Retha Britz Copyright 2013 All rights reserved for this presentation 1 Other important considerations for RECs Retha Britz.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

4 th Meeting of the EC International Dialogue on Bioethics Copenhagen, June 19 th, 2012 Large research and medical databases in clinical and research multi-centred.
Post Research Benefits Mandika Wijeyaratne MS, MD, FRCS Dept. of Surgery, Colombo.
Good Clinical Research Practice Guidelines For Informed Consent Presented by Catherine May Acting Research Practice Development Officer The Office of Research.
The Consent Process: It’s More Than Just a Form A “10 Minute Training” Brought to you by Cyndi Long, MS, RD, CCRC CU Sports Medicine.
B-BBEE VERIFICATION FRAMEWORK.  The BEE Verification process evolved since the release of the B- BBEE strategy in 2003  The dti was requested to provide.
Role of and Duties of Plan Commission Members Ralph E. Booker.
Fundamentals of IRB Review. Regulatory Role of the IRB Authority to approve, require modifications in (to secure approval), or disapprove all research.
Ethical Considerations when Developing Human Research Protocols A discipline “born in scandal and reared in protectionism” Carol Levine, 1988.
IRB Determinations 1. AAHRPP Site Visit Results Site visitors observed a real commitment to human subject protections Investigator and research staff.
Evaluating Risk 1 IRB CELT Presentation Colleen Donaldson – IRB Administrator Julie Wilkens – IRB Coordinator.
Congress and Contractor Personal Conflicts of Interest May 21, 2008 Jon Etherton Etherton and Associates, Inc.
1 Developed by: U-MIC To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the.
Obtaining Informed Consent: 1. Elements Of Informed Consent 2. Essential Information For Prospective Participants 3. Obligation for investigators.
Subject Selection and Recruitment David Wendler Department of Clinical Bioethics NIH, USA.
Use of Children as Research Subjects What information should be provided for an FP7 ethical review?
Introduction to the APPs and the OAIC’s regulatory approach Presented by: Este Darin-Cooper Director, Regulation and Strategy May 2015.
Columbia University IRB IRB 101 September 21, 2005 George Gasparis, Executive Director, CU IRB Asst. V.P. and Sr. Asst. Dean for Research Ethics.
Volunteers and the Law Riverland Community Legal Service Inc.
Good Clinical Practice GCP
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Clinical Research Conference 2012 Legal, Ethical, and Social Dimensions of Clinical Research Takis Vidalis, Ph. D., Hellenic National Bioethics Commission.
Workshop on Health Examination Surveys (HES) Legal and ethical issues Susanna Conti, M. Kanieff, G. Rago Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS) (National Public.
International Research & Research Involving Children K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Office of Research & Development.
Human Research Ethics and Obtaining Ethics Approval
A S Nanivadekar Introduction to GCP. A S Nanivadekar Outline Definition and scope Definition and scope Purpose of clinical research Purpose of clinical.
Retha Britz Copyright 2013 All rights reserved for this presentation 1 Establishment and functioning of a REC Retha Britz.
The Audit Process Tahera Chaudry March Clinical audit A quality improvement process that seeks to improve patient care and outcomes through systematic.
What makes Clinical Research Ethical? Dr Enoka Corea Co-secretary, ERC Faculty of Medicine, Colombo.
1 How to Review a Protocol. 2 Reference Documents WHO/TDR Operational Guidelines for Ethical Committees that Review Biomedical Research, International.
