Indicator #13 Question 1 Virginia Department of Education 1.Did the LEA hold an IEP meeting to discuss measurable postsecondary goals for the student.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IEP Planning Process Beginning at age 14 the IEP should be focused on meeting the student’s postsecondary goals. The IEP is a plan for preparing the student.
Advertisements

Question 8 Virginia Department of Education 8. Does the IEP consider the strengths, interests, preferences, and needs of the student? (34 C.F.R §300.43(a)(2)
Administrative Rules Impacting Secondary Transition Florida Department of Education Revised June 2011.
Changes to Administrative Rules Impacting Secondary Transition Florida Department of Education Dr. Eric J. Smith, Commissioner.
Notification to Participate in an Individualized Education Program (IEP) Meeting Los Angeles Unified School District Division of Special Education.
Excusal of IEP Members Clarification. Federal News Excusal Of IEP team members –If a required member of the IEP team will not be in attendance, the district.
TRANSITION SUMMER INSTITUTE 2014 INDICATOR 13 BASIC REQUIREMENTS.
The IEP Individualized Educational Program. The IEP is the process and document that outlines what a free appropriate public education (FAPE) is for an.
1 ADVOCACYDENVER Special Education 101 Pamela Bisceglia Advocate for Children and Inclusive Policy Implementation August 31, 2011.
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Transition.
Section 1 Demographic Information Podcast Script Laura LaMore, Consultant, OSE-EIS July 13,
Transition 101 I-13 Compliance: Transition Activities for Before, During and After the IEP Meeting.
Checklist and Example of Goals. 1. KIDS ID________________ Student Name______________________ 2. District Number____________ 3. IEP Date___________________.
MN CIMP 2012 COMPLIANCE FOR PARTS OF THE IEP. Compliance Self-Check.
Transition and Indicator 13 Writing Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) That Meet the Legal Mandate A Webinar Series Presented by The California Community.
Pre-test Please come in and complete your pre-test.
IEP Training for Kansas Schools
Section 3: Secondary Transition Considerations Podcast Script Laura LaMore, Consultant, OSE-EIS July 13,
INDICATORS 11 AND 13 Bureau of Indian Education Division of Performance and Accountability WebEx October 18, 2011 DESK AUDIT.
From Here to Here Transition from Infant and Toddler Connection Programs to ECSE School Division Programs.
Indicator 13 August, Contacts Paul Sherman, DPI Procedural Compliance Workgroup, or
Early Childhood Transition Presenters: Kimberly Mitchell Ginger Sheppard Jessica Spataro NOVEMBER 2011.
October 10, The Texas Education Agency has recently clarified and expanded the use of Prior Written Notice (PWN) in Special Education.
Part B Indicator 13 FFY 09 SPP/APR Writing Suggestions Western Regional Resource Center APR Clinic 2010 November 1-3 San Francisco, California.
1 Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements. 2 Today’s Agenda Parent Survey Results Procedural Compliance Self Assessment Results.
Transition 101 Practical Guide to Transition Services.
Transition and the IEP Why is effective transition planning important?
CHRISTINA SPECTOR WENDI SCHREITER ERIN ARANGO-ESCALANTE IDEA Part C to Part B Transition.
1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)
Tennessee Department of Education Compliance Training February 2012 Department of Exceptional Children.
FAQs about New Transition Plans DSD Related Services Department 1/27/2012.
Indicator 13 Kentucky Transition Compliance & Kentucky Continuous Monitoring Process Referencing Kentucky Compliance Record Review School Year
What does Indicator #13 say? Virginia Department of Education  “Percent of youth with IEPs aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes appropriate measurable.
Transition Plans A results-oriented process that focuses on improving the academic and functional achievement of the child with a disability to facilitate.
2010 B13 Data Collection March 24, 2010 Craig Wiles Public Sector Consultants Chuck Saur MI-TOP.
Indicator 13 Assessment Webcast Section 3: Evaluating Transition Plans Complete by November 15, 2011.
B 13 Secondary Transition Preparing for the 2015 IEP Review and Data Collection.
Secondary Transition Services YTP Statewide Conference Hood River, Oregon February 18, 2010 February 2010Oregon Department of Education1.
District 214 – Transition Planning System Buffalo Grove High School Special Education Department.
Transition Outcomes Project Data Collection for Program Improvement NSTTAC Secondary Transition State Planning Institute May 2, 2007 Ed O’Leary, MPRRC.
1 Transition: Part C to Part B Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Spring/Summer 2007.
How to write great transition IEPs and meet compliance for Indicator 13!
618: Transition Resources:  Transition overview (home and family articles)
Post Secondary Transition CANAR, NOVEMBER 12, 2015.
2 Fine Tuning the IEP: Effective Practices for Transition Planning.
The Transition IEP: Vehicle to Membership in the Adult Community.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Department of Education California Department of.
Improving Secondary Transition Services: Meeting the Requirements of Indicator 13 National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center.
SPECIAL EDUCATION BASICS Adrienne Volenik Education Rights Clinic University of Richmond School of Law
Post-Secondary Transition. Kentucky Transition Indicator 13 “Sub-Indicators” 49a Postsecondary Goals 49b Transition Services 49c Agency Involvement 49d.
Categorical Findings of Noncompliance March 24, 2011 Guidance & Intensive Technical Assistance Related to Correction of Noncompliance for SY
IEP Team. Develops the IEP including the transition component for a single student.
Secondary Transition Overview Douglas County ESD Jackie Burr Secondary Transition Specialist November 15, 2007.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Individualized Education Programs Evaluations and Reevaluations.
Implementing IDEA 2004: 2007 Changes to NYS’ Special Education Law and Regulations CSE/CPSE Meeting Membership Individualized Education Programs Continuum.
Improving Secondary Transition Services: Meeting the Requirements of Indicator 13 National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center.
Transition Plan Writing for the School Year.
Post-Secondary Transition
Who is a member? The IEP Team: How to Operate the Slide:
Mission Possible: Planning a Successful Life for Students with Intellectual Disabilities TAC it up! VCU T/TAC May 2010.
Indicator 13, Secondary Transition IEP Record Reviews
Standards-based Individualized Education Program: Module Eight: Additional Components Specific to Secondary IEPs SBIEP Module Eight: Additional Components.
The Iep Team: Who’s a member? How to Operate the Slide:
Post-Secondary Transition
The Iep Team: Who’s a member? How to Operate the Slide:
Transition Outcomes Project Report Out Meeting
Presented By: Eric G. Rodriguez
Who is a member? The IEP Team: How to Operate the Slide:
Who is a member? The IEP Team: How to Operate the Slide:
Transition Requirements for Schools
Presentation transcript:

Indicator #13 Question 1 Virginia Department of Education 1.Did the LEA hold an IEP meeting to discuss measurable postsecondary goals for the student and the transition services needed to assist the student in reaching those goals? (34 C.F.R. § (b)) ___Yes ___No

Indicator #13 Question 2 Virginia Department of Education 2.Is there documentation that a parent(s)/guardian notice of the meeting was provided? (34 C.F.R.§ (a)) ___Yes ___No

Indicator #13 Question 3 Virginia Department of Education 3.If the student has reached the age of majority or if a purpose of the meeting is the consideration of postsecondary goals and transition services, is there documentation that the student was provided notice of the meeting? (34 C.F.R. § (a)) and (34 C.F.R. § (b)(1)) ___Yes ___No

Indicator #13 Question 4 Virginia Department of Education 4. Did the student attend the IEP meeting? ___Yes ___No

Indicator #13 Question 4a Virginia Department of Education 4a. If no, did the LEA take other steps to ensure that the student’s strengths, preferences, and interests were considered? (34 C.F.R. § (b)(2)) ___Yes ___No

Indicator #13 Question 5 Virginia Department of Education 5. Do the parent(s)/guardian and the student meeting notices indicate that a purpose of the meeting will be the consideration of the postsecondary goals and transition services? (34 C.F.R. § (b)(2)) ___Yes ___No

Indicator #13 Question 6 Virginia Department of Education 6. Does the IEP include a statement, if appropriate, regarding the student’s need for involvement from any outside agency in order to make a successful transition? (34 C.F.R. § (b)(3)) and 8 VAC G 10 b ___ Yes ___No ___N/A

Indicator #13 Question 6 Note Virginia Department of Education Note: (For students 16 or older) If the student is 16 or older and the IEP Team has determined agency linkage is not required at this time, yes is selected only if there is a statement that no outside agency is likely to pay or provide transition services.

Indicator #13 Question 6 Note Virginia Department of Education Note: (For students under 16) When the IEP being reviewed is for a student under 16 and the IEP Team has determined agency involvement is likely, you may select yes. If the IEP Team determined agency involvement is not needed at this time, N/A may be selected even when there is no statement of need for involvement from an outside agency.

Indicator #13 Question 7 Virginia Department of Education 7.If an outside agency representative is invited to the IEP Team meeting, is there documentation that the parent(s)/guardian and student meeting notice identifies the other agency representative that will be invited to attend? (34 C.F.R. § (b)(2)(ii)) ___Yes ___No ___N/A

Indicator #13 Question 7 Note Virginia Department of Education Note: If the IEP Team determines that outside agency involvement is not appropriate during the IEP cycle, check N/A. When Question 7 is N/A, use N/A for Questions 7a and 7b.

Indicator #13 Question 7a Virginia Department of Education 7a. To the extent appropriate, is there evidence that the LEA made a reasonable effort to obtain prior consent of the parent(s)/guardian or student who has reached the age of majority? (34 C.F.R. § (b)(3)) ___Yes ___No ___N/A

Indicator #13 Question 7b Virginia Department of Education 7b. If yes to 7a, and if there is evidence of prior consent of the parent(s)/guardian or student who has reached the age of majority to invite an outside agency representative, is there evidence that the outside agency representative was invited to the meeting? (34 C.F.R. § (b)(3)) ___Yes ___No ___N/A

Indicator #13 Question 7b Note Virginia Department of Education Note: Consent means written consent (34 C.F.R. §300.9). N/A may be checked when prior consent of the parent(s)/guardian or student who has reached the age of majority has not been obtained.