Bid Rigging as Provided for under the Fair Competition Act, 2003 and the Proposed Amendments Presenter: Grace Freedom Nicholas Investigation Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Competition Cartels, Collusion & the Code By Andrew C Wood Hon MRCSA (Life) Barrister August 2011.
Advertisements

Case Prioritisation Vipin Naugah, Legal Executive Date: 16 October 2013 ICN Cartel Workshop 2013 Mini Plenary 1.
Darren A. Craig COOPERATION, COLLABORATION, OR COLLUSION? ENHANCED ANTI-TRUST SCRUTINY January 9, 2014.
Bid Rigging Legal Framework in Zambia Natalie Nakazwe Research Analyst.
RESTRICITVE PRACTICES AND LENIENCY Zuzana Šimeková European Union – Opportunities and Challenges June 2009, Dubrovnik.
Powerpoint Templates The fight against bid rigging- NACC experience Bridget Dundee Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, 2013.
COMMISSION For The SUPERVISION Of BUSINESS COMPETITION The REPUBLIC Of INDONESIA REGIONAL ANTITRUST WORKSHOP ON ABUSE OF DOMINANCE.
April 30, 2015 ICN Annual Conference in Sydney Breakout session : Fighting Corruption and Promoting Competition Toshiyuki NAMBU Deputy Secretary General.
1 ICN Cartels Working Group Application of leniency to individuals Stephen Blake Cartels and Criminal Enforcement Group UK Office of Fair Trading 27 January.
Detecting Cartels: What Can We Do? Joo-yong Lee Deputy Director, Cartel Policy Team, Cartel Bureau Korea Fair Trade Commission 7 April 2006, Seoul, Korea.
The Application of Leniency Policy on Individuals in South Africa By Tembinkosi Bonakele Deputy Commissioner Competition Commission South Africa 23 January.
Remarks of Kristen Pinhey Competition Law Officer Competition Bureau Canada Unannounced Inspections in Canada International Competition Network, 2013 Cartel.
Roles and Responsibilities of Directors under Companies Act 2013
C OMPETITION LAW IN NIGERIA Daniel Bwala. Background There is no specific Competition law in Nigeria at the moment. However there are laws or rules in.
Fair competition commission 1 Fifth Annual African Dialogue Consumer Protection Conference September 10-12, 2013 ● Livingstone, Zambia Consumer Protection.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTION
National Environmental Laws Amendment Bill [B ] Clause by clause analysis – Portfolio Committee on Environmental Affairs and Tourism: 10 October.
Obtaining Evidence through Discovery & Witnesses John W. McReynolds Assistant Chief New York Field Office Antitrust Division U.S. Department of Justice.
NPA PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON JUSTICE AND CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT 24 February 2011.
Training Programme in Competition Law & Policy 30 th – 31 st March 2011 Savannah Hotel, Barbados Agreements II Fair Trading Commission 1.
CCS (CCA) Rules 1. General Introduction Disciplinary matters is governed by the provisions emanating from the following four sources. 1.Provisions in.
Fair competition commission Investigative Plan - Competition Joshua Msoma Tanzania Fair Competition Commission Sixth Annual African Dialogue Conference.
Mini Plenary 3: Cartel Enforcement and Leniency in Developing Agencies Leniency Programme in Turkey Gülçin DERE Competition Expert Turkish Competition.
Chinese Foreign Trade Law Jiaxiang Hu Professor of Law, School of Law, SJTU.
Prevention of Market Abuse in Germany | | Seite 1 The German Approach - Prevention of Market Abuse after Implementation of the European Market.
1 INTRODUCTION OF THE LAWS ON ABUSE OF DOMINANT POSITION AND ABUSE OF MONOPONY POSITION IN VIETNAM Speaker: Mr. Trinh Anh Tuan Official Vietnam Competition.
Advising your Clients on the Effect of Competition Law Professor Mark Williams 11 March 2011.
Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992  Chapter I - Preliminary  Chapter II- Power of Central Govt to make orders and announce Export and.
OFFENCES AND PENALTIES
Individual liability for competition law infringements Koen Platteau UIA - Firenze 31 October 2014.
