The Next Step for Idaho’s CWCS. 9:30 Welcome, overview, and what is expected 10:30 Identifying focal areas 12:00 Lunch - Open discussion 1:00 Identifying.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LOWER SALMON RIVER Tributary Protection and Enhancement.
Advertisements

AN M3 EAGLE LLC PROPOSAL. Acting Field Manager Coeur d’Alene Field Office (208)
The Next Step for Idaho’s CWCS. 10:00 Welcome, overview, and what is expected 11:00 Identifying focal areas 12:00 Lunch - Open discussion 1:00 Identifying.
Geology of Idaho The Northern Rockies. Northern Rockies Basin & Range Middle Rockies The 3 mountainous regions of Idaho.
 Necessary materials: PowerPoint Guide Teacher Information!
Created by Jennifer Peterson In Cooperation With Idaho Rangeland Resources Commission and the University of Idaho - Rangeland Ecology & Management Department.
BLM Plant Conservation Program: Its Role in Sage Grouse Conservation
A Statewide Strategy for Restoring Arizona’s Forests A 20-YEAR ACTION PLAN.
Peace Connectivity Network A Presentation By Brian Churchill, Phacet, 2004.
USDA Forest Service Southwestern Region. Overview  Why Landscapes?  Other Landscape Efforts  Strategic Action Plan Summary  Region-wide Landscape.
Development of a Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy for Georgia Georgia Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division.
Wisconsin’s Wildlife Action Plan and Citizen-Based Monitoring Tara L.E. Bergeson Wildlife Action Plan Implementation Coordinator Wisconsin Department of.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level The Economy and Conservation Agendas:
Climate Adaptation: the Power of Conservation Across Boundaries Steven Fuller, NALCC The Wildlife Management Institute.
Santa Fe County Focal Species Workshop Thank you all for participating with a special thanks to: –Santa Fe County –NM Department of Game and Fish –The.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Conserving the Nature of America How does the surrogate species effort relate to other ongoing efforts? Birds of Management.
Biological Basis of the Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan.
New England Cottontail Conservation Efforts Anthony Tur US Fish and Wildlife Service New England Field Office Concord, New Hampshire.
W.G. Kepner and D.F. Bradford 29 April 2004 Regional Gap Analysis Program for Nevada, Utah, New Mexico, Colorado, and Arizona.
Virginia Wildlife Action Plan David K. Whitehurst Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries.
JOINT VENTURES Celebrating 25 Years of Bird Conservation.
Bird Conservation on Private Lands Why Birds Matter.
Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Plan (CWCP) and Citizen-based Monitoring Signe Holtz Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
CSG West Energy and Environment Committee July 28, 2015 Dustin T. Miller Governor’s Office of Species Conservation.
Steering Committee Meeting December 19-20, 2013 UPDATES.
Wyoming Landscape Conservation Initiative An Approach to Landscape Scale Conservation in Southwest Wyoming October 23, 2014.
Conservation Design and the Sagebrush Ecosystem Russell George Executive Director Colorado Dept. of Natural Resources.
Lewis River Wildlife Habitat Management Program February 20, 2008.
Landscape Conservation Cooperatives The Right Science in the Right Places.
The Uncompahgre Partnership Healthy Lands for Healthy Communities.
Bird Conservation on Private Lands Proactive Conservation.
March 26, 2010 Planning for Priority Species and Vegetation: Health Assessment A Systematic Framework to Plan for Biological Resources In the BLM’s Land.
