KMOS Instrument Overview & Data Processing Richard Davies Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics  What does KMOS do?  When will it do it?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
KMOS in a nutshell 24 movable IFUs, each 2.8”x2.8”, 0.2” spatial sampling 7.2’ diameter FOV wavelength coverage: 0.8 um to 2.5 um five spectral bands:
Advertisements

European Southern Observatory European Southern Observatory © ESO 2005 Page 1 AO Department Leiden, April 26th 2005 MUSE M ulti U nit S pectroscopic E.
GLAO instrument specifications and sensitivities
Integral Field Spectroscopy on Gemini Andrew Bunker (IoA, Cambridge) Euro3D Meeting July 2002 GMOS Gemini Multi-Object Spectrograph, optical IFU (Durham)
Echelle Spectroscopy Dr Ray Stathakis, AAO. What is it? n Echelle spectroscopy is used to observe single objects at high spectral detail. n The spectrum.
JWST IFUs and Data Tool Development Plans Tracy Beck JWST NIRSpec Instrument Scientist.
With a wide-field multi-IFU spectrograph.  Clusters provide large samples of galaxies in a moderate field  Unique perspective on the interaction of.
Spectroscopic Reference Design Options D. L. DePoy Texas A&M University.
Alt.Aperturer 0 (m)FWHM(")  0 (")  0 (sec) 4 kmCFHT 3.8m km2.4 m~ ~600~5 35km10 m~ ~600~5 h (km)P (mbars)T (K)  (gm m.
Kinematics/Dynamics  Chemistry/dust  Stellar populations  Searches for z ~ 6-7 « Hot » scientific researches at VLT in cosmology Mass Galaxy formation/gas.
FMOS Observations and Data 14 January 2004 FMOS Science Workshop.
ELT Stellar Populations Science Near IR photometry and spectroscopy of resolved stars in nearby galaxies provides a way to extract their entire star formation.
Impact of Cost Savings Ideas on NGAO Instrumentation December 19, 2008 Sean Adkins.
NGAO Instrumentation Overview September 2008 Updated Sean Adkins.
AURA New Initiatives Office S.C. Barden, M. Liang, K.H. Hinkle, C.F.W. Harmer, R.R. Joyce (NOAO/NIO) September 17, 2001 Instrumentation Concepts for the.
Object selection ideas for NGAO NGAO Meeting #6 Anna Moore April 26, 2007.
NGAO Instrumentation Cost Drivers and Cost Savings September 2008 Sean Adkins.
NGAO Science Instruments Build to Cost Status February 5, 2009 Sean Adkins.
Stellar and Gas Kinematics in the Core and Bar Regions of M100 Emma L. Allard, Johan H. Knapen, University of Hertfordshire, UK Reynier F. Peletier, University.
High Redshift Galaxies: Encircled energy performance budget and IFU spectroscopy Claire Max Sept 14, 2006 NGAO Team Meeting.
Introduction to Spitzer and some applications Data products Pipelines Preliminary work K. Nilsson, J.M. Castro Cerón, J.P.U. Fynbo, D.J. Watson, J. Hjorth.
ADASS XVII - September, Software Modelling of IFU Spectrometers Nuria P. F. Lorente UK Astronomy Technology Centre Royal Observatory, Edinburgh,
KMOS Instrument Science Team Review Instrument overview.
KMOS operations and performance Presentation to the KMOS ESO IST, 10 th May 2006.
Masahiro Konishi (IoA, UTokyo), SWIMS Team S W I M S.
1 High-z galaxy masses from spectroastrometry Alessio Gnerucci Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Florence 13/12/2009- Obergurgl Collaborators:
T-REX OU4 HIRES The high resolution spectrograph for E-ELT E. Oliva, T-REX meeting, Sexten Pustertal (I)1.
JWST calibration requirements Harald Kuntschner. JWST - an overview NIRCam –0.6-5 microns –FoV: 2.16x4.4 arcmin (0.0317” for short band and ” for.
STATUS REPORT OF FPC SPICA Task Force Meeting March 29, 2010 MATSUMOTO, Toshio (SNU)
1 FRIDA Engineering Status 17/05/07 Engineering Status May 17, 2007 F.J. Fuentes InFraRed Imager and Dissector for Adaptive Optics.
1 BDRv3 - November 26, Markus Kissler-Patig E-ELT Programme 1 E-ELT Science Case Markus Kissler-Patig.
14 October Observational Astronomy SPECTROSCOPY and spectrometers Kitchin, pp
