JANUARY 6, 2014 VERNA THOMPSON Delaware 619 Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preschool Special Education A Review of State Performance Indicators and The Child Outreach Network.
Advertisements

1 Early Childhood Outcomes: Early ACCESS and Early Childhood Special Education Presented by: Dee Gethmann Iowa Department of Education October 2006
Data, Now What? Skills for Analyzing and Interpreting Data
Students in Private School Placed by Their Parents Developed by Contra Costa SELPA
Building a national system to measure child and family outcomes from early intervention Early Childhood Outcomes Center International Society on Early.
Indicator 7 Child Outcomes MAKING SENSE OF THE DATA June
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 1 Virginia’s System for Determination of Child Progress (VSDCP)
Early Childhood Transition Presenters: Kimberly Mitchell Ginger Sheppard Jessica Spataro NOVEMBER 2011.
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.
Presented at: Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA - November 3, 2011 Performance Management in Action: A National System.
Update on Child Outcomes for Early Childhood Special Education Lynne Kahn ECO at UNC The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center The National Association.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 The Results are In: Using Early Childhood Outcome Data.
Early Childhood Outcomes ECO Institute Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Robin Rooney ECO at FPG Prepared for the Office of Early Learning and School Readiness.
1 Measuring Child Outcomes: State of the Nation. 2 Learning objective: To gain new information about the national picture regarding measuring child outcomes.
CHILD OUTCOMES BASELINE AND TARGETS FOR INDICATOR 7 ON THE STATE PERFORMANCE PLAN State Advisory Panel for Exceptional Children November 12, 2009 January.
The Results are In: Using Early Childhood Outcome Data Kathy Hebbeler Early Childhood Outcomes Center at SRI International August, 2011.
Presented at Division for Early Childhood National Harbor, Maryland November, Child Outcomes: What We Are Learning from National, State, and Local.
Updates on APR Reporting for Early Childhood Outcomes (Indicators C-3 and B-7) Western Regional Resource Center APR Clinic 2010 November 1-3, 2010 San.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form February 2007.
1 The Maryland Early Childhood Accountability System Program Effectiveness Based on Results for Children Maryland State Department of Education Division.
The Current Status of States' Early Childhood Outcome Measurement Systems Kathy Hebbeler, SRI International Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst October 17,
1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)
Partnering with Local Programs to Interpret and Use Outcomes Data Delaware’s Part B 619 Program September 20, 2011 Verna Thompson & Tony Ruggiero Delaware.
Target Setting For Indicator #7 Child Outcomes WDPI Stakeholder Group December 16, 2009 Ruth Chvojicek Statewide Child Outcomes Coordinator 1 OSEP Child.
Erin Arango-Escalante & Sandra Parker. EC Indicators At-a-Glance.
Child Outcomes Data Analysis Workshop Abby Winer, ECTA, DaSy Kathy Hebbeler, ECTA, DaSy Kathi Gillaspy, ECTA, DaSy September 8, 2014 Improving Data, Improving.
1 Early Childhood and Accountability OSEP’s Project Director’s Meeting August 2006.
Noel Cole, Coordinator Michigan Department of Education, Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services.
SPP Indicators B-7 and B-8: Overview and Results to Date for the Florida Prekindergarten Program for Children with Disabilities PreK Coordinators Meeting.
Preparing the Next Generation of Professionals to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Early Intervention and Preschool Special Education Lynne Kahn Kathy.
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Results of FFY 2007 Monitoring Indicators For The Annual Performance Report & State Performance Plan.
UNDERSTANDING THE THREE CHILD OUTCOMES 1 Maryland State Department of Education - Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services.
Early Childhood Education for ALL Young Children: A Look at the IDEA Six-Year State Performance Plan Susan Crowther IDEA, Part B, Section 619 Coordinator.
Title IA Coordinator Tutorial Preschool Transition
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
Overview to Measuring Early Childhood Outcomes Ruth Littlefield, NH Department of Education Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst November 16,
1 Measuring Child Outcomes: State of the Nation. 2 Learning objective: To gain new information about the national picture regarding measuring child outcomes.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
2012 OSEP Leadership Conference Leading Together to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career Child Outcomes for Early Intervention and Preschool Special Education:
Delaware Child Outcomes Part C and 619 Collaboration Measuring Child and Family Outcomes July 30, 2010 Arlington, Virginia.
Understanding and Using Early Childhood Outcome (ECO) Data for Program Improvement Kansas Division for Early Childhood Annual Conference Feb. 23rd 2012.
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619 Measurement of Preschool Outcomes-SPP Indicator #7 Training Sessions-2010.
Understanding and Using Early Childhood Outcome (ECO) Data for Program Improvement TASN – KITS Fall 2012 Webinar August 31 st, 2012 Tiffany Smith Phoebe.
1 Indicator 7 Child Outcomes: Changes & Updates June 2011 Indicator 7 Child Outcomes: Changes & Updates June 2011.
Presented at ECEA-SCASS Meeting Savannah, Georgia October, 2010 OSEP Initiatives on Early Childhood Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
School for Early Development and Achievement Kim Johnsen SPE 644.
Indicator 7: Measuring Preschool Outcomes Sarah Geldart – MA ESE – Additional Contact:
KETTLE MORAINE (KM) SCHOOL DISTRICT: Ryan Meyer.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Why Collect Outcome Data? Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
Considerations Related to Setting Targets for Child Outcomes.
Building State Systems to Produce Quality Data on Child Outcomes Jim J. Lesko Director, Early Development and Learning Resources Delaware Department of.
Measuring EC Outcomes DEC Conference Presentation 2010 Cornelia Taylor, ECO Christina Kasprzak, ECO/NECTAC Lisa Backer, MN DOE 1.
Early Childhood Outcomes Trying to Get The Word Out Maria Synodi, 619 Coordinator Connecticut State Department of Education NECTAC National TA Meeting.
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
Incorporating Early Childhood into Longitudinal Data Systems:
Appleton Area School District
Early Childhood Outcomes Data (Indicator C3 and B7)
Integrating Outcomes Learning Community Call February 8, 2012
Building State Systems to Produce Quality Data on Child Outcomes
Why Collect Outcome Data?
Building Capacity to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Systems and Practices 2018 DEC Conference.
Early Childhood and Family Outcomes
ECO Suggestions on Indicators C3 and B7 Kathy Hebbeler, ECO
ECO Suggestions on Indicators C3 and B7 Kathy Hebbeler, ECO
Measuring EC Outcomes DEC Conference Presentation 2010
Measuring Part C and Early Childhood Special Education Child Outcomes
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008
Early Childhood Outcomes Data (Indicator C3 and B7)
Presentation transcript:

JANUARY 6, 2014 VERNA THOMPSON Delaware 619 Meeting

Agenda Welcome and Introductions Child Outcomes Annual Performance Report 619 Participation in Delaware Stars Memorandums of Understanding Important Dates

Welcome and Introductions Happy New Year Thank you for sharing time together! Introductions and sharing What is your New Year’s Resolution for 619?

Child Outcomes 2012 Indicator 7: Percent of preschool children with IEPs who demonstrate improved: Positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships); Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communication and early literacy; and Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs.

Child Outcomes Percent of preschool children who did not improve functioning = [(# of preschool children who did not improve functioning) divided by the (# of preschool children with IEPs assessed)] times 100. Percent of preschool children who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of preschool children who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-aged peers) divided by the (# of preschool children with IEPs assessed)] times 100. Percent of preschool children who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it = [(# of preschool children who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it) divided by the (# of preschool children with IEPs assessed)] times 100. Percent of preschool children who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of preschool children who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers) divided by the (# of preschool children with IEPs assessed)] times 100. Percent of preschool children who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of preschool children who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers) divided by the (# of preschool children with IEPs assessed) times 100.

Child Outcomes Summary Statements: Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations, the percent who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they exited the program. The percent of children who were functioning within age expectations by the time they exited the program.

Child Outcomes 2012

A.Positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships): FFY 2012 Number of children FFY 2012 % of children a.Percent of children who did not improve functioning 5 0.6% b.Percent of children who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same- aged peers % c.Percent of children who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach % d.Percent of children who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers % e.Percent of children who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers % TotalN=809100%

Child Outcomes 2012 A.Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communication and early literacy): FFY 2012 Number of children FFY 2012 % of children a.Percent of children who did not improve functioning81.0% b.Percent of children who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-aged peers % c.Percent of children who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach % d.Percent of children who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers % e.Percent of children who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers % Total N= %

Child Outcomes 2012 C.Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs: FFY 2012 Number of children FFY 2012 % of children a.Percent of children who did not improve functioning 50.6% b.Percent of children who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-aged peers % c.Percent of children who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach % d.Percent of children who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers % e.Percent of children who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers % TotalN=809100%

Child Outcomes Next Steps: Visits to each school district to provide:  Local Child Outcome data  Comparisons between 2011 and 2012  Comparisons between actual data and state targets  Comparisons between state and local  Analysis – data quality and program evaluation Who could be invited to meeting?  Administrators?  Teachers? Therapists?

