US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Planning Principles & Procedures – FY11 AUTHORIZATION AND APPROPRIATION OR “It Takes Two to Tango"

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
US Army Corps of Engineers Budgeting Process
Advertisements

Recent Changes to USACE s Continuing Contract Authority U.S. Army Corps of Engineers National Dredging Meeting June 13, 2007.
Plan Formulation: General
Presented By: Gareth Leonard (DEP) Presented To: Florida Oceans and Coastal Council Date: October 30, 2012 DRAFT.
US Army Corps of Engineers Northwestern Division Northwestern Division 1 System Flood Control Review: Regional Agency Review Briefing Lonnie Mettler Northwestern.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® COL Richard P. Pannell District Commander, Galveston District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers United States Army.
Tribal Consultations. Topics FY12 Extensions and IRR Program Funding MAP-21 Programs and Funding.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Vertical Team Roles & Responsibilities Planning Principles & Procedures – FY11.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Suburban Flooding: Finding regional solutions to a growing problem Imad Samara Project Manager and Silver.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Skiatook Lake Drought Issues and Management.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® West Onslow Beach/ Topsail Beach West Onslow Beach/ Topsail Beach Coastal Storm Damage Reduction Project Town.
Federal Budget Process
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Philadelphia District How to start the Corps’ Project Delivery Engine Local Sponsor Identifies A Problem and Requests Corps.
Module 23 STEPS 15 & 16 Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) and Other Decision Documents Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Module 5 Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11. Civil Works Project Delivery Process Step 10 Division Engineer's Transmittal Letter Step 6 Negotiate.
Federal Funding Process LYNDA HOFFMAN, WATERWAYS DIVISION MANAGER.
Module 12 STEPS 6 & 7 Negotiation of PMP/FCSA and Execution of Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Module 22 STEPS 11, 12, 13 & 14 Washington Level and Administration Review Processes Module 22 STEPS 11, 12, 13 & 14 Washington Level and Administration.
Module 9 STEP 2 Congressional Study Resolution/ Authorization Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Module 10 Step 3 Initial Study Funding (incl. Civil Works Budget Process) Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
April, 2008 Office of Coastal Restoration & Management PROJECT UPDATE Office of Coastal Restoration & Management PROJECT UPDATE.
NRCS Watershed Rehabilitation
Module 24 STEPS 17, 18, & 19 Project Implementation Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
An update from the National Committee on Levee Safety Presented to the TWCA by Karin M. Jacoby, PE, Esq. June 17, of 14An Involved Public and Reliable.
1 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Indian River Lagoon North Restoration Feasibility Study Public Meeting September.
Last Topic - Constitutions of United States and its silent Features Silent Features 1.Preamble 2. Introduction and Evolution 3. Sources 4. Significance.
BUILDING STRONG SM Regional Intergovernmental Council Workshop American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Sherry Adams March 24, 2009.
Professional Science Master’s Programs: Federal Budget Strategy April 4, 2008 Council of Graduate Schools.
Module 27 Continuing Authorities Program Module 27 Continuing Authorities Program Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Theodore A. Brown, P.E., SES Chief Planning and Policy Division
Module 11 STEPS 4 & 5 Conduct Reconnaissance Study & Report Certification Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
WRRDA and WRDA: How are they different, and does it make any difference? Inland Rivers, Ports and Terminals, Inc. Tuesday, April 29, 2014 James A. Kearns.
Making every vote count. United States Election Assistance Commission HAVA 101 TGDC Meeting December 9-10, 2009.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® US Army Corps of Engineers Watershed Authorities, Policies and Procedures Michael Greer Regional Technical.
BUILDING STRONG ® 1 US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® The RESTORE ACT and other Economic Opportunities 4 September 2013 Alabama Section American.
Options for CBP Agreement and EC Membership For Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March, 2013.
1 Planning Associates 2 March 2011 Jan Rasgus Senior Policy Advisor Policy and Policy Compliance Division Legislative / Authorization Process.
