2011 Upper Basin Stakeholder Forum Nueces River Authority Feb 16, 2011 – Uvalde Feb 23, 2011 – Corpus Christi.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of Water Quality in Copano Bay Watershed Kevin Wagner, PhD Texas Water Resources Institute.
Advertisements

ALLEN BERTHOLD TEXAS WATER RESOURCES INSTITUTE Water Quality and Copano Bay Watershed Efforts.
SWAMP Team Members Contact Information Karen Taberski: , Nelia White:
What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
O Adopted in 1972, the CWA is known mostly to the public by its mandate for “swimmable and fishable” waterways. o With the CWA, states evaluate all of.
TMDL Development Mainstem Monongahela River Watershed May 14, 2014.
TMDL Development Upper Kanawha River Watershed August 18, 2011 WV DEP WV DEP Dave Montali.
Texas Stream Team: Citizen Science Water Quality Monitoring and TMDLs Travis Tidwell The Meadows Center for Water and the Environment – Texas State University.
Water Resources Monitoring Strategy for Wisconsin: Building on Experience Mike Staggs, WDNR Bureau of Fisheries Management and Habitat Protection Acknowledgements:
Texas Clean Rivers Program Steering Committee Meetings Nueces River Authority Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Citizens March.
2009 Water Quality Monitoring Report – Fish Creek Vaughn Hauser, B.Sc. Naomi Parker, B.Sc., BIT, CEPIT.
Nelly Smith EPA Region 6. - Develop or revise bacteria reduction program for consistency with new TMDL requirements and allocations - Develop or revise.
TMDL Implementation in the Calleguas Creek Watershed Ashli Desai Larry Walker Associates.
Stream Monitoring in Loudoun County David Ward, Water Resources Engineer Department of Building and Development, Department of Building and Development,
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Imperial River: Water Quality Status and Basin Management Action Plan.
Texas Stream Team …is a joint partnership with Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, U.S. EPA Region VI, Texas State University-San Marcos, and numerous.
Summary of Biological Assessment Programs and Biocriteria Development for States, Tribes, Territories, and Interstate Commissions: Streams and Wadeable.
Components of every Good Watershed Management Plan NDEQ – Planning Unit August 6 th, 2014 NDEQ – Planning Unit gust 6 th 2014.
GSWA Stream Team A sub-committee of the GSWA Land and Water Stewardship Committee.
Allen Berthold Texas Water Resources Institute. Review: Clean Water Act Goal of CWA is to restore and maintain water quality suitable for the “protection.
Approaches to Addressing Bacteria Impairments Kevin Wagner Texas Water Resources Institute.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Watershed Assessment 2015 Strategic Monitoring in the Florida Keys DEAR- Water Quality Assessment Program.
California’s Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program SWAMP Today Emilie L. Reyes November 29, 2007.
Texas Clean Rivers Program Nueces River Authority Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Citizens.
Texas Clean Rivers Program Nueces River Authority Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Citizens.
Item No. 13 Recommendation to the State Water Resources Control Board Regarding the Section 303(d) List Lahontan Water Board June 19, 2014 Carly Nilson.
2011 Lower Basin Stakeholder Forum Nueces River Authority Feb 16, 2011 – Uvalde Feb 23, 2011 – Corpus Christi.
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program (SWQM)
Sustaining Long Term Regional Coordinated Monitoring Programs Todd Running, H-GAC May 9, 2006.
Water Quality Standards, TMDLs and Bioassessment Tom Porta, P.E. Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Quality Planning.
By Mary Waters, Texas Stream Team. Outline  About the Arroyo Colorado  Basic information (geography)  History  Major uses  Water quality summary.
Catoctin Creek TMDL Implementation Plan Development June 24, 2004.
The Meadows Center Texas Stream Team Prepared in cooperation with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and U.S. EPA. The preparation of this presentation.
Deep River-Portage Burns Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting March 13, 2013.
RUAA Public Release and Comment Period Nikki Jackson TIAER Project Manager June 27, 2013 Leona River Watershed Partnership Meeting Uvalde, Texas.
Delaware’s Non-Tidal Monitoring Update for CY 2011 February 8,
David R. Maidment New Project Opportunities 1.FEMA floodplain mapping information – 1 research assistant, funding initially for this year but will likely.
Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) in 4 Austin Watersheds Presented to the City of Austin Environmental Board November 7, 2012.
STREAM MONITORING CASE STUDY. Agenda  Monitoring Requirements  TMDL Requirements  OCEA Initial Monitoring Program  Selection of Parameters  Data.
Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Update Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader.
Think about answering the questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Before your volunteers begin collecting data.
Commonwealth of Virginia TMDL Program Update Citizen for Water Quality Annual Summit September 22, 2001.
Nutrient Criteria Development Update Emily McArdle Nutrient Criteria Coordinator | Water Quality Standards Group
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Nutrients and the Next Generation of Conservation Presented by: Tom Porta, P.E. Deputy Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection President,
GALVESTON BAY ESTUARY PROGRAM A CATALYST FOR PARTNERSHIPS AND COLLABORATION Sarah Bernhardt, Ph.D. Lower Rio Grande Valley 18 th Annual Water Quality Management.
Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Update Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader.
Arkansas Dept. of Environmental Quality Regulation No
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS Four Mile Run Bacteria TMDL March 25, 2002
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Project Schedule Final SWIM Plans GEBF Funding Request
Lower Laguna Madre Water Quality
The Basin–Wide Approach New 303(D) Vision
Total Maximum Daily Load Program
Request Approval of (d) Listing Methodology
Tim Cawthon TCEQ Nonpoint Source Program
Mulberry Watershed Management Plan
Surface Water Quality Monitoring in Texas and the Clean Rivers Program
The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program in Illinois
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
ADEQ Approaches to the Assessment Methodology
303(d) List March 9, 2016 WQC Jeff Manning, DWR
Total Maximum Daily Loads
2018 Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Revision
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Marco island water quality monitoring
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards
Presentation transcript:

