MiniBooNE Michel Sorel (Valencia U.) for the MiniBooNE Collaboration TAUP Conference September 2005 Zaragoza (Spain)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Neutrinos from kaon decay in MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn Columbia University MiniBooNE beamline overview Kaon flux predictions Kaon measurements in MiniBooNE.
Advertisements

CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
HARP Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) K2K Neutrino CH Meeting Neuchâtel, June 21-22, 2004.
Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
Measurement of the off-axis NuMI beam with MiniBooNE Zelimir Djurcic Columbia University Zelimir Djurcic Columbia University Outline of this Presentation.
05/31/2007Teppei Katori, Indiana University, NuInt '07 1 Charged Current Interaction measurements in MiniBooNE hep-ex/XXX Teppei Katori for the MiniBooNE.
New results from the CHORUS Neutrino Oscillation Experiment Pasquale Migliozzi CERN XXIX International Conference on High Energy Physics UBC, Vancouver,
MiniBooNE: (Anti)Neutrino Appearance and Disappeareance Results SUSY11 01 Sep, 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL 1.
H. Ray, University of Florida1 MINIBOONE  e e .
MINERvA Overview MINERvA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: – Study.
1 Measurement of f D + via D +   + Sheldon Stone, Syracuse University  D o D o, D o  K -  + K-K- K+K+ ++  K-K- K+K+ “I charm you, by my once-commended.
A Search for Point Sources of High Energy Neutrinos with AMANDA-B10 Scott Young, for the AMANDA collaboration UC-Irvine PhD Thesis:
Liquid Scintillation Detectors for High Energy Neutrinos John G. Learned Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Hawaii See: arXiv:
F.Sanchez (UAB/IFAE)ISS Meeting, Detector Parallel Meeting. Jan 2006 Low Energy Neutrino Interactions & Near Detectors F.Sánchez Universitat Autònoma de.
Preliminary Ideas for a Near Detector at a Neutrino Factory Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting 23 September 2005 Paul Soler University of Glasgow/RAL.
The MINOS Experiment Andy Blake Cambridge University.
Energy Reconstruction Algorithms for the ANTARES Neutrino Telescope J.D. Zornoza 1, A. Romeyer 2, R. Bruijn 3 on Behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration 1.
1 BaBar Collaboration Randall Sobie Institute for Particle Physics University of Victoria.
Study of two pion channel from photoproduction on the deuteron Lewis Graham Proposal Phys 745 Class May 6, 2009.
10/24/2005Zelimir Djurcic-PANIC05-Santa Fe Zelimir Djurcic Physics Department Columbia University Backgrounds in Backgrounds in neutrino appearance signal.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
Coincidence analysis in ANTARES: Potassium-40 and muons  Brief overview of ANTARES experiment  Potassium-40 calibration technique  Adjacent floor coincidences.
MINERvA Overview MINERvA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: – Study.
HARP for MiniBooNE Linda R. Coney Columbia University DPF 2004.
Development of A Scintillation Simulation for Carleton EXO Project Rick Ueno Under supervision of Dr. Kevin Graham.
5/1/20110 SciBooNE and MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn TRIUMF For the SciBooNE and MiniBooNE collaborations A search for   disappearance with:
The Muon Neutrino Quasi-Elastic Cross Section Measurement on Plastic Scintillator Tammy Walton December 4, 2013 Hampton University Physics Group Meeting.
Results and Implications from MiniBooNE LLWI, 25 Feb 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL
Large Magnetic Calorimeters Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) in a Nufact Nufact04 (Osaka, 1/8/2004)
Calibration of the new Particle Identification Detector (PID) Tom Jude, Derek Glazier, Dan Watts.
MiniBooNE Event Reconstruction and Particle Identification Hai-Jun Yang University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (for the MiniBooNE Collaboration) DNP06, Nashville,
Teppei Katori Indiana University Rencontres de Moriond EW 2008 La Thuile, Italia, Mar., 05, 08 Neutrino cross section measurements for long-baseline neutrino.
MiniBooNE : Current Status Heather Ray Los Alamos National Lab.
MiniBooNE Cross Section Results H. Ray, University of Florida ICHEP Interactions of the future!
NESTOR SIMULATION TOOLS AND METHODS Antonis Leisos Hellenic Open University Vlvnt Workhop.
DOE Review 3/18/03Steve Brice FNALPage 1 MiniBooNE Status Steve Brice Fermilab Overview Beam – Primary Beam – Secondary Beam Detector – Calibration – Triggering.
1 Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, 2012 Workshop on Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments March 21, 2012 Fermilab David.
New Results from the Salt Phase of SNO Kathryn Miknaitis Center for Experimental Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics, Univ. of Washington For the Sudbury.
Recent results from SciBooNE and MiniBooNE experiments Žarko Pavlović Los Alamos National Laboratory Rencontres de Moriond 18 March 2011.
Mini Overview Peter Kasper NBI The MiniBooNE Collaboration University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa Bucknell University, Lewisburg University of California,
Search for Sterile Neutrino Oscillations with MiniBooNE
HARP measurements of pion yield for neutrino experiments Issei Kato (Kyoto University) for the HARP collaboration Contents: 1.HARP experiment Physics motivations.
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
1 Muon Veto System and Expected Backgrounds at Dayabay Hongshan (Kevin) Zhang, BNL DayaBay Collaboration DNP08, Oakland.
MiniBooNE MiniBooNE Motivation LSND Signal Interpreting the LSND Signal MiniBooNE Overview Experimental Setup Neutrino Events in the Detector The Oscillation.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
April 26, McGrew 1 Goals of the Near Detector Complex at T2K Clark McGrew Stony Brook University Road Map The Requirements The Technique.
Status of MiniBooNE Short Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiment Jonathan Link Columbia University International Conference on Flavor Physics October.
1 Limitations in the use of RICH counters to detect tau-neutrino appearance Tord Ekelöf /Uppsala University Roger Forty /CERN Christian Hansen This talk.
Georgie Mbianda 1 for the Baryon (E01-002) Collaboration 1 University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg Exclusive Electroproduction of π + and η mesons.
Outline: IntroJanet Event Rates Particle IdBill Backgrounds and signal Status of the first MiniBooNE Neutrino Oscillation Analysis Janet Conrad & Bill.
Results and Implications from MiniBooNE: Neutrino Oscillations and Cross Sections 15 th Lomonosov Conference, 19 Aug 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
MiniBooNE: Status and Plans Outline Physics motivation Beamline performance Detector performance First look at the data Conclusions Fernanda G. Garcia,
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
Some Thoughts on Analysis Blindness Steve Brice Ex-Analysis Coordinator for MiniBooNE.
Double Chooz Experiment Status Jelena Maricic, Drexel University (for the Double Chooz Collaboration) September, 27 th, SNAC11.
Precision Measurement of Muon Neutrino Disappearance with T2K Alex Himmel Duke University for the The T2K Collaboration 37 th International Conference.
A Measurement of the Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Ray Spectrum with the HiRes FADC Detector (HiRes-2) Andreas Zech (for the HiRes Collaboration) Rutgers University.
MINERνA Overview  MINERνA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei  Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: t Study.
R. Tayloe, Indiana University CPT '07 1 Neutrino Oscillations and and Lorentz Violation Results from MiniBooNE Outline: - LSND - signal for oscillations.
EPS HEP 2007 M. Sorel – IFIC (Valencia U. & CSIC)1 MiniBooNE, Part 2: First Results of the Muon-To-Electron Neutrino Oscillation Search M. Sorel (IFIC.
R. Tayloe, Indiana U. DNP06 1 A Search for  → e oscillations with MiniBooNE MiniBooNE does not yet have a result for the  → e oscillation search. The.
Neutrino-Nucleon Neutral Current Elastic Interactions in MiniBooNE Denis Perevalov University of Alabama for the MiniBooNE collaboration presented by:
5/31/2006Fermilab Users Meeting1 Zelimir Djurcic Physics Department Columbia University MiniBooNE, NO A, MINER A.
Systematics Sanghoon Jeon.
The MiniBooNE Little Muon Counter Detector
08/27/04 Strategies for the search for prompt muons in the downgoing
Impact of neutrino interaction uncertainties in T2K
Presentation transcript:

MiniBooNE Michel Sorel (Valencia U.) for the MiniBooNE Collaboration TAUP Conference September 2005 Zaragoza (Spain)

M. Sorel (Valencia U.)2 LSND Result MiniBooNE goal: confirm or refute the LSND evidence in a definitive and independent way, with ● Different systematics ● Higher statistics LSND Result: If interpreted in terms of oscillations: L/E distribution of the excess agrees well with oscillation hypothesis: ● Backgrounds in red, green ● Fit to oscillation signal in blue

M. Sorel (Valencia U.)3 Booster Beamline Target and Horn Decay Region 450 m Dirt MiniBooNE Detector Beam Secondary Beam: mesons are produced from protons striking Be target, focused by horn, and monitored by “Little Muon Counters” (LMC) Neutrino Beam: neutrinos from meson decay in 50m pipe, pass through 450m of dirt (and oscillate?) to reach MiniBooNE detector Primary Beam Secondary Beam Neutrino Beam (protons) (mesons)

M. Sorel (Valencia U.)4 Detector Inner Region Outer Region 12 m in diameter sphere filled with 800 t of undoped mineral oil Light tight inner region with 1280, 20 cm diam., PMTs (10% coverage) 240 PMTs in veto region (>99.9% veto efficiency) Neutrino interactions in oil produce: ● Prompt, ring-distributed, Cerenkov light ● Delayed, isotropic, scintillation light Light transmission affected by: fluorescence, scattering, absorption