Fiscal Monitoring and Oversight Tecumseh Local School District January 8, 2013 Roger Hardin, Assistant Director Finance Program Services (614)
“Getting the Funding Right” Kim Koleos Juris Doctor, University of Florida.
OREGON IDAHO WYOMING COLORADO NEVADA NEW MEXICO TEXAS UTAH ARIZONA CALIFORNIA US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® And Taking Care Of People! Arroyo.
World Association for Waterborne Transport Infrastructure (PIANC) and the International Environmental Commission Technical Seminar October 28, 2009 Westin.
Multipurpose Planning Module M1: Multi-purpose Plan Formulation – Policies and Constraints BU ILDING STRONG SM.
Programmatic Regulations PDT Workshop COMPREHENSIVE EVERGLADES RESTORATION PLAN April 18, 2002.
Western Lake Erie Basin Partnership Presented by: Name, Title Your Organization DATE YOU PRESENTED The Meeting you presented at.
US Army Corps of Engineers Chicago District FY04tpr\skbcongressional Civil Works Program Missions Missions Process Process Select Authorities Select Authorities.
Copyright 2008 by Marlowe & Company, LLC 1 The Federal Beach Nourishment Program: Challenges & Opportunities Howard Marlowe Marlowe & Company, LLC
Lee County Water Resource Initiative: Community Sustainability Committee June 16, 2010 Kurt Harclerode Operations Manager Lee County Natural Resources.
THE LEADING ADVOCATE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT SINCE 1982 Federal Advocates Annual Report to the Board of Supervisors San Joaquin County California Tuesday,
THE LEADING ADVOCATE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT SINCE 1982 Federal Advocates Annual Report to the Board of Supervisors San Joaquin County California Tuesday,
1 Coal Handling & Storage Conference 2015 Paul Rohde, Vice President Waterways Council, Inc.
1 Natomas Levee Improvement Program Crediting Issues Before the Central Valley Flood Protection Board February, 2009 Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency.
R ESOLUTION P ROCESS. Intro to Resolutions A conservation district supervisor should understand the importance of participating in the state and national.
2 West Sacramento, California Project General Reevaluation Report Letter of Support for the West Sacramento General Reevaluation Report Agenda Item 4G:
BUILDING STRONG ® PLANNING SMART ® US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Partnering Opportunities for Water Supply and Distribution Planning Beverley.
THE LEADING ADVOCATE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT SINCE 1982 Federal Advocates Annual Report to the Board of Supervisors San Joaquin County California Tuesday,
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® OVERVIEW OF THE CIVIL WORKS PROCESS Planning Principles & Procedures – FY 11.
2013 SCOWT WASHINGTON MEETING/ WASHINGTON, DC 20 JUNE2013 AASHTO Waterborne Freight Bottom Line Report Chris Smith Intermodal Policy and Program Manager.
S.B Municipality Fees. S.B – Environment Budget Reconciliation Bill Enacted during the 2011 regular legislative session and becomes effective.
EM-1 Office of Environmental Management SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY Post September 11 events have required EM to increase the level of protection at DOE sites.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® BUILDING STRONG SM The Louisville Engineer District CORPS 101 Brandon R. Brummett, P.E., PMP Outreach Coordinator.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Step 6: Selection Of The Recommended Plan Planning Principles & Procedures – FY11.
League of California Cities Federal Briefing October 10, 2012 Federal Sequestration Understanding Impacts to Your City & How to Take Action.
House and Senate Energy and Water Appropriation Bills FY 2017 House and Senate Appropriation Bills on Energy and Water Spending Compared to President’s.
Mahoning County Informational Meeting USACE Programs, Authorities, and Ohio Silver Jackets Program Presented by: Ashley Stephens 16 August 2016.
Continuing Authorities Program
The Triple Crown: Looking at Federal, State and Local Budgeting
Finding the Law: Primary & Secondary Sources in Print
MILTECH Study Update LtCol PJ Zimmerman, USMC
Louisiana Coastal Area
CERCLA 128(a) Tribal Response Program Site Specific Work: Introduction
Presentation transcript:

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Planning Principles & Procedures – FY11 AUTHORIZATION AND APPROPRIATION OR “It Takes Two to Tango"

BUILDING STRONG ® REFERENCES  EC 11-2-XXX, Corps of Engineers Civil Works Direct Program, Program Development Guidance, Fiscal Year 201X  Draft EC , Civil Works Legislative Process

BUILDING STRONG ® OBJECTIVES 1.To be able to identify the various sources of authorities to conduct a study. 2.To be able to explain the difference between authorization and appropriation.

BUILDING STRONG ® AUTHORIZATION Definition: Permission to undertake a specific activity. (e.g., the keys to the car)  Corps needs separate authorization for studies and project construction

BUILDING STRONG ® STUDY AUTHORIZATION PROCESS  Local officials ask Corps for assistance  If no existing authority, locals ask congressional delegation for study authorization.  Member asks House T&I or Senate E&PW Committee to authorize study.  Committee asks Corps for information.  Committee adopts study resolution.

BUILDING STRONG ® EXAMPLE STUDY RESOLUTION LANGUAGE BIG SANDY WATERSHED, KENTUCKY, WEST VIRGINIA, AND VIRGINIA SEC. XXXX. Big Sandy Watershed, Kentucky, West Virginia, and Virginia The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of reallocating authorized reservoir storage for authorized water resources project purposes, including water supply, low-flow augmentation, flood control, ecosystem restoration, and recreation, within the Big Sandy Watershed in Kentucky, West Virginia, and Virginia.

BUILDING STRONG ® EXAMPLE STUDY RESOLUTION LANGUAGE “Resolved by the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the United States House of Representatives, That the Secretary of the Army is requested to review the report of the Chief of Engineers on the Comprehensive Flood Control Plan for Ohio and Lower Mississippi Rivers published as House Document 1, 75 th Congress, 1 st Session, and other pertinent reports to determine whether modifications to the recommendations contained therein are advisable to address the need for flood damage reduction, environmental restoration and protection, and for other purposes in the Duck Creek watershed in Guernsey, Monroe, Noble, and Washington Counties, Ohio.”

BUILDING STRONG ® EXAMPLE PROJECT AUTHORIZATION LANGUAGE TITLE I - WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS (WRDA 1999) SEC PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS. (a) PROJECTS WITH CHIEF’S REPORTS. - The following projects for water resources development and conservation and other purposes are authorized to be carried out by the Secretary substantially in accordance with the plans, and subject to the conditions, described in the respective reports designated in this subsection: (3) SAND POINT HARBOR, ALASKA. - The project for navigation, Sand Point Harbor, Alaska: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated October 13, 1998, at a total cost of $11,760,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $6,964,000 and an estimated non- Federal cost of $4,796,000.

BUILDING STRONG ® STANDING AUTHORITIES  Continuing Authorities Program  Section 216 of FCA of 1970 Review of Completed Works  Section 22 of WRDA 74 Single Purpose Water Supply  Section 22 of WRDA 74 Planning Assistance to States

BUILDING STRONG ® APPROPRIATION Definition: Approval to obligate and expend funds for an authorized activity. (e.g., money for gas)  13 Appropriations Acts fund the U. S. Government  Corps Civil Works appropriations are in the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act

BUILDING STRONG ® THREE PHASES OF THE CIVIL WORKS PROGRAM Defense Development The Program Execution

BUILDING STRONG ® Seamless Funding of CW Project Development R R1R1 R1R1 R1R1 $ $1$1 $1$1 $1$1 R = Request$ = Appropriation= Execution Fiscal Year R2R2 $2$2 R3R3 $3$3 R2R2 $2$2 R2R2 R3R3 R4R4 $2$2 $3$3 A A A = Authorization Reconnaissance Feasibility PED Construction

BUILDING STRONG ® SUMMARY  Sources of study authority include: ► House or Senate Committee Resolution ► WRDA, Appropriations, or other Act of law. ► Section 216 of 1970 Flood Control Act ► Section 2 of 1958 Fish & Wildlife Coord. Act ► Continuing Authorities Program  Authorization is permission to undertake a specific activity (study or project).  Appropriation is approval to obligate and expend funds for an authorized activity.