2011 Upper Basin Stakeholder Forum Nueces River Authority Feb 16, 2011 – Uvalde Feb 23, 2011 – Corpus Christi

1991 Texas Clean Rivers Program To monitor and assess the water quality in the 25 basins throughout Texas TCEQ developed partnerships to manage CRP –15 Partner Agencies State agencies River Authorities Local Governments

NRA’s Area of Responsibility –Nueces River Basin –S.A. Nueces Coastal Basin –Nueces Rio Grande Coastal Basin –Bays and Estuaries 44 Segments 30,500 Square Miles

Texas Clean Rivers Program $9 Million Allocated Statewide Amongst CRP Partners Over 2 Years: NRA: $548,272 Over 2 Years –NRA CRP Budget By Task Project Administration – 21% Quality Assurance – 4% Water Quality Monitoring – 39% Data Management – 13% Data Analysis and Reporting – 9% Stakeholder Participation and Public Outreach – 13% Special Projects: Petronila Creek Continuous Monitoring – 1%

Quarterly Routine Monitoring –pH – DO – Conductivity –Temp –Ammonia –Nitrates –Phosphorus –Chlorophyll-a –Turbidity –Bacteria –Chloride –Sulfate

NRA Database

Interactive Map

Coordinated Monitoring Schedule

NRA Coordinated Monitoring Meeting –Plan Sampling for upcoming Year –Invite: –TCEQ Regional Offices –TPWD –CBBEP –Other Interested Parties

Assessment (Integrated Report) Every 2 Years Based on 7 Years of Data: –2010 – December 1, 2001 – November 30, 2008 –2012 – December 1, 2003 – November 30, 2010

Classified Water Bodies Are Assigned Designated Uses –Aquatic Life Exceptional High Intermediate Limited –Oyster Waters –Contact Recreation Primary Contact Secondary Contact 1 and 2 (New) Noncontact –Public Water Supply –Fish Consumption –General Use

Water Quality Criteria are Assigned to Designated Uses Aquatic Life –Dissolved Oxygen Public Water Supply –Chloride –Sulfate –TDS Recreation –Bacteria General Use –Water Temperature –pH –Ammonia –Nitrogen –Phosphorus Fish Consumption –Fish Tissue

