VALIDATION OF HIGH RESOLUTION PRECIPITATION PRODUCTS IN THE SOUTH OF BRAZIL WITH A DENSE GAUGE NETWORK AND WEATHER RADARS – FIRST RESULTS Cesar Beneti,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Validation of Satellite Rainfall Estimates over the Mid-latitudes Chris Kidd University of Birmingham, UK.
Advertisements

Precipitation in IGWCO The objectives of IGWCO require time series of accurate gridded precipitation fields with fine spatial and temporal resolution for.
Nowcasting and Short Range NWP at the Australian Bureau of Meteorology
Introduction to data assimilation in meteorology Pierre Brousseau, Ludovic Auger ATMO 08,Alghero, september 2008.
QPF verification of the 4 model versions at 7 km res. (COSMO-I7, COSMO-7, COSMO-EU, COSMO-ME) with the 2 model versions at 2.8 km res. (COSMO- I2, COSMO-IT)
Poster template by ResearchPosters.co.za Effect of Topography in Satellite Rainfall Estimation Errors: Observational Evidence across Contrasting Elevation.
Calibration of GOES-R ABI cloud products and TRMM/GPM observations to ground-based radar rainfall estimates for the MRMS system – Status and future plans.
Validation of Satellite Precipitation Estimates for Weather and Hydrological Applications Beth Ebert BMRC, Melbourne, Australia 3 rd IPWG Workshop / 3.
1 00/XXXX © Crown copyright Use of radar data in modelling at the Met Office (UK) Bruce Macpherson Mesoscale Assimilation, NWP Met Office EWGLAM / COST-717.
Characteristics of High-Resolution Satellite Precipitation Products in Spring and Summer over China Yan Shen 1, A.-Y. Xiong 1 Pingping Xie 2 1. National.
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Universidade Federal do Paraná Curitiba, Paraná Brasil Alexandre Guetter Streamflow Prediction Validation.
Precipitation in the Olympic Peninsula of Washington State Robert Houze and Socorro Medina Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Washington.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Quantitative precipitation forecasts in the Alps – first.
Mid-Range Streamflow Forecasts for River Management in the Puget Sound Region Richard Palmer Matthew Wiley Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Univ of AZ WRF Model Verification. Method NCEP Stage IV data used for precipitation verification – Stage IV is composite of rain fall observations and.
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting. The National Weather Service The National Weather Service (NWS) is responsible for forecasts several times.
WORKSHOP ON PRECIPITATION MEASUREMENTS MADRID SEPTEMBER 2002 AN INTERCOMPARISON OF GAUGE, RADAR AND SATELLITE RAINFALL IN THE TROPICS A. J. Pereira.
How low can you go? Retrieval of light precipitation in mid-latitudes Chris Kidd School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Science The University of.
CARPE DIEM Centre for Water Resources Research NUID-UCD Contribution to Area-3 Dusseldorf meeting 26th to 28th May 2003.
March 14, 2006Intl FFF Workshop, Costa Rica Weather Decision Technologies, Inc. Hydro-Meteorological Decision Support System Bill Conway, Vice President.
Integration of Multiple Precipitation Estimates for Flash Flood Forecasting Reggina Cabrera NOAA/National Weather Service.
South Eastern Latin America LA26: Impact of GC on coastal areas of the Rio de la Plata: Sea level rise and meteorological effects LA27: Building capacity.
Forecasting Streamflow with the UW Hydrometeorological Forecast System Ed Maurer Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington Pacific Northwest.
Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, University of California, Irvine Basin Scale Precipitation Data Merging Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo.
STEPS: An empirical treatment of forecast uncertainty Alan Seed BMRC Weather Forecasting Group.
We carried out the QPF verification of the three model versions (COSMO-I7, COSMO-7, COSMO-EU) with the following specifications: From January 2006 till.
Cooperative Institute of Climate Studies University of Maryland 2207 Computer & Spaces Sciences Bldg. College Park, MD Tel: (301) Fax:
Gridded Rainfall Estimation for Distributed Modeling in Western Mountainous Areas 1. Introduction Estimation of precipitation in mountainous areas continues.
Third Workshop of the International Precipitation Working Group October 23-27, 2006, Melbourne, Australia A CMORPH ANALYSIS OF THE CONVECTIVE REGIME OVER.
3 rd INTERNATIONAL PRECIPITATION WORKING GROUP WORKSHOP October 2006, Melbourne, Australia EVALUATION OF HIGH RESOLUTION SATELLITE PRODUCTS UNDER.
GV Activities in Brazil: Brazilian initiative towards the establishment of GPM-BR program Carlos A. Morales, Carlos Frederico Angelis, Luiz A. T. Machado,
