Functional Programming in Scheme and Lisp.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Functional Programming in Scheme and Lisp.
Advertisements

1 Copyright © 1998 by Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. Chapter 14 Functional Programming Languages - The design of the imperative languages is based directly.
Lists in Lisp and Scheme a. Lists are Lisp’s fundamental data structures, but there are others – Arrays, characters, strings, etc. – Common Lisp has moved.
CSE 3341/655; Part 4 55 A functional program: Collection of functions A function just computes and returns a value No side-effects In fact: No program.
1 Programming Languages (CS 550) Lecture Summary Functional Programming and Operational Semantics for Scheme Jeremy R. Johnson.
Functional Programming. Pure Functional Programming Computation is largely performed by applying functions to values. The value of an expression depends.
1 Programming Languages and Paradigms Lisp Programming.
CSE 341 Lecture 16 More Scheme: lists; helpers; let/let*; higher-order functions; lambdas slides created by Marty Stepp
Lambda Calculus and Lisp PZ03J. Lambda Calculus The lambda calculus is a model for functional programming like Turing machines are models for imperative.
Chapter 3 Functional Programming. Outline Introduction to functional programming Scheme: an untyped functional programming language.
CS 355 – PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES Dr. X. Apply-to-all A functional form that takes a single function as a parameter and yields a list of values obtained.
1-1 An Introduction to Scheme March Introduction A mid-1970s dialect of LISP, designed to be a cleaner, more modern, and simpler version than.
1 Functional programming Languages And a brief introduction to Lisp and Scheme.
Functional programming: LISP Originally developed for symbolic computing Main motivation: include recursion (see McCarthy biographical excerpt on web site).
CS 330 Programming Languages 11 / 20 / 2007 Instructor: Michael Eckmann.
Chapter 15 Functional Programming Languages. Copyright © 2007 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 1–2 Introduction Design of imperative languages is.
ISBN Chapter 15 Functional Programming Languages Mathematical Functions Fundamentals of Functional Programming Languages Introduction to.
Functional programming: LISP Originally developed for symbolic computing First interactive, interpreted language Dynamic typing: values have types, variables.
LISP 1.5 and beyond A very quick tour. Data Atoms (symbols) including numbers – All types of numbers including Roman! (well, in the early days) – Syntactically.
1 (Functional (Programming (in (Scheme)))) Jianguo Lu.
Functional Programing Referencing material from Programming Language Pragmatics – Third Edition – by Michael L. Scott Andy Balaam (Youtube.com/user/ajbalaam)
1 Lists in Lisp and Scheme. 2 Lists are Lisp’s fundamental data structures. Lists are Lisp’s fundamental data structures. However, it is not the only.
1 Lisp Functions –Built-in functions –Defining functions –Function Evaluation and Special Forms defun, if Control statements –Conditional if, cond –Repetition.
Functional Programming in Scheme
ISBN Chapter 15 Functional Programming Languages.
Functional Programming in Scheme and Lisp. Overview In a functional programming language, functions are first class objects. You can create them, put.
Introduction to Scheme CS 480/680 – Comparative Languages “And now for something completely different…” – Monty Python “And now for something completely.
Functional Programming and Lisp. Overview In a functional programming language, functions are first class objects. In a functional programming language,
COP4020 Programming Languages Functional Programming Prof. Xin Yuan.
ISBN Chapter 15 Functional Programming Languages.
ISBN Chapter 15 Functional Programming Languages.
LISP Data Types Functional Programming Academic Year Alessandro Cimatti
UMBC CMSC Common Lisp II. UMBC CMSC Input and Output Print is the most primitive output function > (print (list 'foo 'bar)) (FOO BAR) The.
Variables, Environments and Closures. Overview Touch on the notions of variable extent and scope Introduce the notions of lexical scope and dynamic.
Scheme Profs Tim Sheard and Andrew Black CS 311 Computational Structures.
Milos Hauskrecht (PDF) Hieu D. Vu (PPT) LISP PROGARMMING LANGUAGE.
CS 330 Programming Languages 11 / 28 / 2006 Instructor: Michael Eckmann.
1 FP Foundations, Scheme In Text: Chapter Chapter 14: FP Foundations, Scheme Mathematical Functions Def: A mathematical function is a mapping of.
Computer Eng. Software Lab II , Semester 2, Who I am: Andrew Davison CoE, WiG Lab Office Functional Programming.
Ch Ch jcmt CSE 3302 Programming Languages CSE3302 Programming Languages (n-n-n-notes) Summer 2003 Dr. Carter Tiernan.
1 Introduction to Functional Programming in Racket CS 270 Math Foundations of CS Jeremy Johnson.
Functional Programming
CS314 – Section 5 Recitation 10
Functional Programming Languages
History of Computing – Lisp
Basic Scheme February 8, 2007 Compound expressions Rules of evaluation
Introduction to Scheme
Variables, Environments and Closures
Chapter 15 – Functional Programming Languages
Lists in Lisp and Scheme
LISP A brief overview.
Introduction to Functional Programming in Racket
Variables, Environments and Closures
The Metacircular Evaluator
FP Foundations, Scheme In Text: Chapter 14.
Functional Programming Languages
Dynamic Scoping Lazy Evaluation
The Metacircular Evaluator
The Metacircular Evaluator (Continued)
6.001 SICP Further Variations on a Scheme
CSCE 314: Programming Languages Dr. Dylan Shell
Streams, Delayed Evaluation and a Normal Order Interpreter
Lisp and Scheme I.
Streams and Lazy Evaluation in Lisp and Scheme
6.001 SICP Variations on a Scheme
Introduction to Functional Programming in Racket
6.001 SICP Interpretation Parts of an interpreter
Modern Programming Languages Lecture 18 Fakhar Lodhi
Common Lisp II.
Presentation transcript:

Functional Programming in Scheme and Lisp

Overview In a functional programming language, functions are first class objects You can create them, put them in data structures, compose them, specialize them, apply them to arguments, etc. We’ll look at how functional programming things are done in Lisp

eval Remember: Lisp code is just an s-expression You can call Lisp’s evaluation process with the eval function > (define s (list 'cadr ' ' (one two three))) > s (cadr ' (one two three)) > (eval s) two > (eval (list 'cdr (car '((quote (a. b)) c)))) b

apply apply takes a function and a list of arguments for it and returns the result of applying the function to them > (apply + ' (1 2 3)) 6 apply can be given any number of arguments, so long as the last is a list: > (apply ' (3 4 5)) 15 A simple version of apply could be written as (define (apply f list) (eval (cons f list)))

lambda The define special form creates a function and gives it a name However, functions need not have names, and we don’t need to use define to create them The primitive way to create functions is to use the lambda special form These are often called lambda expressions, e.g. (lambda (x) (+ x 1))

lambda expression A lambda expression is a list of the symbol lambda, followed by a list of parameters, fol- lowed by a body of one or more expressions: > (define f (lambda (x) (+ x 2))) > f # > (f 100) 102 > ( (lambda (x) (+ x 2)) 100) 102

Lambda expression lambda is a special form When evaluated, it creates a function and returns a reference to it The function does not have a name A lambda expression can be the first ele- ment of a function call: > ( (lambda (x) (+ x 100)) 1) 101 Other languages like python and javascript have adopted the idea

define vs. define (define (add2 x) (+ x 2) ) (define add2 (lambda (x) (+ x 2))) (define add2 #f) (set! add2 (lambda (x) (+ x 2))) The define special form comes in two varieties The three expressions to the left are entirely equivalent The first define form is just more familiar and convenient when defining a function

Functions as objects While many PLs allow functions as arguments, nameless lambda functions add flexibility > (sort '((a 100)(b 10)(c 50)) (lambda (x y) (< (second x) (second y)))) ((b 10) (c 50) (a 100)) There is no need to give the comparator function a name

lambdas in other languages Lambda expressions are found in many modern languages, e.g., Python: >>> f = lambda x,y: x*x + y >>> f at 0x10048a230> >>> f(2, 3) 7 >>> (lambda x,y: x*x+y)(2,3) 7

Mapping functions Lisp and Scheme have several mapping functions map (mapcar in Lisp) is the most useful It takes a function and ≥1 lists and returns a list of the results of applying the function to elements taken from each list > (map abs '( )) ( ) > (map + ‘(1 2 3) (4 5 6)) (5 7 9) > (map + ‘(1 2 3) ‘(4 5 6) ‘(7 8 9)) ( )

More map examples > (map cons '(a b c) '(1 2 3)) ((a. 1) (b. 2) (c. 3)) > (map (lambda (x) (+ x 10)) ‘(1 2 3)) ( ) > (map + '(1 2 3) '(4 5)) map: all lists must have same size; arguments were: # (1 2 3) (4 5) === context === /Applications/PLT/collects/scheme/private/misc.ss:7 4:7

Defining map Defining a simple “one argument” version of map is easy (define (map1 func list) (if (null? list) null (cons (func (first list)) (map1 func (rest list)))))

Define Lisp’s every and some every and some take a predicate and one or more sequences When given just one sequence, they test whether the elements satisfy the predicate > (every odd? ‘(1 3 5)) #t > (some even? ‘(1 2 3)) #t If given >1 sequences, the predicate takes as many args as there are sequences and args are drawn one at a time from them: > (every > ‘(1 3 5) ‘(0 2 4)) #t

Defining every is easy (define (every1 f list) ;; note the use of the and function (if (null? list) #t (and (f (first list)) (every1 f (rest list)))))

Define some similarly (define (some1 f list) (if (null? list) #f (or (f (first list)) (some1 f (rest list)))))

Will this work? You can prove that P is true for some list ele- ment by showing that it isn’t false for every one Will this work? > (define (some1 f list) (not (every1 (lambda (x) (not (f x))) list))) > (some1 odd? '( )) #t > (some1 (lambda (x) (> x 10)) '( )) #t

filter (filter ) returns a list of the elements of which satisfy the predicate > (filter odd? ‘( )) (1 3 5) > (filter (lambda (x) (> x 98.6)) ‘( )) ( )

Example: filter (define (filter1 func list) ;; returns a list of elements of list where func is true (cond ((null? list) null) ((func (first list)) (cons (first list) (filter1 func (rest list)))) (#t (filter1 func (rest list))))) > (filter1 even? ‘( )) (2 4 6)

Example: filter Define integers as a function that returns a list of integers between a min and max (define (integers min max) (if (> min max) null (cons min (integers (add1 min) max)))) Define prime? as a predicate that is true of prime numbers and false otherwise > (filter prime? (integers 2 20) ) ( )

Here’s another pattern We often want to do something like sum the elements of a sequence (define (sum-list l) (if (null? l) 0 (+ (first l) (sum-list (rest l))))) Other times we want their product (define (multiply-list l) (if (null? l) 1 (* (first l) (multiply-list (rest l)))))

Here’s another pattern We often want to do something like sum the elements of a sequence (define (sum-list l) (if (null? l) 0 (+ (first l) (sum-list (rest l))))) Other times we want their product (define (multiply-list l) (if (null? l) 1 (* (first l) (multiply-list (rest l)))))

Example: reduce Reduce takes (i) a function, (ii) a final value and (iii) a list of arguments Reduce of +, 0, (v1 v2 v3 … vn) is just V1 + V2 + V3 + … Vn + 0 In Scheme/Lisp notation: > (reduce + 0 ‘( )) 15 (reduce * 1 ‘( )) 120

Example: reduce (define (reduce function final list) (if (null? list) final (function (first list) (reduce function final (rest list)))))

Using reduce (define (sum-list list) ;; returns the sum of the list elements (reduce + 0 list)) (define (mul-list list) ;; returns the sum of the list elements (reduce * 1 list)) (define (copy-list list) ;; copies the top level of a list (reduce cons ‘() list)) (define (append-list list) ;; appends all of the sublists in a list (reduce append ‘() list))

The roots of mapReduce MapReduce is a software frame- work developed by Google for parallel computation on large datasets on computer clusters MapReduce It’s become an important way to exploit parallel computing using conventional programming languages and techniques. See Apache’s Hadoop for an open source versionHadoop The framework was inspired by functional programming’s map, reduce and side-effect free programs

Function composition Math notation: g  h is a composition of func- tions g and hcomposition If f=g  h then f(x)=g(h(x)) Composing functions is easy in Scheme > compose # > (define (sq x) (* x x)) > (define (dub x) (* x 2)) > (sq (dub 10)) 400 > (dub (sq 10)) 200 > (define sd (compose sq dub)) > (sd 10) 400 > ((compose dub sq) 10) 200

Defining compose Here’s compose for two functions in Scheme (define (compose2 f g) (lambda (x) (f (g x)))) Note that compose calls lambda which returns a new function that applies f to the result of applying g to x We’ll look at how the variable environments work to support this in the next topic, closures But first, let’s see how to define a general ver- sion of compose taking any number of args

Functions with any number of args Defining functions that takes any number of arguments is easy in Scheme (define (foo. args) (printf "My args: ~a\n" args)))printf If the parameter list ends in a symbol as opposed to null (cf. dotted pair), then its value is the list of the remaining arguments’ values (define (f x y. more-args) …) (define (map f. lists) … )

Compose in Scheme (define (compose. FS) ;; Returns the identity function if no args given (if (null? FS) (lambda (x) x) (lambda (x) ((first FS) ((apply compose (rest FS)) x))))) ; examples (define (add-a-bang str) (string-append str "!"))string-append (define givebang (compose string->symbol add-a-bang symbol->string))string->symbol symbol->string (givebang 'set) ; ===> set! ; anonymous composition ((compose sqrt negate square) 5) ; ===> 0+5i

A general every We can easily re-define other functions to take more than one argument (define (every fn. args) (cond ((null? args) #f) ((null? (first args)) #t) ((apply fn (map first args)) (apply every fn (map rest args))) (else #f))) (every > ‘(1 2 3) ‘(0 2 3)) => #t (every > ‘(1 2 3) ‘(0 20 3)) => #f

Functional Programming Summary Lisp is the archetypal functional programming language, in that it treats functions as first- class objects and uses the same representation for data and code The FP paradigm is a good match for many problems, esp. ones involving reasoning about or optimizing code or parallel execution While no pure FP languages are (yet) considered mainstream, many PLs support a FP style