Project Outline: Technical Support to EPA and RPOs Estimation of Natural Visibility Conditions over the US Project Period: June 2003- May 2008 Reports:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Air Quality and Health Scenario Stefan Falke, Rudy Husar, Frank Lindsay, David McCabe.
Advertisements

FASTNET Report: 0409RegHazeEvents04 Eastern US Regional Haze Events: Automated Detection and Documentation for 2004 Contributed by the FASNET Community,
Attribution of Haze Phase 2 and Technical Support System Project Update AoH Meeting – San Francisco, CA September 14/15, 2005 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource.
Regional Haze Rule Guidance: Tracking Progress & Natural Levels Overview of the concepts currently envisioned by EPA working groups by Marc Pitchford;
Intercontinental Transport and Climatic Effect of Air Pollutants (ICAP) Second Workshop, October 21-22, 2004, Chapel Hill, NC Intercontinental Aerosol.
NATURAL AND TRANSBOUNDARY INFLUENCES ON PARTICULATE MATTER IN THE UNITED STATES: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE EPA REGIONAL HAZE RULE Rokjin J. Park ACCESS VII,
Visualization, Exploration, and Model Comparison of NASA Air Quality Remote Sensing data via Giovanni Ana I. Prados, Gregory Leptoukh, Arun Gopalan, and.
CAPITA Projects NSF ToolsCollaboration Tools for Virtual Workgroups EPA WebVis Internet Visibility System NOAAASOS Data Evaluation EPAICAP Intercontinental.
2004 Technical Summit Overview January 26-27, 2004 Tempe, AZ.
Observation-Based Quantification of the PM and Ozone at the US-Global Boundary CAPITACAPITA, Washington University Rudolf B. Husar, PI In Cooperation with.
FASTNET. FASTNET: Year 1 Plan FASTNET Long-term plan development –Task 0 (Recommended) : Facilitate community-based FASNET long-term plan development.
2004 Workplan WRAP Regional Modeling Center Prepared by: Gail Tonnesen, University of California Riverside Ralph Morris, ENVIRON Corporation Zac Adelman,
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
November 7, 2013 WRAP Membership Meeting Denver, CO Tom Moore WRAP Air Quality Program Manager WESTAR Council.
Update on IMPROVE Light Extinction Equation and Natural Conditions Estimates Tom Moore, WRAP Technical Coordinator May 23, 2006.
DataFed Support for EPA’s Exceptional Event Rule R.B. Husar Washington University in St. Louis Presented at the workshop: Satellite and Above-Boundary.
The Central American Smoke Event of May 1998 A Draft Summary Based on Reports and Data on the Web Rudolf B. Husar and Bret Schichtel.
Causes of Haze Update Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the 5/24/05 AoH conference call.
PM Network Assessment: Speciated Network Planning Prepared for EPA OAQPS Richard Scheffe by Rudolf B. Husar Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis,
Regional Haze Rule Reasonable Progress Goals I.Overview II.Complications III.Simplifying Approaches Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Reasonable.
FASTNET. Regional Haze Rule: Nomenclature and Time Scale Schematics Goal is to attain natural conditions by 2064; Baseline is established during
RPO Monitoring Issues by Marc Pitchford, Ph.D. WRAP Ambient Monitoring & Reporting Forum Co-chair.
Exceptional Event Analysis Draft, July 13, 2005
1 The FASTNET Project Presented by: Sean Raffuse 1 Rudy Husar 2 Rich Poirot and Gary Kleiman 3 1 Sonoma Technology, Inc. 2 Center for Air Pollution Impact.
Global Distribution and Transport of Air Pollution Presented at The Haagen-Smit Symposium: From Los Angeles to Global Air Pollution Lake Arrowhead, April.
Causes of Haze Assessment Update for Fire Emissions Joint Forum -12/9/04 Meeting Marc Pitchford.
Spatio-Temporal Data Sharing using XML Web Services Presented at the Workgroup Meeting on Web-based Environmental Information System for Global Emission.
Application of ESE Data and Tools to Particulate Air Quality Management The CAPITA REASoN Project August 15, 2003 Stefan Falke and Rudolf Husar Center.
Draft, 2 June NATURAL HAZE LEVELS SENSITIVITY ASSESSMENT 1. Project Overview Ivar Tombach Regional Haze Data Analysis Workshop 8 June 2005.
1 Brian Finneran, Oregon DEQ WRAP IWG Meeting, Santa Fe December 2006 Update on Regional Haze 308 SIP Template.
NARSTO PM Assessment NARSTO PM Assessment Chapter 5: Spatial and Temporal Pattern TOC Introduction Data Global Pattern NAM Dust NAM Smoke NAM Haze NAM.
Select, Overlay, Explore; Integration of diverse data Distributed Data Heterogeneous coding, access Connects providers to users; Homogenize data access.
Source Attribution Modeling to Identify Sources of Regional Haze in Western U.S. Class I Areas Gail Tonnesen, EPA Region 8 Pat Brewer, National Park Service.