The NOAA Hydrology Program and its requirements for GOES-R Pedro J. Restrepo Senior Scientist Office of Hydrologic Development NOAA’s National Weather.
Page 1© Crown copyright Scale selective verification of precipitation forecasts Nigel Roberts and Humphrey Lean.
Thomas R. Karl Director, National Climatic Data Center, NOAA Editor, Journal of Climate, Climatic Change & IPCC Climate Monitoring Panel Paul D. Try, Moderator.
Use of Mesoscale Ensemble Weather Predictions to Improve Short-Term Precipitation and Hydrological Forecasts Michael Erickson 1, Brian A. Colle 1, Jeffrey.
Hydrological evaluation of satellite precipitation products in La Plata basin 1 Fengge Su, 2 Yang Hong, 3 William L. Crosson, and 4 Dennis P. Lettenmaier.
Potential for medium range global flood prediction Nathalie Voisin 1, Andrew W. Wood 1, Dennis P. Lettenmaier 1 1 Department of Civil and Environmental.
Topographic Dependency of Rainfall Characteristics from the Sierra Madre Occidental in Northwest Mexico NERN Project Team: NCAR, U. Arizona, U. Sonora,
Alan F. Hamlet Andy Wood Dennis P. Lettenmaier JISAO Center for Science in the Earth System Climate Impacts Group and the Department.
Nathalie Voisin 1, Florian Pappenberger 2, Dennis Lettenmaier 1, Roberto Buizza 2, and John Schaake 3 1 University of Washington 2 ECMWF 3 National Weather.
VERIFICATION Highligths by WG5. 2 Outlook Some focus on Temperature with common plots and Conditional Verification Some Fuzzy verification Long trends.
DOWNSCALING GLOBAL MEDIUM RANGE METEOROLOGICAL PREDICTIONS FOR FLOOD PREDICTION Nathalie Voisin, Andy W. Wood, Dennis P. Lettenmaier University of Washington,
VERIFICATION OF A DOWNSCALING SEQUENCE APPLIED TO MEDIUM RANGE METEOROLOGICAL PREDICTIONS FOR GLOBAL FLOOD PREDICTION Nathalie Voisin, Andy W. Wood and.
Diurnal Cycle of Precipitation Based on CMORPH Vernon E. Kousky, John E. Janowiak and Robert Joyce Climate Prediction Center, NOAA.
Climatology of the Río de la Plata Basin: short and long term variability Mario Bidegain Facultad de Ciencias Universidad de la Republica Uruguay Workshop.
11 Short-Range QPF for Flash Flood Prediction and Small Basin Forecasts Prediction Forecasts David Kitzmiller, Yu Zhang, Wanru Wu, Shaorong Wu, Feng Ding.
VALIDATION OF HIGH RESOLUTION SATELLITE-DERIVED RAINFALL ESTIMATES AND OPERATIONAL MESOSCALE MODELS FORECASTS OF PRECIPITATION OVER SOUTHERN EUROPE 1st.
Application of Probability Density Function - Optimal Interpolation in Hourly Gauge-Satellite Merged Precipitation Analysis over China Yan Shen, Yang Pan,
An Examination of the Diurnal Cycle in the NCEP GFS (and Eta) Model Precipitation Forecasts (during NAME) John Janowiak, Valery Dagostaro*, Vern Kousky,
Performance Evaluation of Precipitation Retrievals over South-Eastern South America considering different climatic regions Paola Salio DCAO - CIMA – University.
Evaluation of TRMM satellite precipitation product in hydrologic simulations of La Plata Basin Fengge Su 1, Yang Hong 2, and Dennis P. Lettenmaier 1 1.
EVALUATION OF SATELLITE-DERIVED HIGH RESOLUTION RAINFALL ESTIMATES OVER EASTERN SÃO PAULO AND PARANÁ, BRAZIL Augusto J. Pereira Filho 1 Phillip Arkin 2.
An Experimental Study of the Rainfall Variability in the Southern Delmarva Peninsula Part I: Climatology and Physical Variability Rigoberto Roche NASA.
Nathalie Voisin1 , Andrew W. Wood1 , Dennis P. Lettenmaier1 and Eric F
Multi-Site and Multi-Objective Evaluation of CMORPH and TRMM-3B42 High-Resolution Satellite-Rainfall Products October 11-15, 2010 Hamburg, Germany Emad.
Hydrologic Considerations in Global Precipitation Mission Planning
Augusto J. Pereira Filho1 Camila G. M. Ramos1 John E. Janowiak2
Systematic timing errors in km-scale NWP precipitation forecasts
Multi-scale validation of high resolution precipitation products
Issues in global precipitation estimation for hydrologic prediction
Radar/Surface Quantitative Precipitation Estimation
Nathalie Voisin, Andy W. Wood and Dennis P. Lettenmaier
Rain Gauge Data Merged with CMORPH* Yields: RMORPH
Validation of Satellite Precipitation Estimates using High-Resolution Surface Rainfall Observations in West Africa Paul A. Kucera and Andrew J. Newman.
University of Washington hydrological modeling in La Plata basin
Evaluation of the TRMM Multi-satellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) and its utility in hydrologic prediction in La Plata Basin Dennis P. Lettenmaier and.
University of Washington hydrological modeling in La Plata basin
Science of Rainstorms with applications to Flood Forecasting
Evaluating Satellite Rainfall Products for Hydrological Applications
An Inter-comparison of 5 HRPPs with 3-Hourly Gauge Estimates
Presentation transcript:

VALIDATION OF HIGH RESOLUTION PRECIPITATION PRODUCTS IN THE SOUTH OF BRAZIL WITH A DENSE GAUGE NETWORK AND WEATHER RADARS – FIRST RESULTS Cesar Beneti, Leonardo Calvetti, Ieda Pscheidt, Itamar Moreira Parana State Meteorological Service - SIMEPAR Curitiba, Brazil Curitiba, Brazil Augusto J. Pereira Filho Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil 3 rd Workshop of the International Precipitation Working Group Melbourne – October 2006

OBJECTIVES - Integrate rain gauge, radar and satellite data to improve QPE - Assimilate QPEs into operational NWP model - Use NWP QPF for hydrological forecasting - Verify QPE, QPF Quantitative Precipitation Estimation and Forecasting Group 3 rd Workshop of the International Precipitation Working Group Melbourne – October 2006

SATELLITE ESTIMATES: - Period: Jan/2002 – Mar/ Area: LAT = 22S to 27S LON = 56W to 46W - Resolution: 0.25deg - Accumulation: 3hour - Techniques: CMORPH, NRLB, PERSIANN, TRMM3B42 Other Data: Raingauge, Radar 3 rd Workshop of the International Precipitation Working Group Melbourne – October 2006 PEHRPP Evaluation Area

1300km 1700km Itaipu Power Plant PEHRPP Evaluation Area Curitiba SaoPaulo Rio de Janeiro Importance of the Area More than 70% of GDP (Gross Domestic Product) Major cities: Sao Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Curitiba (> 80million people) Hydropower Generation in Parana represents 30% Brazil 95% Paraguay Electric Energy in Brazil is >85% Hydro-generation 3 rd Workshop of the International Precipitation Working Group Melbourne – October 2006

(mm) 3 rd Workshop of the International Precipitation Working Group Melbourne – October 2006 PEHRPP Evaluation Area Precipitation in the area is related to MCS (spring/summer) and Frontal Systems (all year) Convection initiates mostly in late afternoon, propagating eastward, with high rainfall accumulation – diurnal cycle well defined.

3 rd Workshop of the International Precipitation Working Group Melbourne – October 2006 PEHRPP Evaluation Area

3 rd Workshop of the International Precipitation Working Group Melbourne – October 2006 Hydromet information available in the area (approx. 200,000km²) - S-Band Doppler Weather Radar, with scans every 5 minutes, 4km2 resolution; - 62 Automatic hydrological stations (precipitation and river level measurements) with 15min. observations; - 37 Automatic meteorological stations (precip. + T, Td, p, wind) with hourly observations; - Satellite data processing system. - New automatic stations to be installed in – up to 140 points - Conventional gauges, daily accumulation – over 50 PEHRPP Evaluation Area

3 rd Workshop of the International Precipitation Working Group Melbourne – October 2006 Precipitation Distribution Spring 2004 PRECIPITATION ANOMALIES CLIMATOLOGY (SON) mm

3 rd Workshop of the International Precipitation Working Group Melbourne – October 2006 Precipitation Distribution Spring 2005 PRECIPITATION ANOMALIES CLIMATOLOGY (SON) mm