15 October Observational Astronomy Direct imaging Photometry Kitchin pp ,
INTEGRAL FIELD SPECTROSCOPY AT THE VLT STAR (CLUSTER) FORMATION IN 3D : INTEGRAL FIELD SPECTROSCOPY AT THE VLT Markus Kissler-Patig (Instrument Scientist.
18 October Observational Astronomy SPECTROSCOPY and spectrometers Kitchin, pp
Integral Field Spectroscopy. David Lee, Anglo-Australian Observatory.
JGR 19 Apr Basics of Spectroscopy Gordon Robertson (University of Sydney)
ASTRO-F Survey as an Input Catalogue for FIRST Takao Nakagawa (ISAS, Japan) & ASTRO-F Team.
X-shooter Phase 2 Users Workshop | Vincenzo Mainieri (USD)
Central Engine of AGN Xi’ian October 2006 Black Hole Mass Measurements with Adaptive Optic Assisted 3D-Spectroscopy Courtesy ESO Guia Pastorini Osservatorio.
WFIRST IFU -- Preliminary “existence proof” Qian Gong & Dave Content GSFC optics branch, Code 551.
PACS SVR 22/23 June 2006 Scientific/Performance Requirements1 PACS Science and Performance Requirements A. Poglitsch.
The Far-Infrared Universe: from the Universe’s oldest light to the birth of its youngest stars Jeremy P. Scott, on behalf of Locke D. Spencer Physics and.
Optical characteristics of the EUV spectrometer for the grazing-incidence region L. Poletto, G. Tondello Istituto Nazionale per la Fisica della Materia.
Science with Giant Telescopes - Jun 15-18, Instrument Concepts InstrumentFunction range (microns) ResolutionFOV GMACSOptical Multi-Object Spectrometer.
Wide field telescope using spherical mirrors Jim Burge and Roger Angel University of Arizona Tucson, AZ Jim
APT Overview for Transiting Exoplanet Proposals Chris Moriarty – APT Developer.
Goals for HETDEX Determine equation of state of Universe and evolutionary history for dark energy from 0
Optimization Strategies for the NIRSpec MSA Planning Tool James Muzerolle.
GMT’s Near IR Multiple Object Spectrograph - NIRMOS Daniel Fabricant Center for Astrophysics.
MPI Semiconductor Laboratory, The XEUS Instrument Working Group, PNSensor The X-ray Evolving-Universe Spectroscopy (XEUS) mission is under study by the.
Describing 3D Datasets Igor Chilingarian (CRAL Observatoire de Lyon/Sternberg Astronomical Institute of the Moscow State University) IVOA DM & DAL WG –
The Field Camera Unit Results from technical meeting S. Scuderi INAF – Catania.
“Phase C” Design of the JWST/FGS Tunable Filter Imager TIPS/JIM June 15, 2006 Alex Fullerton STScI / UVic.
Competitive Science with the WHT for Nearby Unresolved Galaxies Reynier Peletier Kapteyn Astronomical Institute Groningen.
Sample expanded template for one theme: Physics of Galaxy Evolution Mark Dickinson.
Galaxy mass-to-light ratios at z> 1 from the Fundamental Plane: measuring the star formation epoch and mass evolution of galaxies van der Wel, Rix, Franx,
F. Pepe Observatoire de Genève Optical astronomical spectroscopy at the VLT (Part 2)
NIRSpec - the JWST Multi-Object Spectrograph P. Ferruit (ESA), S. Arribas (CSIS), S. Birkmann (ESA), T. Böker (ESA), A. Bunker (Oxford), S. Charlot (IAP),
Julia Bryant HECTOR project scientist Australian Astronomical Observatory University of Sydney CAASTRO With Joss Bland-Hawthorn, Jon Lawrence, Scott Croom.
Single Object Spectroscopy and Time Series Observations with NIRSpec
NIRSpec Time Series Observations
Single Object & Time Series Spectroscopy with JWST NIRCam
Galaxy Evolution from z=2 to the present
Resolving the black hole - nuclear cluster - spheroid connection
ESAC 2017 JWST Workshop JWST User Documentation Hands on experience
Introduction to Spectroscopy
Integral Field Spectroscopy
MIRI Observing Templates
Observational Prospect of NIREBL
Presentation transcript:

KMOS Instrument Overview & Data Processing Richard Davies Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics  What does KMOS do?  When will it do it?  What does the data look like?  How is the data processed?

