Copyright 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Essentials of Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition Joseph S. Valacich Joey F. George Jeffrey A. Hoffer Chapter.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Monash University Week 7 Data Modelling Relational Database Theory IMS1907 Database Systems.
Advertisements

1 Translation of ER-diagram into Relational Schema Prof. Sin-Min Lee Department of Computer Science.
© 2005 by Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 5: Logical Database Design and the Relational Model Modern Database Management 7 th Edition Jeffrey A. Hoffer, Mary B.
Copyright 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Essentials of Systems Analysis and Design Second Edition Joseph S. Valacich Joey F. George Jeffrey A. Hoffer Chapter.
© 2005 by Prentice Hall Chapter 3a Database Design Modern Systems Analysis and Design Fourth Edition Jeffrey A. Hoffer Joey F. George Joseph S. Valacich.
Data Storage Formats Files Databases
Designing Databases Modern Systems Analysis and Design Fifth Edition Jeffrey A. Hoffer Joey F. George Joseph S. Valacich.
Copyright 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Essentials of Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition Joseph S. Valacich Joey F. George Jeffrey A. Hoffer Chapter.
1 © Prentice Hall, 2002 Chapter 5: Logical Database Design and the Relational Model Modern Database Management 6 th Edition Jeffrey A. Hoffer, Mary B.
Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition
Chapter 9 Designing Databases
Chapter 4 Relational Databases Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4-1.
Chapter 8 Structuring System Data Requirements
Copyright 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Essentials of Systems Analysis and Design Second Edition Joseph S. Valacich Joey F. George Jeffrey A. Hoffer Chapter.
Chapter 4 Relational Databases Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education 4-1.
Michael F. Price College of Business Chapter 6: Logical database design and the relational model.
Copyright 2002 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition Jeffrey A. Hoffer Joey F. George Joseph S. Valacich Chapter 10 Structuring.
10-1 Chapter 10 Designing Databases Modern Systems Analysis and Design Jeffrey A. Hoffer Joey F. George Joseph S. Valacich.
Chapter 6 Physical Database Design. Introduction The purpose of physical database design is to translate the logical description of data into the technical.
1 C omputer information systems Design Instructor: Mr. Ahmed Al Astal IGGC1202 College Requirement University Of Palestine.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 9.1.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 9.1.
MIS 385/MBA 664 Systems Implementation with DBMS/ Database Management Dave Salisbury ( )
Functional Dependence An attribute A is functionally dependent on attribute(s) B if: given a value b for B there is one and only one corresponding value.
© 2006 ITT Educational Services Inc. SE350 System Analysis for Software Engineers: Unit 2 Slide 1 Chapter 10 Designing Databases.
Chapter 9 Designing Databases Modern Systems Analysis and Design Sixth Edition Jeffrey A. Hoffer Joey F. George Joseph S. Valacich.
Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Essentials of Systems Analysis and Design Joseph S. Valacich Joey F. George Jeffrey A. Hoffer Chapter 6 Structuring.
Copyright 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Essentials of Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition Joseph S. Valacich Joey F. George Jeffrey A. Hoffer Chapter.
Concepts and Terminology Introduction to Database.
1 Translation of ER-diagram into Relational Schema Prof. Sin-Min Lee Department of Computer Science.