3 rd Workshop of the International Precipitation Working Group Melbourne – October 2006 Precipitation Distribution Summer 2005 mm CLIMATOLOGY (DJF) PRECIPITATION ANOMALIES

mm 3 rd Workshop of the International Precipitation Working Group Melbourne – October 2006 CLIMATOLOGY (DJF) PRECIPITATION ANOMALIES Precipitation Distribution Summer 2006

Spatial Distrib. BIAS Spring (SON) 3 rd Workshop of the International Precipitation Working Group Melbourne – October 2006 CMORPHNRLB TRMM3B42PERSIANN BIAS is for each grid point (.25deg x.25deg), total period: BIAS = -

3 rd Workshop of the International Precipitation Working Group Melbourne – October 2006 CMORPHNRLB TRMM3B42PERSIANN Spatial Distrib. BIAS Spring (SON)

3 rd Workshop of the International Precipitation Working Group Melbourne – October 2006 CMORPHNRLB TRMM3B42PERSIANN Spatial Distrib. BIAS Summer (DJF)

Diurnal Variability of Precipitation 3 rd Workshop of the International Precipitation Working Group Melbourne – October 2006 Distribution is: Number of events with precip larger than a threshold for each 3hour period Even distribution for Spring; Diurnal cycle more evident in Summer; Differences for rain events with higher precip.

3 rd Workshop of the International Precipitation Working Group Melbourne – October 2006 Diurnal Variability of Precipitation Even distribution for Spring; Diurnal cycle more evident in Summer; Differences for rain events with higher precip. Distribution is: Number of events with precip larger than a threshold for each 3hour period

3 rd Workshop of the International Precipitation Working Group Melbourne – October 2006 Diurnal Variability of Precipitation Even distribution for Spring; Diurnal cycle more evident in Summer; Differences for rain events with higher precip. Distribution is: Number of events with precip larger than a threshold for each 3hour period

Average Rainfall Spring (SON) rd Workshop of the International Precipitation Working Group Melbourne – October 2006 PRECIPITATIONMEANSTDBIASRMSECORRELGAUGE9,236,55 CMORPH3,223,22-6,0011,110,69 NRLB3,103,27-6,1211,910,54 PERSIANN2,813,23-6,4211,970,65 TRMM2,882,99-6,3511,680,64

Precipitation Event 11-Sep rd Workshop of the International Precipitation Working Group Melbourne – October 2006 GAUGETRMM3B42NRLBCMORPHPERSIANN RADAR

Precipitation Event 25-Oct rd Workshop of the International Precipitation Working Group Melbourne – October 2006 GAUGETRMM3B42NRLBCMORPHPERSIANN RADAR

Iguassu Basin Area (67446 km2) Evaluation Area (24167 km2) Precipitation in the Iguassu Basin Satellite precipitation estimations were compared with rain gauge and river flow in a sub-basin of Iguassu (area km²), upstream of the first/largest reservoir, which is mainly responsible for regulating the energy generation in the cascade. 3 rd Workshop of the International Precipitation Working Group Melbourne – October rain gauges, with river level and precipitation measurements every 15minutes.

3 rd Workshop of the International Precipitation Working Group Melbourne – October 2006 Precipitation and StreamFlow GAUGECMORPHNRLBPERSIANNTRMM Correlation Coef. between streamflow and precipitation (12hours lag)

3 rd Workshop of the International Precipitation Working Group Melbourne – October 2006 Precipitation and StreamFlow GAUGECMORPHNRLBPERSIANNTRMM Correlation Coef. between streamflow and precipitation (12hours lag)

Monthly Precipitation Accumulation for Iguassu Basin Monthly accumulation for October rd Workshop of the International Precipitation Working Group Melbourne – October RadarSatelliteGauge

Next Steps: Next Steps: More statistics, different periods (spatial, categorical) ; More statistics, different periods (spatial, categorical) ; Compare other satellite techniques (e.g. IR+MW) with Gauge+Radar (using Statistical Objective Analysis) data in the same area Compare other satellite techniques (e.g. IR+MW) with Gauge+Radar (using Statistical Objective Analysis) data in the same area Compare CPC/NCEP 1DD with Gauge+Radar+Sat data in the area for different periods of the year. Compare CPC/NCEP 1DD with Gauge+Radar+Sat data in the area for different periods of the year. 3 rd Workshop of the International Precipitation Working Group Melbourne – October 2006