What & When? Phase B start July 2004 Preliminary Design Review May 2006 Final Design Review July 2007 Preliminary Acceptance Europe Spring 2010 Preliminary Acceptance Chile Autumn m 2800kg

Science Drivers Investigate the physical processes which drive galaxy formation and evolution over redshift range 1<z<10 Map the variations in star formation histories, spatially resolved star-formation properties, and merger rates Obtain dynamical masses of well-defined samples of galaxies across a wide range of environments at a series of progressively earlier epochs need: multiplexing (large numbers of sources), NIR (optical diagnostics at z>1), moderate spectral resolution (kinematics), integral field (mergers vs disks)

Instrumental Features R~3500 spectroscopy at  m 7.2arcmin patrol field 24 robotic pickoff arms, each with a 2.8”×2.8” FoV sampled at 0.2 arcsec IFUs are consolidated in groups of 8 each set feeds one of 3 identical spectrographs pick off mirror (covered) roof mirror to K-mirror & filter wheel multiple-object cryogenic integral field spectrograph

Instrumental Features 24 arms in 2 layers, 20mm above & below focal plane positioning within 0.1” (<60μm) mass ~4.5kg each size ~30cm each path has 45 optical surfaces in total 1080 optical surfaces and 60 cryogenic motors

Fixed instrument configuration: Non-configurable itemOptions available Pixel scale0.2arcsec x 0.2arcsec Field of View2.8arcsec x 2.8arcsec Observing modeintegral field spectroscopy Spatial resolution modeseeing limited Configurable itemOptions available Filter (bandpass)K H YJ Iz HK μm μm μm μm μm R ~ 3700 R ~ 3900 R ~ 3300 R ~ 2800 R ~ 2200 Instrumental Configuration(s) Instrument configuration options:

Raw Data Format first RTD: raw data from the 3 2k×2k detectors wavelength spatial position 14 pixels per slitlet (plus a gap) 14 slitlets per IFU 8 IFUs per detector 3 detectors IFU 1 IFU 2

Reconstructed Images second RTD: reconstructed images for each of the 24 IFUs either arrayed in a grid

Reconstructed Images second RTD: reconstructed images for each of the 24 IFUs or positioned in the 7.2’ patrol field

Association Map

calibration templates & recipes: kmo_dark kmo_flat kmo_illumination kmo_spec_align kmo_wave_cal kmo_std_star KMOS_spec_cal_dark KMOS_spec_cal_calunit KMOS_spec_cal_skyflat KMOS_spec_tec_verticalslit KMOS_spec_cal_wave KMOS_spec_cal_std Templates & Recipes science templates & recipes: kmo_rtd_image kmo_sci_red any acquisition frame KMOS_spec_obs_nodtosky KMOS_spec_obs_stare KMOS_spec_obs_mapping note: reconstruction works on 1 IFU at a time (i.e. in effect recipe runs 24 times for each data set).

Basic Tools used in recipes: kmo_create_cube kmo_set_value kmo_arithmetic kmo_stats kmo_copy kmo_rotate kmo_shift kmo_flip_axis kmo_euro3D_convert More Complex Tools used in recipes: kmo_reconstruct kmo_make_image kmo_extract_spec kmo_combine kmo_sky_mask* kmo_sky_tweak* kmo_bkg_sub* kmo_fit_profile kmo_cosmic* † Additional (Advanced) Tools: kmo_extract_pv* kmo_fit_continuum kmo_extract_moments* kmo_convolve kmo_median kmo_voronoi* * = prototype version in use for SINFONI data † = based on ‘L.A.Cosmic’ by P. van Dokkum other Recipes Modular design also useful to observer when re-processing their data back home

Recipe Hierarchy

What KMOS will & won’t do Things we will do (and think are a good idea)  keep everything modular so astronomers can add in their own extra processing steps or leave some out  provide basic tools so astronomer can manipulate their datacubes  provide some more advanced tools to extract information from a datacube (e.g. emission line kinematics, Voronoi binning, etc) Things we won’t be providing  a 3D data viewing tool (since there are already many good ones, e.g. QFitsView)  tools for deconvolution, line deblending, extracting stellar kinematics, etc (because they’re very user/data/model dependent)  mosaicing tool – it will be possible to combine datacubes with the right offsets to make a larger field, but no scaling/background adjustments will be made