KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WP 5 Safety and Transient Analysis Task 5.6 Containment and source term assessment for the ETDR LEADER Lead-cooled European Advanced DEmonstration Reactor.
Advertisements

Modeling boiling water reactor main steam isolation valve leakage using MELCOR Presented at the 21 st Annual Regulatory Information Conference March 10-12,
EUROTRANS – DM1 RELAP5 Model Evaluation with SIMMER-III Code and Preliminary Transient Analysis for EFIT Reactor WP5.1 Progress Meeting KTH / Stockholm,
LEADER Project: Task 5.4 Analysis of Representative DBC Events of the ETDR with RELAP5 G. Bandini - ENEA/Bologna LEADER 5 th WP5 Meeting JRC-IET, Petten,
EUROTRANS WP 1.5 Meeting FZK – Karlsruhe, November 27-28, 2008 FPN-FISNUC / Bologna EUROTRANS – DM1 EFIT Transients Analysis with RELAP5, SIMMER-III and.
Sheet 0 November 13 th -14 th, 2007, Madrid Task Containment Assessment IP-EUROTRANS DOMAIN 1 Design WP 1.5 Safety Assessment of the Transmutation.
AREVA NP EUROTRANS WP1.5 Technical Meeting Task – ETD Safety approach Safety approach for EFIT: Deliverable 1.21 Lyon, October Sophie.
Framatome ANP IP-EUROTRANS Meeting WP 1.5 Progress in safety approach development TEE, March Sophie EHSTER.
May 22nd & 23rd 2007 Stockholm EUROTRANS: WP 1.5 Task Containment Assessment IP-EUROTRANS DOMAIN 1 Design WP 1.5 Safety Assessment of the Transmutation.
AREVA NP EUROTRANS WP1.5 Technical Meeting Task – Safety approach Madrid, November Sophie EHSTER.
Royal Institute of Technology, Nuclear Power Safety AlbaNova University Center, SE Stockholm, SWEDEN 1 The SGTR Event.
EUROTRANS – DM1 Preliminary Transient Analysis for EFIT with RELAP5 and RELAP/PARCS Codes WP5.1 Progress Meeting Empresarios Agrupados - Madrid, November.
AREVA NP EUROTRANS WP1.5 Technical Meeting Task – ETD Safety approach Safety approach for XT-ADS: Deliverable 1.20 Lyon, October Sophie.
“Design and safety analysis of ALFRED”
1 Safety studies for MYRRHA B. Arien, S. Heusdains, H. Aït Abderrahim on behalf of the MYRRHA Team and Support IP-Eurotrans Workshop DM1-WP1.5Brussels,
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe Technik und Umwelt IRS /FzK W.M.SchikorrEUROTRANS WP1.5 Safety Meeting : Karlsruhe, Nov 27-28, EFIT-Pb Transient Analysis.
AREVA NP EUROTRANS WP1.5 Technical Meeting Task – ETD Safety approach Safety approach for EFIT: Deliverable 1.21 Stockholm, May Sophie.
Pre-Project Planning Lessons from the Construction Industry Institute Construction Industry Institute Michael Davis, P. Eng, PMP Ontario Power Generation.
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor.
Thermal hydraulic analysis of ALFRED by RELAP5 code & by SIMMER code G. Barone, N. Forgione, A. Pesetti, R. Lo Frano CIRTEN Consorzio Interuniversitario.
EUROPEAN LEAD FAST REACTOR The LEADER project aims to define an European Lead Fast Reactor configuration for an industrial-sized (600 MWe, the ELFR) reactor,
Nuclear Research Institute Řež plc 1 DEVELOPMENT OF RELAP5-3D MODEL FOR VVER-440 REACTOR 2010 RELAP5 International User’s Seminar West Yellowstone, Montana.
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor.
LEADER, Task 5.5 ETDR Transient Analyses with SPECTRA Code LEADER Project JRC, Petten, February 26, 2013 M.M. Stempniewicz NRG-22694/
NIST Special Publication Revision 1
Analyses of representative DEC events of the ETDR
D29 - Roadmap for LFR development Davide Mattioli ENEA UTFISSM-PRONOC LEADER (Lead-cooled European Advanced DEmonstration Reactor) WP 1 - Task 1.1 Amsterdam.
Work Package 2 Giacomo Grasso ENEA UTFISSM-PRONOC LEADER Work Package 2 meeting Madrid, May 8, 2012 Current status and organization of the work.
LEADER/ELECTRA Safety Workshop: Petten February 2013 IRSN presentation on its document “ Overview of Generation IV (Gen-IV) reactor designs Safety.
SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Role of the TSO in Public Information/ Debate Openness, Transparency.
LEADER WP3 Conceptual Design Status KIT Town Office Ostendorfhaus Weberstraße 5, Karlsruhe, Luigi Mansani
LEADER, GIF,EURATOM and other News 6 th PCC and 3 rd GB meeting of the LEADER project Karlsruhe November, 23 rd 2012 Alessandro Alemberti
Development of a RELAP5-3D thermal-hydraulic model for a Gas Cooled Fast Reactor D. Castelliti, C. Parisi, G. M. Galassi, N. Cerullo (San Piero A Grado.
EUROTRANS – DM1 ENEA Activities on EFIT Safety Analysis ENEA – FIS/NUC Bologna - Italy WP5.1 Progress Meeting Tractebel / Brussels, March 17, 2006 G. Bandini,
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
Safety Analysis Results of the DEC Transients of ALFRED LEADER Lead-cooled European Advanced DEmonstration Reactor G. Bandini (ENEA), E. Bubelis, M. Schikorr.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/1 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
TACIS Project: R8.01/98 – TRANSLATION, EDITING AND DIFFUSION OF DOCUMENTS (Result Dissemination) Probabilistic Safety Analysis Technology (PSA) TACIS R3.1/91.
1 Kaspar Kööp, Marti Jeltsov Division of Nuclear Power Safety Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) Stockholm, Sweden LEADER 4 th WP5 MEETING, Karlsruhe.
Please insert a figure in the master transparency. KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association.
Repository Design Overview Presented to: NSNFP Meeting Presented by: Joe Price Office of Repository Development April 13, 2005 Bethesda, MD.
WP1: Reference design objectives and specifications Didier De Bruyn SCKCEN Fourth PCC meeting FP7 LEADER Bologna, 27 October.
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor.
License Application Status Presented to: National Nuclear Spent Fuel Program Presented by: Joseph D. Ziegler, Director Office of License Application and.
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor.
LEADER Project Analysis of Representative DBC Events of the ETDR with RELAP5 and CATHARE Giacomino Bandini - ENEA/Bologna Genevieve Geffraye – CEA/Grenoble.
LEADER WP3 Conceptual Design Status KIT Campus North, Karlsruhe, Luigi Mansani
Analysis of Representative DEC Events of the ETDR with RELAP5 LEADER Project: Task 5.5 G. Bandini - ENEA/Bologna LEADER 5 th WP5 Meeting JRC-IET, Petten,
LEADER Work Package 2 Status of activities Giacomo Grasso on behalf of Carlo Artioli – Work Package 2 leader UTFISSM-PRONOC ENEA LEADER PCC meeting Bologna,
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
Regional Meeting on Applications of the Code of Conduct on Safety of Research Reactors Lisbon, Portugal, 2-6 November 2015 Diakov Oleksii, Institute for.
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor.
Task 2.1: Review of ELSY and Conceptual design & neutronic characterization of the ELFR Industrial Plant Kamil Tuček on behalf of Task 2.1 contributors.
LEADER achievements and next steps 4 th GB MEETING of the LEADER project Genova May 10 th 2013 Alessandro Alemberti
“Design and safety analysis of Alfred” G. Forasassi President of CIRTEN CIRTEN Interuniversity Consortium for Technological Nuclear Research 3 rd LEADER.
IHM/ KIT/ Campus Nord 1 | Georg Müller | LEADER Bologna November 17, 2010 LEADER WP6 AGENDA Bologna, November 17th, 2010 ENEA, Aula Magna 14.00Agenda (G.
ERMSAR 2012, Cologne March 21 – 23, 2012 OECD Benchmark Exercise on the TMI-2 Plant: Analysis of an Alternative Severe Accident Scenario G. Bandini (ENEA),
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Development of the Basis Document for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
Low Power and Shutdown PSA IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Workshop Information IAEA Workshop City, Country.
NRG Contribution to LEADER WP1.1 Status LEADER Petten, Netherlands Ferry Roelofs
1DEN/CAD/DTN/DIR Genova 2010 April 22nd LEADER WP6 Task 6.3 Assessment, validation and adaptation of oxygen control and purification strategy (CEA-5, ENEA-1,
Tacis 1.14/91 on life-time evaluation TACIS Project: R8.01/98 – TRANSLATION, EDITING AND DIFFUSION OF DOCUMENTS (Result Dissemination) Tacis R1.14/91,
November 19th 2010, Bologna LEADER 1 1st LEADER PCC MEETING WP4 PLANT OPERATION, INSTRUMENTATION, CONTROL AND PROTECTION SYSTEM DESIGN.
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor.
Use and Conduct of Safety Analysis IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decission Making Workshop Information IAEA Workshop Lecturer.
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor.
BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module V Safety classification of structures, systems and components Case Studies Version 1.0, May 2015.
Role of the TSO in Public Information/ Debate Openness, Transparency Technical support to regulatory body for the new NPP (OL3) project Keijo Valtonen.
Complementarity of deterministic and probabilistic approaches
Presentation transcript:

KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor Technology LEADER: WP5 – Safety and Transient Analysis Overview and status of WP5 activities as of February 2013 E. Bubelis, M. Schikorr, W. Hering (KIT)

Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor Technology (INR) E. Bubelis et. al. – LEADER WP5 meeting, Petten LEADER WPs

Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor Technology (INR) E. Bubelis et. al. – LEADER WP5 meeting, Petten LEADER WP5 – Time Table & Milestones Milestones M05/D11 (WPL & T5.3, PSI) - Identification of representative DBC and DEC accident initiators for the ETDR (May 2012) M07/D15 (WPL / T5.4, KIT-G) - Analysis of DBC events for the ETDR (September 2012) M10/D22 (WPL & T5.5, ENEA) - Analysis of DEC events for the ETDR (March 2013) - Milestones; - Draft reports ; - Final reports ; - WP5 meetings. WP5 meetings M01 - LFR updated reference configuration – (TEC ) ; M04 - ETDR reference configuration – (TEC ).

Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor Technology (INR) E. Bubelis et. al. – LEADER WP5 meeting, Petten LEADER WP5 – Deliverables & Technical documents Deliverables D04 (T5.1, ANSALDO) - Safety approach for LFR plants (February 2011) D08 (T5.2, KIT-G) - Report on the results of analysis of DBC & DEC key transients for the LFR reference plant (October 2012) D11 (T5.3, PSI) - Identification of representative DBC and DEC accident initiators for the ETDR (May 2012) D15 (T5.4, KIT-G) - Report on the results of analysis of DBC events for the ETDR (March 2013) D18 (T5.6, EA) - Report on Containment Assessment for the ETDR (Rev. 0 – January 2013, Rev. 1 – March 2013) D22 (T5.5, ENEA) - Report on the results of analysis of DEC events for the ETDR (March 2013) Technical Documents T68 (T5.2, KIT-G) - Plant data for the safety analysis of the industrial LFR (March 2012) T58 (T5.3, PSI) - Plant data for the safety analysis of the ETDR (May 2012) T64 (T5.6, EA) - Report on Source Term Assessment for the ETDR (Rev. 0 – November 2012, Rev. 1 - March 2013)

Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor Technology (INR) E. Bubelis et. al. – LEADER WP5 meeting, Petten LEADER WP5 - Tasks Task 5.1 (Monica Frogheri Global safety approach re-assessment (ANSALDO, KIT-G, SCKCEN) Task 5.2 (Evaldas Bubelis Re-evaluation of consequences of representative accident (key transient) initiators within the DBC and DEC for the LFR reference plant (KIT-G, CIRTEN, ENEA, PSI) Task 5.3 (Konstantin Mikityuk Identification of representative DBC and DEC accident initiators of the ETDR (PSI, ANSALDO, CEA, ENEA, KIT-G, SCKCEN) Task 5.4 (Evaldas Bubelis Analyses of representative DBC events of the ETDR (KIT-G, CEA, CIRTEN, ENEA, JRC-IE, KTH, PSI) Task 5.5 (Giacomino Bandini Analyses of representative DEC events of the ETDR (ENEA, KIT-G, JRC-IE, KTH, NRG) Task 5.6 (Angela Cortes Containment and source term assessment for the ETDR (EA, KTH)

Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor Technology (INR) E. Bubelis et. al. – LEADER WP5 meeting, Petten LEADER WP5 tasks contact persons

Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor Technology (INR) E. Bubelis et. al. – LEADER WP5 meeting, Petten LEADER WP5 The objective of this task is the re-evaluation of the global safety approach for the LFR reference plant and the development of the safety strategy and approach for the ETDR. The specification of the operational and safety limits, as well as the acceptance criteria for the safety performance in order to facilitate the licensing of the ETDR plant will be developed. Safety system recommendations of the GEN IV Risk and Safety Working Group (RSWG) need to be considered appropriately and differences to other projects as the CP-ESFR for the sodium cooled system should be clearly identified. Task 5.1 Global safety approach re-assessment (ANSALDO, KIT-G, SCKCEN) D04 (T5.1, ANSALDO) - Safety approach for LFR plants (February 2011)

Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor Technology (INR) E. Bubelis et. al. – LEADER WP5 meeting, Petten LEADER WP5 The main objective of this task is to re-evaluate the consequences of accident (key transient) initiators within the DBC and DEC for the updated LFR reference configuration, as defined by WP3, in order to confirm the safety performance of the plant and to resolve previously identified potential safety issues. Task 5.2 Re-evaluation of consequences of representative accident (key transient) initiators within the DBC and DEC for the LFR reference plant (KIT-G, CIRTEN, ENEA, PSI) D08 (T5.2, KIT-G) - Report on the results of analysis of DBC & DEC key transients for the LFR reference plant (October 2012)

Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor Technology (INR) E. Bubelis et. al. – LEADER WP5 meeting, Petten LEADER WP5 The objective of this task is to identify representative accident initiators for Design Basis Conditions (DBC), Design Extension Conditions (DEC) including complex sequences, severe accidents and limiting events. In addition initiating events or accident sequences allocated to the “practically excluded” event category should be identified. On the basis of the design solution for the ETDR a simplified line-of-defense strategy will be applied to identify accident initiators. The identified event initiators will be categorized and the more representative for each category will be selected for safety analysis to be carried out in task 5.4 and 5.5. Impact of specific design solution especially for the heat conversion system will be taken into account appropriately. Task 5.3 Identification of representative DBC and DEC accident initiators of the ETDR (PSI, ANSALDO, CEA, ENEA, KIT-G, SCKCEN)

Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor Technology (INR) E. Bubelis et. al. – LEADER WP5 meeting, Petten Task 5.3 Identification of representative DBC and DEC accident initiators of the ETDR (PSI, ANSALDO, CEA, ENEA, KIT-G, SCKCEN) The objectives of this task are 1)to identify accident initiating events; 2)to categorize them (DBC, DEC, practically excluded) and 3)to select representative events from each category for safety analysis (for Tasks 5.4 and 5.5). M05/D11 (WPL & T5.3, PSI) - Identification of representative DBC and DEC accident initiators for the ETDR (May 2012) D11 (T5.3, PSI) - Identification of representative DBC and DEC accident initiators for the ETDR (May 2012) T58 (T5.3, PSI) - Plant data for the safety analysis of the ETDR (May 2012)

Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor Technology (INR) E. Bubelis et. al. – LEADER WP5 meeting, Petten LEADER WP5 The main objective of this task is to evaluate the consequences of representative accident initiators within the DBC. Specific attention will be given to the consequence evaluation of partial and/or total blockages in a fuel assembly and to consequences of steam generator tube ruptures (SGTR). An input data set representing the plant in sufficient detail will be established on the basis of a specific deliverable developed in strict collaboration with WP3. Several suitable computer codes (i.e. SIM-LFR, SAS-LFR, RELAP, TRACE, CFX) available among the partners will be used to analyze transients behavior within design basis conditions (DBC) including those requiring 3-dimensional neutron kinetics. The DBC accidents to be analyzed will be specified within Task 5.3. Consequences of SGTR will be analyzed with special attention. The SGTR could potentially lead to a rapid pressurization and shock waves in the heat exchanger (HX). By analyzing a section of a full bundle HX it will be possible to evaluate the generated pressure waves. The other important aspect is to investigate whether the steam bubble or bubbles can be dragged downwards towards the core inlet region. Task 5.4 Analyses of representative DBC events of the ETDR (KIT-G, CEA, CIRTEN, ENEA, JRC-IE, KTH, PSI) D15 (T5.4, KIT-G) - Report on the results of analysis of DBC events for the ETDR (March 2013)

Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor Technology (INR) E. Bubelis et. al. – LEADER WP5 meeting, Petten LEADER WP5 The main objective of this task is to evaluate the impact of the core and plant design features on the Design Extended Conditions (DEC) including complex sequences. Several computer codes (i.e. SIM-LFR, SAS-LFR, RELAP, TRACE, CFX, SIMMER, SPECTRA) principally available among the partners will be applied to evaluate consequences of selected un-protected accidents scenarios such as Loss-of-Flow, Loss-of- Heat Sink, and Reactivity initiated accidents. Additionally consequences of SGTR events allocated to DEC are to be evaluated within this Task. However, priority will be given to those representative accident initiators identified and selected in Task 5.3. It will be analyzed qualitatively what specific problems might occur when part of the core materials should become mobile and become relocated within the reactor vessel. Task 5.5 Analyses of representative DEC events of the ETDR (ENEA, KIT-G, JRC-IE, KTH, NRG) D22 (T5.5, ENEA) - Report on the results of analysis of DEC events for the ETDR (March 2013)

Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor Technology (INR) E. Bubelis et. al. – LEADER WP5 meeting, Petten LEADER WP5 The objective of this task is to provide a scoping assessment of the Source Term that may be available for release to the environment through containment leakage at some assumed rate. The Source Term assessment would include thermodynamic calculations to assess what fission products and which Polonium compounds may be formed. This task will also provide an assessment of the adequacy of the containment systems. The activity will consider the scenarios in which there may be thermal and pressure loadings of the containment due to the release of secondary coolant and fission product release from the primary system to the containment. Another activity will be that of the transport of airborne radio-nuclides in the containment and their potential release to the environment. Task 5.6 Containment and source term assessment for the ETDR (EA, KTH) T64 (T5.6, EA) - Report on Source Term Assessment for the ETDR (Rev. 0 – November 2012, Rev. 1 - March 2013) D18 (T5.6, EA) - Report on Containment Assessment for the ETDR (Rev. 0 – January 2013, Rev. 1 – March 2013)