Policy Development Process Committee Report to the Community, April 2011 Lee Howard, Committee Chair.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RIRs, the NRO and ICANN Update - August So far The RIR boards have drafted an agreement to be undertaken between themselves to establish a Number.
Advertisements

1 Update on New gTLD PDP Joint GAC/GNSO meeting Avri Doria Chair, GSNO Council San Juan, Puerto Rico.
STAFF Implement Proposed action STAFF – Assess (initial AND revisions based on feedback) Implementation change? Policy guidance needed? Admin/error update?
Protection of Intl Organization Names in new gTLDs ALAC Presentation Brian Peck.
Citizens Task Force Study of Financial, Legal & Legislative Issues Associated with Improving Roadway Service Delivery Board of Supervisors Transportation.
Participation Requirements for a Guideline Panel Member.
ARIN Advisory Council ARIN 32 October 10-11, 2013 Phoenix.
Life-cycle model ccWGs 22 May 2014 Bart Boswinkel ccNSO Senior Policy Advisor.
Participation Requirements for a Patient Representative.
60 Draft Policy ARIN Remove Web Hosting Policy.
GNSO Policy Development Process. “The PDP is broken”….. Photo credit: 2013 NYCitywoman.
September 24, 2013 Nonprofit Essentials Institute for Public Engagement Governance: What Makes for Bad Board Governance.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
ARIN Advisory Council John Sweeting. 15 elected members, 3 year terms The Advisory Council.
Second Independent Evaluation Roles / Responsibilities & Relationships.
Draft compilation of trends in the GAC comments from Buenos Aires for the Paris meeting of the CCWG 15 July 2015.
Draft Community Planning Process May 26, 2008 For Discussion.
PDP Improvements Update & Discussion. | 2 Background  Ten proposed improvements aimed to streamline and enhance the GNSO PDP Ten proposed improvements.
Intersectoral Collaboration An Initiative: Promoting collaboration among the three sectors of the social work profession.
Consumer Trust, Consumer Choice & Competition Presenter: Steve DelBianco Chair: Rosemary Sinclair.
Karen Hogenboom Kathleen Kluegel Sue Searing (chair) Tom Teper Shared Governance & Administrative Structure.
Conservation Districts Supervisor Accreditation Module 9: Employer/Employee Relations.
Second expert group meeting on Draft fiche on delegated act on the European code of conduct on partnership (ECCP) Cohesion Policy
GAC-GNSO Consultation Group On GAC Early Engagement in GNSO PDP London Progress Report 22/06/2014.
Policies that guide us Overview: Government of Yukon Contract and Procurement Regulation and Contracting and Procurement Directive.
1 San Diego, California 25 February ARIN’s Policy Development Process Current Number Resource Policy Discussions and How to Participate Owen DeLong.
1 Madison, Wisconsin 9 September14. 2 ARIN’s Policy Development Process Current Number Resource Policy Discussions and How to Participate John Springer.
Why Proposed TC Procedures? Define how TC reaches “completion” of what OASIS calls “Committee Specifications” TC procedures lead up to the OASIS process:
ARF Strategic Guidance Technical Working Group: Current Status of Initiative ASEAN Regional Forum Statement on disaster management and Emergency Response.
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN Out of Region Use.
ARIN Advisory Council Dan Alexander, AC Chair. 2 Advisory Council “The Policy Development Process charges the member- elected ARIN Advisory Council (AC)
Fees and Services John Curran President and CEO. Situation Fee Structure Review Panel completed and discharged – Final Fee Structure Review Report released.
1 ARIN’s Policy Development Process Current Number Resource Policy Discussions and How to Participate Dan Alexander ARIN Advisory Council.
The ASO is a supporting organization of ICANN Number Resource Policy Development Process Alan Barrett ICANN ASO Address Council ICANN 46 Beijing April.
Cross Community Working Group (CCWG) Accountability Update 8 October 2015.
Advocacy: Influencing Facility Development in Public Parks and Recreation Departments Tennis advocacy should occur year round through informal communications.
STAKEHOLDER CALL/MEETING TO DISCUSS AND PROVIDE INPUT ON ZEV INCENTIVE PROGRAM GUIDELINES CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD March 7,
Aline Giordano & Sean Wellington Southampton Solent University.
RIR Response to ICANN Evolution and Reform Process Prepared by Geoff Huston September 2002.
1 Orlando, FL February 24, ARIN’s Policy Development Process Current Number Resource Policy Discussions and How to Participate Heather Schiller.
OPERATIONS STEERING COMMITTEE Communications Team Kick-Off Meeting
ARIN Advisory Council ARIN XXVI October 6-8, 2010 Atlanta, GA.
September 18, 2014 Jim West :: Co-Chair, RTF Policy Advisory Committee RTF Policy Advisory Committee Background.
Page 1 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information Safeguards Gary Hannaford, Working Group Chair IESBA Meeting London January 12 – 14, 2015.
Policies for ASN Management in the Asia Pacific Region – Revised Draft Address Policy SIG APNIC14, Kitakyushu, Japan 4 Sept 2002.
Policy Development Process Committee Report to Community, October 2010 Lee Howard, Committee Chair.
ARIN Advisory Council ARIN XXIV October 21-23, 2009 Dearborn, MI.
Policy Development Processes in the APNIC Region 4 th ASO General Assembly Santiago, Chile 24 April 2003.
Policy Development Process
GNSO/Council Restructure Enhance & Support SGs/Constituencies Improve Communications & Coordination Revise the Policy Development Process Adopt a WG Model.
ICANN ASO Address Council Status Report APNIC 14, Open Policy Meeting Kitakyushu, Japan September 5 th, 2002.
Draft Policy Merge IPv4 ISP and End-User Requirements 59.
Text #ICANN49 Policy & Implementation Working Group Update.
Proposed Workplan for Completing the Alignment of the Partnership Management Board Meeting 9/13/12 Carin Bisland.
Federal Subsistence Board Work Session January 12 – 13, 2016 Presenters: Amee R. Howard and Theo Matuskowitz.
Recommended Draft Policy RIR Principles 59.
CONFERENCE IMPLEMENTATION OF MARKETS IN FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS DIRECTIVE -MiFID- Split, June 2007 OPENING SPEECH Ante Samodol President of the Board.
AC On Docket Report Dan Alexander, AC Chair. 2 Advisory Council “The Policy Development Process charges the member-elected ARIN Advisory Council (AC)
ARIN Board of Trustees Vint Cerf, Chair. ARIN Board of Trustees Activities (since ARIN 36) Financial/Fiduciary Approved staff moving forward with securing.
60 Draft Policy ARIN NRPM 4 (IPv4) Policy Cleanup.
9 th International HIA Conference A framework for public health officials to integrate HIA considerations in municipal project undertakings for the City.
GNSO Council Restructure Enhance & Support SGs/Constituencies Improve Communications & Coordination Revise the Policy Development Process Adopt a WG Model.
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN David Farmer
ASU Governance & Bylaw Review
Action Request (Advice) Registry
Introduction to the ARIN Policy Development Process
Policy Development Processes in the APNIC Region
Proposed Workplan for Completing the Alignment of the Partnership
Presentation transcript:

Policy Development Process Committee Report to the Community, April 2011 Lee Howard, Committee Chair

Status Busy committee members, hard to meet Scheduling regular meetings, not meetings-as- needed Three documents drafted: – Part I: Goals and Definitions – Part II: Process – Part III: Petition Process Recommendations to Advisory Council

Part I: Goals and Definitions Purpose Definitions Scope Principles Criteria for Policy Changes

Part II: Process Policy Proposal Initial Evaluation Discussion, Development Public Policy Meeting Final Review, Last Call Adoption

Part III: Petition Process When petitions may start, when they end What may be petitioned Criteria for success Outcome of successful petitions

Problems Identified Newcomers have a hard time understanding PDPNew PDP It takes too long to pass policyNew PDP Many proposals aren’t important, or aren’t policyNew PDP Need to improve communication between Board, AC, and community Operational Guidelines Policy workload is high, for AC members and community Operational Guidelines Role of shows of hands, polling Operational Guidelines

Proposed Process and Guidelines The following slides show a summary of Committee’s thinking We committed to solicit feedback before recommending changes Each slide shows: – A step in the proposed Policy Development Process – with supporting operational guidance.

Discussion Points Public policy meeting – Purpose to inform AC or to determine consensus? – Slows process but ensures consideration – Required for all proposals?

Next Steps Formalize PDP draft for AC and Board review Send to PPML for public comment Review additional problem areas for additional work

Problems Identified NRPM needs edits Request AC and Staff Governments (and other bodies?) need access. Supported in new PDP? Difficult for community members to keep up with PPML New PDP easier? People with limited time for policy work or who are only intrested in certain policy areas find it very difficult to participate New PDP easier? Global policy development process is unclear, especially when changes are needed. Is also slow. Review ARIN’s part of Global PDP

Problems Identified Unclear who the community is: government? Extra-regional? ISPs? End-user organizations? End users? Law enforcement? Supported in new PDP? Unclear where policy variations for different kinds of organizations, or different sub-regions, are appropriate. Ask AC for advice

Summary Presentations to AC Process documents in final stages Easier to understand, easier to participate