ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Fish Habitat Restoration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kevin L. Hoover Waters Edge Hydrology, Inc. – Wetland Conservation Approaches.
Advertisements

WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS for ANTIDEGRADATION
Environmental Scoping Guidance Jerry Vogt Region Environmental Coordinator ODOT – Region 3.
A section has been added regarding Stream Restoration Design Criteria: A. Designs for stream restoration try to mimic natural conditions present in stable.
LENTIC CHECKLIST. NATURAL RIPARIAN RESOURCES LENTIC CHECKLIST HYDROLOGIC.
CITY OF SAN MARCOS/TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY 2015 WORK PLAN BUDGETED CONSERVATION MEASURES.
April 14, Indicate every resource type proposed for impact on the Application: Tidal Wetland (short form for some projects) Nontidal Wetland Waterway.
ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Oregon’s Federal Aid Highway Programmatic.
South Llano River: One of 2011’sTop Ten National Fish Habitat Action Plan named SLR as “water to watch” WHY?? –Conserve freshwater, estuarine, and marine.
Natural Riparian Resources Vegetation Landscape/Soil Water.
ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Contract Specifications Background on.
Road Decommissioning Monitoring For every 10 miles of road decommissioned, one ¼ mile monitoring segment is established and monitored. Segments are monitored.
Pine Valley Country Club Stream Restoration: Phase 2 Proposal Presented March 17, 2003 Greg Jennings, NC State Univ Barbara Doll, NC Sea Grant Dave Bidelspach,
Suzanne Macey.  DEC looks at known occurrences with 1 mile  FWS looks at known occurrences plus the potential for suitable habitat  Contact DEC and/or.
Examples for Mitigation Category 1 and 2 Streams.
Lewis Creek Reach M19 Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3.
Watersheds Capture, Store And Safely Release Water.
1 Design and Restoration. 2 Appreciative Design From Fridley, 2006 Stakeholders (including Problem Owner) Stakeholder expectations (SE) Functional Requirements.
This training was prepared by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) team of Sarah Librea-USDA Foreign Agricultural Service (Team Leader), Jon Fripp.
Restoration of Chamberlain Creek Amy Clinefelter Riparian Wetland Research Program Restoration of Chamberlain Creek Amy Clinefelter Riparian Wetland Research.
Stream Restoration Techniques
Freshwater Fishery Management Objective- Discuss the lake habitat to include basic fishery management techniques.
Proposed Novato Creek Bank Stabilization Guidelines Questa Engineering Corp.
Overview of Watershed Systems
Range Practices 1 Objectives and Range Practices under FRPA & Objectives & Objectives The Focus is on Results.
A Review of Stream Restoration Techniques and a Hierarchical Strategy for Prioritizing Restoration in Pacific Northwest Watersheds North American Journal.
Greg Jennings, PhD, PE Professor, Biological & Agricultural Engineering North Carolina State University BAE 579: Stream Restoration Lesson.
PC Meeting July 1, 2015 CUP 15-02/DR 15-06/DR
1 ELEMENTS OF AN EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN PLANNING APPROACH Issued May 2009 Level II: Introduction to Design Education and Certification for Persons.
Watershed Assessment and River Restoration Strategies
ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 When a new project begins early coordination,
ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Bank Stabilization Streambank or channel.
ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Welcome to Oregon’s Programmatic ESA.
Conceptual Ecological Model of San Acacia Reach of Middle Rio Grande River – 2/13/07 1 st Draft Ibis Ecosystem Associates, Inc. Diversion & Regulation.
Habitat Presentation 1 Phil Kaufmann --- USEPA, Corvallis, OR
Step 1: Assess Riparian Resource Function Using PFC §1d. Complete PFC assessment l 17 questions about attributes and processes l Reminder – PFC based on:
Natural Riparian Resources Water Landscape & SoilVegetation.
Channel Modification Washington Dept. Forestry, 2004, Channel Modification Techniques Katie Halvorson.
Chumstick Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Land development, road construction, and other human activities have affected channel migration and sediment.
Icicle Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Land Development has affected stream channel movement, off channel habitat, and LWD recruitment. Barriers to migration.
Stream Processes and Habitat Ryan Johnson. Overview Watershed Processes – Factors and their effects on the watershed as a whole Stream Processes – Factors.
Landowner Assistance Programs in Florida Gainesville, Florida September 24, 2010.
Fluvial Criteria in the FAHP. “ All permanent stream crossing replacements must provide for a fully functional floodplain”
Oregon Case Studies Ryan Johnson. Studies  The response of impounded sediment to a culvert replacement project on Sutter Creek, a tributary of Honey.
ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Roles & Responsibilities Project Biologist.
ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Oregon’s Federal Highway Aid Programmatic.
ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Welcome to Oregon’s Programmatic ESA.
Stormwater Retrofitting: The Art of Opportunity Prepared by the Center for Watershed Protection.
Maximizing Impact / Minimizing Impact: Balancing Human and Environmental Concerns through Site Access Design Lee-Anne Milburn Department of Landscape Architecture.
Mission, Brender, and Yaksum Creeks Habitat Conditions Low flows and associated high temperatures affect distribution and abundance of native species.
ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Fish Habitat Restoration.
Importance of the Lower Wenatchee River in Salmon Recovery* The Lower Wenatchee is a critical migration corridor for all ESA listed species Of the total.
ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Pile Driving/Pile Removal.
ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Early Coordination This required step.
Habitat Mapping of High Level Indicators at Multiple Scales for Fish and Wildlife.
Laguna Canyon Creek Protection and Restoration. Major Watercourse Laguna Canyon Creek is a major watercourse. The City identifies it as that and treats.
Update: Where We Are and Feedback Lake George Stream Corridor Management Stake Holder Meeting June 25, 2008.
Nason Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Development, and road building have affected riparian (streamside) habitat, large woody debris and gravel recruitment.
ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Pile Driving/Pile Removal.
Natural Riparian Resources Erosion/Deposition Water Vegetation.
ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Clearing and Site Preparation and Site.
1 Structural Control Practices ©2002 Dr. Bradley C Paul.
Natural Riparian Resources Vegetation Landscape/Soil Water.
ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Early Coordination This required step.
Bridges Reach analysis Fundamental tool for design
A Review of Stream Restoration Techniques and a Hierarchical Strategy for Prioritizing Restoration in Pacific Northwest Watersheds North American Journal.
The Gila River Restoration at Apache Grove
Module 10/11 Stream Surveys
Streams Hydrodynamics
Agricultural Order 4.0 Discussion
Presentation transcript:

ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Fish Habitat Restoration

ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Off- and side-channel habitat restoration. Reconnection of historical off- and side-channels habitats that have been blocked includes the removal of plugs, which impede water movement through off- and side-channels, and excavation within historical channels that does not exceed the thalweg depth in the main channel. The purpose of the additional sediment removal is to provide unimpeded flow through the side-channel to minimize fish entrapment. (Page 29)

ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Excavation depth may not exceed the maximum thalweg depth in the main channel. –Excavated material removed from off- or side-channels shall be hauled to an upland site or spread across the adjacent floodplain in a manner that does not restrict floodplain capacity. (Page 29)

ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 –Data requirements and analysis that must be submitted to NMFS with a request for approval of off- and side-channel habitat restoration include evidence of historical channel location, such as land use surveys, historical photographs, topographic maps, and remote sensing information.

ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Set-back existing berm, dike, or levee. To the greatest degree possible, non-native fill material, originating from outside the floodplain of the action area will be removed from the floodplain to an upland site. (Page 29-30)

ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Breaches > active channel width. Downstream end of the project and/or at the lowest elevation of the floodplain to ensure the flows will naturally recede back into the main channel, thus minimizing fish entrapment. Overburden or fill comprised of native materials, which originated from the project area, may be used within the floodplain to create set-back dikes and fill anthropogenic holes provided that does not impede floodplain function. (Page 29-30)

ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Degraded wetlands may be restored by excavation and removal of fill materials, contouring to reestablish more natural topography, setting back existing dikes, berms and levees, reconnecting historical tidal and fluvial channels, or planting native wetland species. Wetland Restoration (Page 31)

ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Water control structure removal. This includes removal of small dams that are less than 16.4-feet high, do not impound contaminated sediments, and are not likely to initiate head-cutting; channel-spanning weirs; subsurface drainage features; tide gates; or instream flow redirection structures. (Page 30-31)

ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 –Data requirements and analysis for structure removal include: A longitudinal profile of the stream channel thalweg for 20 channel widths upstream and downstream of the structure shall be used to determine the potential for channel degradation. A minimum of three cross-sections – one downstream of the structure, one through the reservoir area upstream of the structure, and one upstream of the reservoir area outside of the influence of the structure) to characterize the channel morphology and quantify the stored sediment. (Page 30-31)

ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Sediment characterization to determine the proportion of coarse sediment (>2mm) in the reservoir area. A survey of any downstream spawning areas that may be affected by sediment released by removal of the water control structure. Reservoirs with a d35 greater than 2 mm (i.e., 65% of the sediment by weight exceeds 2 mm in diameter) may be removed without excavation of stored material, if the sediment contains no contaminants; reservoirs with a d35 less than 2 mm (i.e., 65% of the sediment by weight is less than 2 mm in diameter) will require partial removal of the fine sediment to create a pilot channel, in conjunction with stabilization of the newly exposed streambanks with native vegetation. Data requirements (Cont.) (Page 30-31)

ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Streambank Restoration Primary Goal: Restore ecological function in riparian and floodplain habitats Planting or installing large wood, trees, shrubs, and herbaceous cover. Include large wood in each streambank restoration action when appropriate to the system, and to the maximum extent feasible. Large wood must be intact, hard, and undecayed with intact rootwads

ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Streambank Restoration. (Cont.) Rock will not be used for streambank restoration, except as ballast to stabilize large wood. Use a diverse assemblage of species native to the action area or region and appropriate to the project area, including trees, shrubs, and herbaceous species. Do not use noxious or invasive species. Do not apply surface fertilizer within 50-feet of any stream channel. Install fencing as necessary to prevent access to revegetated sites by livestock or unauthorized persons. (Page 30-31)

ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Other covered restoration actions Large wood and boulder placement Floodplain restoration Fish passage restoration Pile removal, removal of treated wood Removal of artificial structure or fill from the functional floodplain. Stormwater retrofits Riparian restoration

ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Herbicide Use

ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Invasive and Non-native Plant Control (includes use of herbicides.) Non-herbicide methods. Limit vegetation removal and soil disturbance within the riparian zone by limiting the number of workers there to the minimum necessary to complete manual and mechanical plant control (e.g., hand pulling, clipping, stabbing, digging, brush-cutting, mulching or heating with radiant heat, pressurized hot water, or heated foam). Herbicide Label. Herbicide applicators must comply with all label instructions. Power equipment. Gas-powered equipment with tanks larger than 5 gallons will be refueled in a vehicle staging area placed 150-feet or more from any natural waterbody, or in an isolated hazard zone such as a paved parking lot. (Page 40-42)

ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Maximum herbicide treatment area. The total area treated with herbicides within riparian areas will not exceed 10-acres above bankfull elevation and 2 acres below bankfull elevation, per 1.6-mile reach of a stream, per year. Herbicide applicator qualifications. Herbicides will be applied only by an appropriately licensed applicator using an herbicide specifically targeted for a particular plant species that will cause the least impact. The applicator will be responsible for preparing and carrying out and the herbicide transportation and safely plan, as follows. Herbicide transportation and safety plan. The applicator will prepare and carry out an herbicide safety/spill response plan to reduce the likelihood of spills or misapplication, to take remedial actions in the event of spills, and to fully report the event. (Page 40-42)

ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Herbicides. The only herbicides proposed for use under this opinion are: i.aquatic imazapyr (e.g., Habitat) ii.aquatic glyphosate (e.g., AquaMaster, AquaPro, Rodeo) iii.aquatic triclopyr-TEA (e.g., Renovate 3) iv.chlorsulfuron (e.g., Telar, Glean, Corsair) v.clopyralid (e.g., Transline) vi.imazapic (e.g., Plateau) vii.imazapyr (e.g., Arsenal, Chopper) viii.metsulfuron-methyl (e.g., Escort) ix.picloram (e.g., Tordon) x.sethoxydim (e.g., Poast, Vantage) xi.sulfometuron-methyl (e.g., Oust, Oust XP) Table 5 in the FAHP outlines application methods and buffers for all of the above herbicides (Table 8 in the FAHP Guidance document). (Page 40-42)