Compease Staff Salary Administration Program. Compease - General A fully qualified and effective work force is essential to the College’s success Fundamental.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Risk Management Initiative: Wage and Hour Issues for Employees and Supervisors Module Office of the Vice President for Ethics and Compliance Office of.
Advertisements

1 Market Pricing Organizations seek to offer market based pay rates in order to attract and retain competent employees There are two basic methods to recognize.
Mt. San Antonio College CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION STUDY February 2012.
Compensation Management Mid-term Review Dr. Barbara Lyon, SPHR HRM 516.
A Roundtable Discussion: Market Based Pay Structures for “Reality Based” Pay July 2005.
Chapt. 8 – Job Evaluation Primary Goal of Job Evaluation:
Career Banding.
1 Position Evaluation is the foundation of Pay Program Design Exempt Pay Program Design.
MGMT Managing Employee Reward Systems Individual Pay Determination Creating Equitable Salary Structures.
The US Department of Labor’s Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
Job Evaluation Kenneth M. York School of Business Administration Oakland University.
©a Times Mirror Higher Education Group, Inc., company, 1997 IRWI N Equity Theory OUTCOME INPUTS OUTCOME INPUTS ? the same more or less A person evaluates.
Motivating Employees through Compensation
Agenda Topics: Managing Pay Within a Grade Setting Starting Salaries
Introduction to Compensation. Agenda Marquette University’s compensation philosophy What is the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)? Definition and differences.
Non-Academic Staff Compensation Structure & Administration
Jointly presented by Human Resources and FSO-Operations Fair Labor Standards Act Revisions.
HR for Non-profits Valerie Schuette, Executive Director Human Resources & Workforce Development.
Copyright ©2012 by Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.9- 1 Chapter 9 Compensation and Benefits Prepared by Joseph Mosca Monmouth University.
Total Rewards and Compensation
STAFF COMPENSATION PROGRAM TOWN HALL MEETINGS FEBRUARY 2004.
Competitive Market Compensation Review July 2009 Project Overview.
What is the Global Grading Project
Pay Structure Decisions
Building Internally Consistent Compensation Systems
SECCP Salaried Employees Compensation and Classification Program June, 2005.
Chapter 9 Determining Pay and Benefits.
Staff Meeting Compensation Plan Adopted during the November 11, 2010 Board of Supervisor’s Meeting.
Employee & Organizational Development Position Description Questionnaire (PDQ) Review “The PDQ and YOU” Human Resources The University of Tennessee
Non-Academic Staff Compensation Program Employee Presentation 2013.
Wage / Hour for Independent Schools
VSQUASK WELCOME Lester Pourciau Round Table Group Session 1
HOD and HOU Orientation. 1.MEDIU’s Vision, Mission, Values & Objectives 2.MEDIU’s Organisational Chart 3.Divisional, Departmental, and Unit Functions.
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT MIHE Mashal Institute of Higher Education.
Updated Performance Management for Exempt Staff Fall 2009.
1 Employee Relations/Reward Assessing job size. 2 Question??????? Why is one job worth more than another? How do you measure or evaluate jobs in a way.
© 2009 South-Western Cengage. All rights reserved. Chapter 7 Compensation Strategies and Practices.
Benchmarking Compensation & Benefits: How Do You Compare? Christina L. Greathouse, Ph.D. Strategic Performance Group April 30, 2008.
FLSA Training for Supervisors: Part IV
Cost accounting concepts and objectives Usually there are three management levels The operating management The middle management The executive management.
Topic 6 - A Designing the Compensation Program. 9. Centralization Vs. Decentralization of Pay Decisions 8. Open Vs. Secret Pay 7. Monetary Vs. Non-monetary.
JOB EVALUATION & SALARY STRUCTURE DESIGN
-09/06/13, - Page 1 The Ohio State University - Classification and Compensation Talking Points - CONFIDENTIAL – for internal use only -  Compensation.
Chapter 11 Establishing a Pay Structure. MGMT Chapter2 Decisions About Pay Job Structure –Relative pay for different jobs within the organization.
Campus Quality Survey 1998, 1999, & 2001 Comparison Office of Institutional Research & Planning July 5, 2001.
© Prentice-Hall, Inc., 2001 Chapter Seven Building Internally Consistent Compensation Systems.
JOB EVALUATION MAGNETIC CONTACTORS.
Procedure for Establishing Point Method of Job Evaluation
Executive, Administrative and Professional Exemptions FLSA 29 CFR 541.
Chapter 9 Managing Compensation
Strategic Human resource Management compensation.
Pay Reform Perspectives in Jordan Amman-Jordan September 2006 Ministry of Public Sector Development.
Chapter 11 Pay Structure Decisions Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written.
Planning and Organizing Chapter 13. The Planning Function Planning for a business should stem from the company’s Business Plan – The business plan sets.
- 1 - FINAL_NOScript_JDVerificationTraining pptx Job Titles Examples Used for HISD Nonexempt Jobs Assistant: Using knowledge of a functional area(s),
一、 Translate the following HRM terms ( 15 Points,each 1 point ) 二、 True or False ( 20 Points,each 1 point ) 三、 Define the following terms(25points, each.
Discussion on Compensation. Goal To assist in securing and retaining a staff of necessary quality to achieve the goals and objectives of the organization.
Fair Pay for Northern California Nonprofits: The 2016 Compensation & Benefits Survey HIGHLIGHTS AND TRENDS May 12, 2016 Sponsored by CompassPoint Nonprofit.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Appraisal Training for Central Office and Campus-Based Non-Teacher Employees September 2013 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT.
Managing Compensation Chapter 10 MGT 3513 “The thermometer of success is merely the jealousy of the malcontents.” Salvador Dali.
Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) Proposed Changes CALS May 24, 2016 Kelly Delforge, SPHR, SHRM-SCP Director, HR Solutions and Consulting Division of Human.
JOB EVALUATION MAGNETIC CONTACTORS 1/26/2018.
Job Titles Examples Used for HISD Nonexempt Jobs
Job Evaluation.
ESTABLISHING STRATEGIC PAY PLANS
Introduction to Compensation
Job Evaluation Salary Administration Program
Career Banding Program for North Carolina State Government Employees
Chapter 10: Compensation
Compensation 101 A Primer for HR Professionals
Presentation transcript:

