Pesticide Spray Drift Conference September 5 and 6, 2001 AgDRIFT® Dave Esterly Environmental Focus, Inc

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
21M062007D The Shaw Group Inc. ® An Analytical Screening Technique to Estimate the Effect of Cooling Ponds on Meteorological Measurements – A Case Study.
Advertisements

A Model for Evaluating the Impacts of Spatial and Temporal Land Use Changes on Water Quality at Watershed Scale Jae-Pil Cho and Saied Mostaghimi 07/29/2003.
Wetland Critical Areas - Draft Ordinance Overview 18.20: Definitions Many new definitions added for clarity when used in the regulations and several unnecessary.
Developing Modeling Tools in Support of Nutrient Reduction Policies Randy Mentz Adam Freihoefer, Trip Hook, & Theresa Nelson Water Quality Modeling Technical.
HELICOPTER PESTICIDE APPLICATION NONE OF THE MYTHS. JUST THE FACTS.
Introduction to SCREEN3 smokestacks image from Univ. of Waterloo Environmental Sciences Marti Blad NAU College of Engineering and Technology.
Introduction to SCREEN3 smokestacks image from Univ. of Waterloo Environmental Sciences Marti Blad.
Accurate Modeling for Drift Reduction: General Overview and Regulatory Status April 11 th, 2014 Dan Dyer On Behalf of the CLA Spray Drift Issue Management.
1 Encouraging the Use of Drift Reduction Technologies for Pesticide Applications --What’s in Store for 2007? Jay Ellenberger US EPA/Office of Pesticide.
IPM in NRCS Programs Joe Bagdon USDA - NRCS National Water & Climate Center Amherst, Massachusetts.
Norman Birchfield and Jay Ellenberger EPA Office of Pesticide Programs Gregory Sayles, Kerry Bullock, and Michael Kosusko EPA Office of Research and Development.
Meteorological Data Issues for Class II Increment Analysis.
Orchard Management Practices for Protecting Water  CURES: Non-profit organization: agricultural, urban projects  Promote stewardship, Best Management.
A GIS Approach to Pedestrian Level of Service Natalia Domarad 14th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Columbus, Ohio May 5-9, 2013.
Technical lessons and improvements to the AWARE code Conference on Product Codes within REACH Gent, 4 and 5 October Pieter van Broekhuizen.
ADMS ADMS 3.3 Modelling Summary of Model Features.
Projects to propose 3 project ideas: Expansion of Trail Creek WMS site Sediment Sample Site Inventory Hydrologic improved DEM.
LEARNING MATERIALS for AQUATIC MONITORING N. Scott Urquhart Department of Statistics Colorado State University.
1 Modelled Meteorology - Applicability to Well-test Flaring Assessments Environment and Energy Division Alex Schutte Science & Community Environmental.
Introduction to the ISC Model Marti Blad NAU College of Engineering.
Adam N. Pasch 1, Ashley R. Russell 1, Leo Tidd 2, Douglas S. Eisinger 1, Daniel M. Alrick 1, Hilary R. Hafner 1, and Song Bai 1 1 Sonoma Technology, Inc.,
Spray Droplet Size Standard S-572 Robert E. Wolf Extension Specialist Application Technology Biological and Agricultural Engineering.
Radionuclide dispersion modelling
Hitting the Mark: Pros and Cons of Precision Application CropLife America & RISE Spring Conference Crystal City, Virginia - April 11, 2014 Rod Thomas President,
Chemical Screening Tool for Exposures and Environmental Releases
Introduction to ArcGIS for Environmental Sciences Day 2 – Fundamentals Module 8 Creating & Editing Data Creating Metadata.
An agroforestry practice This presentation was developed by the USDA National Agroforestry Center.
Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry How to estimate future forest cover in a watershed.
Introduction to Atlantic RBCA Version 3 Webinar May 4, 2013.
Field Test Comparisons of Drift Reducing Products for Fixed Wing Aerial Applications Robert E. Wolf, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas Scott Bretthauer,
Pesticide Drift Management
Understanding Territorial Impacts: Tool for Territorial Impact Assessment Bernd Schuh (ÖIR) Karkow, Nov
