Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November 2007 1 |1 | Prequalification programme: Priority.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Design of Bioequivalence Studies Alfredo García – Arieta, PhD
Advertisements

Regulation documentation requirements
Presentation of BE data in a product dossier Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Training of BE assessors, Kiev, October 2009.
Henning H. Blume, PhD SocraTec R&D, Oberursel/Germany
Research Study Designs
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust The School of Pharmacy UCL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH Centre for Paediatric Pharmacy Research Drug Development.
Kyiv, TRAINING WORKSHOP ON PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY, GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE & BIOEQUIVALENCE Statistical Considerations for Bioequivalence.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - EAC/EC/WHO Training workshop / September |1 | Prequalification programme:
Kyiv, TRAINING WORKSHOP ON PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY, GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE & BIOEQUIVALENCE Introduction to the Discussion of Bioequivalence.
Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 1 Regulatory Requirements.
Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
Neonatal/Juvenile Animal Safety Studies Kenneth L. Hastings, Dr.P.H., D.A.B.T. Office of New Drugs, CDER.
Hanoi, WORKSHOP ON PREQUALIFICATION OF ARV: BIOEQUIVALENCE Introduction to the Discussion of Bioequivalence Study Design and Conduct Presented.
Artemisinin combined medicines, Kampala, February |1 | Training workshop on regulatory requirements for registration of Artemisinin based combined.
WHO Prequalification Program Workshop, Kiev, Ukraine, June 25-27,2007.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - EAC/EC/WHO Training workshop / September |1 | Prequalification programme:
Interchangeability and study design Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Training of BE assessors, Kiev, October 2009.
Venkata Ramana S. Uppoor, M.Pharm., Ph.D., R.Ph.
Tanzania, August, 2006 Dr. Barbara Sterzik, BfArM, Bonn 1 Guidelines and Tools available TRS 937 and BTIF (Bioequivalence Trial Information Form)
1 MARKETING AUTHORIZATION OF PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO MULTISOURCE (GENERIC) PRODUCTS: A MANUAL FOR DRUG REGULATORY AUTHORITIES.
Documentation of bioequivalence Drs. J. Welink Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October 2009.
Bioequivalence Studies Dr Sanet Aspinall, PhD Managing Director AddClin Research Pretoria 20 March 2009.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - EAC/EC/WHO Training workshop / September |1 | Prequalification programme:
regulatory requirements
OVERVIEW OF DACA BIOEQUIVALENCE REPORT EVALUATION Presented by Solomon Shiferaw 31Augst 2010.
Week 6- Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
Case studies Saila Antila, PhD WHO consultant Training workshop on Pharmaceutical Quality, Good Manufacturing Practice & Bioequivalence, Kiev
Regulatory requirements Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009.
1 Axcan Public Presentation for the FDA Pharmaceutical Science and Clinical Pharmacology Advisory Committee Meeting July 23, 2008.
Bioavailability Dr Mohammad Issa.
WHO Workshop on Assessment of Bioequivalence Data Addis Ababa, 31. August – 3. September 2010 Artemisinin-based Products Dr. Henrike Potthast
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |1 | Prequalification programme: Priority.
Statistical considerations Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009.
WHO Workshop on Prequalification of Medicines Programme, Abu Dhabi, October, 2010 Regulatory principles reflected in practice of WHO PQP Milan Smid,
Population Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of Levosulpiride and Terbinafine in Healthy Male Korean Volunteers Yong-Bok Lee College of Pharmacy and Institute.