M. Sorel (Valencia U.)5 Reconstruction and PID Measure photoelectrons from optical photons reaching the PMT surface: ● Total charge ● Spatial distribution ● Time distribution Event Reconstruction: ● Correlated electrons from muon decays ● Neutrino interaction vertex ● Direction, spatial extent, and energy of Cerenkov tracks ● Separate amounts of Cerenkov and scintillation light ● For CCQE, full event kinematics: Particle ID: Low-energy Electron Muon

M. Sorel (Valencia U.)6 Calibration Samples Laser calibration sample: prompt, isotropic light source PMT hit reconstruction: PMT time/charge resolution, pre/afterpulsing Oil optical properties: absorption, surface reflections, scattering Muon calibration sample: cosmic rays through tracker, and stopping in scintillation cubes Muons of known direction, decay vertex, pathlength, deposited energy up to 700 MeV Electron calibration sample: Michel electrons from muon decays at rest Known energy spectrum between 0 and 52.3 MeV Energy reconstruction accuracy at 52.3 MeV: 14%

M. Sorel (Valencia U.)7 Muon-to-Electron Neutrino Oscillation Analysis Reconstruction and nue-CCQE Cuts Compare Predicted nues Measured nues Oscillation Result Osc. Analysis Flow MC tuning / algorithms optimization process Will now give a flavour of ongoing MC tuning / algorithms optimization process, necessary for oscillation results

M. Sorel (Valencia U.)8 Neutrino Flux Tool is GEANT4 description of the beamline, simulating: ● Primary protons, geometry, materials and horn B-field ● Interactions, focusing, decays of baryons, mesons, muons Overall muon neutrino flux normalization, and electron neutrino flux component from muon decay, tuned on MiniBooNE CCQE neutrino data Electron neutrino flux component from kaon decay will be tuned on MiniBooNE LMC monitoring data and high-energy CCQE neutrino data Pion/kaon production data on beryllium is the most important external physics input to the simulation BNL E910 pion production data at 12.3 GeV/c CERN HARP pion production data to be used soon! See A. Guglielmi's talk, this session

M. Sorel (Valencia U.)9 Neutrino Interactions Tool is NUANCE cross-section generator, simulating all relevant elastic, resonant, and coherent neutrino processes, including detailed treatment of Carbon nuclear effects: External constraints used in the simulation: ● Free nucleon cross-sections from neutrino data ● Nuclear model from electron data ● Final state interactions from pion/proton scattering data Major background for oscillation search: NCPi0 events where Pi0 is misidentified as electron Resonant and coherent NCPi0 cross-sections will be tuned on the MiniBooNE NCPi0 data sample

M. Sorel (Valencia U.)10 Detector Response Tool is GEANT3 description of the detector and calibration devices, with detailed simulation of: ● Optical model: light production and transmission mechanisms in MiniBooNE mineral oil ● PMT charge/time response Tabletop measurements constraining critical optical model parameters: ● Time-resolved fluorescence ● Rayleigh/Raman scattering ● Light attenuation.vs. wavelength Overall tuning accomplished with MiniBooNE calibration data: ● Total PMT charge distribution, for Michel electrons from muon decays at rest ● Angular distribution of detected light, for cosmic ray muons of known direction photo n  Cerenkov cone

M. Sorel (Valencia U.)11 Reconstruction and PID Various algorithms (MLL, ANN, BDT) used to optimize reconstruction/PID, to achieve good: ● Reconstruction accuracy ● Robustness ● Efficiency of PID separation Reconstruction accuracy example: ~10% resolution on neutrino energy reconstruction, predicted for muon neutrino CCQE interactions, for algorithm chosen for oscillation analysis Efficiency of PID separation example: muon / low-energy electron identification, measured with cosmic ray muons and associated decay electrons, for two PID algorithms under study Muons Electrons PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY

M. Sorel (Valencia U.)12 Oscillation Sensitivity ~300 events

M. Sorel (Valencia U.)13 Conclusions Basic ingredients for MiniBooNE muon-to-electron neutrino oscillation analysis are already in place: A fully calibrated detector Over 0.6 million neutrino interactions detected Well-tested Monte Carlo and reconstruction tools Understanding of key analysis issues The devil is in the details. Ongoing efforts on: Fine-tuning of MC and reconstruction/PID tools, for best possible performance and accurate predictions Evaluating and reducing systematic uncertainties Devising consistency checks and increase analysis robustness The MiniBooNE electron neutrino appearance analysis is a blind analysis Oscillation results will be published shortly after the box will be opened Current estimate is not before the end of 2005 First oscillation results should address LSND signal in a defnitive way Similar timescales for neutrino cross-section results (NCPi0, CCPi+) Schedule: