Alternative epistemologies for algebraic generalisation Richard Noss, Celia Hoyles, Eirini Geraniou and Manolis Mavrikis London Knowledge Lab Institute.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Expert vs. Novice Teachers Piaget: Constructivist Scaffolding Reorganization of knowledge Social context (Vygotsky)
Advertisements

Data Analysis Chapter 11..powerful professional development tool that can lead to school improvement.
The Conceptual and Architectural Design of a System Supporting Exploratory Learning of Mathematics Generalisation Darren Pearce, Alex.
The MiGen system and its impact on students and teachers: a review of the research dilemmas and positive outcomes through the eyes.
Operations and Algebraic Thinking: Addition and Subtraction.
Math CAMPPP 2011 Plenary 1 What’s the Focus? An Introduction to Algebraic Reasoning Ruth Beatty and Cathy Bruce 1.
Follow Through: Four important levels when using Manipulatives Alfred Ojelel, PhD Alpha Secondary School Burnaby BCAMT Conference,
Plenary 3 Summer Institute Differentiating instruction We will focus in this and our next few sessions on ways to differentiate instruction (not.
Section 3 Systems of Professional Learning Module 1 Grades 6–12: Focus on Practice Standards.
Learning and Teaching Linear Functions Video Cases for Mathematics Professional Development, 6-10.
Consistency of Assessment
TIER ONE INSTRUCTION Comparing Fractions. Tier I Instruction Tier I is the highly effective, culturally responsive, evidence-based core or universal instruction,
Directorate of Human Resources Teaching International Students: improving learning for all 24April 2006 Jude Carroll.
KRISTEN BURTON ERIN FAASUAMALIE Future of Alternate Achievement Standards and Assessment in Wisconsin Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
Introduction to Workshop 10 Choosing Learning and Teaching Approaches and Strategies.
Learning and Teaching Linear Functions Video Cases for Mathematics Professional Development, 6-10.
Student Engagement through the use of High-Level Tasks Presented by: Raven Hawes iZone Mathematics.
Mathematics the Preschool Way
MATHEMATICS KLA Years 1 to 10 Understanding the syllabus MATHEMATICS.
Analysing and Supporting Students’ Interactions in Synthesized Learning Environments: A Case Study with a Microworld and a Discussion Tool Toby Dragon.
PERCENTAGE AS RELATIONAL SCHEME: PERCENTAGE CALCULATIONS LEARNING IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL A.F. Díaz-Cárdenas, H.A. Díaz-Furlong, A. Díaz-Furlong, M.R. Sankey-García.
Richard Noss Co-director: London Knowledge Lab Institute of Education, University of London Director: UK Technology-enhanced Learning (Teaching and Learning.
CRICOS Provider No 00025B Re-visioning mathematics education at the secondary-tertiary interface: Towards creative boundary practices Merrilyn Goos The.
1 Unit 4: One-Step Equations The Georgia Performance Standards Website.
CCGPS Mathematics Fourth Grade Update Webinar Unit 3: Fraction Equivalents October 14, 2013 Update presentations are the result of collaboration between.
Thinking Actively in a Social Context T A S C.
What we know…. Use Lisa’s call in number 3 1 Instructional Multiplier Customized and Adaptive Scaffolded Support Active Engagement Accelerated Learning.
Nicole Paulson CCSSO Webinar March 21, 2012 Transition to the Common Core State Standards in Elementary Math.
1 Math CAMPPP 2011 Math at the Beach!!! Grade 5-8 Sandra Fraser Erik Teather.
Professor Richard Noss (Director) London Knowledge Lab, IOE Professor Diana Laurillard London Knowledge Lab, IOE Professor Mike Sharples LSRI, Nottingham.
1. An Overview of the Algebra Standard for School Mathematics? 2.
MiGen: Intelligent Support for Mathematical Generalisation INVESTIGATORS Richard Noss Alex Poulovassilis George Magoulas Celia Hoyles Niall Winters TEACHERS.
LEARNING DISABILITIES IMPACTING MATHEMATICS Ann Morrison, Ph.D.
NC NAEP Project Module 3 - Activity 3 Doing and Analyzing Early Algebra Problems from NAEP Elementary Module 3, Activity 3.
Big Ideas Differentiation Frames with Icons. 1. Number Uses, Classification, and Representation- Numbers can be used for different purposes, and numbers.
MiGen: Intelligent Support for Mathematical Generalisation Richard Noss Alex Poulovassilis George Magoulas Celia Hoyles Niall Winters Ken Kahn Sergio Gutiérrez.
Plenary 2 Summer Institute 2009 Thunder Bay. Setting Lesson Goals.
Mysterious X Using algebraic reasoning to solve for the value of variables for 8 th graders By Rachel Deal LTEC
High School Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics.
5.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SUMMER INSTITUTE 2014 SESSION 5 20 JUNE 2014 SEEING PATTERNS AND TRENDS IN BIVARIATE DATA.
Towards some Grand (?) Challenges for Technology Enhanced Learning Richard Noss London Knowledge Lab University of London (IOE/Birkbeck) TLRP - Technology.
Insights About the Grade 1 Learning Expectations in the CCSS Topic #1: The meaning of the equal sign Presented by the Office of Curriculum, Instruction.
1 Breakout 2 Patterning and Algebra Building Learning Goals and Consolidating Questions.
LEARNING DISABILITIES IMPACTING MATHEMATICS Ann Morrison, Ph.D.
Patterns and Relationships. Graphing Relations A graph can also be used to show the relationship between two quantities The relation is used to create.
© BLR ® —Business & Legal Resources 1408 Teambuilding for All Employees.
Students in Kindergarten will focus on two critical areas: representing, relating, and operating on whole numbers describing shapes and spatial relationships.
What do we have to learn in order to learn mathematics? Anne Watson Stirling 2009.
Linear Growing Patterns and Relations: A Sneak Preview Grade Wendy Telford Grade Wendy Telford.
Technology in mathematics education: Implications for professional development Alison Clark-Wilson UCL Knowledge Lab, University College London.
Developing mathematical thinking in the core curriculum Anne Watson East London Maths Forum June 2008.
1 Breakout 2 Patterning and Algebra Building Learning Goals and Consolidating Questions.
Plenary 1. What’s important about the Math we Teach? A Focus on Big Ideas Marian Small
Math Alliance Teaching All Learners Summer 2011 Beth Schefelker Melissa Hedges Chris Guthrie.
This module was developed by Margaret Smith and Victoria Bill at the University of Pittsburgh. Video courtesy of Pittsburgh Public Schools and the Institute.
Enhancing Mathematical Learning through Talk October 16 th 2014: Session 1 Connecting Threads.
Session 3 Implementing Tasks: Maintaining Fidelity Reflecting on Practice: Worthwhile Tasks Reflecting on PracticePark City Mathematics Institute1.
SB 2042 Curriculum Information Literacy April 16, 2007 Element 16d.
Program Description Comprehensive middle school mathematics curriculum primarily used in grades 6-8. Development of the curriculum was funded in part by.
Learning type: Acquisition
Presenters: Wei-Chih Hsu Professor: Ming-Puu Chen Date: 12/18/2007
Leap Frog Fractions 4th Grade
Organizational Culture
Technology in mathematics education: Implications for professional development Alison Clark-Wilson UCL Knowledge Lab, University College London.
Lesson – Teacher Notes Standard:
Evaluating Algebraic Expressions
Reflecting on Practice: Worthwhile Tasks
Evaluating Algebraic Expressions
Presentation transcript:

Alternative epistemologies for algebraic generalisation Richard Noss, Celia Hoyles, Eirini Geraniou and Manolis Mavrikis London Knowledge Lab Institute of Education - University of London

 an intelligent exploratory learning environment for supporting the construction of mathematical generalisations & their expression as rules

UK Curriculum for grade 4/5

Level 4 Level 4/5

an epistemological obstacle  teachers’ epistemology  the special case is a way of thinking about the general case How many here? How many there? How many in general? Count, recognize pattern, apply the pattern to any 'given number'.

an epistemological obstacle  students’ epistemology  the answer is the number of tiles – i’ll count them!  the teacher says ‘any number’. OK, 6.  oh alright, 7!!!  what is this other thing i’m supposed to do and why am I supposed to be doing it?

Teachers Teacher Educators Stakeholders Advisors John Mason (Open Univ.) Lulu Healy (Univ. UNIBAN, Sau Paulo, Brazil) Teachers Teacher Educators Stakeholders Advisors John Mason (Open Univ.) Lulu Healy (Univ. UNIBAN, Sau Paulo, Brazil) School A (Hackney) School B (Leamington Spa) School C (Islington) School D (Alton) School A (Hackney) School B (Leamington Spa) School C (Islington) School D (Alton) The M i GEN team Richard Noss (IOE) Alex Poulovassilis (BBK) Celia Hoyles (IOE) George Magoulas (BBK) Richard Noss (IOE) Alex Poulovassilis (BBK) Celia Hoyles (IOE) George Magoulas (BBK) Eirini Geraniou (IOE) Sergio Gutierrez (BBK) Ken Kahn (IOE) Manolis Mavrikis (IOE) Darren Pearce (BBK) Niall Winters (IOE) PhD students Mihaela Cocea (BBK) Boon Chua Liang (IOE) Eirini Geraniou (IOE) Sergio Gutierrez (BBK) Ken Kahn (IOE) Manolis Mavrikis (IOE) Darren Pearce (BBK) Niall Winters (IOE) PhD students Mihaela Cocea (BBK) Boon Chua Liang (IOE)

The eXpresser microworld

M i Gen System The MiGen system comprises 1.a microworld (the eXpresser) 2.intelligent Support to encourage generalisation through  adaptive feedback to students  support for teachers to monitor students’ progress and suggest strategies 3.tools to support collaboration  group tasks for sharing & discussing constructions and rules with each other and with teachers

some responses to the epistemological challenge  dynamically presented tasks  ‘unlocked numbers’ as a model for for constants and variables  synchronous view of the general case alongside any actions on special cases  the big idea - any epistemological rupture between competing epistemologies is made explicit and manipulable

 play swf play swf

Students’ Constructions Number Of Students Students’ Derived Rules

sharing process & outputs

see Can this be ‘messed up’? providing intelligent support to students and teachers

migenproject.wordpress.com

spare slides

1.scaffolds to construct general models provision of a rationale for generality through animated task presentation allowing student-controlled validation of constructions and rules by animation 2.mutually supportive model and underlying rule construction  objects & operations to construct patterns rules built on the basis of patterns’ building blocks and their transformations

3. work on a particular case while `keeping an eye’ on the general a.operationalising the distinction between constants and variables b.fostering explicit expression of implicit relationships between quantities within a pattern c.motivating explicit expression of implicit relationships between variables in the model

4. enabling assessment of the equivalence of rules replacement simple manipulation & collecting ‘like’ terms relating rule and figure number subsequent validation by animation