Human Subject Protection Research Imperatives. History World War II - Nuremberg Tuskegee Study Belmont Report Modern Problems - Inadequacy of “Good Intentions”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 3: Ethical Issues in Health Promotion Research
Advertisements

Chapter 10 Ethical Issues in Nursing Research. Perspectives for Assessing Ethical Acceptability Utilitarian Perspective - the good of a project is defined.
Criteria For Approval 45 CFR CFR Minimized risks Reasonable risk/benefit ratio Equitable subject selection Informed consent process Informed.
By: Ronald F. White, Ph.D. Professor of Philosophy College of Mount St. Joseph.
UH employees and students who conduct research involving human subjects are required to obtain approval from the Committee on Human Studies (CHS). John.
THE ETHICS OF HUMAN PARTICIPANT RESEARCH Office for Research Protections The Pennsylvania State University.
DO NO HARM IRRB Presentation Purposes Responsibilities Processes NLU IRRB Home page.
Ethical Guidelines for Research with Human Participants
Detectives in the Classroom - Investigation 2-3: What's Wrong with This Picture? What's Wrong with This Picture?
Ethical Treatment of Participants in Studies of Online Behaviors Barbara M. Wildemuth School of Information & Library Science University of North Carolina.
FOUNDATIONS OF NURSING RESEARCH Sixth Edition CHAPTER Copyright ©2012 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Nursing Research,
THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.
Scientific Data Management for the Protection of Human Subjects Robert R. Downs NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC) Center for International.
Ethics in research involving human subjects
Human Subject Research Ethics
1 Wheaton College INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB)
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
The Goals and Principles of Human Participant Protection Part 4: Vulnerable Populations.
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD HISTORY AND ETHICS. 2 Ethical History : Holocaust : Nuremburg Trials 1964: Declaration of Helsinki :
Human Research Protection Program 101 July 19-20, 2007 Milwaukee, WI.
Protecting Human Participants in Your Research and Classroom Projects NAU Institutional Review Board
1 Protection of Vulnerable Subjects in Research Melody Lin, Ph.D. December 2012.
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) What is our Purpose and Role for Ethical Research.
Slide 1 Mosby items and derived items © 2006, 2002 by Mosby, Inc. LEGAL AND ETHICAL ISSUES: Informed Consent Chapter 13.
Institutional Review Board Protecting Human Research Subjects.
Theoretical and Conceptual Framework. THEORY Theory is: a generalized abstraction about the relationship between two or more concepts a systematic abstract.
Introducing Communication Research 2e © 2014 SAGE Publications Chapter Three Ethics: What Are My Responsibilities as a Researcher?
Ethics Ethics Applied to Research Back to Class 2.
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
The Ethics of Research on Human Subjects. Research Activity on Human Subjects: Any systematic attempt to gain generalizable knowledge about humans A systematic.
Consent Procedures. What is Informed Consent? Consent by a patient to a surgical or medical procedure or participation in a clinical study after achieving.
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
TUN IRB: The Basics February 26, IRB Function Review human-subject research Ensure the rights & welfare of human subjects are adequately protected.
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
Objective 9/23/15 Today we will be completing our research methods unit & begin reviewing for the upcoming unit assessment 9/25. Agenda: -Turn in all homework.
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
Donna B. Konradi, DNS, RN, CNE GERO 586 Understanding the Ethics of Research.
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
Joni Barnard IRB Information Session: EHE Workshop 10/13/2015.
Conducting Research at Lincoln IRB/HRPP Policies, Procedures & Good Clinical Practices B Kanna MD, MPH, FACP Associate Program Director of Internal Medicine.
M6728 Ethics in Research Informed Consent/IRBs Reporting Research Results.
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
Ann Billetz, Ph.D. 11/6/09. Excerpt from MCLA’s IRB policy.
Copyright © 2008 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 7 Generating Research Evidence Ethically.
 What is an IRB and why do we need one at Western?  Who needs to submit proposals to the IRB?  If approved, how long is your proposal good for?  Is.
PRIMER: Human Subjects, Past, Present, and Future Susan Metosky, Arizona State University Debra Murphy, Arizona State University.
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 7 Ethics in Nursing Research.
Chapter 2: Ethical Issues in Program Evaluation. Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) Federal mandate for IRBs –Concern during 1970s about unethical research.
Copyright c 2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.1 Chapter 5 Research Ethics All researchers, even students, have a responsibility to conduct ethical research.
Doing IRB Right … Together JOHN POTTER, OD, MA Chair, Institutional Review Board.
Scholarship Issues Chapter 12
Back to Basics – Approval Criteria
Ethical Considerations in Human Subjects Research
IRB BASICS Ethics and Human Subject Protections Summer 2016
Protection of Human Subjects In Research
Chapter 5 Research Ethics
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. CIP President HRP Associates, Inc.
The Importance of Ethics and the Protection of Subjects By Westley R
CHAPTER 7: Ethics in Psychological Research
Ethics in Research.
ETHICAL ASPECTS OF HEALTH RESEARCH
Intro to Projects – Research with Human Subjects
Greg Nezat CRNA, PhD CDR/NC/USN Chairman, IRB II
Ethics Review Morals: Rules that define what is right and wrong Ethics: process of examining moral standards and looking at how we should interpret and.
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
Protocol Approval Criteria
Research with Human Subjects
Presentation transcript:

Human Subject Protection Research Imperatives

History World War II - Nuremberg Tuskegee Study Belmont Report Modern Problems - Inadequacy of “Good Intentions”

Belmont Report Respect for Persons - Informed Consent - Confidentiality Beneficence -Risk and Benefit Justice - benefits for all

Belmont Report Respect for Persons: In consideration of respect for persons, investigators are required to seek voluntary informed consent from potential subjects. Voluntary informed consent means that subjects are given free choice to decide about participation, and the study is fully described in terms that are easy to understand. The consent form should include adequate information about the study risks and benefits that will assist subjects in deciding whether to participate in the research. In addition, respect means honoring the privacy of individuals and maintaining the confidentiality of data obtained. Respect for minors and mentally disabled persons requires taking extra precautions to protect those individuals who are immature or incapacitated, perhaps even to the extent of excluding them from participation in certain research. The extent of protection depends upon the level of autonomy the person possesses. Beneficence: The principle of beneficence requires that researchers maximize the potential benefits to the subjects and minimize the risks of harm. Benefits to the subjects, or generalized knowledge gained from the research, should balance or outweigh the risks. Justice: The principle of justice means that subjects are selected fairly and that the risks and benefits of research are distributed equitably. Investigators should take precautions not to select subjects simply because of the subjects’ easy availability, their compromised position, or because of social, racial, gender, economic or cultural biases. Investigators should base inclusion criteria on those factors that most effectively and soundly address the research problem. (Dunn & Chadwick, 1999)

Specific Problems Coercion Vulnerable Populations Populations unable to give consent

Protection of Privacy Recruitment of Subjects Publication Protection of data HIPAA and protecting “Personal Health Information”

The IRB - Review, Audits Facilitation Required Role New Problems of Internet Authority for Sanctions and Referral

IRBs at Case Case IRB (Behavioral Emphasis) UH IRB (Clinical Trial Emphasis) - UH patients - all med school Cleveland Clinic IRB Metro IRB VA IRB

IRB Process Exempt and Non Exempt Expedited Review Full Board Review Role of Staff Responsible Investigator

Mechanics - Case IRB CWRU website for application Manual also available Use consent templates Discuss problems with staff Respond to queries - you can disagree

Our Experience Combined Informed and HIPAA consents Separate consents for patients, and practitioners Consents for parents or guardians - assents for children Under 18 are children in Ohio Coding and separation of consents from data