1 Controlled drug release Dr Mohammad Issa. 2 Frequency of dosing and therapeutic index  Therapeutic index (TI) is described as the ratio of the maximum.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - EAC/EC/WHO Training workshop / September |1 | Prequalification programme:
Bioequivalence of Locally Acting Gastrointestinal Drugs: An Overview
Bioequivalence Dr Mohammad Issa Saleh.
WHO Prequalification Programme June 2007 Training Workshop on Dissolution, Pharmaceutical Product Interchangeability and Biopharmaceutical Classification.
Bioavailability Dr. Basavaraj K. Nanjwade M. Pharm., Ph. D Department of Pharmaceutics Faculty of Pharmacy Omer Al-Mukhtar University Tobruk, Libya.
Grade Statistics without Bonus with Bonus Average = 86 Median = 87 Average = 88 Median = 89 Undergraduates Average=88 MS Average=92.
Pre-qualification Program: Priority Medicines Interchangeability of Multi Source Drug Products SALOMON STAVCHANSKY, PH.D. ALCON CENTENNIAL PROFESSOR OF.
Using Product Development Information to Address the Bioequivalence Challenges of Highly-variable Drugs Lawrence X. Yu, Ph. D. Director for Science Office.
Introduction What is a Biowaiver?
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - EAC/EC/WHO Training workshop / September |1 | Prequalification programme:
Examples of deficiencies in submitted data Drs. J. Welink Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October.
Bioavailability and Bioequivalence General concepts and overview
Malaysia, EVALUTION OF DOSSIERS IN WHO- PREQUALIFICATION PROJECT MULTISOURCE TB-DRUGS Evaluation of bioavailability/bioequivalence data Based,
Bioavailability and Bioequivalence L 10,11.  Bioavailability is a measurement of the rate and extent (amount) to which the active ingredient or active.
Modified release products. Considerations in the evaluation of modified release products Requirements for preparing extended release products. The bioavailability.
Milan Smid, MD, PhD Tutorial: WHO Prequalification Programme for Priority Medicines, Beijing, March, 2010 Demonstration of Bioequivalence.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |1 | Prequalification programme: Priority.
Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 1 Statistical Considerations.
Interchangeability and study design Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009.
SOME ISSUES ON THE DETERMINATION OF BIOEQUIVALENCE FOR HIGHLY VARIABLE DRUGS Laszlo Endrenyi University of Toronto Laszlo Tothfalusi Semmelweis University.
In vitro - In vivo Correlation
The First Conference for Medicines Regulatory Authorities In Sudan and Neighboring Countries Khartoum December 2014 Alain PRAT, Technical Officer,
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - EAC/EC/WHO Training workshop / September |1 | Prequalification programme:
Tanzania, August 2006 Dr. Barbara Sterzik, BfArM, Bonn 1 Bioequivalence dossier requirements for the prequalification project WHO Training Workshop.
Introduction What is a Biowaiver?
Biopharmaceutics of modified release drug products
Dissolution testing and in vitro in vivo correlation of conventional and SR preparations Formulation development and optimization is an ongoing process.
Controlled drug release
Scientific rationale for EU regulatory expectations concerning product composition in case of Class-I and Class-III medicinal products Dr Ridha BELAIBA.
Clinical Pharmacokinetics
1 Concentration-time curve
Pharmacologic Principles (Lilley, p. 16)
Bioequivalence trials: design, evaluation, regulatory requirements
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring chapter 1 part 1
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |1 | Prequalification programme: Priority essential medicines Training programme on pharmaceutical quality, good manufacture practice and bioequivalence with a focus on TB products. Jiaxing Peoples’ Republic of China 5 – 9 November 2007

Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |2 | Training Workshop on Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products. Experimental design of bioequivalence studies Presenter: Drs. J. Welink Senior pharmacokineticist Medicines Evaluation Board, NL WHO adviser

Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |3 | Bioequivalence – single dose minimize variability not attributable to formulations Basic design considerations: goal: compare performance 2 formulations minimize bias

Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |4 | Bioequivalence – single dose single dose, two-period, crossover Golden standard study design: Reference (comparator)/ Test (generic) healthy volunteers

Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |5 | Bioequivalence – single dose

Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |6 | Bioequivalence – multiple dose More relevant clinically? Multiple dose: Less sensitive to formulation differences!

Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |7 | Bioequivalence – multiple dose Multiple dose studies in case of….. Drug too potent/toxic for healthy volunteers –patients/ no interruption therapy Extended/modified release formulations – accumulation / unexpected behavior Non-linear PK at steady state Analytical assay sensitivity

Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |8 | Bioequivalence – parallel design Crossover design preferred: - intra-subject comparison - lower variability - fewer subjects required Crossover: Parallel: R R T

Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |9 | Bioequivalence – parallel design Parallel design may be useful: Drug with very long elimination half-life –Crossover design not practical Number of subjects Parallel design considerations: Adequate sample collection –Complete absorption –72 hours sufficient in general

Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November | Bioequivalence – replicate vs. non-replicate non-replicate Standard approach BE study: average bioequivalence single administration R and T

Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November | Bioequivalence – replicate vs. non-replicate T and/or R administered twice Replicate (RRTT or RRT or TTR): Subject X formulation interaction Intra-subject variability average bioequivalence/ individual bioequivalence

Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November | Bioequivalence – replicate design Scientific advantages: Comparison within-subject variances T and R Indicate whether T exhibits lower or higher within-subject variability More information (performance/S*F interaction) Reduce number of subjects

Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November | Bioequivalence – replicate design Disadvantages: Bigger commitment volunteers More administrations per subject More expensive

Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November | Bioequivalence – fast/fed no change in absorption:delay in absorption: increase in absorption:decrease in absorption: Food effect:

Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November | Bioequivalence – fast/fed Food effect due to change in: gastric emptying time acid secretion intestinal motility bile secretion enzyme secretion active absorption process

Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November | Bioequivalence – fast/fed If the SPC of the reference product contains specific recommendations in relation with food intake related to food interaction effects the study should be designed accordingly

Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November | Bioequivalence – fast/fed If the recommendation of food intake is based on pharmacokinetic properties such as higher bioavailability, then a bioequivalence study under fed conditions is generally required If the recommendation of food intake is intended to decrease adverse events or to improve tolerability, a bioequivalence study under fasting conditions is considered acceptable although it would be advisable to perform the study under fed conditions. If the SPC leaves a choice between fasting and fed conditions, then bioequivalence should preferably be tested under fasting conditions as this situation will be more sensitive to differences in pharmacokinetics.

Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November | Bioequivalence – fast/fed

Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November | Bioequivalence – fast/fed The composition of the meal should be described and taken into account, since a light meal might sometimes be preferable to mimic clinical conditions, especially when the fed state is expected to be less sensitive to differences in pharmacokinetics. For products with release characteristics differing from conventional immediate release (e.g. improved release, dissolution or absorption), even if they cannot be classified as modified release products with prolonged or delayed release, bioequivalence studies may be necessary in both the fasted and fed states.

Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November | Bioequivalence – fast/fed Different modified release formulations of the same drug substance may differ with respect to food interaction. Hence, the influence of food on the bioavailability of oral modified release formulations must be investigated for safety and efficacy purposes. The optimal experimental conditions to produce a food effect include the ingestion of a predefined high fat meal immediately before dosing. For the assessment of food effect besides AUC and Cmax, it may also be valuable to compare the modified release characteristics.

Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November | Bioequivalence – fast/fed example Diclofenac 50 mg studies Study I: 2-way cross-over study administered after intake of a high fat breakfast, sampling for 12 hours Study 2: 2-way cross over study administered after intake of a high fat breakfast, sampling for 24 hours

Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November | Bioequivalence – fast/fed example Diclofenac 50 mg short study

Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November | Bioequivalence – fast/fed example Diclofenac 50 mg short study

Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November | Bioequivalence – fast/fed example Diclofenac 50 mg long study Reference

Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November | Bioequivalence – fast/fed example Diclofenac 50 mg long study Test

Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November | Bioequivalence – fast/fed example Diclofenac 50 mg normalised on Tlag

Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November | End