Copyright ©2011 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. Health Information Technology and Management Richard.
XXX_DECRIPT_MON00/1 Quality and impact of Social Science and Operations Research by the Special Programme in Human Reproduction Department of Reproductive.
“What’s Ethics Got To Do With It” Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Gary Kent Head Governance Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
GCP & ETHICS COMMITTEES Ravi Rengachari Vector Control Research Centre PONDICHERRY.
Annual seminar in Berlin – 27 th May Should EU corporate governance measures take into account the size of listed companies ? How ? Should a.
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH MARGARITA M. CARDONA DIRECTOR OF SPONSORED RESEARCH Institutional Review Board.
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
Providing Research Results to Participants David Shalowitz Department of Clinical Bioethics National Institutes of Health Pre-conference Program: Advanced.
1 [INSERT SPEAKER NAME DATE & LOCATION HERE] Ethics of Tuberculosis Prevention, Care and Control MODULE 10: RESEARCH IN TB CARE AND CONTROL Insert country/ministry.
Guidance Training (F520) §483.75(o) Quality Assessment and Assurance.
Challenges of 21st Century Clinical Research from an Independent IRB’s View Chesapeake Research Review, Inc. Paul Goebel, CIP Vice President Matthew Whalen,
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) School of Professional Studies April 18, 2013
APPROVAL CRITERIA AN IRB INFOSHORT MAY CFR CRITERIA FOR IRB APPROVAL OF RESEARCH In order for an IRB to approve a research study, all.
Cultural Competence Considerations [and other alliterations] in International Research IRB 2 Continuing Education March 10, 2015.
Elements of Ethical Review of Study Documents Dr.C.H.Shashindran Director-Professor & Head Department of Pharmacology JIPMER.
M6728 Ethics in Research Informed Consent/IRBs Reporting Research Results.
HPTN Ethics Guidance for Research: Community Obligations Africa Regional Working Group Meeting, May 19-23, 2003 Lusaka, Zambia.
All About the Institution Review Board! Jennifer A. Jones, M.S. Jessica P Lauren E. Ewaniuk M.Ed ED 510 Fall 2011.
Second Annual Medical Research Summit March 25, 2002 Washington, D.C.
8 th November 2007 Research: ethics and research governance Rossana Dowsett Research and Regional Development Division [Pre Award Support] University of.
The Health Information Protection Act. What is the Health Information Protection Act (HIPA)? HIPA is legislation that speaks to access to, and protection.
Research ethics.
CHB Conference 2007 Planning for and Promoting Healthy Communities Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Boards Presented by Carla Anglehart Director,
Quality Metrics of Performance of Research Ethics Committees Cristina E. Torres, PhD FERCAP Coordinator.
GCP (GOOD CLINICAL PRACTISE)
Slide 1 Standard Operating Procedures. Slide 2 Goal To review the standard operating procedures Creating the informed consent document Obtaining informed.
Page 1 Procurement and Probity Issues that Impact on the School Environment Presentation to the Tasmanian Schools Administrators’ Association (TSAA) Hobart.
Accounting Standards Board Annual Report 2006
Chapter 5 ASX Guidelines for Listed Companies
Eimantas Peicius Kaunas regional REC, Lithuania
Back to Basics – Approval Criteria
Research Compliance and Institutional Review Boards
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. CIP President HRP Associates, Inc.
Ethics in Research and International Cooperation
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP)
Analysis of Final HIPAA Privacy Modification Rule
SRO APPROACH TO REGULATION
Protocol Approval Criteria
Presentation transcript:

Retha Britz Copyright 2013 All rights reserved for this presentation 1 Other important considerations for RECs Retha Britz

 Conflict of Interest  Vulnerability  Re-imbursement of Research Participants  Privacy and Confidentiality  Monitoring by RECs  Multi-National Collaborative Research 2

Conflict of Interest (SA GCP section 8.12) Includes  Direct benefits e.g. Sponsorship of the investigation  Indirect benefits e.g. provision of materials or facilities, provision for travel expenses to e.g. attend conferences RECs to have clearly formulated policies regarding conflict of interest 3

Conflict of Interest (continues)  Researcher to disclose actual, apparent or potential conflict of interest to RECs at the time of seeking approval  REC to consider whether the apparent conflict of interest might compromise the scientific integrity of the research  If yes, recommend appropriate remedial action and standards to be met in order for the research to be approved 4

Conflict of Interest (continues)  Members of REC to withdraw from the committee when their own projects are discussed and voted for (membership list to reflect this)  Care to be taken to ensure members are financially and administratively independent of ECs in order to adequately fulfill their duties 5

Vulnerability “Individuals whose willingness to volunteer for participation in research may be unduly influenced” Researchers to demonstrate how they will redress the vulnerability if research is to be conducted with such participants 6

Vulnerability (continues) REC to ensure that:  Vulnerable pts will not be ordinarily be involved in research that could be carried out in non-vulnerable communities  Research is relevant to the [health] needs and priorities of the community in which the research will be carried out  Research pts should know that they are taking part in research and they have to give consent 7

Re-imbursement of Research Participants REC to ensure that:  Conditions for participation do not constitute undue influence that could possibly compromise participant’s ability to voluntary make an informed decision whether to participate or not  Consider time and inconvenience of study participants as well as travel related expenses  Re-imbursement or any other incentive to be disclosed to RECs (value and brand is important) 8

Re-imbursement of Research Participants (continues) Example wording in the ICF Payment for Participation “You will not be paid for your participation in this study, but you will be reimbursed for reasonable travelling expenses up to R150 per study visit for travel and/or parking costs that you incur as a result of participating in this study” 9

Privacy and Confidentiality 10  Privacy is concerned with access to personal records. Prevention of disclosure to other than authorised individuals, of a sponsor’s proprietary information or of a participant(s) identity  Confidentiality refers to the use of personal information. Protect personal information from unauthorised access, use, disclosure, modification, loss or theft

Privacy and Confidentiality (continues) (continues) 11  Informed consent form has a clause that third parties such as authorities e.g. the REC may access the study information Example wording in the ICF “Your records and any information obtained during the study may be inspected by representatives of the sponsor, the ethics committee and government health authorities to check the procedures and the data or as required by law.”

Monitoring by RECs  REC responsibility to ensure conduct of research approved by the REC is monitored  Frequency and type of monitoring depends on the degree of risk to pts in the project  Reports to be requested from PIs at least annually for annual re-approval  Adopt any additional appropriate mechanism for monitoring including random inspection (as long as pt has consented to it) 12

Monitoring by RECs (continues) Annual reports from researchers to include:  Progress to date, or outcome in the case of completed research  Information concerning maintenance and security of records  Evidence of compliance with the approved protocol  Evidence of compliance with any conditions of approval 13

Multi-National Collaborative Research  Study designs to be appropriate for local setting and modifications may be required for a local study e.g. in-and exclusion criteria  Is the research conducted in the country of origin?  Standards of care across countries should be similar e.g. USA vs rural areas in SA 14

Multi-National Collaborative Research (continues)  Pay attention to study design (sampling strategy)  Appropriateness of incentives to pts and remuneration packages to investigators  Not universal guidelines for research Research cannot be considered in isolation 15

Multi-National Collaborative Research (continues) REC to ensure:  Benefits accrue to pts in the host country  Potential benefits considerably outweigh potential risks to vulnerable individuals or communities  Research must be non-exploitative and in the best interest of pts and the community  Improved access to research for vulnerable groups  Pts are encouraged to participate in the research planning and conduct of the study 16

Multi-National Collaborative Research (continues)  Capacity building in healthcare  Economic and educational empowerment to promote delivery of health care and progress  Weigh risk to pts vs benefits to sponsor  Efforts to translate research findings into component of accessible care in the community  Modify research protocols to suit the situation in local communities  Publications inclusive of investigators from host and sponsoring countries 17

References  SOUTH AFRICA. Department of Health. Directorate: Health Systems, Research, Research Coordination and Epidemiology Ethics in health research: principles, structures and processes. Research ethics guidelines. Pretoria: Government Printer. 67 p.  SOUTH AFRICA. Department of Health. Directorate: Health Systems, Research, Research Coordination and Epidemiology South African good clinical practice guidelines. 2 nd ed. Pretoria: Government Printer. 96 p.