Delaware Stars Delaware Stars Work Group  Meeting Date  January 15 th - needs to be rescheduled  February 12 th 9:00 – EIEIO in afternoon Who will be invited?  619 coordinators  DIEEC – TA, Case Managers, ECERS validator  DOE/OEL staff  Other school district program administrators? (619 only or should Title 1 and school district ECAP also?)  Others?

Delaware Stars Purpose of Work Group  Discuss successful strategies 619 programs are implementing  Determine issues related to 619 participation in Stars QRIS  Determine solutions to identified issues  Determine strategies to assist 619 program meet state targets  Determine possible recommendations for changes to policies related to 619 participation in Stars QRIS  Determine areas of support needed  Other ideas?

This agreement is entered onto by ___________ School District, _________ School District for the period beginning __________________. Purpose Statement The purpose of this agreement is to delineate responsibilities for screening, evaluation and provision of FAPE for preschool children in New Castle County. This agreement is for those services eligible for preschool children with disabilities until entry into Kindergarten. Upon entry into Kindergarten, preschool children will follow the same procedures for district of residence and Choice as do all Kindergarten children. For purposes of this agreement, districts will be defined as follows:  District of residence: District in which the child and family live  District of service : District in which the child is enrolled in a Head Start, ECAP, child care, preschool program ) {for more than _____ hours (opt)} The District of service may be the same as the district of residence or may be any of the districts that are signatory to this agreement.

MOU Between School Districts Responsibilities of _____ County School Districts. 1. District of service will be responsible for ensuring screening of preschool children who attend the Head Start, ECAP, child care or preschool facility which is within said district’s boundary. This reflects current practice. 2. For those children who are enrolled in a Head Start, ECAP, child care or preschool for more than _____ hours in a district other than the district of residence, comprehensive developmental evaluations will be the responsibility of the {district of service in which child is enrolled in child care } or {district of residence}. 3. For those families who request such, provision of FAPE will be the responsibility of the district of service in which the child is enrolled in a preschool facility (Head Start, ECAP, child care, preschool). 4. Transportation will be provided by the district of services. 5. For count purposes, children will be counted by the district of services. 6. Tuition will be paid by the district of residence to the district of service for children from tuition generating programs. 7. Early Childhood Outcomes data will be collected and reported for and by the district of services. 8. It is incumbent upon the district of service to apprise families that entry into Kindergarten will trigger the same policies and procedures which apply to all rising Kindergarten children. The rules that that govern district of residence and Choice apply to all K – 12 children. Notification of these rules that govern districts will be given to the district of service as part of the usual procedures for dissemination of Choice information. 9. By April 15, the district of service will notify the district of residence of children who will be eligible for Kindergarten the following September. Current practice for transfer of records will apply. 10. Dispute resolution procedures include: Responsibilities of _____ County School Districts. 1. District of service will be responsible for ensuring screening of preschool children who attend the Head Start, ECAP, child care or preschool facility which is within said district’s boundary. This reflects current practice. 2. For those children who are enrolled in a Head Start, ECAP, child care or preschool for more than _____ hours in a district other than the district of residence, comprehensive developmental evaluations will be the responsibility of the {district of service in which child is enrolled in child care } or {district of residence}. 3. For those families who request such, provision of FAPE will be the responsibility of the district of service in which the child is enrolled in a preschool facility (Head Start, ECAP, child care, preschool). 4. Transportation will be provided by the district of services. 5. For count purposes, children will be counted by the district of services. 6. Tuition will be paid by the district of residence to the district of service for children from tuition generating programs.

MOU Between School Districts Additions to MOU Deletions Questions to be answered Issues to be resolved

Future Dates to Remember February 12  EIEIO February 27  Still Listening Conference TBA  619/Stars Work Group  Ages and Stages Training  Next 619 Meeting

Other Issues Next Steps

Thank you for coming!