Doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1011r0 Submission September 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 Verification of Polarization Impact Model by Experimental Data Date:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /1252r0 Submission November 2009 Inter Cluster Parameters of Living Room Channel Model for 60 GHz WLAN Systems Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1387r0 Submission Nov Yan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 HEW channel modeling for system level simulation Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1214r1 September 2014 Leif Wilhelmsson, Ericsson ABSlide 1 Impact of correlated shadowing in ax system evaluations.
Radio Propagation in Hallways and Streets for UHF Communications Dana Porrat Advisor: Professor Donald Cox.
Doc.: IEEE /0630r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Verification of IEEE ad Channel Model for Enterprise Cubical Environment.
July 2015 doc.: IEEE /XXXXr0 July 2015
Submission doc.: IEEE /0808 July 2015 Songnam Hong, EricssonSlide 1 Frequency-independent Digital Precoder for Hybrid MIMO Precoding Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0844r0 Slide 1 Non-linear Multiuser MIMO for next generation WLAN Date: Authors: Shoichi Kitazawa, ATR.
Doc.: IEEE /0489r1 Submission May 2010 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 PHY Performance Evaluation with 60 GHz WLAN Channel Models Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0323r1 Submission March 2009 Vinko Erceg, BroadcomSlide 1 TGad Channel Model Requirements Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0493r1 Submission May 2010 Changsoon Choi, IHP microelectronicsSlide 1 Beamforming training for IEEE ad Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0416r1 Slide 1 Broadband Indoor TVWS Channel Measurement and Characterization at 670 MHz Date: Mar 2012 Ming-Tuo.
Doc.: IEEE /0090r0 SubmissionMartin Jacob, TU Braunschweig January 2010 Slide 1 Modeling the Dynamical Human Blockage for 60 GHz WLAN Channel.
Doc.: IEEE d_Intra-Device_Propagation_Measuremets Submission March 2015 Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE /0336r0 Submission March 2009 Alexander Maltsev, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Conference Room Channel Model for 60 GHz WLAN Systems - Summary.
Possible Indoor Channel Models for HEW System Simulations
Efficient Beam Selection for Hybrid Beamforming
March 2004 Communications Research Laboratory Slide 1 doc.: IEEE a Submission Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE /0553r1 Submission May 2009 Alexander Maltsev, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Path Loss Model Development for TGad Channel Models Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0889r0 Submission June 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Performance Gains from CCA Optimization Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0431r0 Submission April 2009 Alexander Maltsev, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Polarization Model for 60 GHz Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE c Submission March 2006 Slide 1 Chang-Soon Choi, NICT Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: d Stochastic Channel Model for Wireless Data Center Submission Match 2015 Bile Peng (TU Braunschweig). Slide 1 Project: IEEE P
Doc.: IEEE /0493r0 Submission May 2010 Changsoon Choi, IHP microelectronicsSlide 1 Beamforming training for IEEE ad Date: Authors:
November 2015 doc.: IEEE /XXXXr0 November 2015
Doc.: IEEE /1145r0 Submission September 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 SU-MIMO Configurations for IEEE ay Date: Authors:
Dr. Galal Nadim.  The root-MUltiple SIgnal Classification (root- MUSIC) super resolution algorithm is used for indoor channel characterization (estimate.
Doc.: IEEE /0161r1 Submission doc.: IEEE /0087r0 January 2010 R. Kudo, K. Ishihara and Y. Takatori (NTT) Slide 1 Measured Channel Variation.
IEEE SG3a-02/325 Submission July 9, 2002 J.M. Cramer, TRW Space and Electronics Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /1044r0 Submission September 2008 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 60 GHz WLAN Experimental Investigations Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0133r0 Submission January 2010 Alexander Maltsev, Intel TGad Channel Model Update Authors: Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1229r1 Submission November 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 Application of 60 GHz Channel Models for Comparison of TGad Proposals.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1028r0 September 2015 Shouxing Simon Qu, BlackBerry, Ltd..Slide 1 PDF of Spatial Angles Reflected from Ceiling in the Conference.
Doc.: IEEE /0632r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Experimental Measurements for Short Range LOS SU-MIMO Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0632r0 Submission May 2008 Vinko Erceg, BroadcomSlide 1 VHT 60 GHz Channel Model Recommendation Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1214r0 September 2014 Leif Wilhelmsson, Ericsson ABSlide 1 Impact of correlated shadowing in ax system evaluations.
Doc.: IEEE /327 Submission July 2002 Intel Research and Development Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /0112r2 Submission January, 2010 Hirokazu Sawada, Tohoku UniversitySlide 1 [Intra-cluster response model and parameter for channel.
Doc.: IEEE /0811r1 Submission July 2008 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 Channel Modeling for 60 GHz WLAN Systems Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE Submission Nov 2014 Link Budget Analysis for 40-50GHz Indoor Usage Date: Authors: Slide 1Jianhan Liu, Mediatek Inc.
Doc.: IEEE /0889r3 Submission June 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Performance Gains from CCA Optimization Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Interdigital Communications Submission doc.: IEEE /1333r1 November 2015 Feasibility of SU-MIMO under Array Alignment Method Date: Slide.
Doc.: IEEE /1121r0 Submission November 2009 I. Siaud, Orange LabsSlide 1 Path Loss Models for TGad Channel Models: Antenna and Dispersion Impact.
Doc.: IEEE /0372r0 Submission March, 2010 Hirokazu Sawada, Tohoku UniversitySlide 1 [Intra-cluster response model and parameter for the enterprise.
Doc.: IEEE /313r0 Submission May 2003 Val Rhodes, Cliff Prettie, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Intel SISO/MIMO WLAN Channel Propagation Results Val Rhodes.
Doc.: IEEE /0015r1 Submission Large-Scale Characteristics of 45 GHz Based on Channel Measurement Authors/contributors: Date: Presenter:
Doc.: IEEE c Submission January 2006 Ali Sadri (Intel Corporation)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
InterDigital, Inc. Submission doc.: IEEE /0911r1 July 2016 Link Level Performance Comparisons of Open Loop, Closed Loop and Antenna Selection.
Doc.: IEEE /1209r0 Submission Hotel lobby SU-MIMO channel modeling: 2x2 golden set generation Date: September 2016 Alexander Maltsev,
Doc.: IEEE /0664r0 Submission May 2010 Alexander Maltsev, Intel TGad Channel Model Update Authors: Date:
Closed Loop SU-MIMO Performance with Quantized Feedback
Open Loop vs Closed Loop SU-MIMO for 11ay
On the Channel Model for Short Range Communications
GI Overhead/Performance Impact on Open-Loop SU-MIMO
TGad interference modeling for MAC simulations
Small-Scale Characteristics of 45 GHz Based on Channel Measurement
Further Discussion on Beam Tracking for ay
Concept of Power Control in Cellular Communication Channels
Protocols for Hybrid Beamforming in ay
TGad Channel Model Update
Match 2015 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: The THz Channel Model in Wireless Data Center.
TGad July 2009 Closing Report
Further Discussion on Beam Tracking for ay
TGad September 2009 Closing Report
Update on “Channel Models for 60 GHz WLAN Systems” Document
Protocols for Hybrid Beamforming in ay
Submission Title: [Wireless Display Throughput Requirements]
TGad May 2009 Closing Report
PHY Performance Evaluation with 60 GHz WLAN Channel Models
Channel Modeling with PAA Orientations
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /1011r0 Submission September 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 Verification of Polarization Impact Model by Experimental Data Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE /1011r0 Submission September 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 2 Abstract This contribution presents results of experimental verification of the polarization impact model proposed in [1] - [3]. Using measurements results presented in [4], it is demonstrated that the proposed polarization impact model is well matched to actual experimental data obtained in a conference room environment.

doc.: IEEE /1011r0 Submission September 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 3 Introduction Accurate modeling of polarization characteristics is important for 60 GHz wireless systems where impact due to polarization mismatch can be very strong for both LOS and NLOS environments. Experimental data for the polarization impact was presented in [4] demonstrating that mismatch of polarization characteristics of the transmit and receive antennas can result in large degradations of the received signal power by dB. The model for the polarization impact was proposed in [1] - [3]. This contribution presents results of verification of the polarization model [1] - [3] with the experimental results from [4].

doc.: IEEE /1011r0 Submission Polarization Impact Model (1 of 3) Polarization impact model proposed in [1] takes into account polarization properties of antennas on both TX and RX parts and also polarization properties of propagation channel [2], [3]. Antennas polarizations are described using Jones vector e, composed of two orthogonal components of the normalized electrical field vector E. Examples of antennas polarization description using the Jones vector are shown in the table below (for more details see [1], [2]). Antenna polarization typeCorresponding Jones vector Vertical linear polarized (VLP) Horizontal linear polarized (HLP) Left hand circular polarized (LHCP) Right hand circular polarized (RHCP)

doc.: IEEE /1011r0 Submission Polarization Impact Model (2 of 3) Polarization characteristics of each cluster of the propagation channel are described by channel polarization matrix H. Polarization impact was modeled at the cluster level with all rays inside one cluster having the same polarization properties. For the LOS signal path, matrix H is close to the identity matrix (non-diagonal components responsible for depolarization may be non-zero but significantly smaller than diagonal elements). For NLOS clusters, the channel matrix H accounts for the reflection loss coefficients of the perpendicular and parallel components of the E vector and also two depolarization mechanisms (coupling between perpendicular and parallel polarization vector components due to reflection and due to geometrical depolarization). For NLOS first and second order reflected clusters statistical models were developed and corresponding distributions were obtained in [1], [2]. Note that matrix H does not include the propagation loss along the corresponding signal path. September 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 5

doc.: IEEE /1011r0 Submission Polarization Impact Model (3 of 3) For a fixed configuration of the polarizations for both TX and RX antennas (e TX, e RX ) the matrix distribution of H is reduced to the distribution of complex scalar reflection coefficient R: The proposed verification procedure is based on the comparison experimentally measured samples of R and the distributions of R obtained from numerical simulations of the polarization impact model.