EQUAL REMUNERATATION ACT INTRODUCTION The principle of equal work to men and women worker has been gaining increasing acceptance all over the world.
Defining and applying mitigating and aggravating circumstances. Relevant changes to the amount of fine. Defining and applying mitigating and aggravating.
FEDERAL ANTIMONOPOLY SERVICE International Competition Network 6 th Annual Conference Moscow 2007 Application Experience of International Competition Network.
Towards a fair and efficient economy for all The Competition Amendment Act, 2009 Presentation to Parliament’s Portfolio Committee on Economic Development.
Audit Director Roundtable, Finance Practice © 2009 Corporate Executive Board. All Rights Reserved. ADR1B2ZMP1 1 The FCPA establishes both anti-bribery.
Merger Control in Uruguay American Bar Association- South American Regional Conference Buenos Aires, March, 2007 Guyer & Regules Juan Manuel Mercant.
Competition Amendment Bill, 2008 AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPETITION AMENDMENT BILL DATE: 7 October 2008 Zodwa Ntuli – DDG: Consumer and Corporate Regulation.
INVESTIGATION AND ENFORCEMENT Presentation by Duncan T. Morotsi 15 th March
PROTECTION OF PERSONAL DATA. OECD GUIDELINES: BASIC PRINCIPLES OF NATIONAL APPLICATION Collection Limitation Principle There should be limits to the collection.
Developments in Australian Competition Law ABA International Asia/Pacific Antitrust Round-Up Fiona Crosbie, Partner Allens Arthur Robinson.
Minimum Wages Act 1948.
FEDERAL ANTIMONOPOLY SERVICE Moscow 2006 New Antimonopoly Law of the Russian Federation.
Leniency Programme Igor Pospíšil Director of the Cartel Department St. Martin Conference 2009 November 12, 2009.
1 Board Process 7 th February, 2015 © Savithri Parekh.
Leniency and Obtaining Evidence Hiroshi Nakazato Investigation Bureau Fair Trade Commission of Japan April 6 th 2006 OECD-KOREA.
1 Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine Guidelines on setting fines imposed for violations of the law on protection of economic competition GENERAL APPROACHES.
OM PRAKASH SAH ARTICLE-KHATUWALA ASSOCIATES (Chartered Accountants) Ph: 11.
Copyright All rights reserved. Copyright All rights reserved. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) – value added for business or competitive.
Presentation to the 6 th Annual African Dialogue on Consumer Protection Conference, September 2014 The views and opinions expressed herein are those.
BY Suhail Anjum Siddiqui,Advocate B.com.(Hons)LL.B(Hons.) MBA.
P ROSECUTION OF CARTELS WITHOUT DIRECT EVIDENCE – SLOVENIAN EXPERIENCE DAVID VOGRINEC Department for Legal Affairs and Investigations Slovenian Competition.
1 Roles of Competition Law/ Policy Fair Trade Commission, Chinese Taipei Presented to the 5th East Asia Conference on Competition Law and.
(new)The Competition Act. The Competition Act 2003 & 2007 The Competition bill was passed by both the houses of Parliament in December 2002, and The President.
Competition Policy in India: an Overview Pankaj Jain Faculty : Lovely Professional University.
Sophie Honohan Barrister-at-Law, Accredited Mediator 21 st April, 2016 Health Identifiers Act Conference.
ROLE OF COMPANY SECRETARY Knowledge Workshop On “Understanding New Regime of Company Law in India”
PHILIPPINE COMPETITION ACT
PRESENTATION AT THE OECD NATIONAL WORKSHOP ON FIGHTING BID-RIGGING IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT PRESENTATION BY DUNCAN T. MOROTSI DIRECTOR LEGAL AND ENFORCEMENT.
Contract & Consumer Law Chapter 11
European Union Law Week 10.
NATIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND LABOUR COUNCIL (NEDLAC)
Chapter 37 Antitrust Law.
Adaption of antitrust compliance program
This is the prescribed textbook for your course.
Legal Aspects Of Corporate Business
Non-Discretionary Administrative Sanctions under the AMA in Japan
ICN Cartel Working Group SG 1 Call Series Linda Plumpton
Essential Commodities Act, 1955 R/W, special provisions Act, 1981
Essentials of the legal environment today, 5e
Using Leniency to Fight Hard-Core Cartels
Presentation transcript:

Bid Rigging as Provided for under the Fair Competition Act, 2003 and the Proposed Amendments Presenter: Grace Freedom Nicholas Investigation Department Fair Competition Commission June,

Part I Bid Rigging under the Fair Competition Act,

Bid Rigging in Tanzania is provided for under section 9(1)(d) of the Fair Competition Act, Section 9 provides: “9(1) A person shall not make or give effect to an agreement if the object, effect or likely effect of the agreement is- (a)Price fixing between competitors; (b)A collective boycott by competitors; or (c)Output restrictions between competitors; (d)Collusive bidding or tendering”. 3

Section 9(2)(d) gives an explanation of bid rigging as follows- ““Collusive bidding or tendering” means- (i)To fix or control the prices or terms or conditions of any bid or tender by any of the parties to an agreement at an auction or in any tender or other form of bidding, in competition with any other party to the agreement; or (ii)To prevent a party to an agreement from making a bid or tender at an auction or in any tender or other form of bidding, in competition with any other party to the agreement”. 4

Section 9(4) creates offence for any person who intentionally or negligently acts in contravention of the provisions of section 9. Section 60 provides for penalty which is a fine of not less than five percent and not exceeding ten percent annual turnover. 5

Part II The Proposed Amendments 6

FCC has resorted to propose some amendments (approved by the Cabinet) including introduction of leniency policy (in Section 9) – the most effective tool for detecting cartels and obtaining relevant evidence due to the fact that detecting such offences is not always easy. Secret cooperation between participants of such offences. There is little documentary evidence left behind. 7

Proposed to add a provision to provide for Leniency Programme: “9A –For the purposes of section 9, the Commission may execute leniency programme extinguishing or reducing the applicable penalty pursuant to the terms thereof, for a person that engage in anti- competitive conducts, provided that such person effectively cooperate with investigations and administrative proceedings”. 8

Proposed to add at s. 9(1): “allocation of markets or customers”. and its definition at s.9(2) – “to divide a market between competitors so as to limit the right to do business within a defined geographical territory, a defined product category, or to certain specified customers with result of eliminating or restraining competition between competitors”. 9

Proposed to delete the words “intentionally or negligently”. A person who contravenes the provisions of Section 9 should be liable for committing an offence whether or not the contravention was intentional or negligent otherwise it will seem to imply that the plaintiff must prove intentionality or negligence. That would impose an unwise and unusual burden on the plaintiff. 10

Punishment as provided for under section 60. Section 60 provides- “Where a person commits an offence against this Act (other than under Part VI, part VII or sections 58, 59 or 88) or is involved in such an offence, the Commission may impose on that person a fine of not less than five percent of his annual turnover and not exceeding ten percent of his annual turnover.” 11

Proposed to amend section 60(1) to accommodate contravention of s. 9 by adding- :…and in case of an offence in contravention of section 9, the Commission may impose a fine of not less than fifteen percent of his annual turnover but not exceeding thirty percent of his annual turnover in the preceding business year ”. 12

Proposed to add a new subsection to provide punishment for a natural person – “A director, manager, or officer of a body corporate found to violate this Act shall be personally liable to a fine up to five million shillings or imprisonment for a period twenty four months or, in case of violations of section 9, to a fine of percent of the fine imposed to the legal person or to imprisonment up to a period of 36 months or both”. 13

NB: FCC has drafted: (i)FCC Leniency Policy (ii)FCC Leniency Rules 14

Thank you for your attention! 15