Lecture 12 Designing Databases 12.1 COSC4406: Software Engineering.
10/3/2012ISC329 Isabelle Bichindaritz1 Logical Design.
Copyright 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Essentials of Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition Joseph S. Valacich Joey F. George Jeffrey A. Hoffer Chapter.
Chapter 10 Designing Databases Modern Systems Analysis and Design Fifth Edition Jeffrey A. Hoffer Joey F. George Joseph S. Valacich.
CIS 210 Systems Analysis and Development Week 6 Part II Designing Databases,
Unit 4 Object Relational Modeling. Key Concepts Object-Relational Modeling outcomes and process Relational data model Normalization Anomalies Functional.
1 © Prentice Hall, 2002 Chapter 5: Logical Database Design and the Relational Model Modern Database Management 6 th Edition Jeffrey A. Hoffer, Mary B.
Physical Database Design Purpose- translate the logical description of data into the technical specifications for storing and retrieving data Goal - create.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Essentials of Systems Analysis and Design Fourth Edition Joseph S. Valacich Joey F.
1 ER Modeling BUAD/American University Mapping ER modeling to Relationships.
Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Essentials of Systems Analysis and Design Joseph S. Valacich Joey F. George Jeffrey A. Hoffer Chapter 9 Designing Databases.
Chapter 10 Designing Databases. Objectives:  Define key database design terms.  Explain the role of database design in the IS development process. 
9-1 © Prentice Hall, 2007 Topic 9: Physical Database Design Object-Oriented Systems Analysis and Design Joey F. George, Dinesh Batra, Joseph S. Valacich,
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 9 Designing Databases 9.1.
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 5 (Part a): Logical Database Design and the Relational Model Modern Database Management.
6-1 © Prentice Hall, 2007 Topic 6: Object-Relational Modeling Object-Oriented Systems Analysis and Design Joey F. George, Dinesh Batra, Joseph S. Valacich,
8-1 © Prentice Hall, 2007 Chapter 8: Object-Relational Modeling Object-Oriented Systems Analysis and Design Joey F. George, Dinesh Batra, Joseph S. Valacich,
11-1 © Prentice Hall, 2004 Chapter 11: Physical Database Design Object-Oriented Systems Analysis and Design Joey F. George, Dinesh Batra, Joseph S. Valacich,
Lecture 4: Logical Database Design and the Relational Model 1.
Logical Design 12/10/2009GAK1. Learning Objectives How to remove features from a local conceptual model that are not compatible with the relational model.
Copyright 2002 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition Jeffrey A. Hoffer Joey F. George Joseph S. Valacich Chapter 10 Structuring.
Copyright 2002 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition Jeffrey A. Hoffer Joey F. George Joseph S. Valacich Chapter 12 Designing.
Cis339 Modern Systems Analysis and Design Fifth Edition Chapter 10 Designing Databases 10.1.
Chapter 10 Structuring System Requirements: Conceptual Data Modeling
Logical Database Design and the Rational Model
Chapter 4 Logical Database Design and the Relational Model
Chapter 4: Logical Database Design and the Relational Model
Chapter 9 Designing Databases
MIS 322 – Enterprise Business Process Analysis
Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition
Chapter 4 Relational Databases
Translation of ER-diagram into Relational Schema
Chapter 9 Designing Databases
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Chapter 9 Designing Databases
Chapter 12 Designing Databases
Chapter 10 Structuring System Requirements: Conceptual Data Modeling
Chapter 10 Designing Databases
Chapter 9 Designing Databases
Presentation transcript:

Copyright 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Essentials of Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition Joseph S. Valacich Joey F. George Jeffrey A. Hoffer Chapter 9 Designing Databases 9.1

Copyright 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Process of Database Design Logical Design Based upon the conceptual data model Four key steps: 1.Develop a logical data model for each known user interface for the application using normalization principles. 2.Combine normalized data requirements from all user interfaces into one consolidated logical database model. 3.Translate the conceptual E-R data model for the application into normalized data requirements. 4.Compare the consolidated logical database design with the translated E-R model and produce one final logical database model for the application. 9.2

Copyright 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. 9.3

Copyright 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Process of Database Design (continued) Physical Design Based upon results of logical database design Key decisions: 1. Choosing storage format for each attribute from the logical database model 2. Grouping attributes from the logical database model into physical records 3. Arranging related records in secondary memory (hard disks and magnetic tapes) so that records can be stored, retrieved, and updated rapidly 4. Selecting media and structures for storing data to make access more efficient 9.4

Copyright 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Process of Database Design (continued) Primary Key An attribute whose value is unique across all occurrences of a relation Foreign Key An attribute that appears as a nonprimary key attribute in one relation and as a primary key attribute (or part of a primary key) in another relation. 9.5

Copyright 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Deliverables and Outcomes Logical database design must account for every data element, system input or output Normalized relations are the primary deliverable Physical database design results in converting relations into files 9.6

Copyright 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Relational Database Model Data represented as a set of related tables or relations Relation A named, two-dimensional table of data. Each relation consists of a set of named columns and an arbitrary number of unnamed rows. Properties  Entries in cells are simple.  Entries in columns are from the same set of values.  Each row is unique.  The sequence of columns can be interchanged without changing the meaning or use of the relation.  The rows may be interchanged or stored in any sequence. 9.7

Copyright 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Relational Database Model (continued) Well-Structured Relation A relation that contains a minimum amount of redundancy and allows users to insert, modify, and delete the rows without errors or inconsistencies 9.8

Copyright 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Transforming E-R Diagrams into Relations It is useful to transform the conceptual data model into a set of normalized relations Steps: 1.Represent entities 2.Represent relationships 3.Normalize the relations 4.Merge the relations 9.9

Copyright 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Transforming E-R Diagrams into Relations (continued) 1. Represent Entities Each regular entity is transformed into a relation The identifier of the entity type becomes the primary key of the corresponding relation The primary key must satisfy the following two conditions a. The value of the key must uniquely identify every row in the relation b. The key should be non-redundant 9.10

Copyright 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. 9.11

Copyright 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Transforming E-R Diagrams into Relations (continued) 2. Represent Relationships Binary 1:N Relationships  Add the primary key attribute (or attributes) of the entity on the one side of the relationship as a foreign key in the relation on the right side  The one side migrates to the many side 9.12

Copyright 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. 9.13

Copyright 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Transforming E-R Diagrams into Relations (continued) Binary or Unary 1:1  Three possible options: a. Add the primary key of A as a foreign key of B b. Add the primary key of B as a foreign key of A c. Both 9.14

Copyright 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Transforming E-R Diagrams into Relations (continued) 2. Represent Relationships (continued) Binary and higher M:N relationships  Create another relation and include primary keys of all relations as primary key of new relation 9.15

Copyright 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. 9.16

Copyright 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Transforming E-R Diagrams into Relations (continued) Unary 1:N Relationships  Relationship between instances of a single entity type  Utilize a recursive foreign key A foreign key in a relation that references the primary key values of that same relation Unary M:N Relationships  Create a separate relation  Primary key of new relation is a composite of two attributes that both take their values from the same primary key 9.17

Copyright 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. 9.18

Copyright 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. 9.19

Copyright 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Transforming E-R Diagrams into Relations (continued) 3. Merging Relations (View Integration)  Purpose is to remove redundant relations  View Integration Problems  Synonyms  Two different names used for the same attribute  When merging, get agreement from users on a single, standard name  Homonyms  A single attribute name that is used for two or more different attributes  Resolved by creating a new name  Dependencies between nonkeys  Dependencies may be created as a result of view integration  In order to resolve, the new relation must be normalized 9.20

Copyright 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Physical File and Database Design The following information is required Normalized relations, including volume estimates Definitions of each attribute Descriptions of where and when data are used, entered, retrieved, deleted, and updated (including frequencies) Expectations or requirements for response time and data integrity Descriptions of the technologies used for implementing the files and database 9.21

Copyright 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Designing Fields Field The smallest unit of named application data recognized by system software Each attribute from each relation will be represented as one or more fields Choosing data types Data Type A coding scheme recognized by system software for representing organizational data Four objectives: Minimize storage space Represent all possible values for the field Improve data integrity for the field Support all data manipulations desired on the field Calculated fields A field that can be derived from other database fields 9.22

Copyright 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Controlling Data Integrity Default Value A value a field will assume unless an explicit value is entered for that field Input Mask A pattern of codes that restricts the width and possible values for each position of a field Range Control Limits range of values that can be entered into field Referential Integrity An integrity constraint specifying that the value (or existence) of an attribute in one relation depends on the value (or existence) of the same attribute in another relation Null Value A special field value, distinct from 0, blank or any other value, that indicates that the value for the field is missing or otherwise unknown 9.23

Copyright 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. 9.24