reconstructed Preview CERN Courier Nov. 2003

U. Katz, ApPEC Munich30 The NEMO Project Extensive site exploration (Capo Passero near Catania, depth 3340 m) R&D towards km 3 : architecture, mechanical structures, readout, electronics, cables arms per tower, 20 m arm length, arms 40 m apart 64 PMs per tower Underwater connections Up- and down-looking PMs

U. Katz, ApPEC Munich31 The NEMO Project NEMO test site approved and funded (depth 2000 m)

U. Katz, ApPEC Munich32 NEMO - Composite Junction Box

U. Katz, ApPEC Munich33 Towards a Collaboration Cooperation ANTARES-NEMO: –majority of NEMO institutes participating in ANTARES –common site-exploration campaigns KM3NeT project group (ANTARES, NEMO, NESTOR): –4 meetings of KM3NeT coordination group (first meeting in January 2003, Munich) –agreement to proceed with the KM3NeT in a common coordinated effort VLV T Workshop Amsterdam, Oct Next steps: –formalise collaboration –writing of the Design Study proposal

Objectives and Scope of the KM3NeT Design Study Establish path from current projects to KM3NeT critical review of current technical solutions thorough tests of new developments assessment of quality control and assurance explore and establish possible cooperation with industry envisaged time scale of design, construction and operation poses stringent conditions

U. Katz, ApPEC Munich35 Design Study Target Values (i) Detection principle: water Cherenkov Location in Europe: in the Mediterranean Sea Detection view: maximal angular acceptance for all possible detectable neutrino signals including down-going neutrinos at VHE Angular resolution: close to the intrinsic resolution ( ~ 10 TeV) Detection volume: 1 km 3, expandable

U. Katz, ApPEC Munich36 Design Study Target Values (ii) Lower energy threshold: a few 100 GeV for upward going neutrinos with possibility to go lower for from known point sources Energy reconstruction: within factor of 2 for muon events Reaction types: all neutrino flavours Duty cycle: close to 100% Operational lifetime: >= 10 years But these parameters need optimisation !

U. Katz, ApPEC Munich37 Technical Design of the Telescope Cost-effectiveness: <~ 200 MEuro per km 3 Architecture: strings vs. rigid towers vs. flexible towers vs. new solutions Photo detectors Mechanical solutions Readout: electronics, data acquisition, data transport Calibration and slow control Cables and connectors: dry vs. wet Simulations: design optimisation and assessment; impact of environmental conditions

U. Katz, ApPEC Munich38 Production and Assembly Detailed assembly procedures Distributed production lines Evaluation of logistics needs Quality control and assurance model Construction of the telescope within 5 years after end of the Design Study

U. Katz, ApPEC Munich39 Installation and Maintenance Deployment: fast procedures; parallelisation of operations Shore infrastructure: supply units; on-shore computing; internet connection Maintenance: flexible, low-cost access to sea- operation equipment; rapid recovery procedures; cost-effective repair options

U. Katz, ApPEC Munich40 Exploitation Model Reconstructed data will be made available to the whole community Observation of specific objects with increased sensitivity will be offered (dedicated adjustment of filter algorithms) Close relation to space-based observatories will be established (alerts for GRBs, Supernovae etc.) “Plug-and-play” solutions for detectors of associated sciences Goal: facility exploited in multi-user and interdisciplinary environment

U. Katz, ApPEC Munich41 Operation Model Maintenance centre for detector components (closely related to sea-operation base) Computer facilities allowing for external operation and control Data storage and distribution (relation to GRID?) Software development and maintenance, in particular for on-line filter Goal: centralised services for tasks exceeding the capacity of single institutes

U. Katz, ApPEC Munich42 Funding and Governance Invite and coordinate world-wide participation Explore national, European and regional funding sources Assess and study models for contractual structures Address legal questions related to the international structure and in particular to a possible detector deployment in international waters Goal: establish legal foundation for the project

U. Katz, ApPEC Munich43 Work Packages WP1: coordination and project management WP2: science (physics, simulation, architecture and calibration) WP3: industry (materials, power, cables, connectors, photo detectors) WP4: technology (signal detection and transmission, digitization, data processing and distribution) WP5:quality assurance (new!) WP6: infrastructure (deployment and recovery base, shore station, European data network, European science network) WP7: associated sciences WP8: governance, legal and funding aspects

U. Katz, ApPEC Munich44 Why us, why now, why an FP6 Design Study? The KM3NeT group comprises the current expertise for design, construction and operation of sea-water Cherenkov neutrino telescopes The KM3NeT project aims at achieving the timely construction of a km 3 -scale telescope in the Northern hemisphere Extensive preparatory studies required for KM3NeT with substantial need for manpower and investments. An FP6 Design Study offers the chance to pursue a common European effort.

U. Katz, ApPEC Munich45 Requested Funding Detailed evaluation of financial needs still ongoing Estimated overall budget of Design Study of the order 15 MEuro. Amount requested from EU: MEuro over 3 years

Time Schedule of KM3NeT  Experience from current first generation water neutrino telescopes is a solid basis for the design of the KM3NeT detector  interest fades away if KM3NeT comes much later than IceCube (ready by 2010) Time scale given by "community lifetime" and competition with ice detector Initiative for km 3 water detector has to be consolidated now

U. Katz, ApPEC Munich47 KM3NeT Milestones

Associated Sciences Great interest in long term deep-sea measurements in many different scientific communities: – Biology – Oceanography – Environmental sciences – Geology and geophysics –... Communication with ESONET established Plan: include the associated science communities in the design phase to understand and react to their needs

Management, Political Issues and Status of Proposal Preparation Writing group for Design Study proposal established Assembly of institution representatives as major decision body Administrational and legal support by Erlangen University Target for complete application draft: Jan. 2004

Summarising Remarks Exciting physics perspectives of neutrino telescopes A km 3 -scale telescope in the Northern hemisphere is needed to complement IceCube in sky-coverage and to exploit the full potential of neutrino astronomy The Mediterranean offers optimal conditions. The current expertise in water Cherenkov neutrino telescopes is united in Europe The European groups have agreed on a common coordinated effort towards KM3NeT This effort has to be consolidated now in order to achieve a timely construction of the detector. An FP6 Design Study offers optimal conditions to proceed Let’s Go For It !

Discussion (i) Comment: The mentioned point sources are probably not good candidates for sources of high-energy neutrinos. Answer U.Katz: These sources are examples representing models that were assumed to be promising at some point. However, there is a large variety of models predicting neutrino fluxes from different kinds of point sources that will be well in the sensitivity of KM3NeT. Comment: No sensitivity of KM3NeT to top-down scenarios due to high neutrino energy Answer U.Katz: Shows plot with a possible top-down scenario (last transparency of this file: thick red curve) with expected sensitivity of IceCube and emphasises that KM3NeT may have even higher sensitivity.

Discussion (ii) Question: Is there enough manpower for the KM3NeT Design Study in view of the commitments for the ongoing construction of the current neutrino telescopes? Answer U.Katz: Additional manpower is one of the main objectives of the requested funding. Comment J.Carr: After the start of mass production of ANTARES components in 2004 manpower for development tasks becomes available. Comment I.Siotis: The new project attracts a lot of young scientists. In case of the successful start of KM3NeT NESTOR could stop at 4 floors instead of heading for the full 12-floor tower, thus making additional manpower available.

Top-Down Scenarios - Signal fluxes G. Sigl, HENA workshop 2003 Paris