USPTO Updated Strategic Plan in Brief March 3 rd, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 13: Organizational Innovation and Change
Advertisements

The Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences AIPLA S PRING M EETING 2012 James Donald Smith Chief Administrative Patent Judge Board of Patent Appeals.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
FY2016 Budget Priorities Goal 1: High Quality Instruction Evaluate instructional initiatives and align funding to deliver a rigorous, relevant instructional.
1 The Community College of Baltimore County. G RANTS C OMPLIANCE What is grants compliance? Adopting and consistently applying systematic procedures to.
VIEWS ON THE NEW INTERNATIONAL PRELIMINARY REPORT ON PATENTABILITY PROCEDURE (“MERGER OF PCT CHAPTERS I AND II”): ADVANTAGES, PROBLEMS AND FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES.
Wireline Competition Bureau 2004 Promoting Real Consumer Choice and Investment in Broadband Facilities.
PROSECUTION APPEALS Presented at: Webb & Co. Rehovot, Israel Date: February 14, 2013 Presented by: Roy D. Gross Associate St. Onge Steward Johnston & Reens.
1 Clearing the Oldest Patent Applications (COPA) John Barlow Subject Matter Expert Technology Center 2800.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Modifications to the USPTO Count System Sponsored by the Chartered Institute of Patent.
July 8, Enhanced Examination Timing Control Robert A. Clarke Deputy Director Office of Patent Legal Administration
John J. Calvert Administrator, Inventor Assistance Program John J. Calvert Administrator, Inventor Assistance Program Patents – Past, Present and Future.
© 3M All Rights Reserved. July 20, 2010 Response to USPTO Request for Public Comment on Enhanced Examination Timing Control Initiative.
THE USPTO 21 ST CENTURY STRATEGIC PLAN – A BRIEF REVIEW AND UPDATE RICK D. NYDEGGER PRESIDENT-ELECT AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW ASSOCIATION NICE,
1 Introduction to Workforce Planning and Development in State of Alaska Executive Branch Departments.
Application Filings and Examiner Production. UPR Applications Filed
The United States Patent and Trademark Office March 15, 2005 BCP Customer Partnership Meeting.
THE STATE OF THE PATENT SYSTEM BACKGROUND FOR RULE PROPOSALS Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association “Washington and the West” Conference January.
The United States Patent and Trademark Office July 19, 2005 The National Association of Patent Practitioners 2005 Patent Practice Update.
Boston Patent Law Association Joseph Rolla – Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy.
USPTO Implementation of the America Invents Act Teresa Stanek Rea Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Deputy Director of the.
Procurement Transformation State of North Carolina
Strategic Management of Human Capital Workforce Planning & Deployment Summary FOREIGN AGRICULTURAL SERVICE Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services FY
INDEPENDENT REGULATORY BOARD FOR AUDITORS Bernard Agulhas Chief Executive Officer 1 Select Committee on Finance 20 June 2012.
David S. Langdon Senior Economist U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration Intellectual Property and the U.S. Economy: Industries.
United States Army Freedom of Information Act (Freedom of Information Act Managerial Training)
The Role of Workforce Planning in Reorienting SSA’s Disability Determination Process Carol Dawn Petersen, Assistant Director Education, Workforce and Income.
1 Improving Federal Rights-of-Way Management to Spur Broadband Deployment Meredith Attwell Senior Advisor to the Assistant Secretary National Telecommunications.
Customer Partnership Meeting John Doll Commissioner for Patents.
11 IP Section Colorado Bar Association Robert Stoll Commissioner for Patents United States Patent and Trademark Office.
1 Patent Quality Initiatives Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Tuesday, April 7, 2015 Valencia Martin-Wallace Deputy Commissioner.
1 5 Year Financial Plan : 2008 – 2012 Presentation to Senate by Hollie Clarkson Acting Chief Finance Officer Wednesday 9 April 2008.
Quality Counts!! GOAL “Provide our customers with the highest levels of quality and service in all aspects of PTO operations”
Preparing a Provisional Patent Application Hay Yeung Cheung, Ph.D. Myers Wolin, LLC March 16, 2013 Trenton Computer Festival 1.
1 Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership June 1, 2010 Valencia Martin-Wallace – Director, Technology Center 2400.
1 1 AIPLA American Intellectual Property Law Association Updates on the USPTO Chris Fildes AIPLA-JPAA Joint Meeting April 9, 2013.
1 Reduction to our parliamentary appropriations Our challenge doesn’t end there.
Slide 1© 2003 By Default! Knowledge-Based Economic Development: World Bank Strategy for Achieving Global Competitiveness Khaled F. Sherif, Sector Manager.
1 IP Infrastructure for Promotion of Work Sharing - Japan’s Perspective - Koichi MINAMI Deputy Commissioner Japan Patent Office WIPO Global Symposium of.
20th November 2009 National Policy Dialogue 1 Role of State in a Developing Market Economy S.B. Likwelile.
Concern Universal Vacancy Director of Income Generation and Communications.
ACADEMIC REORGANIZATION: THOUGHTS ON A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK & TIMELINE ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY March 23, 2010.
Christian Chace Patent Process Reengineering Team September 8, 2010 Patent Process Reengineering Team as part of the Patent End-To-End Processing Team.
111 Teresa Stanek Rea Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
OCFO - Financial Status of USPTO May 7, FY 2010 Status Authorized level of $1,887.0 million Mid-year Budget Execution Review currently underway.
Progress Update- August IDENTITY Solidify UME’s identity as the provider of excellent research-based educational programs in defined priority areas.
Patent Fee Proposal Patent Public Advisory Committee Hearing November 19, 2015.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
The Implementation of BPR Pertemuan 9 Matakuliah: M0734-Business Process Reenginering Tahun: 2010.
Copyright © 2015 Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP Inside the USPTO Peggy Focarino Senior Patent Advisor.
FY 2010 and FY 2011 Budget and Fee Collection Update March 3, 2010.
FY 2010 and FY 2011 USPTO Financial Report Trademark Public Advisory Committee Meeting February 25, 2010.
1. Video Conference Interviews 2 Sean Hagan Director of the Midwest Regional United States Patent and Trademark Office Webinar for Knobbe Martens January.
The United States Patent and Trademark Office January 27, 2005.
1 Smart and innovative solutions to increase productivity and enhance the quality of government services.
Talent Acquisition, Staffing, Recruitment, Executive Search.
OFFICE OF INNOVATION & TECHNOLOGY CITY OF PHILADELPHIA Innovation & Technology Status Update Adel W. EbeidCity of Philadelphia, Office of Innovation &
CCSF – Citywide IT Plan Current State Assessment December 18 th, 2008 Craig Holt, Consulting Director.
Portfolio Committee 14 March 2006
Final Rule: At-a-Glance
FOREIGN AGRICULTURAL SERVICE Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services
General Services Department
SMITH-LEAHY AMERICA INVENTS ACT
North Iowa Community Action
Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association
South Seattle Community College
TAB T Research Update Academic Strategies Committee Meeting January 17, 2019 Prepared by Office of Research Irem Y. Tumer, Interim Vice President for.
The National Association of Patent Practitioners (NAPP)
Presentation transcript:

USPTO Updated Strategic Plan in Brief March 3 rd, 2010

2 USPTO Strategic Priorities The USPTO has identified strategic priorities that are in support of the Administration/Department performance goal. These include: Reduce Patent Pendency and Backlogs Improve Quality of Examination Improve/Enhance Patent Appeal and Post-Grant Processes Demonstrate Global Leadership in all Aspects of IP Policy Development Improve Information Technology Infrastructure and Tools Secure a Sustainable Funding Model, and Improve Relations with Stakeholders

33 3 Aggressive Pendency Reduction Goals 2009 Examiner Hiring = 600 Maximum OT + Efficiency Gains + Examiner Hiring = 1000 (2011/12) Maximum OT + + First Review 25.8 months Time Patent Pending 34.6 months 24.4 months FA pendency 25.6 months Pending 34.4 months month total pendency First Filed in U.S. First Review 10.7 months 2013 FY 2010FY 2011/12/13

4 USPTO Actions To Reach Pendency/Backlog Goals by 2013  Patent Goals  10 months to first action and 20 months total pendency for patent applications; inventory reduction of 326,000 cases  Achieve targeted inventory level per examiner of 10 months  Short/Long Term Plan Components*  Efficiency Improvements  Examination Firepower  Develop and deploy 21 st Century IT System that permits end-to-end electronic processing *Fee setting authority is critical to achieve success

5 Increase Examination Capacity  Hiring 1,000 patent examiners in each of FY 2011 and 2012  Initiating a New Hiring Model that emphasizes:  Recruiting candidates with significant IP experience (IP professionals, such as agents and attorneys, and technologists with invention experience)  Hiring outside the Washington, D.C. area  Implemented/In Process:  Hiring, including rehires and IP specialists—replacing current attrits with experienced IP professionals  Turn On Limited Overtime  Shorten training period for hires  Align performance plans and awards with Agency goals  PCT contractor outsourcing/assists  Resources back to TCs  Under Development:  Accelerated signatory program  Nationwide workforce  Information technology upgrades

6 Efficiency Improvements – Patent Prosecution  Achieving efficiency improvements of 3 percent a year by reengineering management and operations systems and processes; for example  Implemented/In Process:  Compact prosecution initiatives – interview, prosecution, and claim interpretation; statistical analysis to target areas for improvement  Revisions to the examiner count system  Internal review and changes  External study of relative complexity of patent examiner goals  Improved docket management  First Action Interview Program  Patent Prosecution Highway/Work-Sharing  Backlog reduction for small entities  Quality study to identify methods for enabling compact prosecution  Reengineering classification system  Ombudsman Program  Addressing historic ex parte appeal workload growth  Under Development:  Customized examination tracks  End-to-end electronic processing  Efficiencies in reexaminations and appeals processing Efficiency improvements targeted to yield 3% increase in office capacity

7 Develop and Deploy 21 st Century Information Technology System Funds are requested to begin working towards a new IT Vision which includes: Conducting a ground up redesign of the USPTO’s infrastructure and applications on 21st Century platforms Stabilizing current systems to “keep the trains running” This will be done by investing $122M for: Patent end-to-end electronic processing Trademark’s Next Generation Stabilize current systems

8 USPTO Sustainable Funding Model: Addressing Short Term and Long Term Needs Short Term / Interim Funding Authority - Begins putting USPTO on stable ground to set USPTO priorities in motion Full access to USPTO fee collections Interim Fee Adjustment on Patent fees Fee Setting Authority Operating Reserve Long Term / Sustainable – Reform USPTO Fee Structure and manage multi-year plans Establish fees that reflect costs of services Structure fees to provide appropriate incentives for innovation Structure fees to facilitate the effective administration of patent and trademark processes Maintain Operating Reserve