Scaling relations of spheroids over cosmic time: Tommaso Treu (UCSB)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Marianne Vestergaard Dark Cosmology Centre, Copenhagen First Galaxies, Quasars, and GRBs, June Determining Black Hole Masses in Distant Quasars.
Advertisements

1 Reverberation Mapping of the Broad-Line Region Bradley M. Peterson The Ohio State University Collaborators: M. Bentz, S. Collin, K. Denney, L.-B. Desroches,
COEVOLUTION OF SUPERMASSIVE BLACK HOLES AND THEIR HOST GALAXIES...OR: CHICKEN, EGG OR BOTH? Jari Kotilainen Tuorla Observatory, University of Turku, Finland.
UNCERTAINTIES ON THE BLACK HOLE MASSES AND CONSEQUENCES FOR THE EDDINGTON RATIOS Suzy Collin Observatoire de Paris-Meudon, France Collaborators: T. Kawaguchi.
The Highest-Redshift Quasars and the End of Cosmic Dark Ages Xiaohui Fan Collaborators: Strauss,Schneider,Richards, Hennawi,Gunn,Becker,White,Rix,Pentericci,
The Role of Dissipation in Galaxy Mergers Sadegh Khochfar University of Oxford.
Padova 03 3D Spectrography 3D Spectrography IV – The search for supermassive black holes.
Supermassive Black Holes in Radio-loud AGNs
Kevin Bundy, Caltech The Mass Assembly History of Field Galaxies: Detection of an Evolving Mass Limit for Star-Forming Galaxies Kevin Bundy R. S. Ellis,
On the geometry of broad emission region in quasars Roberto Decarli Turin - May, 20 th, 2008 Università degli Studi dell’Insubria Dipartimento di Fisica.
Supermassive Black Holes Course 689 Presentation by Yan Shi Nov 5, 2009.
The Size, Structure & Ionization of the Broad-Line Region in NGC 3227 and NGC 4051 Nick Devereux (ERAU) Emily Heaton (ERAU) May 22 nd, 2013 Naples, Italy.
1 Black Hole Masses from Reverberation Mapping Bradley M. Peterson The Ohio State University Collaborators: M. Bentz, S. Collin, K. Dasyra, K. Denney,
Eddington limited starbursts in the central 10pc of AGN Richard Davies, Reinhard Genzel, Linda Tacconi, Francisco Mueller Sánchez, Susanne Friedrich Max.
The two phases of massive galaxy formation Thorsten Naab MPA, Garching UCSC, August, 2010.
Massive galaxies in massive datasets M. Bernardi, J. Hyde and E. Tundo M. Bernardi, J. Hyde and E. Tundo University of Pennsylvania.
Dark Matter and Galaxy Formation Section 4: Semi-Analytic Models of Galaxy Formation Joel R. Primack 2009, eprint arXiv: Presented by: Michael.
THE MODERATELY LARGE SCALE STRUCTURE OF QUASARS
The Narrow-Line Region and Ionization Cone Lei Xu.
RECOILING BLACK HOLES IN GALACTIC CENTERS Michael Boylan-Kolchin, Chung-Pei Ma, and Eliot Quataert (UC Berkeley) astro-ph/
On the inconsistency between the SMBH Mass Function from velocity dispersion and luminosity E. Tundo 1,2, M. Bernardi 2, R. K. Sheth 2 J. B. Hyde 2, A.
Cosmological formation of elliptical galaxies * Thorsten Naab & Jeremiah P. Ostriker (Munich, Princeton) T.Naab (USM), P. Johannson (USM), J.P. Ostriker.
Black holes: do they exist?
Dissecting the Red Sequence: Stellar Population Properties in Fundamental Plane Space Genevieve J. Graves, S. M. Faber University of California, Santa.
AGN downsizing は階層的銀河形成論で 説明できるか? Motohiro Enoki Tomoaki Ishiyama (Tsukuba Univ.) Masakazu A. R. Kobayashi (Ehime Univ.) Masahiro Nagashima (Nagasaki Univ.)
Star Formation Downsizing: Testing the Role of Mergers and AGN Kevin Bundy (University of Toronto) Richard Ellis (Caltech), Tommaso Treu (UCSB), Antonis.
The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.
Keck NIRSPEC/AO spectra of nearest Seyfert 1s Multiple slit positions  2D velocity and flux distribution maps Model 2D velocity field to estimate M BH.
THE ROLE OF BLACK HOLES IN GALAXY EVOLUTION Tiziana Di Matteo Carnegie Mellon University Volker Springel, Lars Hernquist, Phil Hopkins, Brant Robertson,
Probing AGN Outflows with Variability Smita Mathur Ohio State Collaborators: Yair Krongold, Fabrizio Nicastro, Anjali Gupta Nancy Brickhouse, Martin Elvis.
The Black-Hole – Halo Mass Relation and High Redshift Quasars Stuart Wyithe Avi Loeb (The University of Melbourne) (Harvard University) Fan et al. (2001)
The Fundamental Plane of Astrophysical Black Holes WU Xue-Bing (Peking University) Collaborators: WANG Ran (PKU) KONG Minzhi (NAOC)
The Future of Direct Supermassive Black Hole Mass Measurements Dan Batcheldor Rochester Institute of Technology - The Role of SMBHs measurements. - Current.
Central Engine of AGN Xi’ian October 2006 Black Hole Mass Measurements with Adaptive Optic Assisted 3D-Spectroscopy Courtesy ESO Guia Pastorini Osservatorio.
IAU Jong-Hak Woo Univ. California Santa Barbara Collaborators: Tommaso Treu (UCSB), Matt Malkan (UCLA), & Roger Blandford (Stanford) Cosmic Evolution.
M-σ. Predicted in based on self- regulated BH growth M ~ σ 5 (Silk & Rees) M ~ σ 4 (Fabian)
The coordinated growth of stars, haloes and large-scale structure since z=1 Michael Balogh Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Waterloo.
Super-massive Black Holes of Quasars at World’s End Myungshin Im (Seoul National University) Youichi Ohyama (ISAS & ASIAA) Minjin Kim, Induk Lee, H. M.
Modeling the dependence of galaxy clustering on stellar mass and SEDs Lan Wang Collaborators: Guinevere Kauffmann (MPA) Cheng Li (MPA/SHAO, USTC) Gabriella.
Black Hole - Bulge Relation of High Redshift Quasars Xue-Bing Wu (Dept. of Astronomy, Peking University)
Galactic Astronomy 銀河物理学特論 I Lecture 2-1: Active galaxies and super massive black holes in the local universe Seminar: Gultekin et al. 2009, ApJ, 698,
The Star Formation Histories of Red Sequence Galaxies Mike Hudson U. Waterloo / IAP Steve Allanson (Waterloo) Allanson, MH et al 09, ApJ 702, 1275 Russell.
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LUMINOSITY AND BLACK HOLE MASSES IN ACTIVE GALAXIES: USING NEAR-INFRARED LINE Do-hyeong Kim, Myungshin Im Astronomy Program, Department.
An alternative track of Black hole – galaxy co-evolution An alternative track of Black hole – galaxy co-evolution Smita Mathur The Ohio State University.
Assembly of Massive Elliptical Galaxies
Radio Galaxies part 4. Apart from the radio the thin accretion disk around the AGN produces optical, UV, X-ray radiation The optical spectrum emitted.
Semi-analytical model of galaxy formation Xi Kang Purple Mountain Observatory, CAS.
The dependence on redshift of quasar black hole masses from the SLOAN survey R. Decarli Università dell’Insubria, Como, Italy A. Treves Università dell’Insubria,
Evolution of Accretion Disks around Massive Black Holes: Constraints from the Demography of Active Galactic Nuclei Qingjuan Yu UC Berkeley April 21, 2006.

How are galaxies influenced by their environment? rachel somerville STScI Predictions & insights from hierarchical models with thanks to Eric Bell the.
AST101 Lecture 20 Our Galaxy Dissected. Shape of the Galaxy.
KASI Galaxy Evolution Journal Club A Massive Protocluster of Galaxies at a Redshift of z ~ P. L. Capak et al. 2011, Nature, in press (arXive: )
What can we learn from High-z Passive Galaxies ? Andrea Cimatti Università di Bologna – Dipartimento di Astronomia.
The M BH -  star relation at the highest redshifts Fabian Walter (MPIA)
Star Formation and Accretion: Systems experience periods of activity on the first passage of the galaxies, where tidal tails and morphological disturbances.
Galaxy mass-to-light ratios at z> 1 from the Fundamental Plane: measuring the star formation epoch and mass evolution of galaxies van der Wel, Rix, Franx,
Vatican 2003 Lecture 30 HWR Black Holes. Vatican 2003 Lecture 30 HWR Black Holes and Galaxy Centers Two most important energy production mechanisms in.
Evolution of massive binary black holes Qingjuan Yu Princeton University July 21, 2002.
T. J. Cox Phil Hopkins Lars Hernquist + many others (the Hernquist Mafia) Feedback from AGN during Galaxy Mergers.
Lecture 16 Measurement of masses of SMBHs: Sphere of influence of a SMBH Gas and stellar dynamics, maser disks Stellar proper motions Mass vs velocity.
Massive galaxies in massive datasets M. Bernardi (U. Penn)
Kyoko Onishi SOKENDAI (The Graduate University for Advanced Studies)
How to Better Weigh a Black Hole and Other Adventures in Quasar Physics Michael Brotherton.
Biases in Virial Black Hole Masses: an SDSS Perspective
Xiaohui Fan University of Arizona June 21, 2004
‘3D’ Data Sets are ABSOLUTELY Crucial to Answer the Important Questions of Galaxy Formation and Evolution Galaxy dynamical masses, gas masses Spatially.
- = + = Quasars, Mergers, and the Formation of Elliptical Galaxies
On the Outliers of the Black Hole - Bulge Relation
Demographics of SDSS Quasars in Two-Dimension
Presentation transcript:

Scaling relations of spheroids over cosmic time: Tommaso Treu (UCSB)

Outline Use scaling laws (e.g. Fundamental Plane, M-sigma relation) to map the cosmic evolution of the three main constituents of spheroids: 1.Stars 2.Dark matter 3.Supermassive black holes

1: Stars Treu et al. 1999,2001,2002,2005a,b See di Serego Alighieri & van der Wel’s talks

The Fundamental Plane as a diagnostic of stellar populations Empirical correlation between size, luminosity and velocity dispersion Gives “effective M/L” at “effective mass” Dressler et al. 1987; Djorgovski & Davis 1987; Bender Burstein & Faber 1992; Jorgensen et al. 1996

Evolution of Mass to Light ratios Evolution of mass to light ratio is a function of dynamical mass More massive galaxies evolve slower than less massive ones, i.e. older stars (“downsizing”) Treu et al. 2005a

Downsizing star formation Treu et al. 2005b Young stars <1%Young stars ~5%Young stars up to 20-40% Log M> >Log M>1111>Log M

Stellar populations: conclusions Stars in massive early-type galaxies are old Stars in smaller galaxies are younger Is this “downsizing” compatible with hierarchical models? –Perhaps, if massive galaxies are assembled without forming new stars (AGN feedback?) –But can other properties (e.g. dark halos, BH) be reproduced as well?

3: Supermassive Black Holes

The local Universe Gebhardt et al. 2001; Tremaine et al Ferrarese & Merritt 2001

How do black-holes and spheroids know about each other? The size of the dynamical sphere of influence of a BH is R~M BH7 / (σ 200 ) 2 pc ~ pc The size of the spheroid is of order kpc Typical accretion rates are of order 0.01 solar mass per yr for a 10 7 M_sun black hole. Mass of black holes could change over a Gyr timescale. If spheroids evolve by mergers, what makes the BH and spheroids stay on the same correlation?

The distant universe: two problems Black hole mass: 1” at z=1 is ~8kpc. We CANNOT resolve the sphere of influence, active galaxies are the only option Velocity dispersion: distant objects are faint and not resolved. If the galaxy is active we CANNOT avoid AGN contamination

The distant universe: a solution, focus on Seyfert 1s Black hole mass: –Reverberation mapping (Blandford & McKee 1982) does not need spatial resolution. –Empirically calibrated photo-ionization (ECPI: Wandel, Peterson & Malkan 1999) based on reverberation masses Velocity dispersion: –integrated spectra have enough starlight that with good spectra it is possible to measure the width of stellar absorption features on the “featureless AGN continuum”. Treu, Malkan & Blandford 2004

Measuring velocity dispersion. Woo, Treu, Malkan & Blandford 2006, astro-ph yesterday!

Black-Hole Mass. Empirically Calibrated Photo-Ionization Method The flux needed to ionize the broad line region scales as L(ion)/r 2. Coefficients too hard to compute theoretically An empirical correlation is found, calibrated using reverberation mapping Wandel Peterson & Malkan 1999; Kaspi et al Kaspi et al L (5100AA) Broad line region size

Black-Hole Mass. Hb width determination Hb width from single epoch spectra provides a good estimate of the kinematics of the broad line region if constant narrow component is removed. (Vestergaard & Peterson 2006) Overall uncertainty on BH mass ~0.4 dex

The Black-Hole Mass vs Sigma relation at z=0.36 Woo, Treu, Malkan & Blandford 2006, astro-ph yesterday!

The Black-Hole Mass vs Sigma relation at z=0.36; cosmic evolution? Δlog M BH = 0.62±0.10±0.25 dex redshift Δ log M BH

Conclusions. Bulges at z=0.36 smaller than their black- hole masses suggest. Three possibilities: 1.Selection effects 2.Problems with the ECPI method 3.Evolution

Recent evolution of (active) bulges? Treu et al. 2006b

Closing remarks: conjectures and predictions.. Galaxies form initially as blue disks Major mergers 1) trigger AGN activity, 2) quench star formation, 3) increase the bulge size The characteristic mass scale decreases with time (‘downsizing’), consistent with that of our galaxies at z=0.36 Hopkins et al redshift Log M tr The M-sigma relation should be already in place for larger masses!

The end