Technical Projects Update WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT November 10, 2004.
NATURAL AND TRANSBOUNDARY POLLUTION INFLUENCES ON AEROSOL CONCENTRATIONS AND VISIBILITY DEGRADATION IN THE UNITED STATES Rokjin J. Park, Daniel J. Jacob,
IMPROVE Algorithm for Estimating Light Extinction Draft Recommendations to the IMPROVE Steering Committee.
Global and Local Dust over North America Initial Assessment by a Virtual Community on Dust Coordinated by R.
Support by Inter-RPO WG - NESCAUM Performed by CAPITA & Sonoma Technology, Inc F ast A erosol S ensing T ools for N atural E vent T racking FASTNET Project.
Project Outline: Technical Support to EPA and RPOs on the Implementation of the Regional Haze Regulations Estimation of Natural Haze as Part of Total Haze.
Air and Waste Management Association Professional Development Course AIR-257: Satellite Detection of Aerosols Issues and Opportunities Fraction.
RAW and FASTNET for the Collaborative Study of Natural Aerosol Events.
Project Outline: Technical Support to EPA and RPOs on the Implementation of the Regional Haze Regulations Estimation of Natural Haze as Part of Total Haze.
Implementation Workgroup Meeting December 6, 2006 Attribution of Haze Workgroup’s Monitoring Metrics Document Status: 1)2018 Visibility Projections – Alternative.
Air Quality Data User Agencies Draft ESIP Federation Air Quality Cluster February, 2005.
Springtime Airmass Transport Pathways to the US Prepared by: Rudolf B. Husar and Bret Schichtel CAPITACAPITA,Washington University, Saint Louis, Missouri.
CAPITA Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis.
Attribution of Haze Report Update and Web Site Tutorial Implementation Work Group Meeting March 8, 2005 Joe Adlhoch Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Ambient Monitoring & Reporting Forum Plans for 2005 Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Planning Team Meeting (3/9 – 3/10/05)
The Central American Smoke Event of May 1998 A Draft Summary Based on Reports and Data on the Web Rudolf B. Husar and Bret Schichtel CAPITA, Dec 1998.
1 RPO Data Analysis/Monitoring Grant Guidance Review Extracted from the EPA’s 3/5/02 RPO 4 th Year Policy, Organizational & Technical Guidance.
Proposal Outline The Influence of Weather and Climate Events on Dust, Smoke and Sulfate Events R. Husar, PI Response to EPA STAR RFA Extreme Event Impacts.
1 SEEDS IT Vision Scenario: Smoke Impact REASoN Project: Application of NASA ESE Data and Tools to Particulate Air Quality Management (PPT/PDF)Application.
Concepts on Aerosol Characterization R.B. Husar Washington University in St. Louis Presented at EPA – OAQPS Seminar Research Triangle Park, NC, April 4,
Tools for Closure of Emissions, Observations and Models using Service Oriented Architecture Rudolf B. Husar, Washington University, USA.
Application of NASA ESE Data and Tools to Particulate Air Quality Management A proposal to NASA Earth Science REASoN Solicitation CAN-02-OES-01 REASoN:
Aerosol Pattern over Southern North America Tropospheric Aerosols: Science and Decisions in an International Community A NARSTO Technical Symposium on.
Integration of Satellite and Surface Observations during Exceptional Air Quality Events R.B. Husar, Washinton University N. Frank, US EPA R. Poroit, State.
Concepts on Aerosol Characterization R.B. Husar Washington University in St. Louis Presented at EPA – OAQPS Seminar Research Triangle Park, NC, April 4,
Key Findings from May & July 2008 WRAP Technical Workshops September 30, 2008 Steve Arnold, Colorado DPHE & Bob Kotchenruther, EPA R10 (Co-Chairs, WRAP.
BACKGROUND AEROSOL IN THE UNITED STATES: NATURAL SOURCES AND TRANSBOUNDARY POLLUTION Daniel J. Jacob and Rokjin J. Park with support from EPRI, EPA/OAQPS.
Fast Aerosol Sensing Tools for Natural Event Tracking (FASTNET) Rudolf B. Husar, P.I. Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis, Washington University,
Fire, Smoke & Air Quality: Tools for Data Exploration & Analysis : Data Sharing/Processing Infrastructure This project integrates.
Agencies Active in Air Quality and Management and Science Draft ESIP Federation Air Quality Cluster February, 2005.
Shawn McClure, Rodger Ames and Doug Fox - CIRA
AoH Phase 2 Update AoH Meeting – San Diego, CA January 25, 2006
Tom Moore (WESTAR and WRAP) and Pat Brewer (NPS ARD)
Adjusting the Regional Haze Glide path using Monitoring and Modeling Data Trends Natural Conditions International Anthropogenic Contributions.
IMPROVE Data Processing
Status of Preliminary Reasonable Progress Analysis
Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Presentation transcript:

Project Outline: Technical Support to EPA and RPOs Estimation of Natural Visibility Conditions over the US Project Period: June May 2008 Reports: 2005, 2008

The Haze Rules require States to establish and update Baseline, Natural and Current Visibility Conditions Baseline conditions represent visibility at the time the regional haze program is established Natural conditions represent the visibility conditions that would be experienced in the absence of human-caused impairment. Current condition is the most recent multiyear average, to be revised for each SIP revision. It includes showing progress from the last revision and from the baseline period. All three visibility parameters are to be derived from multiyear averaging of the best and worst 20% days

EPA Haze Rule on Natural Conditions Reaching the natural visibility conditions is the goal of the EPA visibility program. Estimating the natural and current conditions establishes how ‘‘close’’ a Class I area is to the goal, i.e. the magnitude of the human-induced ‘exceedance’ over the natural. The default annual natural visibility is 11-2 deciview for the East, 8 dv for the West. The regional natural visibility is to be derived from sulfate, nitrate, organic carbon, elemental carbon, and crustal material estimates using IMPROVE methodology. EPA along with States, tribes, and FLMs to develop and refine the technical guidance on estimating natural conditions (e.g. natural fire and dust) - hence this project?? States, in turn, will work with the FLMs, tribes and EPA in estimating their natural conditions using these guidelines at each Class I area in the time frame (2003–2005??)

Project Goal and Objective The goal of the project is to provide technical support to EPA & RPOs on: Estimation of Natural Visibility Conditions over the US Tasks and Approach: 1.Conceptual Evaluation of Natural PM and Visibility Conditions Establish Virtual Workgroup with representatives from EPA, RPOs, scientific community 2.Quantitative Estimation of Recent Regional Natural Contribution Statistics Conduct Data Analysis for estimating natural contributions (1995+, surf. and satellite obs) 3.Real-Time Estimation of Natural Aerosols and Visibility Implement a Web-based Tool for routine real-time estimation of natural aerosols/visibility

Task 1: Conceptual Evaluation of Natural PM and Visibility Conditions Establishing the main natural source types, e.g. –Windblown dust (local and distant) –Biomass smoke (forest, grass and other uncontrolled fires, local and distant) –Biogenic emissions (trees, marshes, oceans) –Sea salt Physico-chemical properties of natural aerosols –Size distribution –Chemical composition –Optical properties Evaluate suitable metrics for statistically describing natural conditions –Relevant aerosol components (e.g. SO4, NO3, OC, EC, Dust) –Spatial scales and resolution of natural events/conditions –Temporal scales and resolution of natural events/conditions

Task 2: Quantitative Estimation of Regional Natural Contributions Approach: Study each natural aerosol type in detail (dust, smoke, biogenic, sea salt) Use ALL available aerosol observations (surface and satellite) and model results Establish source strength/variability and spatio-temporal pattern at relevant scales (e.g.natural aerosol statistics) Example Natural Aerosol Analyses: Fine Dust In July, in the Southeast, Sahara dust contributes 4-8  g.m 3, about 2-4 times the local fine dust. July SeaWiFS satellite image of Sahara dust approaching the continent (July 24,1998). For more detail see: Local and Global Dust Over N. AmericaLocal and Global Dust Over N. America

Example Natural Aerosol Analyses: Biomass Smoke Satellite data show numerous small fires in the Southeast but the nature of fires is not known. Prescribed burning? Wild fires? PM2.5 conc., smoke pattern and SeaWiFS image of plumes originating from Kentucky, Nov 15, 1999.SeaWiFS For more detail see: Carbonaceous Aerosol and Smoke over the Eastern USCarbonaceous Aerosol and Smoke over the Eastern US Nov 15, 1999 Oct 5, 1998 Smoke Plumes Regional Smoke?

Task 3. Real-Time Estimation of Natural Aerosols and Visibility Real-time Aerosol Watch System (RAW) Real-Time Virtual PM Monitoring Dashboard. A web-page for one-stop access to views of current PM/Visibility monitoring data (aerosol, weather) and model output for nowcasting and forecasting. Virtual Workgroup Website. An interactive website which facilitates the active participation of diverse members in the interpretation, discussion, summary and assessment of the aerosol events. Air Quality Managers Console. Delivers a packaged PM data and summary reports prepared by the Virtual workgroups. Helps PM managers make decisions during major aerosol events. Rationale The dominant natural aerosol sources are from windblown dust and biomass smoke. Dust and smoke events can be monitored real-time by numerous surface and satellite sensors. Both are ‘episodic’, i.e. short-term extreme concentrations that require AQ management actions. The development and implementation of RAW is already being supported at CAPITA by grants from NSF, NOAA, EPA/EMAP, NASA(pending). Incremental funding from this project would support estimating ‘Natural PM/Visibility Contributions’ during such events.

Right. SeaWiFS satellite and METAR surface haze shown near-real time in the Voyager distributed data browser Below. SeaWiFS, METAR and TOMS Absorbing Aerosol Index superimposed Satellite data are fetched from NASA GSFC; surface data from NWS/CAPITA servers Illustration of RAW: Quebec Smoke, July 6, 2002

Schedule: Phase I: 2003 – Conceptual evaluation of natural conditions Analyze natural events Regional natural aerosol statistics 2005 – Interim report Phase II: 2005 – Re-evaluation of natural condition definitions Analyze natural events including model results Revised regional natural aerosol statistics 2008 – Final report