IMPROVED OVERALL SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED SOFT-TISSUE OR BONE SARCOMAS WHO ACHIEVED A CLINICAL-BENEFIT RESPONSE WHEN TREATED WITH AP23573, A.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
Advertisements

Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee
CM A pooled safety & efficacy analysis examining the effect of performance status on outcomes in 9 first line treatment trials of 6,286 patients.
Phase 1/2 Study of Weekly MLN9708, an Investigational Oral Proteasome Inhibitor, in Combination with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients with Previously.
1 N9841: A Randomized Phase III Equivalence Trial of Irinotecan (CPT-11) versus FOLFOX4 in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma Previously Treated.
A pooled analysis of the final results of the two randomized phase II studies comparing Gemcitabine (G) vs Gemcitabine + Docetaxel (G+D) in patients (pts)
IMPACT OF CHEMOTHERAPY IN UTERINE SARCOMA (UTS): REVIEW OF 12 CLINICAL TRIALS FROM EORTC INVOLVING ADVANCED UTS COMPARED TO OTHER SOFT TISSUE SARCOMA (STS)
1 Results of the Phase 3, placebo-controlled trial (SUCCEED) evaluating the mTOR inhibitor ridaforolimus as maintenance therapy in advanced sarcoma patients.
Ibrance® - Palbociclib
Introduction  Soft Tissue Sarcoma (STS) are a group of highly chemotherapy resistant tumors  Doxorubicin is the only APPROVED 1 st line chemotherapy.
Targeting Tumors Using Endogenous Albumin
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
EN.8 - A PHASE III STUDY OF STANDARD THERAPY VERSUS RIDAFOROLIMUS IN WOMEN WITH RECURRENT OR METASTATIC ENDOMETRIAL CANCER WHO HAVE PREVIOUS HAD CHEMOTHERAPY.
A Phase III study (EMBRACE. ) of eribulin mesylate vs
Phase III study of first-line XELOX plus bevacizumab (BEV) for 6 cycles followed by XELOX plus BEV or single agent (s/a) BEV as maintenance therapy in.
Treatment with Bendamustine- Bortezomib-Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Shows Significant Activity and Is Well Tolerated Ludwig H.
A PHASE 2 STUDY OF TH-302 IN COMBINATION WITH DOXORUBICIN IN ADVANCED SOFT TISSUE SARCOMA Sant P Chawla, MD Sarcoma Oncology Center Santa Monica, CA Sant.
ESP1/SARC025 Global Collaboration: A Phase I Study of a Combination of the PARP inhibitor, Niraparib and Temozolomide in Patients with Previously Treated,
1 SNDA Gemzar plus Carboplatin Treatment of Late Relapsing Ovarian Cancer.
Results of Docetaxel Plus Oxaliplatin (DOCOX) +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Metastatic Gastric and/or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Results.
*University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
Phase III Trial of Pazopanib in Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Sternberg CN et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Oral Presentation)
Cetuximab + Cisplatin in Estrogen Receptor-Negative, Progesterone Receptor-Negative, HER2-Negative (Triple-Negative) Metastatic Breast Cancer: Results.
NHL13: A Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Study of Rituximab as Maintenance Treatment versus Observation Alone in Patients with Aggressive B ‐ Cell Lymphoma.
1Bachelot T et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S1-6.
1 THE ROLE OF COVARIATES IN CLINICAL TRIALS ANALYSES Ralph B. D’Agostino, Sr., PhD Boston University FDA ODAC March 13, 2006.
CheckMate 025: A randomized, open-label, phase III study of nivolumab versus everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma Padmanee Sharma, Bernard Escudier,
CE-1 IRESSA ® Clinical Efficacy Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive.
BASED ON PROTOCOL VERSION 1 SEPTEMBER 2012 A new study evaluating an investigational drug to treat patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastroesophageal.
Two Year Estimate of Overall Survival in COMBI-v, a Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Combination of Dabrafenib and Trametinib With Vemurafenib.
Outcome of chemotherapy in synovial sarcoma (sys) patients (pts): review of 15 clinical trials from EORTCc involving advanced sys compared to other Soft.
Ibrutinib, Single Agent or in Combination with Dexamethasone, in Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM): Preliminary Phase.
Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.