doc.: IEEE /1011r0 Submission Verification Procedure The verification was done in two ways: –Direct comparison of the experimental points for R with the simulated distributions –Application of the statistical hypotheses test – null hypotheses is considered that the mean evaluated for the sample of the experimental values of R is the same as for the parameter of the simulated distribution. Two-tailed test of the hypothesis is applied and it is assumed that the variance is known. September 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 7

doc.: IEEE /1011r0 Submission Measurement Scenario Verification procedure for the polarization impact model is applied for the conference room (CR) environment scenario and the STA-STA sub-scenario. In this sub-scenario, the transmitter and receiver are placed on the table [2] in the middle of the conference room. The 60 GHz prototype [5] was used for performing experimental measurements of the polarization impact. Four different types of antenna polarizations could be set – HLP, VLP, LHCP, and RHCP on both TX and RX sides. Three different positions of the prototype in the conference room were tested. An example of the prototype position is shown in the next slide. The polarization impact was investigated for six different signal propagation paths in each position of the prototype. These are a LOS path and five reflected signal propagation paths: one first order reflection from ceiling, two first order reflections from walls, and two second order reflections from walls. (Note that other clusters exist for the used positions, but measurements were performed for the mentioned clusters only.) September 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 8

doc.: IEEE /1011r0 Submission Conference Room Floor Plan and Example of Prototype Position

doc.: IEEE /1011r0 Submission Calculation of Reflection Loss Using Measurements Data Measurements of the received baseband SNR characteristics were used in the experiments. Reflection loss coefficient R dB for each cluster can be evaluated from the experimental SNR data in accordance with the following equation: where SNR LOS is the received SNR for the LOS path and co-polarized antennas (HLP-HLP or LHCP-LHCP), SNR cluster is the received SNR for given cluster, PL LOS is the path loss for the LOS path, and PL cluster is the path loss for given cluster. All variables in the above equation are expressed in the decibel scale. Since spatial positions of TX and RX are known, the distances along the signal propagation paths can be evaluated. Estimated distances are substituted into the Friis equation to evaluate path loss values PL LOS and PL cluster. September 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 10

doc.: IEEE /1011r0 Submission Comparison of Experimental Points with Simulated Distributions for the First Order Clusters Reflected from Ceiling HLP-HLPLHCP-LHCP

doc.: IEEE /1011r0 Submission Comparison of Experimental Points with Simulated Distributions for the First Order Clusters Reflected from Ceiling (Cont’d) LHCP-RHCPLHCP-HLP

doc.: IEEE /1011r0 Submission Comparison of Experimental Points with Simulated Distributions for the First Order Clusters Reflected from Walls HLP-HLPLHCP-LHCP Polarization pairNull hypotheses for mean for significance level 5% HLP-HLPaccepted LHCP-LHCPaccepted

doc.: IEEE /1011r0 Submission Comparison of Experimental Points with Simulated Distributions for the First Order Clusters Reflected from Walls (Cont’d) LHCP-RHCPLHCP-HLP Polarization pairNull hypotheses for mean for significance level 5% LHCP-RHCPaccepted LHCP-HLPaccepted

doc.: IEEE /1011r0 Submission Comparison of Experimental Points with Simulated Distributions for the Second Order Clusters Reflected from Walls HLP-HLPLHCP-LHCP Polarization pairNull hypotheses for mean for significance level 5% HLP-HLPaccepted LHCP-LHCPaccepted

doc.: IEEE /1011r0 Submission Comparison of Experimental Points with Simulated Distributions for the Second Order Clusters Reflected from Walls (Cont’d) LHCP-RHCPLHCP-HLP Polarization pairNull hypotheses for mean for significance level 5% LHCP-RHCPaccepted LHCP-HLPaccepted

doc.: IEEE /1011r0 Submission Conclusion The proposed polarization model for the CR environment was verified by direct comparison of the experimental results and the simulated distributions as well as by application of the statistical hypotheses tests. It was shown that the proposed polarization impact model is well matched to the experimental data and can be used in channel models for the 60 GHz WLAN systems. September 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 17

doc.: IEEE /1011r0 Submission September 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 18 References 1.IEEE doc /0431r0. Polarization model for 60 GHz, A. Maltsev et al, April 2, IEEE doc /0334r3. Channel models for 60 GHz WLAN systems, A. Maltsev et al, July, IEEE doc /0860r0. Update on “Channel Models for 60 GHz WLAN Systems” document, A. Maltsev et al, July, IEEE doc /0552r0. Experimental investigation of polarization impact on 60 GHz WLAN systems, A. Maltsev et al, May 11, IEEE doc /1044r0. 60 GHz WLAN Experimental Investigations, A. Maltsev et al, Sept. 8, 2008.