Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 5b Health Data Interchange Standards.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EMRLD A RIM-based Data Integration Approach Pradeep Chowdhury Manager, Data Integration.
Advertisements

Duke University W. Ed Hammond, Ph.D.. Duke University GROUPS OF STANDARDS COMMUNICATIONS XML, TCP/IP, SOAP, W3C, IETF, Web services, others DATA ELEMENTS.
Joint TC Meeting: EHR – RCRIM RCRIM Overview HL7 Working Group Meeting January, 2007 Presented by: Ed Tripp Program Director, eSubmissions Abbott (RCRIM.
Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0 Fall Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 4e Basic Health Data Standards Component 9/Unit.
HelsIT 2010 Alberto Sáez Torres Sacyl Interoperability Office Junta de Castilla y León Experience of ePrescription in Spain using HL7 V3 September 21 th,
QIDAM Issues and proposals for a logical model For discussion during HL7 WG Meeting in Jan 2014 Thursday Q3.
Catherine Hoang Ioana Singureanu Greg Staudenmaier Detailed Clinical Models for Medical Device Domain Analysis Model 1.
SAFER – HEALTHIER – PEOPLE CDC NEDSS Drug Reaction Notification 2 October Page: 1 Notification Messaging to Support FDA Building an HL7 Version.
Cross Domain Patient Identity Management Eric Heflin Dir of Standards and Interoperability/Medicity.
FHIM Overview How the FHIM can organize other information modeling efforts.
Cross Domain Patient Identity Management Eric Heflin Dir of Standards and Interoperability/Medicity.
The Evolution of Pharmacy Messages HL7 UK Conference 2 November 2004 Hugh Glover, BSc, PhD Partner, Blue Wave Informatics LLP
Initial slides for Layered Service Architecture
Slide 1 Wolfram Höpken RMSIG Reference Model Special Interest Group Second RMSIG Workshop Methodology and Process Wolfram Höpken.
The EHR-S FIM project plans to harmonize the EHR-S FM R2
HL7 HL7  Health Level Seven (HL7) is a non-profit organization involved in the development of international healthcare.
Standards & Vocabulary
IHE Profile – SOA Analysis: In Progress Update Brian McIndoe December 6, 2010.
Introduction to MDA (Model Driven Architecture) CYT.
This material was developed by Duke University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information.
Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 6b EHR Functional Model Standards.
L SERVICE DELIVERY Pharmacy Public Health Provider Interoperability Services Data Interchange Legacy System Adapters Simulator Health Service Bus Infrastructure.
Component 11/Unit 8b Data Dictionary Understanding and Development.
1 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Current Framework and Fundamental Concepts  For those unfamiliar with the HITSP Harmonization Framework.
Dave Iberson-Hurst CDISC VP Technical Strategy
Clinical Document Architecture. Outline History Introduction Levels Level One Structures.
Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 7d Supporting Standards for EHR Application.
New ITS Investigation NHS CfH Research Report Grahame Grieve, Laura Sato, Charlie McCay.
Gpi gordon point informatics Information Decomposition at NCI Jean Duteau HL7 UK RIMBAA Conference, November 4, 2010.
IHE Profile – SOA Analysis: In Progress Update Brian McIndoe January 18, 2011.
Message Development Framework (MDF) Is a Methodology for building HL7 models Is a description for defining HL7 standard messages Full instruction.
Standards Analysis Summary vMR –Pros Designed for computability Compact Wire Format Aligned with HeD Efforts –Cons Limited Vendor Adoption thus far Represents.
Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0 Fall Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 3b National and International Standards Developing.
This material was developed by Duke University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information.
Final Project – Health Information Exchange: Technology, Challenges & Opportunities Group 3 Gary Brown, Michelle Burke, Kazi Russell MMI 402 Fall 2013.
Introduction to HL7 Version 3 W. Ed Hammond February 25, 2008.
Common Terminology Services 2 CTS 2 Submission Team Status Update HL7 Vocabulary Working Group May 17, 2011.
This material was developed by Duke University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information.
Dictionary based interchanges for iSURF -An Interoperability Service Utility for Collaborative Supply Chain Planning across Multiple Domains David Webber.
Terminology in Health Care and Public Health Settings Unit 14 What is Health Information Management and Technology?
This material was developed by Duke University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information.
Open Source & Interoperability Profit Proprietary Closed Free Collaborative Open.
Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 6a EHR Functional Model Standards.
Commentary: The HL7 Reference Information Model as the Basis for Interoperability George W. Beeler, Jr. Ph.D. Co-Chair, HL7 Modeling & Methodology.
HL7 Version 3 Veli BICER. Agenda HL7 Problems with Version 2.x HL7 Models Use Case Model Information Model Interaction Model Message Model.
Jemerson Pedernal IT 2.1 FUNDAMENTALS OF DATABASE APPLICATIONS by PEDERNAL, JEMERSON G. [BS-Computer Science] Palawan State University Computer Network.
Helping the Cause of Medical Device Interoperability Through Standards- based Test Tools DoC/NIST John J. Garguilo January 25,
THE DICOM 2014 INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR August 26Chengdu, China HL7 and DICOM: Complementary Standards, Collaborating Organizations Bao Yongjian Principal.
CDA Overview HL7 CDA IHE Meeting, February 5, 2002 Slides from Liora Alschuler, alschuler.spinosa Co-chair HL7.
CCD and CCR Executive Summary Jacob Reider, MD Medical Director, Allscripts.
Data Models. 2 The Importance of Data Models Data models –Relatively simple representations, usually graphical, of complex real-world data structures.
Tung Tran, Ph.D. What is the EMR? Computerized legal medical record created by healthcare organizations Enables storage and retrieval of patient information.
ITI Infrastructure - Wednesday November 7th, IHE IT infrastructure “Terminology Sharing” Christel Daniel (AP-HP, INSERM, Paris), Ana Esterlich (GIP-DMP),
Case Study: HL7 Conformance in VA Imaging Mike Henderson Principal Consultant Eastern Informatics, Inc.
Health Management Information Systems Unit 3 Electronic Health Records Component 6/Unit31 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010.
Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter 2 Clinical Information Standards – Unit 3 seminar Electronic.
Dave Iberson-Hurst CDISC VP Technical Strategy
Networking and Health Information Exchange
Networking and Health Information Exchange
WP1: D 1.3 Standards Framework Status June 25, 2015
Unit 5 Systems Integration and Interoperability
Networking and Health Information Exchange
Electronic Health Information Systems
Clinical Observation Interoperability March 18, 2008
HingX Project Overview
Metadata The metadata contains
, editor October 8, 2011 DRAFT-D
Component 9 - Networking and Health Information Exchange
Component 9 - Networking and Health Information Exchange
Presentation transcript:

Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 5b Health Data Interchange Standards

Objectives Explain how model-based standards are created Define the methodology development framework Describe HL7 v3.0 messaging standards Discuss other data interchange standards including DICOM Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010 Component 9/Unit 5b2

v3 Messaging Standard Based on an object information model, called the Reference Information Model, (RIM). This model is “abstract,” that is, it is defined without regard to how it is represented in a message “on the wire” or in a “service architecture” method or in a “clinical document.” In fact, each of these representations can contain the same “instance” of information. Consequently, can be extended incrementally when new clinical information domains need to be added, in a way that doesn’t require changing what has already been created. Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010 Component 9/Unit 5b3

Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall Why Cross-Reference to the RIM? Domain analysis models support communication within a domain Communications between domains requires an abstract, domain-independent model such as the HL7 RIM Cross-reference tables build the mappings from the narrow world of the individual domain to the cross-domain interoperability supported by the HL7 RIM Component 9/Unit 5b4

Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall HL7 V3 Reference Information Model Referral Transportation Supply Procedure Consent Observation Medication Administrative act Financial act Organization Place Person Living Subject Material Patient Member Healthcare facility Practitioner Practitioner assignment Specimen Location Entity 0..* 1 Role 1 0..* 1 Act Relationship 1..* 1 0..* 1 Participation Act Author Reviewer Verifier Subject Target Tracker Has component Is supported by Component 9/Unit 5b5

7 July HL7 Development Framework Formal methodology for mapping any “local”, domain specific system, such as a “laboratory system” in the v3 Reference model. Basic concept is that any system can be mapped into a “neutral” and formal UML-based Domain Analysis (DAM) model with the help of domain experts. The DAM can then be mapped into the equivalent v3-RIM model. Mapping is bi-directional and highlights any changes needed by either the local system or the RIM to create a semantically complete mapping. RIM Harmonization process supports a standard way to add new domain requirements to the RIM in a way that doesn’t invalidate the previously created models – a feature of object-oriented paradigms. Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010 Component 9/Unit 5b6

7 July Model-based Development HL7 Framework HL7 Specification RIM Data types Data elements Vocabulary Templates Clinical Statements Core Structured Content V3 Messaging CDA Specifications GELLO System Oriented Architecture Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010 Component 9/Unit 5b7

7 July What’s Different About v3? Conceptual foundation – a single, common reference information model to be used across HL7 Semantic foundation –explicitly defined concept domains drawn from the best terminologies Abstract design methodology that is technology-neutral – able to be used with whatever is the technology de jour (e.g. XML, UML, etc.) Maintain a repository (database) of the semantic content to assure a single source and enable development of support tooling Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010 Component 9/Unit 5b8

7 July HL7 Model Repository Data base holding the core of HL7 semantic specifications –RIM –Storyboards –Vocabulary domains –Interaction models –Message designs –Message constraints Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010 Component 9/Unit 5b9

Tool Sets Permit management of repository content Review and browsing of semantic specifications Design of abstract information structures based on the RIM for use in messages, templates, documents, etc. Publish HL7 specifications and standards Support implementation of HL7 standards Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010 Component 9/Unit 5b10

7 July Drivers for V3 Adoption Needed to support for large scale integration V3 has “built-in” support for Complex Data types supporting “universally unique” instance identifiers for persons, places, organizations, practitioners, URL’s, orders, observations, etc. Name data type (persons and organizations) Time and date-related data type forms Codes (binding standard vocabularies to RIM attributes) V3’s methodology of deriving its models from the RIM also supports semantic interoperability Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010 Component 9/Unit 5b11

7 July Drivers for v3 Adoption For implementations requiring large scale integration (city, region, province, nationwide, international), v3 has ‘built- in’ support The need for decision support and rules-based processing requires the v3 model-based semantic interoperability which is available across the many healthcare information domains. Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010 Component 9/Unit 5b12

7 July HL7 Version 3.0 Use-case Model Reference Information Model Domain Information Model Message Information Model Message Object Diagram Hierarchical Message Description Common Message Element Definition Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010 Component 9/Unit 5b13

Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010 Component 9/Unit 5b14

7 July HL7 Version 3 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010 Component 9/Unit 5b15

7 July Common Domains Common Message Element Types (CMETS): template structures for complex administrative objects such as address or telephone number Shared Messages Clinical Statement Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010 Component 9/Unit 5b16

7 July Administrative Management Accounting and billing Claims and reimbursement Patient Administration (DSTU) Personnel Management Scheduling Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010 Component 9/Unit 5b17

7 July Infrastructure / Messaging Transmission Message Control Query Master File / Registry Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010 Component 9/Unit 5b18

7 July Health and Clinical Management *Blood, Tissue and Organ *Care Provision Cardiology DAM Clinical Decision Support Clinical Document Architecture *Clinical Genomics *Immunization Laboratory Materials Management *Medical Records *Medication Observations Orders *Pharmacy Public Health Reporting Regulated Products Regulated Studies Specimen Therapeutic Devices * DSTU Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010 Component 9/Unit 5b19

The next series of slides show the process or methodology by which HL7 messages are created. Component 9/Unit 5bHealth IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall

7 July v-3 Methodology Defining Abstract Message Use Case Model Interaction Model Hierarchical Message Description Domain Information Model Message Information Model Refined Message Information Model Common Message Element Definition Reference Information Model Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010 Component 9/Unit 5b21

Example of R-MIM Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010 Component 9/Unit 5b22

7 July Message instance... Source: W. Beeler Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010 Component 9/Unit 5b23

7 July v3 Messaging Concerns Difficult to implement No one understands v3 Overhead too much –1% of message is payload compared to v2 (delimiters) is about 90-95% No one understands what implementation of v3 messaging means Need stability, clarity, definition of v3 messaging Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010 Component 9/Unit 5b24

7 July What About v3 Messages? Some implementers create their own messaging using the HDF process. This is complex and probably not necessary. HL7 has begun to build a library of v3 messages, developed by HL7 experts in different areas and clinical domains. How many v3 messages are required to support robust EHR, RHIO, and NHIN? Could we meet data interchange needs with only a few messages with constraint mechanisms? Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010 Component 9/Unit 5b25

Summary This subunit introduced the HL7 v3 data interchange standard. This section also introduced an approach to planning for what system you need, the development and use of models, and introduced the concept of a reference information model which becomes the basis for interoperability among heterogeneous systems. Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010 Component 9/Unit 5b26