Compease Staff Salary Administration Program

Compease - General A fully qualified and effective work force is essential to the College’s success Fundamental to pay employees a fair and equitable amount for their services Achieved through a salary system that is Internally consistent Externally competitive Responsive to changes in economic conditions

Compease – Job Evaluation Objectives Focus on the job and not the person holding it Treat employees doing approximately the same kind and/or level of work similarly in regard to pay The job evaluation process attempts to: Establish the relative value of jobs Group jobs into appropriate pay grades Ensure a basis for disciplined rather than arbitrary judgments Provide consistent, understandable measure of the worth of each job

Compease – Job Evaluation Process Process is carried out by utilizing guide charts Evaluation method is essentially a point/factor comparison plan Built around a group of jobs called benchmarks Well established, clear-cut, clearly understood jobs within the College Representative of large employee populations (this is more applicable at lower levels) Easily compared to like jobs outside the organization Includes all regular (non-temporary) jobs at the College except for faculty and coaching positions

Compease – Job Evaluation Process Continued Ten Compensatory factors Knowledge/skills Problem Solving (effort) Accountability

Compease — Determination of Salary Structures Process by which monetary values are attached to salary grades Assists the College in meeting their salary administration objectives Salary surveys are utilized to determine salary levels for both campuses

Compease — Determination of Salary Structures Continued Extreme care is taken to ensure benchmark jobs used for surveys are representative of our organization Commonly found in most competitive companies Cover substantial portion of employee population Varying salary levels Represent major functional areas

Compease – Types of Salary Structures Three salary structures: executive, exempt (salaried), and non-exempt (hourly) Non-exempt based on local labor market Exempt based on local/regional or industry labor market Executive based on regional/national or industry labor market

Compease – Elements of Salary Ranges Midpoints (job market rate) considered the critical points in administering salaries Controlling guide is the pattern which provides the closest fit to competitive practices The spread, maximum rate minus minimum rate, varies by salary structure

Compease – Sample Job Evaluation File Clerk Experience—1 (The job can be learned in hours or days or weeks.) Education—2 (A high school education or GED.) Managerial Responsibility—1 (Has no supervisory/managerial responsibilities.) Interpersonal Skills—1 (Normal courtesy in dealing with others is required. Work involves minimal contacts, usually within the department. Contact usually involving routine, non-sensitive issues.) Independent Judgment—2 (Specific standards and operating procedures provide some options and latitude for independent decision and action. Decisions are usually limited to choosing between two or three known options. There is minimal room for discretion. Decisions normally take the form of recommendations (very limited decision-making authority.)) Mental Process—1 (Problems encountered are simple in nature, requiring a choice from a limited number of prescribed options.)

Compease – Sample Job Evaluation Continued Organizational Impact—1 (Has little or no noticeable authority to make decisions that would impact the overall goals and objectives of the College and would not have budgetary responsibilities. The impact of the job would generally effect the services or product which an individual student would receive. Does not have budgetary responsibilities and is not authorized to make decisions that would commit or jeopardize college assets/budget.) Organizational Restraint—2 (Moderate supervision and inspection of work. Errors can be difficult to detect but are generally easy to resolve and/or consequences of potential errors is of some concern but not significant.) Physical Demands—1 (Job may require lifting light weight objects (1 to 10 pounds) with no repetitive bending or stooping. Occasionally lift average weight objects (1 to 10 pounds.)) Working Environment—1 (Regular exposure to favorable conditions such as those found in a normal office.) Resulting job grade based on evaluation: 4

Compease – Status at the College On January 15, 16, and 17 designated college staff, along with a consultant from KG and Associates (creator of the Compease software) met with supervisors to evaluate 215 regular full-time and part-time positions KG and Associates also provided training to designated college staff on how to use the Compease system Analysis of results Held conference call with consultant on February 13 to go over results of analysis of evaluation Plan to utilize the Compease system for staff salary increases for the fiscal year if moneys are available for this purpose Also, as part of the process, our plan is to post all staff positions with corresponding grades and make this posting accessible to employees.

Compease – Additional Information KG and Associates provides 800 number phone support anytime for no additional cost The software allows a way to do a market comparison or Compa-ratio Tool to calculate cost of salary increases by the person, department, and the institution The software provides a process for writing and maintaining job descriptions

Compease Are there any questions????