Best Practices in Transit Rider Survey Data Collection Chris Tatham Sr. Vice President, CEO, ETC Institute 725 W. Frontier Circle Olathe, KS 66061 913-254-4512.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Debugging ACL Scripts.
Advertisements

HES Data Management Ari Haukijärvi. Planning of HES Data Management Purpose of the data management The data will be available for analysis The available.
Parsons Brinckerhoff Chicago, Illinois GIS Estimation of Transit Access Parameters for Mode Choice Models GIS in Transit Conference October 16-17, 2013.
PASSENGER O-D TRIP TABLE FROM FAREBOX RECEIPTS Kelly Chan 2013 GIS in Transit Conference, October 16, 2013.
Conducting Income Survey’s Indiana Office of Community and Rural Affairs “Serving Indiana’s rural communities through technical, financial and personal.
STRATEGIES FOR ORGANIZATION, VALIDATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF TRANSIT GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS DATA Jonathan Wade Manager, Service Development Support.
11 Tunde Balvanyos, Ph.D. Bus Rapid Transit Coordinator, Pace APTA BRT May 2009.
An Approach for Base Transit Trip Matrix Development: Sound Transit EMME/2 Model Experience Sujay Davuluri Parsons Brinckerhoff Inc., Seattle October,
The Current State and Future of the Regional Multi-Modal Travel Demand Forecasting Model.
Multiple-operator Transit Traveler Information New York State Department of Transportation From TRIPS123 to 511 NY.
Advanced Public Transit Systems (APTS) Transit ITS CEE582.
Cheryl Thole, Jennifer Flynn CUTR/NBRTI, Senior Research Associates Transit in GIS Conference September 14, 2011 St. Petersburg, Florida.
ON-BOARD TRANSIT SURVEYS IN PHILADELPHIA - Where we’ve been, and - Where we’re going Brad S. Lane, AICP May 21, 2015.
Opportunities & Challenges Using Passively Collected Data In Travel Demand Modeling 15 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic.
An Application of Mitigating Flow Bias from Origin/Destination Surveys in a Transit System Jamie Snow (AECOM) David Schmitt (AECOM) May 20, 2015.
Transit Traveler Information CEE582. Fixed-Route Central ControlCustomer Information Wireless Data On-Off Load Data Radio/ Message and AVL Transmission.
Survey Design Training OFFICE OF PLANNING, RESEARCH & INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS CAÑADA COLLEGE.
Trip Reconstruction Tool for GPS- Based Personal Travel Surveys Eui-Hwan Chung.
Conversion of Volunteer-Collected GPS Diary Data into Travel Time Performance Measures Research Project Conducted for PC : Terry Keener PD : Michael.
GIS Techniques and Algorithms to Automate the Processing of GPS- Derived Travel Survey Data Praprut Songchitruksa, Ph.D., P.E. Mark Ojah Texas A&M Transportation.
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation leadership you can trust. Innovative Approach to Transit On-board Data Collection.
1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.
KY Module 3: Geocoding and GPS. What is the single hardest information to get from a travel survey? Location, location, location What is the address of.
1 GIS Transit Applications in Fairfax County, VA Brendan Ford Department of Information Technology (GIS) Wendy Jia Department of Transportation June, 1999.
Short Range Transit Improvement Plan CITY OF HIGHPOINT Sounding Board Meeting Educational Session 101 May 29, 2014.
C M Clarke-Hill1 Collecting Quantitative Data Samples Surveys Pitfalls etc... Research Methods.
Field Direct, A Field Inspection Application Designed to Improve Data Integrity and Accessibility for Management Oversight Kari Ward, PMP IT Project Manager.
A Spatial Analysis of Orange Line Rider Demographics November 1, 2012By Tamar Sarkisian.
Presented to MTF Transit Committee presented by Scott Seeburger, Myung Sung, Dave Schmitt & Peter Haliburton November 20, Tri-Rail On-Board Survey.
STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF TRANSIT ONBOARD SURVEY RESULTS AND METHODS Kathleen Yu, Arash Mirzaei, Behruz Paschai, Hua Yang North Central Texas Council of.
Welcome to the TSIP Project Webinar Planning Technical Working Group 28 July – 3:30 pm.
Travel Speed Study of Urban Streets Using GPS &GIS Tom E. Sellsted City of Yakima, Washington Information Systems and Traffic.
USING SENSECAM TO PURSUE “GROUND TRUTH” FOR GPS TRAVEL SURVEY Ohio, May th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Li Shen and Peter.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 18: Demand Forecasting.
Big Data “Triage” for Long Range Planning Transportation Engineering and Safety Conference Reuben S MacMartin December 12, 2014.
On-Board Transit Survey Presentation to TCC Dec. 13, 2002 Heather Alhadeff, AICP
Is Transit Part of the Equation? Is Transit Part of the Equation? Travel Data Users Forum: How Will the Changing Cost of Energy Affect Personal Travel?
Prepared by: DECEMBER 2008 Metro Transit Light- Rail and Bus Rider Survey FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PERISCOPE.
Urban Freight Data Collection 1 Jeffrey Wojtowicz VREF Center of Excellence for Sustainable Urban Freight Systems.
0 GIS Applications for Origin- Destination Surveys Greg Spitz and John Lobb Resource Systems Group Daniel Jacobs MTA.
Sample Expansion for Transit Rider Surveys Experiments with Two Rail Systems.
ArcGIS Data Reviewer: An Introduction
Deducing Mode and Purpose from GPS Data Peter Stopher, Jun Zhang and Eoin Clifford Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies The University of Sydney.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Timetabling Components Unit 5: Staff & Fleet Scheduling.
MATRIX ADJUSTMENT MACRO (DEMADJ.MAC AND DEMADJT.MAC) APPLICATIONS: SEATTLE EXPERIENCE Murli K. Adury Youssef Dehghani Sujay Davuluri Parsons Brinckerhoff.
Combining EMME/2 and ArcView GIS: The CAPITAL Model Case Study.
Ying Chen, AICP, PTP, Parsons Brinckerhoff Ronald Eash, PE, Parsons Brinckerhoff Mary Lupa, AICP, Parsons Brinckerhoff 13 th TRB Transportation Planning.
Presented to MTF Transit Committee presented by David Schmitt, AICP November 20, 2008 FSUTMS Transit Survey Applied Research.
Transit Signal Priority (TSP). Problem: Transit vehicles are slow Problem: Transit vehicles are effected even more than cars by traffic lights –The number.
FDOT Transit Office Modeling Initiatives The Transit Office has undertaken a number of initiatives in collaboration with the Systems Planning Office and.
FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts1March 2009FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts1March 2009 Charlotte South Corridor LRT Bill.
Chapter Eleven The entire group of people about whom information is needed; also called the universe or population of interest. The process of obtaining.
1 FSUTMS-Voyager: Transit Standards within Evolving FSUTMS Summary Presentation Florida Model Task Force Tampa, Florida December 13 th, slides.
May 2009TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference 1 PATHBUILDER TESTS USING 2007 DALLAS ON-BOARD SURVEY Hua Yang, Arash Mirzaei, Kathleen.
Verification & Validation. Batch processing In a batch processing system, documents such as sales orders are collected into batches of typically 50 documents.
1 Palm Tran Transit Survey Coordination Meeting November 18 th, 2008.
Topics Survey data comparisons to “old” model Bluetooth OD data findings Freight model design Q & A.
Transit Choices BaltimoreLink Ad-hoc Committee Meeting January 12, 2016.
Walk Statistics.  The question has been asked: “Is Lomas a better BRT corridor than Central?”  The purpose of this analysis is to compare the two corridors.
Responses to Gas Prices in Knoxville, TN Vince Bernardin, Jr., Ph.D. Vince Bernardin, Jr., Ph.D. Bernardin, Lochmueller & Associates Mike Conger, P.E.
The Potential of Using the Smart Card Data to Define the Use of Public Transit in Seoul Dr. Jin Young Park The Korea Transport Institute Dept. of Metropolitan.
PPTA - April 2016 A CT 44 D ATA R EPORTING QC P LAN E LEMENTS, T HEMES AND O PPORTUNITIES.
Use Survey to Improve the DFX Transit Model
TRB Planning Application Conference, May 2017
Staten Island Bus Study Public Workshop
Using GIS to Create Demand Response Service Schedule Zones and Times
PowerCampus: PowerUP! Saving time in the Enrollment Office
The Computer-Assisted Personal
Geocoding of 2007 WMATA Rail Survey
Transit Survey White Paper
Presentation transcript:

Best Practices in Transit Rider Survey Data Collection Chris Tatham Sr. Vice President, CEO, ETC Institute 725 W. Frontier Circle Olathe, KS May 11, 2011

n Challenges with On-Board Data Collection n Methods to Address the Challenges 1.Use of Personal Interviews/Tablet PCs 2.GPS-Based Boarding/Alighting Counts 3.Use of GIS-Based Edit Check Programs 4.Data Expansion at the Stop/Segment Level n Questions Agenda

n Quality of the Data Accuracy of address information (origins, destinations, and home addresses) Accuracy of boarding/alighting locations Accuracy of transfers Missing information (income and other key demographics) n Distribution of the Sample Major stops along a route under-represented Short-trips under-represented Key demographic groups under-represented n Methods to Address the Challenges n Questions Challenges

n Advantages of Personal Interview More accurate More complete More representative –key groups are not under-represented n Advantages of Tablet PCs Details about the study area/transit system can be pre-programmed Less time to administer (helps capture short trips) Less time between data collection in the field and implementation 1. Tablet PCs and Personal Interviews

Tablet PC vs. Self Administered Combined results of pilot tests in Atlanta (2009), Phoenix (2010), and Nashville (2011)

Reasons Tablet PCs Enhance Data Quality and Sampling Tablet PCs can be programmed with information to improve the quality of the data collected Route location and stops pre-loaded Transfers along the route are pre-loaded Street names and major attractions/destinations are pre-loaded Methodology enhances the representativeness of the sample Skip patterns reduce the length of the survey, which helps ensure that short-trips are represented Persons who cannot read and others who may not be able to complete a paper survey are included

How Tablet PCs Work in the Field

Bus route numbers pulled from the GIS layer shown on a dynamic map later in the survey How Tablet PCs Work in the Field

Zoomed-in. Selected stop flagged in yellow. Stop ID, coordinates, and name saved to survey record. How Tablet PCs Work in the Field

Zoomed-in. Selected stop flagged in yellow. Stop ID, coordinates, and name saved to survey record. How Tablet PCs Work in the Field

2. GPS-Based Boarding/Alighting Counts n Improves accuracy of the boarding and alighting locations n Helps agencies locate the actual boarding location if good stop address information is not available Build accurate stop lists for specific routes n Helps link boarding and alighting counts with survey data ‘

Results are saved in a database table as well as individual “Stop” files. A continuous GPS log is also saved for the trip.

n Following the collection of the survey data in the field, GIS-based edit checks allow you to check the logic and accuracy of the data collected Allows Visual Review of: All key points on the trip (home, origin, boarding location, alighting location, and destination) Transfers Mode of travel relative to the access/egress distances Travel distance on transit compared to the total length of the trip 3. GIS Based Edit Check Programs

Edit Check Programs Interface with Google to Allow Accurate Trip Corrections

4. Data Expansion By Stop/Segment Traditional methods expand data by direction and time of day Problems can result if the distribution of the sample is not representative of the actual ridership along the route Too many surveys are often collected at the end of the line or places where the respondents have more time to complete the survey If the locations of boardings are not adjusted to the actual boardings at key stops along a route, data expansion will only multiply the poor distribution obtained in the field.

Relies on accurate boarding and alighting counts at the stop/station level Requires a good locational distribution of surveys in the field Bus Expansion By Time of Time By Direction By Location Each route divided into major stops/segments Rail Expansion: By Time of Day By Direction By Path (BOARDING STATION to ALIGHTING STATION) Data Expansion By Stop/Segment METHODOLOGY

Data Expansion - BUS

Data Expansion - RAIL 31

 Good on-board transit survey data collection starts with good training and oversight of the people administering the survey.  Once the basics are in place, the methods discussed today can be used to enhance the overall quality of the data collected  Table PCs  GPS-Based Boarding/Alighting Counts  GIS-Based Edit Check Programs  Data Expansion at the Stop/Segment Level  The practical application of these techniques will be impacted by budget Summary

Questions ???