PRESENTATION FOR TAMARISK COALITION WEBINAR 18 DECEMBER 2013.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Great Plains Landscape Conservation Cooperative December 4, 2009 Dr. Benjamin Tuggle and Steve Guertin Regional Directors,
Overview of the KBA Process : A report card for Melanesia Insert representative image or map here Outcome definition for CI Melanesia through Moore- funded.
Symposium in Context of Yellow Rail Conservation JENNIFER WHEELER, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Waterbird Conservation for the Americas JANE AUSTIN, US.
On – Site Training Overview LAND USE PLANNING FOR PRIORITY SPECIES AND VEGETATION March 11, 2010.
Solutions on the Horizon: Integrated Planning in the 21 st Century Trisha White Defenders of Wildlife.
Seabird Monitoring in the California Current System U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service U.S. Geological Survey.
US Fish and Wildlife Service Focal Species Strategy for Migratory Birds.
The Next Step for Idaho’s CWCS. 9:00 Welcome, overview, and what is expected 10:00 Identifying focal areas 12:00 Lunch - Open discussion 1:00 Identifying.
Utah’s Watershed Restoration Initiative Mule Deer.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife: Incorporating Climate Change into Department Activities Panel Presentation North Pacific LCC Steering Committee.
Conservation planning strategies at the landscape scale.
Helping Communities Protect Wildlife Habitat Emily Brunkhurst Wildlife Biologist NH Fish and Game Taking Action for Wildlife.
AREAS OF CONSERVATION EMPHASIS ACE-II Photos courtesy of USFWS National Image Library Melanie Gogol-Prokurat California Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Sustaining Front Range Forests & Communities February 26, 2010.
Habitat Mapping of High Level Indicators at Multiple Scales for Fish and Wildlife.
Landscape Analysis Project: Craig Mountain Wildlife Management Area For/Range 527 Landscape Ecology.
GREATER SAGE-GROUSE COMPREHENSIVE CONSERVATION Strategy Conservation in Sagebrush Ecosystems San Stiver Sage-Grouse Coordinator Western Association of.
1. Adaptation – management actions to help fish and wildlife and their habitats adapt to climate change, using a Strategic Habitat Conservation Framework.
“The conservation challenges of the 21 st Century represent a force of change more far-reaching and consequential than any previously encountered.” Year:
Progress Under Guidance Documents Northeast Conservation Framework LCC Conservation Science Strategic Plan USFWS Science Investment and Accountability.
Conserving Birds & Their Habitats Brief Overview of IMBCR Program and New Developments.
SAGE GROUSE INITIATIVE OREGON IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY USDA – NRCS – Oregon.
1A - 1B. Define Project Team, Scope, Vision & Targets.
What are Rangelands? Presentation (ppt.)
North Atlantic LCC Science Needs and Projects Background Vision and Mission 2010 Projects (review, status, next steps) 2011 Science Needs Assessment, Workshop.
Unit Webex Meetings Step 1: Targets, Threats, and Stresses.
Options and Starting Points for Developing for Multi-Species ESA Conservation Programs Specifically for Threats Resulting in Habitat Loss Sean Kyle WAFWA.
Conserving habitat through partnerships
Prioritizing Species for Biological Planning in the North Atlantic Landscape Conservation Cooperative (NALCC) USFWS Region 5 Strategic Habitat Conservation.
Landscape Conservation Strategy
Sagebrush Conservation Strategy Workshop
Rangeland Ecosystems of Idaho
Teacher Information! Necessary materials: ppt guide PowerPoint Guide
Sagebrush Steppe.
Conserving habitat through partnerships
Management Indicator Species
Jay Carlisle, Coordinator
Presentation transcript:

The Next Step for Idaho’s CWCS

9:30 Welcome, overview, and what is expected 10:30 Identifying focal areas 12:00 Lunch - Open discussion 1:00 Identifying focal areas 3:00 Wrap-up 3:30 Adjourn Today’s Agenda

Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy “…provide a framework for conserving ‘species of greatest conservation need’ and the habitats upon which they depend.”

State Wildlife Grant Program in 2001 CWCS required by 2005 Strategic document, not prescriptive “…enable agency and private partners to individually or cooperatively implement conservation actions that will benefit priority species and habitats.”

229 Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) 18 priority habitats 14 ecological sections

Current Implementation BLM: Challenge Cost Share funding and Resource Management Plans specify SGCN FS: Forest Plan updates incorporate SGCN NRCS: Farm Bill programs target SGCN USFWS: LIP targets SGCN Doris Duke Charitable Foundation: specifies implementation of CWCS

From the Strategy… …to the ground … to Action Plans…

SGCN Prioritizing Tool Species by section filters Based on user interests

NatureServe Conservation Status Ranks Assessment of the species condition statewide (S) and rangewide (G). G1 or S1Critically imperiled G2 or S2Imperiled G3 or S3Vulnerable G4 or S4Apparently secure G5 or S5Secure

A Vision for Focal Areas 1. Select Species Species A Species B Species C Species D Overlay Known Distributions Richness = High Low

A Vision for Focal Areas 3. Compare with other priorities Winter Range Focus Streams Unique Habitat Richness 4. Your Focal Areas High Low

Resource Focal Area: a geographical area necessary for the long-term persistence of SGCNs and their habitats (aka High Resource Value Areas or Biologically Important Areas) Management Focal Area: a general geographical area that targets resources and efforts where they can benefit the largest number of species and habitats in need of conservation (likely includes species/habitats other than SGCN and may incorporate factors such as ownership, urgency of threat, etc.). What are Focal Areas? Resource Focal Area: a geographical area necessary for the long-term persistence of SGCNs and their habitats (aka High Resource Value Areas or Biologically Important Areas) Management Focal Area: a general geographical area that targets resources and efforts where they can benefit the largest number of species and habitats in need of conservation (likely includes species/habitats other than SGCN and may incorporate factors such as ownership, urgency of threat, etc.).

Hypothetical Example SGCN Richness Harlequin breeding Important Corridors … Focal Areas

Regional Workshops SGCN Richness Maps Final Focal Area Maps Partner Input Idaho Falls (Apr 11, 25) Boise (Mar 19, Apr 3) Coeur d’Alene (Feb 11, 22) IDFG Input IDFG Focal Area Maps

Workshop Objectives 1.Capture regional expertise and local knowledge. 2.Create ecological section-level focal area maps identifying areas of high conservation value. 3.Enable use of maps and action plans as a conservation tool for on the ground implementation and prioritization.

1.Are there specific areas that need to be included as focal areas for SGCNs and their habitat (e.g., waterfalls for black swift)? Are there areas we currently have identified that should not be (e.g., errors in the models)? 2.Do these focal areas also include species or habitat significant to conservation for other reasons (e.g., migration corridors, big game winter range). 3.What conservation actions are necessary in each area? Specific Questions

In or Out? General areas important for SGCN but by no means are intended to imply that conservation actions should be restricted to these areas.

3 Amphibians 28 Birds (1) 15 Fishes (3) 49 Invertebrates (15) 22 Mammals (6) 3 Reptiles 120 Species of Greatest Conservation Need Southwest/Central Idaho Species (#) = Number of species lacking essential information pertaining to their status in Idaho.

Dry conifer forest NRM Ponderosa Pine Woodland and Savanna RM Lodgepole Pine Forest Northern mesic conifer forest Subalpine forest RM Subalpine-Montane Riparian Shrubland, Subalpine Dry-Mesic Spruce-Fir Forest and Woodland, Subalpine Mesic Meadow Mesic deciduous shrubland Dry grassland Columbia Basin Foothill and Canyon Dry Grassland Rocky Mountain Cliff, Canyon, and Massive Bedrock Southern xeric shrubland and steppe IMB Semi-Desert Shrub-Steppe, Mixed Salt Desert Scrub, Big Sagebrush Steppe, Big Sagebrush Shrubland, Columbia Plateau Low Sagebrush Steppe, Western Juniper Woodland and Savanna Arableland Non-native herbaceous (Seeded Perennial Grassland) Priority Habitats & Systems

Edit, embellish focal area boundaries Define criteria Identify actions The Maps… What’s Expected?