Analysis of the geomagnetic field transfer functions during the 2009 L’Aquila seismic sequence A. De Santis 1,3, G. Cianchini 1,2, Di Lorenzo C. 1, Di.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LAKSHMAN KARALLIEDDE OCTOBER 2011
Advertisements

Review. 2 TEST A 1.What is the single most important property of vibrating structure? 2. What happens when structure is vibrating in resonance? 3.What.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
Sensitivity Analysis In deterministic analysis, single fixed values (typically, mean values) of representative samples or strength parameters or slope.
Large Scale Gravity and Isostasy
Magnetic Methods (IV) Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I
Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. How to Use a Spectrum Analyzer Wi-Spy Version Last Update
Geology of the Lithosphere 2. Evidence for the Structure of the Crust & Upper Mantle What is the lithosphere and what is the structure of the lithosphere?
electromagnetic method
Statistical Analysis of Electrostatic Turbulences over Seismic Regions T. Onishi and J.J. Berthelier Centre d'Etude des Environnements Terrestre et Planétaires.
GG 450 April 30, 2008 Seismic Reflection Interpretation.
Center to Limb Variation of Hard X-Ray Spectra from RHESSI J.McTiernan (SSL/UCB) ABSTRACT: We use the RHESSI flare database to measure the center to limb.
Study of magnetic helicity in solar active regions: For a better understanding of solar flares Sung-Hong Park Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New.
CHAPTER 6 Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data
Characteristics of VLF Tweeks Nedra Tounsi & Hassen Ghalila Laboratoire de Spectroscopie Atomique Moléculaire et Applications 1 In this spectrogram recorded.
V. M. Sorokin, V.M. Chmyrev, A. K. Yaschenko and M. Hayakawa Strong DC electric field formation in the ionosphere over typhoon and earthquake regions V.
AGU fall meeting, December 5-9, 2011, San Francisco INGV Spatial organization of foreshocks as a tool for forecasting large earthquakes E. Lippiello 1,
Workshop on Earthquakes: Ground- based and Space Observations 1 1 Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Science, Graz, Austria 2 Institute of Physics,
Chapter 2 The Research Enterprise in Psychology. n Basic assumption: events are governed by some lawful order  Goals: Measurement and description Understanding.
Electromagnetic Methods (EM) Measurement of varying electromagnetic fields Induced by transmitter antennas, recorded by receiver antennas Alternative measurement.
New earthquake category Nature 447, (3 May 2007) | doi: /nature05780; Received 8 December 2006; Accepted 26 March A scaling law for slow.
EM propagation paths 1/17/12. Introduction Motivation: For all remote sensing instruments, an understanding of propagation is necessary to properly interpret.
RESOLVING FOCAL DEPTH WITH A NEAR FIELD SINGLE STATION IN SPARSE SEISMIC NETWORK Sidao Ni, State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earth’s Dynamics, Institute.
Influence of Magma on Rift Evolution: A Modeler’s Perspective Mark D. Behn Department of Geology & Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Roger.
Intraplate Seismicity Finite element modeling. Introduction Spatial patterns (Fig. 1) –Randomly scattered (Australia) –Isolated “seismic zones” (CEUS)
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
GOCE OBSERVATIONS FOR DETECTING UNKNOWN TECTONIC FEATURES BRAITENBERG C. (1), MARIANI P. (1), REGUZZONI M. (2), USSAMI N. (3) (1)Department of Geosciences,
Anomalous Geomagnetic Variations Possibly Linked with the Taiwan Earthquake Mw= 6.4, 19 December 2009 Takla E. M 1 ; K. Yumoto 1, 2 ; J. Y. Liu 3 ; Y.
SOES6002: Modelling in Environmental and Earth System Science CSEM Lecture 1 Martin Sinha School of Ocean & Earth Science University of Southampton.
Bucharest, May Gerald Duma Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics Vienna, Austria GEOMAGNETIC VARIATIONS AND EARTHQUAKE ACTIVITY.
Nowaday urbanization. White curves represent the Tiber valley with its tributary lateral velleys, both form the Holocene hydrographic network of the city.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
Probabilistic and Statistical Techniques 1 Lecture 3 Eng. Ismail Zakaria El Daour 2010.
A comparison of the ability of artificial neural network and polynomial fitting was carried out in order to model the horizontal deformation field. It.
Seismology Part VI: Surface Waves: Love Augustus Edward Hough Love
GP33A-06 / Fall AGU Meeting, San Francisco, December 2004 Magnetic signals generated by the ocean circulation and their variability. Manoj,
FAT TAILS REFERENCES CONCLUSIONS SHANNON ENTROPY AND ADJUSTMENT OF PARAMETERS AN ADAPTIVE STOCHASTIC MODEL FOR RETURNS An adaptive stochastic model is.
Section 2-1 Review and Preview. 1. Center: A representative or average value that indicates where the middle of the data set is located. 2. Variation:
Issues concerning the interpretation of statistical significance tests.
NS/V noise NS/H noise NS/H earthquakes The use of a very dense seismic array to characterize the Cavola, Northern Italy, active landslide body. By P. Bordoni.
2. MOTIVATION The distribution of interevent times of aftershocks suggests that they obey a Self Organized process (Bak et al, 2002). Numerical models.
Birkeland field-aligned current as an attractor of Alfvénic coherent structures: mechanism for aurora brightening and structuring I.V. Golovchanskaya,
Observed & Simulated Profiles of Cloud Occurrence by Atmospheric State A Comparison of Observed Profiles of Cloud Occurrence with Multiscale Modeling Framework.
Crustal velocity and anisotropy temporal variations at Etna volcano (1) Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, sezione di Napoli, Italy (2) Seismology.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown,
Basic resistivity models 2 Layer 4 Layer 3 Layer Characteristic Curves.
New tool forecasting sporadic E layer appearance on the basis on magnetic eta index Beata Dziak-Jankowska (1), Tomasz Ernst (2), Iwona Stanisławska (1),
Global Structure of the Inner Solar Wind and it's Dynamic in the Solar Activity Cycle from IPS Observations with Multi-Beam Radio Telescope BSA LPI Chashei.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown,
Effects of January 2010 stratospheric sudden warming in the low-latitude ionosphere L. Goncharenko, A. Coster, W. Rideout, MIT Haystack Observatory, USA.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
Electrode Spread (Array type)
Using of modern seismological data to reveal the earthquake precursors G.A.Sobolev 1,2, A.A.Lyubushin 1 1.Institute of Physics of the Earth RAS, 2. Geophysical.
STATS DAY First a few review questions. Which of the following correlation coefficients would a statistician know, at first glance, is a mistake? A. 0.0.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown,
Extraction of surface impedance from magnetotelluric data
Images courtesy of Google Earth (top), and USGS (bottom).
Electromagnetic Methods (EM)
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
STATS DAY First a few review questions.
R. Console, M. Murru, F. Catalli
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
The radar band is loosely taken to extend from approximately 0
Yuki Takagi1*, Kazuo Shiokawa1, Yuichi Otsuka1, and Martin Connors2  
Ranulfo Romo, Adrián Hernández, Antonio Zainos  Neuron 
Volume 50, Issue 4, Pages (May 2006)
Session 5: Higher level products (Internal)
A. Ippolito(1), C. Cesaroni(1) and L. Spogli(1,2)  
Presentation transcript:

Analysis of the geomagnetic field transfer functions during the 2009 L’Aquila seismic sequence A. De Santis 1,3, G. Cianchini 1,2, Di Lorenzo C. 1, Di Mauro D. 1, Di Persio M. 1, Iezzi B. 3, P. Palangio 1, E. Qamili. 1,2, Wu L. X. 4 With the aim of understanding the physical phenomena associated with L’Aquila (Central Italy) seismic sequence, culminated with the 6 April 2009 M6.3 earthquake, and of possibly identifying any possible sign of precursors, we analyze the Cartesian components of the geomagnetic field measured at the Geomagnetic Observatory of L'Aquila in the period On one hand, we see weak but peculiar anomalies in the transfer functions between the horizontal and vertical magnetic components in the frequency domain. In post data analysis these anomalies could be easily put in relation with some hypothetical variations of the lateral and in-depth geoelectric characteristics of the site of observation. However, their statistical significance can be discarded because their appearance could be just occurred by chance. On the other hand, when we analyse the same data in terms of the spectral entropy of the magnetic transfer functions over a time preceding the main shock of the sequence, the most significant result is the presence of distinct temporal regimes that cannot be expected by external field contaminations. We find clear entropy anomalies that may be related to migration of fluids and / or changes in micro and mesofracturations that likely affected most of the lithosphere beneath the region of L'Aquila before the occurrence of the main significant event. However, although the found indications are important to understand some of the physical processes preceding the main shock, they do not seem at present to have any practical forecasting potential. 2. “Non-conventional” Way: Transfer Function Entropy Analysis A “conventional” transfer function analysis of L’Aquila magnetic data do not detect clear anomalies during the interval : indeed, some apparent differences in behavior of the transfer functions appear to be episodic and random. It is only by the subsequent analysis of the same magnetic data in terms of the Shannon entropy, the so-called Transfer Function Entropy, that we can identify some distinct temporal regimes in which there is a significant decrease of this amount to about one year before the main shock, and subsequent oscillations at 10 and 6 months earlier. Although the absolute minimum of E(t) practically coincides with the maximum K p index, successive minima have no equivalent correspondence in K p behaviour. The most remarkable outcome, however, is that in contrast to this overall decrease, some single harmonics show a counter-trend contribution. In particular, the periods between 30 and 40 seconds (frequency of mHz, corresponding to skin depths of km) show values of entropic contributions significantly higher than the background value. We interpret this result as due to the complex phenomenology associated with the evolution of the L’Aquila seismic sequence occurring in the deep crustal layers at around  = km. These entropic anomalies can be related probably to migration of fluids and / or changes in the micro- and meso-rupture process that affected much of the lithosphere beneath the region of L'Aquila, with particular concentration at km depth, so just below the mean hypocentral depth (approximately 10 km) of the L’Aquila earthquake sequence. However, although the found indications are important to understand some of the physical processes preceding the main shock, they do not seem at present to have any practical forecasting potential. 1. The “Conventional” Way: Transfer Function Analysis From the 1 Hz magnetic data recorded at the Magnetic Observatory of L'Aquila (Central Italy), a magnetovariational analysis is carried out to study the electromagnetic state of the crust under the measuring site, which is only a few kilometers far from the epicentre. In the frequency domain, the equation that links the changes in the vertical Z to horizontal X and Y magnetic field components is as follows: Z( ω ) = A( ω )·X( ω ) + B( ω ) ·Y( ω ) where A( ω ) and B( ω ) are the complex transfer functions 3. Conclusions Then we define the (normalized) Transfer Function Entropy as E (t) = −  i=1,n p i ( ,t)·log p i ( , t)/log n where p i ( ,t) = K ( ,t)/  i K i ( ,t), n = total number of harmonics and K( ,t)=A r ( ,t), B r ( ,t) at time t. We impose that p i ( ,t)·log p i ( , t) = 0 for p i ( ,t) = 0. With the above term we mean an analysis of the spectral Entropy characterizing the order / disorder state of the layered crustal volume beneath the measurement site, considered as “a whole” system. We do this with the objective to search for any peculiar feature of the system under investigation before the main shock and to look at individual spectral contributions corresponding to specific frequencies, which, in turn, correspond to some depths. This is a typical approach to study a complex system (eg De Santis, 2009). The starting hypothesis under scrutiny is that the 6 th April, 2009 earthquake is only the "culmination" of a long and complex process that has “significantly” affected the volume of the crust, where the main mechanical failure (i.e. the sequence main event) took place. Under this hypothesis, we analyzed the transfer functions A( ω ), B( ω ) and their spectral entropy through the concepts and tools of the Information Theory (Shannon,1948). A( ω ) and B( ω ) contain information about the state of conductivity of the layer of crust at depth  (called skin depth):  = (2/  ) 0.5 The above figure shows the behaviour from 1/1/2007 to 31/12/2009 of the modified K p index (K p *, top of figure), the total entropy E(t) for the real part of the transfer function A(  ) (middle). By the bold red line we indicate the 20-day moving averages. Finally (bottom), for each angular frequency , the individual contribution - p(  )·log[p(  )] to the total entropy is shown. Although the absolute minimum of E(t) practically coincides with the maximum K p index (see the 20-day moving average) the subsequent relative minima have no equivalent in K p behaviour. However, the most remarkable outcome is that the contribution of some individual harmonics are opposite with respect to the overall decrease of entropy. In particular, the periods between 30 and 40 seconds (i.e.  /2  = mHz, corresponding to  = km) show significantly higher values than the background entropic contribution. This result is particularly important because it is detected when the system responds mostly with an overall decrease of entropy to the increase in external magnetic activity. 4. Bibliography De Santis A. (2009). Geosystemics, Proceedings of the 3rd IASME/WSEAS International Conference on Geology and Seismology (GES’09), Feb Cambridge, Niblett E.R. and Y. Honkura (1980). Time-dependence of EM transfer functions and their association with tectonic activity, Geophysical Surveys, 4, Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication, Bell Syst.Tech. J. 27, 379, 623. computed at the single station. A( ω ) and B( ω ), where ω is the angular frequency, are related to the electrical resistivity which, might vary over time due to tectonic activity (eg. Honkura and Niblett, 1980). The main shock, occurred on the 6 th April, 2009 is indicated by the red vertical line and the asterisk. The figures on the right show the example of the absolute value of the real part of B (i.e. |B R |) at different periods. For periods higher than seconds (i.e. frequencies lower than 25 mHz) we do not notice anything anomalous, while at 30 seconds (yellow figure) we observe that there are two large peaks around a year before L’Aquila earthquake. Do they occur by chance? Are they real? And if so, how can they be interpreted? Session NH4.1/SM5.8 Seismo EM Phenomena and Earthquake Precursors EGU Vienna 3-8 April, 2011 Board NumberXY411 Display Time Thursday, 07 April :00 – 19:30 Attendance 17:30 – 19:00 1 Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia – 2 Scuola Dottorato Università Siena – 3 Università “Gabriele D’Annunzio” Chieti - 4 Beijing Normal University