Assessment Includes 2 Lists: –305(B) List Concerns –303(d) List Impairments

Concerns 305(b) List Water bodies where 20% of samples > criteria –Ammonia-Nitrogen –Nitrate+Nitrite –Orthophosphorus –Total phosphorus –Chlorophyll-a

Impairments 303(d) List Water bodies that do not meet the criteria for support of one or more of its beneficial uses

Impairments 303(d) List TDS, Chloride, Sulfate –Average > criteria (Public Water Supply Impairment) DO: grab samples and 24-Hr average –10% of samples < criteria (Aquatic Life Impairment) pH –10% of samples outside range (General Use Impairment) E. coli, Enterococcus –Geometric mean > criteria (Recreational Use Impairment)

List of Impairments in the Upper Basin 2103 Lake Corpus Christi impaired TDS (New) 2104 Nueces River Above Frio impaired Fish and Macrobenthos community (New) 2106 Nueces River/Lower Frio River impaired for TDS 2107 Atascosa River impaired for bacteria, low DO, Fish, and Macrobethos community 2108 San Miguel Creek impaired for bacteria 2109 Leona River impaired for bacteria

2010 List of Impairments in the Upper Basin 2110 Lower Sabinal River impaired for nitrates 2113 Upper Frio River impaired for Macrobenthos and Fish communities 2116 Choke Canyon impaired for Low DO 2117 Frio Above Choke Canyon impaired for bacteria

CWA Requires State to Take Action to Restore Impaired Waters Additional Monitoring - is the impairment real? Use Attainability Analysis (UAA)- Are existing criteria and uses appropriate for water body? Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Watershed Protection Plan (WPP) Special Study

Ongoing Projects to Address the Impaired Water Bodies in the Upper Basin Atascosa River –UAAs Lower Sabinal –TMDL Leona River –Assessment

Atascosa River Segment 2107 Flows 103 Miles to confluence with the Frio River Impaired for: –Bacteria (1996) –Low Do (1996) –Fish Community (2006) –Macro Community (2010)

Atascosa River TMDL Team-UAAs –Contact Recreation –Aquatic Life Use –Are designated uses and existing criteria appropriate for the Atascosa? * Currently Contact recreation and high aquatic life use

Recreational Use Attainability Analysis (RUAA) Evaluate the presence or absence of water recreation activities in the Atascosa –Report was submitted to the standards group

Aquatic Life Use Attainability Analysis Data Collection to be completed in Fall 2011 Technical report will be out in 2012 The UAAS will assess Current Standards and Criteria on the Atascosa

Lower Sabinal Flows 27 miles to the confluence with the Frio Listed in 2002 as impaired for Nitrates

Lower Sabinal TMDL 2003 TCEQ initiated a TMDL (Total Maximum Daily Load) TMDL team determined nitrates were from the Sabinal WWTF –Built in 1967 within the 100 year floodplain

TMDL Implementation Plan New WWTF To Be Completed This Spring New WWTF in Sabinal thru the use of ARRA Funds -outside 100 yr. floodplain -looped aeration -clarifiers -UV disinfection -Mech. Screen

Leona River Assessments Nikki Jackson TIAER

Other Studies and Projects NRSA Study-EPA Study of streams and rivers across the U.S. Determine % of good, fair, and poor conditions

NRSA Study

NRA SEP Application

Supplemental Environmental Project Funding Violators can use fine to support an environmental project in their region 3 rd parties can apply for funding projects

2011 Basin Highlights Report –Assessment Year BHR– a snapshot of every segment and any impairments or concerns –Year Following the Assessment BHR -any updates and ongoing projects in each basin –Every 5 th year Basin Summary-more in depth and detailed than the Basin Highlights Report Comments to Kati Carberry Fax: Mail: Nueces River Authority 1201 N. Shoreline Blvd. Corpus Christi, TX 78401

Input for FY 2011 Planning Additional routine monitoring sites? Special studies? Additional outreach opportunities? Additional web-based information?

Contact Information Kati Carberry: Sky Lewey: Rocky Freund: Beth Almaraz: