1 REINFORCED PLASTIC COMPOSITES NESHAP Applicability and Requirements of the Final Rule For Composites 2004 October 6, 2004 Keith Barnett, Environmental.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
METAL FURNITURE SURFACE COATING MACT OVERVIEW 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART RRRR July 2006.
Advertisements

SUBPART N MACT AMENDMENTS QUESTIONS & ANSWERS 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART N.
METAL COIL SURFACE COATING MACT OVERVIEW 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May 2006.
METAL CAN SURFACE COATING MACT OVERVIEW 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006.
METAL CAN SURFACE COATING MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006 June CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006 June 2006.
METAL FURNITURE SURFACE COATING MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE
METAL COIL SURFACE COATING MACT FACILITY INSPECTIONS 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May, CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May, 2006.
METAL COIL SURFACE MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May 2006 May 2006.
METAL CAN SURFACE COATING MACT FACILITY INSPECTIONS 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June, CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June, 2006.
Compliance Dates The final rule was published on January 25, 1995,
METAL FURNITURE SURFACE COATING MACT QUESTION & ANSWERS 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART RRRR July 2006.
IRON & STEEL FOUNDRY MACT QUESTION & ANSWERS
IRON & STEEL FOUNDRY MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE
Anne M. Inman, P.E. Air Permits Division September 11, 2012.
EPA Pesticide Container and Repackaging Regulations, Flow Chart 2: Can I fill this large portable refillable container (greater than 119 gallons)? (end.
APAI Environmental Workshop FESOP Recordkeeping/Plans James (Jim) Heim, C.T.C., E.P. Bruce Carter Associates, L.L.C February 9, 2012.
NSPS OOOO & Fracking Air Quality Rule Updates Oil & Gas Environmental Compliance Conference – Appalachian Basin May 13-14, 2014 Robert Keatley, PE Senior.
Regulatory Drivers for Reducing Solvent Emissions Barbara Johnson, PE Kansas State University Kansas Small Business Environmental Assistance Program March.
2010 Sign Sales Meeting NESHAP Subpart 6H NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLUTANTS.
New Emission Rules for IC Engines Presented by Scott Wallace Devon Gas Services, L.P.
New Federal Regulations for Internal Combustion Engines Doug Parce.
Implementation and Management of Leak Detection and Repair Programs – New Rules and Other Considerations Nebraska Ethanol Safety & Environmental Coalition.
Dr. Sophia Hassiotis.  Laboratory set up  Personal Protective equipment  Directions for mixing  Slump test  Cylinder casting  Cleaning up your station.
What options do states have? What is Georgia planning to do? What are some of the other states doing? What are the possible implications to permit fees?
NCMA Workshop March 24, 2015 Booker Pullen Supervisor, Permitting Section North Carolina Division of Air Quality, Raleigh, NC (919) Permitting.
NCMA Workshop March 19 and 24, 2015 Betty Gatano, P.E. Permitting Section North Carolina Division of Air Quality, Raleigh, NC (919)
REINFORCED PLASTICS AND BOAT MANUFACTURING MACT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT For the Composites Fabricators Association Annual Meeting October 23, 1998 Madeleine.
1 Control Techniques Guidelines Joel Leon September 16, 2011.
VOC and NO x Rules Related to the Oil and Natural Gas Industries Air Quality Division Bob Gifford Air Quality Specialist, Air Quality Division Presented.
Mustang Watchdog April 22, 2014
1 PSD - Case #1 Case #1: –A simple cycle natural gas power plant with PTE NOx of 300 tpy and GHGs of 150,000 tpy CO2e receives a PSD permit addressing.
1 Improving Environmental Protection and Reducing Administrative Burden North Carolina Division of Air Quality Improving Environmental Protection and Reducing.
1 RECENT CHANGES TO THE EPA MACT RULE FOR COMPOSITES MANUFACTURING For Composites 2005 September 29, 2005 Keith Barnett, Environmental Engineer Office.
New Orleans / ACC / SOCMA November 2003 Randy McDonald, OAR, USEPA.
EPA Rule 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart HHHHHH “The Refinisher Rule”
Georgia Environmental Protection Division Stage II Gasoline Vapor Recovery Decommissioning Workshop June 11, 2014 EPD Tradeport Training Room.
Air Quality 101 Kansas Air Quality Program overview.
10/1/ Air Quality Permitting Air Quality Committee William D. Willets, P.E. Engineering Supervisor DAQ Permitting Section May 7, 2014.
The Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) and Provision 2.
Blue Skies Delaware; Clean Air for Life NESHAPs Jim Snead October 8, 2008.
Title V Operating Permits: A Compliance and Enforcement Tool Candace Carraway US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
The Paper and Other Web Coating (POWC) MACT – Executive Summary The executive summary is a power point presentation designed to be used for basic education.
Pollution Prevention in Air Quality A Government Perspective H. Patrick Wong, Chief Air Quality Management Division Miami-Dade County Department of Environmental.
PSD/Nonattainment Review You can do this! Marc Sturdivant Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental Trade Fair 2015.
Processes Used to Form Composite Materials
Emissions Banking and Trading (EBT) Overview/Update Melissa Ruano Air Quality Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced Air Permitting.
1 NSR Rule Review and Guidance 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121. General Provisions Chapter 127 Subchapter E. New Source Review The Allegheny Mountain Section.
Update on Methane Regulations Affecting Landfills Pat Sullivan Senior Vice President SCS Engineers Nov. 10, 2015.
2005 NSR Regulation Changes Dwight Wylie. Old Units vs. New Units  There is a broad disparity between air pollution control requirements and emissions.
Analytical Laboratories - Potential and Restricted Emissions Kevin Tyson, Air Quality Analyst Wednesday, December 10, 2014.
BY: Winston G. Smith Environmental Engineer UST/PCB & OPA Enforcement & Compliance Section EPA Region 4.
Overview of 3 rd Party Inspection Program for USTs.
DRAFT: 9/10/98 REINFORCED PLASTICS MACT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT FOR EXISTING OPEN MOLDING SOURCES Briefing Package for Outreach Meeting with Small Businesses.
Proposed Carbon Pollution Standard For New Power Plants Presented by Kevin Culligan Office of Air Quality Planning And Standards Office of Air and Radiation.
Nonattainment New Source Review (NA NSR) Program Raj Rao US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards ,
2012 Emissions Inventory Workshop 1. 2  The owner or operator of any facility that is a source of air contaminants shall submit a complete emission.
Standards Certification Education & Training Publishing Conferences & Exhibits Jay Christopher Business Unit Manager, Air & Process Services Trihydro Corporation.
Air Quality Division Emissions Inventories SAW: May 3, 2016 Page 1 Point Source Emissions Inventories Air Quality Division Susan Wampler May 3,
Start Do you own or operate a facility that engages in the coating of paper, plastic film, metallic foil or any other web surfaces? Your facility is not.
Dan Nickey Miscellaneous Surface Coating at Area Sources: Iowa Department of Natural Resources Iowa Waste Reduction Center Iowa Collision Repair Association.
Climate: ANPR, SIPs and Section 821 WESTAR October 2, 2008.
THURSDAY TARGETED TRAINING: Reporting Regulations and Requirements
UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA 800/
Clean Air Act Glossary.
Common Control Self-Declaration form
Boiler Sheltered Initiative
Kansas Air Quality Seminar March 5, 2008
Air Quality Permitting
Best Available Control Technology for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Sources
Uinta Basin General Conformity
Presentation transcript:

1 REINFORCED PLASTIC COMPOSITES NESHAP Applicability and Requirements of the Final Rule For Composites 2004 October 6, 2004 Keith Barnett, Environmental Engineer Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Emission Standards Division Minerals and Inorganic Chemicals Group

2 What we are covering Rule information resources Rule applicability Covered operations RPC/Boat manufacturing interface Important dates Synthetic minor sources Planned corrections and clarifications New or existing source determination General rule requirements Initial compliance demonstration Open molding compliance examples Frequently asked questions

3 Rule information resources Rule web page at Rule text and implementation materials are available on this web site As new implementation materials are developed, they will be added State, local, or EPA regional office for applicability and interpretation questions for questions relating to rule

4 Applicability This rule applies if you: –Manufacture reinforced plastics composites, and –Have your facility at a major source (10 tpy of any one HAP or 25 tpy of any combination of HAP), and –Use thermoset resins or gel coats, and –The resins or gel coats contain styrene The rule does not apply if you: –Use less than 1.2 tpy of styrene containing resins and gel coats, or –Only perform research and development, or –Only repair reinforced plastic composites, or –Are an area or synthetic minor source

5 Covered Operations with Requirements Open Molding Compression/injection Molding Centrifugal Casting Continuous Lamination/Casting SMC/BMC Manufacturing Pultrusion Mixing Storage Equipment Cleaning

6 Covered operation with no requirements Polymer Casting Resin Transfer Molding (RTM) Application of mold sealing and release agents Mold stripping and cleaning Repair unrelated to your manufacturing operations Materials that do not contain resin or gel coat Personal activities not part of manufacturing operations Prepreg materials Non-gel coat surface coatings Research and development operations

7 RPC/Boat Manufacturing Interface The Boat Manufacturing NESHAP only applies if you manufacture boat hulls or decks, or molds for boat hulls or decks If you are not subject to the Boat Manufacturing NESHAP, you are subject to this rule if you meet the rule applicability criteria If you are subject to the Boat Manufacturing NESHAP, but make parts that are not part of your boats, the non-boat operations are subject to this rule You may elect to place all operations under the Boat Manufacturing NESHAP if that results in equal or lower HAP emissions

8 Important dates The final rule was published on April 21, 2003 Existing major sources must comply by April 21, 2006 Operating new major sources should have complied by April 21, 2003, or startup, whichever was later New major sources under construction must comply at startup

9 Synthetic Minor Sources If your potential to emit is above the major source threshold (10/25 tpy), you can still elect to obtain synthetic minor source status – and the NESHAP will not apply You must obtain and comply with Federally enforceable emission limits ensuring that actual and potential emissions are below major source thresholds You may use any combination of controls, reduced operating hours, and processes changes to achieve the required emission level You must accomplish this prior to the compliance date of April 21, 2006

10 Planned Corrections and Clarifications Correct three round-off errors in Table 3 –CR/HS mechanical resin application emission limit should be 113 lb/ton, not 112. –Non-CR/HS mechanical resin application emission limit should be 88 lb/ton, not 87 –Tooling gel coat emission limit should be 440 lb/ton, not 437 lb/ton Change the presentation of compliant resin/gel coats in Table 3 –Considering dropping the last column (it has confused both regulated sources and state and local agencies) –Clarify that you are only required to show that individual resin and gel coats, as applied, meet their individual Table 3 HAP emissions limits in lb/ton to deem the material as compliant

11 Planned Corrections and Clarifications Requiring facilities using the same resins for all operation compliance option in (c) to use nonatomized mechanical resin application Considering changing rule to allow some materials to be compliant while others are averaged Clarify that an existing area source that becomes major is still an existing source

12 Planned Corrections and Clarifications Add polymer casting and RTM to the list of operations with no requirements (but remember that co-located gel coating operations do have requirements) Are considering changing definition of large pultruded parts for existing sources (1000 reinforcements versus glass weight) Any other typos or referencing errors that we have found (if you know of any, please send them to

13 New Source You commenced construction after August 2, 2001, and When you commenced construction, there were no reinforced plastic composites operations at the facility The definition above would include moving an existing facility

14 Existing Source Any source that is not new Existing sources are not considered new as a result of reconstruction

15 Overview of Controls Most existing sources must only meet the existing source floor –low HAP resins and gel coats –nonatomized application techniques –covering open containers, mixers, resin baths –add-on controls for continuous lamination/casting Existing sources with centrifugal casting and continuous lamination/casting operations that emit over 100 tpy of HAP must –Use add-on controls for both centrifugal casting and continuous lamination/casting (95 percent control) –Meet the same requirements as other existing sources for their other operations

16 Overview of Controls New sources with HAP emissions below the 100 tpy threshold meet the same limits as existing sources New sources at or above the 100 tpy threshold must control the operations below by 95 percent –Open Molding –Centrifugal Casting –Continuous Lamination/Casting –Pultrusion –SMC/BMC Manufacturing –Mixing

17 Large Parts Exemptions Two different large parts exemptions One applies only to existing pultrusion operations –Allows pultrusion machines making large parts to substitute “air flow management” for the 60 percent emission reduction requirement –In this exemption, a large part must have a cross sectional area of 60 inches or more and 1000 or more reinforcements

18 Large Parts Exemptions One applies only to operations at new sources otherwise subject to the 95 percent capture and control requirements Large part production operations are allowed to meet the limits in Table 3, rather then 95 percent capture and control A large open molding part must either exceed 250 cubic feet of volume, or 50 square feet on any one side A large pultruded part must exceed 24 inches outside perimeter, or 350 or more reinforcements

19 How Do I determine if I am above the 100 tpy HAP Emission Threshold ? Sum emissions from operations potentially subject to 95 percent control prior to any add-on controls (and only these operations) Calculate these emissions using –Equations in Table 1 –Unified emission factors –Other published emission factors –Site specific factors if based on emission test data

20 Work Practice Standards Injection/Compression Molding - Cover Charges Equipment Cleaning - Cleaning materials may contain no HAP (except for closed systems, and cleaning cured resin from application equipment) Resin Storage - Cover storage containers Sheet Molding Compound – Nylon- containing film, cover resin delivery to doctor box

21 Work Practice Standards Resin Mixing and BMC Manufacturing - Cover the mixers, keep vents closed during mixing Pultrusion of large parts – air flow management

22 Initial Compliance Demonstration Emission limits - perform emission factor calculations as specified in the rule Work practice standards - submit a certified statement that the work practice is being performed Equipment standards - submit a certified statement that the equipment is in place and meet the requirements specified in the rule

23 Meeting P2 Standards Open Molding and Centrifugal Casting Option 1 Change your resins and gel coats to ones that individually meet the appropriate emission limits This is the simplest method and results in the least reporting and record keeping

24 Meeting P2 Standards Option 1 Example Prior to MACT –Atomized application of 45 percent HAP noncorrosion resistant filled resin (EF = 283, EL = 87) –Atomized application of a 35 percent HAP white gel coat (EF = 335, EL = 267) After MACT –Nonatomized application of 35 percent HAP noncorrosion resistant filled resin (EF = 77, EL = 87) –Atomized application of 30 percent HAP white gel coat or nonatomized application of 40.8 percent HAP white gel coat (EF = 267, EL = 267)

25 Meeting P2 Standards Open Molding and Centrifugal Casting Option 2 Change your resins and gel coats so the weighted average emission factor is less than or equal to the weighted average emission limit Requires purchase records by resin type, and monthly average calculation Average is based on last 12 months of operation

26 Meeting P2 Standards Option 2 Example Prior to MACT –Currently use two corrosion resistant resins, one 42 percent HAP and one 55 percent HAP –nonatomized mechanical application –ratio of resin use is 60/40 (average EF = 115, EL = 112) after MACT –Replace 55 percent HAP resin with resin containing 52 percent HAP –maintain same 60/40 split (average EF = 111.4, EL = 112)

27 Meeting P2 Standards Open Molding and Centrifugal Casting Option 3 Determine the highest resin HAP content allowable for each operation Use this resin for all operations Can not include gel coats or mix corrosion and noncorrosion resistant operations

28 Meeting P2 Standards Option 3 Example Prior to MACT Making corrosion resistant tanks Using atomized mechanical (end caps), filament winding (body), and manual application (joining parts) Using 50 percent HAP resin

29 Meeting P2 Standards Option 3 Example After MACT Determine MACT for each operation –Mechanical is 46.2 percent HAP resin nonatomized application –Filament winding is 42 percent HAP resin –Manual is 40 percent HAP resin Select highest allowable resin HAP level (46.2 percent) Maintain a weighted average resin HAP content of 46.2 percent or less for all three operations

30 Calculating Emission Factors Equations are presented in Table 1 of the rule Resin use may be based on purchase records Resin HAP content may be based on MSDS or resin specification sheets If averaging, you must determine the amounts of resin used for each specific operation

31 Example Emissions Factor Calculation Open molding - mechanical resin application - nonatomized - filled - noncorrosion resistant –Resin HAP content (from MSDS) is 36 percent –Emission factor equation from rule is EF = ((0.157)(%HAP) ) x 2000 EF = ((0.157)(0.36) ) x 2000 EF = 80 –Emission Limit is = 87 lb/ton –This resin would be considered compliant Do not consider catalysts or promoters Do consider any additional monomer addition

32 Frequently Asked Questions If I use more than 1.2 tpy of resin and gel coat (combined) am I subject to the rule? –No, you must be a major source of HAP (i.e. area sources are not covered) If my emissions are less than 100 tpy am I exempt? –Not if you are a major source

33 Frequently Asked Questions What resin HAP content, hours of operation, and parts do I use to calculate PTE? –Generally you have to do a reasonable worst case analysis, but not make assumptions that would result in an impossible scenario

34 Frequently Asked Questions Should I use the UEF equation for MMA? –Not for purposes of complying with this rule. If you have a gel coat with 30 percent styrene, and 5 percent MMA, then the input to the equation in Table 1 is 0.35 (30 percent plus 5 percent, expressed as a decimal). This would include calculations to determine if you are above or below the 100 tpy threshold

35 Frequently Asked Questions Should I use the UEF equation for MMA when reporting emissions? –You should use the most accurate method available for reporting emissions for Title V purposes Can site specific factors be used in lieu of Table 1 factors. –Yes, if they are supported by actual facility emissions test data If my resins contain no styrene am I covered by the NESHAP? –No

36 Frequently Asked Questions If I move do I become a new source? –Yes, if the new location does not already have reinforced plastic composites operations. If I am an open molder below the 100 tpy emission level and move (becoming a new source), and several years after the move my emissions increase above 100 tpy, do the 95 percent capture and control requirements apply? –Yes

37 Frequently Asked Questions How do I know if my materials are resins, and/or thermoset resins? –We do not define “resin” and “thermoset resin” in the rule. If you have questions on your materials, ask the materials supplier. I use a putty-like filler, is this covered? –If the filler contains a resin, that by itself, could be used to make reinforced plastic composites, then it is a filled resin. If the filler does not contain a resin, then it is not covered, even if it contains styrene.

38 Frequently Asked Questions What if I manually apply gel coat? –For compliance purposes, treat the gel coat as if it were applied using atomized spray, or –If you use some nonatomized gel coat application, treat as if you apply all manual gel coat using nonatomized spray –Do not use equation 1.h in Table 1 for any compliance calculations –You may (but are not required) to use equation 1.h in Table 1 for purposes of semi-annual emissions reporting.

39 Frequently Asked Questions If I build a new building next to my current building, does the new building become a new source? –The best source to answer these questions is your permitting authority because the decision may rest on site specific factors. My gel coat contains alpha-methyl styrene. Should the percentage of this chemical be added to the styrene content? –No, alpha-methyl styrene is not a HAP.

40 What we covered Rule information resources Rule applicability Covered operations RPC/Boat manufacturing interface Important dates Synthetic minor sources Planned corrections and clarifications New or existing source determination General rule requirements Initial compliance demonstration Open molding compliance examples Frequently asked questions

41 Other Questions?

42 How do I demonstrate Initial Compliance for add-on controls? If you are using add-on controls, you must perform a compliance test prior to the compliance date (or within 180 days after startup if a new source) Performance tests methods are EPA Method 18, 25, 25A The PTE must be certified using EPA Method 204 If the PTE does not meet 204 criteria, you must test for capture using EPA Methods 204B-204E

43 How Do I Demonstrate Initial Compliance for a PTE? Determine the equivalent diameters of all NDO and exhausts Determine the equivalent diameters of all NDO from HAP emission points and exhausts from NDO (must be at least four) Measure PTE surface area (A T ) and NDO surface area (A N ). The ratio of AT/AN must 0.05 or less.

44 How Do I Demonstrate Initial Compliance for a PTE (Con’t)? Measure all exhaust flows (Q O ) and all forced makeup air flows (Q I ) using EPA Method 2. Calculate the average NDO facial velocity as FV= (Q O - Q I )/A N FV must be 200 fpm or more; or measure pressure differential across enclosure differential must be inches of water or more

45 How Do I Demonstrate Initial Compliance for a PTE (Con’t)? Verify direction of flow is inward for all NDO using streamers, smoke tubes, or tracer gases If FV is 500 or more, inward flow verification is not required