Lenalidomide Is Safe and Active in Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) 1 Updated Results from a Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Phase 1b/2 Study.
KRAS status and efficacy in the first- line treatment of patients with mCRC treated with FOLFOX with or without cetuximab: The OPUS experience Carsten.
Final Efficacy Results from OAM4558g, a Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating MetMAb or Placebo in Combination with Erlotinib in Advanced NSCLC Spigel DR.
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
Cmab might have therapeutic benefit in Japanese patients with KRAS p.G13D mutant colorectal cancer. Limitations of this study are its retrospective design.
MEASURING CLINICAL EFFICACY IN PHASE II TRIALS Response: Karnofsky, WHO, RECIST Event rate: progression free/survival Time to event: progression/survival.
Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the influence of KRAS and BRAF biomarkers on outcome: updated data from the CRYSTAL.
Time to Secondary Resistance (TSR) After Interruption of Imatinib: Updated Results of the Prospective French Sarcoma Group Randomized Phase III Trial on.
CV-1 Trial 709 The ISEL Study (IRESSA ® Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer) Summary of Data as of December 16, 2004 Kevin Carroll, MSc Summary of Data.
A Phase 1 Study of the Selective Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-Delta (PI3Kδ) Inhibitor, Idelalisib (GS- 1101) in Combination with Rituximab and/or Bendamustine.
1 CONFIDENTIAL – DO NOT DISTRIBUTE ARIES mCRC: Effectiveness and Safety of 1st- and 2nd-line Bevacizumab Treatment in Elderly Patients Mark Kozloff, MD.
A Phase 2 Study with a Daily Regimen of the Oral mTOR Inhibitor RAD001 (Everolimus) in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer Amato RJ et.
12 th Annual CTOS Meeting 2006 AP23573 Induced Long-term Stability in 2 Patients with Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor (#561) Scott Schuetze, Warren.
until tumour progression until tumour progression
Phase II Study of Sunitinib Administered in a Continuous Once-Daily Dosing Regimen in Patients With Cytokine-Refractory Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Low Dose Decitabine Versus Best Supportive Care in Elderly Patients with Intermediate or High Risk MDS Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Final Results.
P.A. Tang 1, S. J. Cohen 1, G. Bjarnason 1, C. Kollmannsberger 1, K. Virik 1, M. J. MacKenzie 1, J. Brown 1, L. Wang 1, A. Chen 2, M. J. Moore 1 1 Princess.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
Moskowitz CH et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 673.
Phase II Trial of R-CHOP plus Bortezomib Induction Therapy Followed by Bortezomib Maintenance for Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma: SWOG 0601.
A Phase III, Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter Study of Eribulin Mesylate versus Capecitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast.
Mok TS, Wu SL, Thongprasert S, et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009;361: Gefitinib Superior.
Erlotinib plus Gemcitabine Compared with Gemcitabine Alone in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute.
Single-agent nab-Paclitaxel Given Weekly (3/4) as First-line Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer (An International Oncology Network Study, #I )
Belani CP et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract CRA8000. (Oral Presentation)
A cura di Filippo de Marinis
LUX-Lung 3 clinical trial
Maintenance Lapatinib After Chemotherapy in HER1/2-Positive Metastatic Bladder Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
Phase III Trial (MPACT) of Weekly nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Influence of Prognostic Factors of Survival J Tabernero,
NCI/CTEP 7435: Eribulin Active, Tolerable in Urothelial Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting* May 29 - June 2,
Intervista a Lucio Crinò
Dimopoulos MA et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract LBA-6.
until tumour progression until tumour progression
Baselga J et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 45.
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
1 Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract Cervantes F et al.
Cetuximab with chemotherapy as 1st-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of the CRYSTAL and OPUS studies according to KRAS.
Presentation transcript:

IMPROVED OVERALL SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED SOFT-TISSUE OR BONE SARCOMAS WHO ACHIEVED A CLINICAL-BENEFIT RESPONSE WHEN TREATED WITH AP23573, A NOVEL MTOR INHIBITOR: UPDATE OF A PHASE 2 TRIAL G.Z. D’Amato, S.P. Chawla, A.W. Tolcher, A.P. Staddon, S.M. Schuetze, J.Y. Blay, J. Loewy, R. Kan, G.D. Demetri, and the AP23573 Sarcoma Study Group CTOS Seattle, 2007 Oncology 1, Friday November 2 CONFIDENTIAL ®

2 11/02/07 DEFOROLIMUS (AP23573, MK-8669) l Potent mTOR inhibitor l Non-prodrug rapamycin analog l Product of structure-based drug design l Exquisite specificity for mTOR l Compatible with i.v. or oral delivery l Crosses blood-brain barrier l Combinations possible –In vitro with targeted and cytotoxic agents –In patients with cytotoxic agents FKBP mTOR (fragment)

3 11/02/07 Trial Design l Patients with any form of advanced soft-tissue or bone sarcomas (metastatic and/or unresectable) l No restriction on prior therapy l Open-label, non-randomized trial, Simon 2-stage design l Deforolimus daily for 5 consecutive days i.v. (12.5 mg fixed dose, could be reduced for significant AE), every 2 weeks in repeating 4-week cycles l Four independent parallel groups based on histological subtype l Primary end-point –Clinical-benefit response (CBR) = objective response (complete or partial), or stable disease for ≥ 16 weeks –Criterion of success: CBR ≥ 25% (per histological subgroup) l Secondary end-point – progression-free survival (PFS)

4 11/02/07 Trial Schema Metastatic / Unresectable Soft-tissue and Bone sarcomas Age ≥15 years No restriction on prior therapy Measurable disease Bone Sarcomas Leiomyosarcoma Liposarcoma Other soft-tissue sarcoma Deforolimus i.v. QDx5 q2wks

5 11/02/07 ANALYSIS OBJECTIVES l Describe Overall Survival (OS) in overall population l Determine if Clinical-Benefit Response (CBR) is a prognostic factor for OS –CBR defined as complete response, partial response, or stable disease ≥ 16 weeks

6 11/02/07 METHODS l Kaplan-Meier curves plotted to describe Overall Survival (OS) in 2 populations –All treated (deforolimus) patients (N=212) –Subset of treated patients surviving ≥ 16 weeks (n=169)* l OS described in both populations for – those achieving CBR and, – those not achieving CBR l Cox regression analysis on patients surviving ≥ 16 weeks to determine –If selected baseline characteristics predictive of OS –To determine if CBR is predictive of OS across all subgroups * to adjust for any potential bias introduced by patients who expired or withdrew from study prior to evaluation for CBR

7 11/02/07 PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS Total Number of Patients Median Age (yrs) Age Range (yrs) Number of Males Number of Females Number of Prior Chemo – therapy Regimens (50%) > 4 (7%) (16%) (39%) At least 90% of patients had disease progression prior to enrollment

8 11/02/07 SURVIVAL PREDICTORS Overall Survival Hazard Ratios (95% CI) for Selected Baseline Characteristics (n=169) Cox proportional hazards models performed on potential predictors of survival For all characteristics CBR most predictive of survival HR = Hazard ratio for CBR robust in all patients treated (N=212). HR= [not shown] CBR:Yes rt No Bone Mets.: ECOG: Regimen: Lung Mets.: Liver Mets. : Age: TS Diag. (wks): Histology: Gender: No rt Yes 0 rt 1 0 & 1 rt >1 Yes rt No <65 rt ≥65 >208 rt ≤208 Bone rt STS Male rt Female 012 Hazard Ratio rt=relative to

9 11/02/07 Overall Survival – Entire Population

10 11/02/07 Overall Survival – Subset of Patients Surviving ≥ 16 Weeks

11 11/02/07 SURVIVAL PREDICTORS the data in the overall population hold true in a majority of subgroups sample size in some categories leads to wide confidence intervals Overall Survival Hazard Ratios (95% CI) for CBR in Patient Subgroups (n=169) Histology: Age: Gender: Regimen: TS Diag. (wks): Lung Mets.: Liver Mets.: Bone Mets.: ECOG: Bone STS <65 ≥65 Male Female 0 & 1 >1 ≤208 >208 Yes No Yes No Yes No NE Hazard Ratio 012

12 11/02/07 SUMMARY l Median OS was 40 weeks for all treated patients –72 vs 26 weeks for CBR and non-CBR patients, respectively l Median OS was 52 weeks in the subset of patients surviving ≥ 16 weeks –72 vs 38 weeks for CBR and non-CBR patients, respectively l OS did not differ by histological category l CBR status found to be associated with OS duration –Finding consistent for all patients and in subset of patients on trial ≥ 16 weeks

13 11/02/07 CONCLUSION l This exploratory analysis suggests that patients who achieve a CBR on deforolimus will have an overall survival duration at least double that of those with non-CBR l Additional studies are needed to further investigate this observation

14 11/02/07 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS G.D. DemetriA. Elias M. Von MehrenD. Quinn W. ChowJ. Moore S. UndeviaS.P Chawla A.W. TolcherA.P. Staddon S.M. SchuetzeJ.Y. Blay A. Le CesneP. Schoffski G. EdelmanJ. Germino AP23573 Sarcoma Study Group