André Augustinus 21 June 2004 DCS Workshop Detector DCS overview Status and Progress.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ALICE DCS, Heidelberg 8 Sept G. De Cataldo, CERN CH and INFN Bari;A. Franco INFN Bari 1 Updating on the HV control systems in ALICE The DELPHI HV,
Advertisements

The Detector Control System – FERO related issues
Status of the CTP O.Villalobos Baillie University of Birmingham April 23rd 2009.
André Augustinus 15 March 2003 DCS Workshop Safety Interlocks.
DCS workshop 13-14/6/2005G. De Cataldo, CERN-CH and INFN bari1 Common FSM’s updates An exercise to design the standard FSMs for the DCS, the HV and the.
Alarms and interlocks handling in the FSM environment Hypernet 1.The standardization of the FSM state diagram; 2.The FSM error states and their recovering.
CWG10 Control, Configuration and Monitoring Status and plans for Control, Configuration and Monitoring 16 December 2014 ALICE O 2 Asian Workshop
André Augustinus 16 June 2003 DCS Workshop Safety.
André Augustinus ALICE Detector Control System  ALICE DCS is responsible for safe, stable and efficient operation of the experiment  Central monitoring.
Peter Chochula, January 31, 2006  Motivation for this meeting: Get together experts from different fields See what do we know See what is missing See.
Supervision of Production Computers in ALICE Peter Chochula for the ALICE DCS team.
Clara Gaspar, May 2010 The LHCb Run Control System An Integrated and Homogeneous Control System.
The Project AH Computing. Functional Requirements  What the product must do!  Examples attractive welcome screen all options available as clickable.
3 June 2003U. Frankenfeld1 TPC Detector Control System Status.
LHC Gas Control System Stefan Haider EP-TA1-GS ALICE DCS workshop, S.Haider2 Outline Introduction and working philosophyIntroduction and working.
CLAS12 CalCom Activity CLAS Collaboration Meeting, March 6 th 2014.
Designing a HEP Experiment Control System, Lessons to be Learned From 10 Years Evolution and Operation of the DELPHI Experiment. André Augustinus 8 February.
Summary DCS Workshop - L.Jirdén1 Summary of DCS Workshop 28/29 May 01 u Aim of workshop u Program u Summary of presentations u Conclusion.
1 Status & Plans DCS WS L.Jirdén. 2 DCS Planning FINAL INST COM- MISS BEAM OP PRE- INST DET DCS URD ENG. SOLUTIONS PROTOTYPE SUBSYSTEM.
B. IlleWACH /11/20021 WELCOME to WACH I am happy to introduce this ‘Workshop Analysis Calorimetry H4’ dedicated to M0’ data analysis and the.
JCOP Workshop September 8th 1999 H.J.Burckhart 1 ATLAS DCS Organization of Detector and Controls Architecture Connection to DAQ Front-end System Practical.
André Augustinus 10 September 2001 Common Applications to Prototype A two way learning process.
André Augustinus 16 September 2002 Safety issues.
Update on Database Issues Peter Chochula DCS Workshop, June 21, 2004 Colmar.
XXVI Workshop on Recent Developments in High Energy Physics and Cosmology Theodoros Argyropoulos NTUA DCS group Ancient Olympia 2008 ATLAS Cathode Strip.
DCS Workshop - L.Jirdén1 ALICE DCS PROJECT ORGANIZATION - a proposal - u Project Goals u Organizational Layout u Technical Layout u Deliverables.
André Augustinus 10 September 2001 DCS Architecture Issues Food for thoughts and discussion.
1 Status and Plans DCS workshop L.Jirdén u Budget u Status u Planning u Goals for end 2002.
André Augustinus 17 June 2002 Technology Overview What is out there to fulfil our requirements? (with thanks to Tarek)
André Augustinus 10 October 2005 ALICE Detector Control Status Report A. Augustinus, P. Chochula, G. De Cataldo, L. Jirdén, S. Popescu the DCS team, ALICE.
DCS workshop July 2007 Overview Installed detectors Installed detectors FMD3 commissioning FMD3 commissioning FSM Hierarchy FSM Hierarchy LV+HV FSMs LV+HV.
Muon System Safety Issues Burkhard Schmidt.
André Augustinus 6 October 2005 Cabling, Interlocks, Racks Some remarks.
P. Chochula ALICE Week Colmar, June 21, 2004 Status of FED developments.
Naming and Code Conventions for ALICE DCS (1st thoughts)
André Augustinus 10 March 2003 DCS Workshop Detector Controls Layout Introduction.
Clara Gaspar, March 2005 LHCb Online & the Conditions DB.
15-16/3/04 DCS workshop G. De Cataldo, A,.Franco and A. Tauro 1 Answers from the HMPID to the ACC questions 1.Concerning global DCS overview drawing 2.Concerning.
G. Dissertori ETHZ CMS Electronics ECAL DCS : Plans for 2003 G. Dissertori ETHZ
André Augustinus 16 September 2002 PVSS & Framework How to get started.
CERN, O.Pinazza: ALICE TOF DCS1 ALICE TOF DCS Answers to DCS Commissioning and Installation related questions ALICE week at CERN O. Pinazza and.
4 th Workshop on ALICE Installation and Commissioning January 16 th & 17 th, CERN Muon Tracking (MUON_TRK, MCH, MTRK) Conclusion of the first ALICE COSMIC.
Peter Chochula ALICE Offline Week, October 04,2005 External access to the ALICE DCS archives.
L0 DAQ S.Brisbane. ECS DAQ Basics The ECS is the top level under which sits the DCS and DAQ DCS must be in READY state before trying to use the DAQ system.
ALICE Pixel Operational Experience R. Santoro On behalf of the ITS collaboration in the ALICE experiment at LHC.
André Augustinus 16 June 2003 DCS Workshop General Purpose Monitor.
André Augustinus 9 October 2006 Interlocks update.
Muon Tracking Meeting SOR issue First priority Diagnostic: MCH DetectorScriptError Arriving at the initialization stage: the whole or part.
The (prototype) C&V Framework component used for the SPD Cooling Control A.Tauro, G.De Cataldo.
André Augustinus 21 June 2004 DCS Workshop Follow-up from last workshop.
DCS overview - L.Jirdén1 ALICE ECS/DCS – project overview strategy and status L.Jirden u Organization u DCS system overview u Implementation.
Proposal for a Global Network for Beam Instrumentation [BIGNET] BI Group Meeting – 08/06/2012 J-J Gras CERN-BE-BI.
14 November 08ELACCO meeting1 Alice Detector Control System EST Fellow : Lionel Wallet, CERN Supervisor : Andre Augustinus, CERN Marie Curie Early Stage.
Clara Gaspar, April 2006 LHCb Experiment Control System Scope, Status & Worries.
Summary of User Requirements for Calibration and Alignment Database Magali Gruwé CERN PH/AIP ALICE Offline Week Alignment and Calibration Workshop February.
LAV thresholds requirements Paolo Valente. LAV answers for Valeri’s questions (old) 1.List of hardware to control (HV, LV, crates, temperatures, pressure,
The DCS Databases Peter Chochula. 31/05/2005Peter Chochula 2 Outline PVSS basics (boring topic but useful if one wants to understand the DCS data flow)
Summary of TPC/TRD/DCS/ECS/DAQ meeting on FERO configuration CERN,January 31 st 2006 Peter Chochula.
André Augustinus 17 June 2002 Detector URD summaries or, what we understand from your URD.
Database Issues Peter Chochula 7 th DCS Workshop, June 16, 2003.
1 Infrastructure and DCS Presentation of the Infrastructure Controls aspect in the ALICE DCS Based on U ser R equirements D ocument …you should still know.
André Augustinus 18 March 2002 ALICE Detector Controls Requirements.
André Augustinus 13 June 2005 User Requirements, interlocks, cabling, racks, etc. Some remarks.
M. Caprini IFIN-HH Bucharest DAQ Control and Monitoring - A Software Component Model.
Statistical process model Workshop in Ukraine October 2015 Karin Blix Quality coordinator
André Augustinus P2 events & perturbations 07 May 2010 ALICE Technical Coordination Meeting.
LIU Configuration Management EDMS Documentation, Layout and ECRs This presentation follows the LIU-PSB specific presentation done on 9 th October 2014.
Peter Chochula Calibration Workshop, February 23, 2005
Configuration DB Status report Lana Abadie
Presentation transcript:

André Augustinus 21 June 2004 DCS Workshop Detector DCS overview Status and Progress

André Augustinus 21 June 2004DCS Workshop 2 Introduction  Since some time the ‘overview drawings’ for each detector form the basis of our understanding of the various sub-systems  From the end of last year, there are only very few modifications +Things are decided and stable… good! –You haven’t had time to update the drawings… … try to put in the small effort or, as a minimum, forward me your comments

André Augustinus 21 June 2004DCS Workshop 3 Feedback  Last workshop many points of general interest were presented and discussed; on which feedback was requested from the detectors  Detectors were reminded to give feedback on some of these points two weeks ago  Unfortunately we received very little input for this workshop…  So, I will not really summarize current status (as basically nothing changed since March)

André Augustinus 21 June 2004DCS Workshop 4 Feedback  I will try to explain again why and on what areas we would like you to provide us with feedback  Remember that: We are there to support you For that we need to know what you want! Pre-installation starts in a few months, installation in a year from now Things take time to prepare (properly), please allow us that time 16 or so detectors will have to be operated coherently Has to be designed, we need to know how you operate your detector

André Augustinus 21 June 2004DCS Workshop 5 URD’s  The URD is supposed to be the repository for your requirements Need to be updated when your requirements change  Currently ‘dormant’… We haven’t seen any updates for a year (or more) No URD at all for some detectors!

André Augustinus 21 June 2004DCS Workshop 6 URD’s  Need to be reviewed and put in EDMS Collection of URD’s is referred to in the TDR  Base this review around overview drawing, the URD… … allows to put more information (description) … allows to capture other information than ‘numbers’ … allows to cover operational aspects  We will get back to you on this…

André Augustinus 21 June 2004DCS Workshop 7 Operational aspects  During installation and commissioning you will operate your detector ‘stand alone’  An important ‘mission’ of the DCS team is to allow centralized and coherent operation (of the DCS) of the whole ALICE experiment  The design and prototyping for this is now starting Was already started with the ‘common solutions’  Therefore we need your input

André Augustinus 21 June 2004DCS Workshop 8 Operational aspects  Relevant on many levels in the DCS  Firstly, the operation or behaviour of each individual sub-system Aim is to describe behaviour in a state diagram Cover both ‘normal operation’ and ‘anomalies’ Inventory of all possible anomalous states Reaction on these anomalous states: recovery or reporting E.g. automatic recovery of a tripped HV channel  This will be covered in more detail by Giacinto

André Augustinus 21 June 2004DCS Workshop 9 Operational aspects  Secondly, the interaction between the various sub- systems in your detector What are the dependencies between the sub-systems E.g. a sub-system cannot be operated without another No LV without cooling, no HV without correct gas Operations on sub-systems need to be done in a defined order (some) LV need to be switched on before HV This also touches the subject of interlocks  Again state diagram or flow chart would be useful  Aim is to standardize as far as possible States, commands

André Augustinus 21 June 2004DCS Workshop 10 Operational aspects  Finally, the interaction between the DCS and ‘the rest of the world’  Rarely the DCS is operated in ‘isolation’  Need to understand relation to e.g. other online systems Makes no sense to start data-taking without HV and LV on HV can only be switched on when beam conditions allow For some calibration coordination between DAQ and DCS is needed  Important for the design of the ECS  Even further: what DCS information is needed offline

André Augustinus 21 June 2004DCS Workshop 11 Operational aspects  Capture, on each level, ‘normal operation’ in flow charts or state diagrams  Normal operation will probably follow ‘LHC cycle’

André Augustinus 21 June 2004DCS Workshop 12 Operational aspects  Clearly many aspects are still unclear will only become clear when you start understanding your detector  Some questions to trigger reflection What operations are needed before or at the start of a fill ramp voltages from off, or intermediate, special calibration or configuration to be done What recovery procedures are foreseen recovery of trips, recovery of SEU What operations are needed at the end of fill ramping down of voltages, switching off sub-systems, performing automatically some ‘post-fill calibration’

André Augustinus 21 June 2004DCS Workshop 13 Operational aspects What kind of calibration(s) will be needed when and how often will they be performed what are the conditions to do them can it be done with beam or should it be without beam what sub-systems or other online systems (DAQ, TRG etc.) are involved and how do they interact

André Augustinus 21 June 2004DCS Workshop 14 Operational aspects  Not limited to data taking periods, DCS will be operational (and essential) during ‘shutdown’ periods What will be the status of your detector during (prolonged) shutdowns e.g. for one or more days (LHC ‘machine development’) or some weeks or months (‘technical stop’ or ‘winter shutdown’) will all sub-systems be switched off or will some systems remain operational, and if so will this require operator surveillance What will be the startup procedure after a shutdown period e.g. gas purge, cool down period

André Augustinus 21 June 2004DCS Workshop 15 Databases  Last workshop(s) Peter presented the various databases related to DCS Configuration DB, conditions DB, PVSS archive  Need your feedback on the use of these databases To evaluate technology, access, performance, tools…  Some (most) of it comes with framework but some will be ALICE specific

André Augustinus 21 June 2004DCS Workshop 16 Databases - configuration  Configuration database holds all kind of information Static information (on processes, on devices) Dynamic information (settings, alarm limits, recipes) FERO configuration (information for FEE) ALICE specific  Static system information (processes) relatively straightforward What process is running where, what managers, what drivers… Will need to add your specific needs

André Augustinus 21 June 2004DCS Workshop 17 Databases - configuration  Static (device) information relatively well known for ‘common devices’, for specific devices we need your input  Dynamic information Again, for non-common devices we need to know what settings exist How are these settings defined (populating the database) “Manually” Automatically e.g. following a calibration run

André Augustinus 21 June 2004DCS Workshop 18 Databases - configuration  FERO configuration, strictly seen the same as device configuration (static and dynamic) Will be shared with other online systems (DAQ, ECS) You will have to define what need to be stored, and how database will be populated  Static configuration will be accessed only occasionally  Dynamic configuration more often Would like to know how often, when, amount of data to assess performance issues

André Augustinus 21 June 2004DCS Workshop 19 Databases - conditions  Conditions database: data needed for (physics) data analysis by offline  (PVSS) Archive: all data acquired by PVSS stored for use by DCS experts  Conditions database is a subset of data in archive or based on archive data  Depending on developments in PVSS, on performance etc. offline might have access to archive directly  Need your input on what data is needed for offline

André Augustinus 21 June 2004DCS Workshop 20 Interlocks  Last workshop I presented a draft document on ideas on interlocks Have not had any comments on its content  Would like to have your feedback with your needs  Closely related to operational aspects, especially ‘soft interlocks’  Would like to have for each detector an inventory of all aspects of all your interlocks

André Augustinus 21 June 2004DCS Workshop 21 Interlocks - Questions  What we would like to know from you (in principle for both hard and soft interlocks) Source, what system is generating the interlock On what conditions is the interlock generated At least in indication (gas mixture, pressure, temperature …) Will there be a delay between detection of condition and generation of interlock Destination, what system is receiving the interlock For hardwired interlocks, what will be the signal (both source and destination end) open/close contact, voltage level, current loop …

André Augustinus 21 June 2004DCS Workshop 22 Interlocks  We will get back to you with precise questions  And a proposal how to capture your needs table, drawing filled with what we already know with information on ‘external systems’ (how e.g. cooling and gas are generating interlocks)  Doesn’t prevent you from starting to think on the subject!

André Augustinus 21 June 2004DCS Workshop 23 Summary  Will continue to bother you with request for information  Shift our attention from ‘numbers’ to ‘operation’  Review URD’s  Feedback needed on operation, databases, interlocks