The use of the Mesonet in Oklahoma agriculture Clint Dotson Precision Ag April 16, 2007.
Sediment Retention model
Land Treatment and the Conservation Planning Process CNMP Core Curriculum Section 3 — Land Treatment Practices.
Agricultural Aviation Technology
1 MOBILE6 -Input and Modeling Guidance -SIP and Conformity Policy North American Vehicle Emission Control Conference Atlanta, April 4, 2001 Gary Dolce.
Application Concerns for Control of Invasive Species ‘A focus on Equipment & Calibration’
M O V E – Management – Of – Vibration – Emissions/Exposure.
Spray Droplet Sizing – Understanding the Basics Brad Fritz USDA ARS Aerial Application Technology Research Unit College Station, Texas.
Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department Spray Droplet Analysis of Air Induction/Venturi Nozzles Using WRK’s DropletScan.
Critical Loads and Target Loads: Tools for Assessing, Evaluating and Protecting Natural Resources Ellen Porter Deborah Potter, Ph.D. National Park Service.
The ARTS quick-scan methodology ARTS Assessment of Regional and Territorial Sensitivity Aalborg, June 2012.
PRoMPT David Pendlington Unilever Sustainable Agriculture Project Co-ordinator.
New Requirements For Soil Fumigant Pesticide Products EPA - August 2010 Soil Fumigant RED Requirements Training Program Module 1: The EPA Regulatory Process.
Proposed Revisions to the Guideline on Air Quality Models
Comparison of the AEOLUS3 Atmospheric Dispersion Computer Code with NRC Codes PAVAN and XOQDOQ 13th NUMUG Conference, October 2009, San Francisco, CA.
2001SDTF SDTF Comments on Sensitive Areas and BMP Labeling Dave Valcore, Dow AgroSciences & SDTF Technical Committee Chair John Jachetta, SDTF Regulatory.
Improving the Genetic Algorithm Performance in Aerial Spray Deposition Management University of Georgia L. Wu, W.D. Potter, K. Rasheed USDA Forest Service.
The Affect of Application Volume and Deposition Aids on Droplet Spectrum and Deposition for Aerial Applications Presented at ASAE/NAAA Technical Session.
Class I Overview EPA Class I determination. Basics regarding how Class I works. Importance of Tribal Class I status. EPA’s Handling of Michigan’s objections.
Types of Models Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs Proposed Product Labeling for Spray/Dust Drift Jay Ellenberger Acting Director Field.
A Global Review of Methodologies for Aquatic Ecological Risk Assessment.
Ch. 1: “Watersheds and Wetlands” Lesson 1.5: “Factors That Affect Wetlands and Watersheds” Part 2.
Calibration of your Field Sprayers using Shortcut Methods
Cecil Tharp MSU Pesticide Education Program Pesticide Education Specialist Department of Animal and Range Montana State University.
Tank Mix and Adjuvants Summary l The entire tank mix determines droplet size l Adjuvants added to improve spray performance l Droplet size spectra l Drift.
Understanding Spray Drift Robert E. Wolf Extension Specialist Application Technology Biological and Agricultural Engineering.
Field Test Comparisons of Drift Reducing Products for Fixed Wing Aerial Applications Robert E. Wolf, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas Dennis.
Regulatory background How these standards could impact the permitting process How is compliance with the standards assessed.
Worker re-entry exposure within the framework of the BROWSE project Kim Doan Ngoc  Pieter Spanoghe 
Considerations for Selecting Turf Spray Tips Maximizing control while minimizing spray drift!
Application Exclusion Zone/ Protections During Applications Region 3 WPS Training April 11-12, 2016.
Environmental aspects and sustainable use of PPPs: Drift
Anniston PCB Site Review of Risk Assessments for OU-1/OU-2
Introduction With TimeCard users can tag SharePoint events with information that converts them into time sheets. This way they can report.
Boiler Sheltered Initiative
Brad Fritz USDA-ARS Aerial Application Technology Research Unit
Presentation transcript:

Pesticide Spray Drift Conference September 5 and 6, 2001 AgDRIFT® Dave Esterly Environmental Focus, Inc

A Really Fast Overview

Introduction AgDRIFT® Spray Drift Deposition Model AgDRIFT® incorporates a proposed overall method for evaluating off-site deposition of aerial, orchard or ground applied pesticides, and acts as a tool for evaluating the potential of buffer zones to protect sensitive aquatic and terrestrial habitats from undesired exposures.

Program Overview AgDRIFT® was developed under a cooperative Research and Development Agreement, CRADA, between the EPA, USDA, US Forest Service, and SDTF.

AgDRIFT® is a modified version of AGDISP, a US Forest Service Model. Modifications include: –Took box to standardize calculations –Built-in graphics –Special export functions –Improved evaporation function –Emphasis drift to speed up the calculations Program Overview

AgDRIFT® Two Versions Regulatory Version Two Extra Tiers: –Tier I Aerial –Tier II Aerial –Direct access to all the SDTF field studies

Tier I Aerial

AgDRIFT® Aerial Tier I Regulatory Risk Assessment Screening Tool “Reasonable Worst Case” Implies maximum acceptable Deposition Not Maximum expected Deposition

Tier II Aerial

AgDRIFT® Aerial Tier II Regulatory Risk Assessment Advanced Registration Tool Designed for Label Mitigation Selected Inputs can be Changed –Measurable –Controllable –Enforceable

AgDRIFT® Two Versions Public Version or Web Version –No access to the SDTF field data –No Tier I or Tier II Aerial –Defaults values “Typical Application Conditions” –Tier I & Tier II results can be recovered by using the Tier I default values. ( See manual )

AgDRIFT® MAP Web Version 2.03 Agricultural –Tier I – Ground (Empirical) –Tier I –Orchard (Empirical) –Tier III – Aerial (Physics Based) Forestry –Tier III – Aerial (Physics Based) Two Modes and Four Tiers

AgDRIFT® Program Map

AgDRIFT® Tier I Ground

Tier I Ground Boom Height –Low –high Drop Size Distribution –FINE –MEDIUM / COARSE Extended Settings –Number of swaths Info –Field data summary

AgDRIFT® Tier I Orchard

Tier I Orchard Combination Orchards –Normal –Dense –Sparse Extended Setting Info

AgDRIFT® Tier III Aerial

Tier III Aerial Aircraft (72) Nozzle & DSD Transport Swath Spray Material Meteorology Terrain Advance Settings

Graphical Outputs Incremental Volume Fraction

Graphical Outputs Cumulative Fraction

Graphical Outputs Deposition

Graphical Outputs Pond-Integrated Deposition

Graphical Outputs Vertical Profile

Vertical Profile The total amount of mass (pesticide) passing in air at a given point down-wind as a function of height above the ground Think of it as the drift before it deposits Flux plane is set by the user Units mg/cm 2 Mass is conserved

Graphical Outputs 1 Hour Average Concentration

1 Hour Average Concentration The total amount of mass (pesticide) passing in air at a given point down-wind as a function of height above the ground diluted with the volume of air the passes through the same point (area) in space The volume of air is based on the wind speed Units  g/l

Toolbox (Aquatic Assessment) Water body –EPA Pond –EPA wetland –User Defined Application Rate Calculations –Buffer –Fraction of applied (rate) Fraction g/ha Pond concentration  g/l

Toolbox (Terrestrial Assessment) Terrestrial Field Deposition –Point –Average Application Rate Calculations –Buffer –Fraction of applied (rate) Fraction g/ha  g/cm 2

Toolbox (Spray Block Assessment) Water body –EPA Pond –EPA wetland –User Defined Application Rate Calculations –Buffer –Fraction of applied (rate) Fraction g/ha  g/cm 2

Toolbox (Spray Block Assessment) Spray block assessment: Ask yourself the following question. If the area to be sprayed is 125ft from the sensitive area. How large of a area can I spray before I exceed a deposition of one percent of the application rate?

Toolbox (Spray Block Assessment)

Toolbox (Stream Assessment)

Toolbox (Multiple Application Assessment)

Toolbox (Multiple Application Assessment) Wind Rose

Toolbox (Multiple Application Assessment) Deposition

And Much More HELP! The F1 key Short cut to the program help and definitions Details! Read the Manual Updates! Check the Web site:

AgDRIFT® Training Date: To Be Established Time: Session Length 1 or 2 Days Place: Groups Choice Cost: Cover Expenses Contact SDTF: Dave, Dave, Dave, or Andrew

Questions