HB 446/SB 142 Standards for Out-of-State Placement of Ohio Children Stakeholder Meeting April 6, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Regulatory Perspective
Advertisements

Correctional Certification Subpart 1. Purpose: establish program certification requirements that govern facilities providing correctional program.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
1 Transitional Services Certification Minnesota Rules
Runaways and the ICJ 2013 Annual Business Meeting.
ECE II Objective 2.01 Interpret licensing requirements for early childhood programs.
Treatment Plans and Administrative Case Reviews In a Nutshell.
Child Welfare Services Family centered services to achieve well- being through ensuring self-sufficiency, support, safety, and permanence. Dual tracks-
“Reform of the Child Care System: Taking Stock and Accelerating Action” South East Europe 3 – 6 July 2007, Sofia.
A court dedicated to protecting children and promoting families
Who Must Comply? When is a patient authorization NOT required?  As needed for the protection of federal and state elective constitutional officers and.
Eileen Hileman Administrative Assistant for School Nutrition Programs MS, RD.... Pam Heimbach.
OCYF Webinar ACA and Former Foster Youth. Former Foster Youth Eligibility Youth who at any time on or after their 18 th birthday were in Pennsylvania’s.
OACCA Public Policy Presentation Theme: Fast & changing world of health care & social services.
9/2/20151 Ohio Family and Children First An overview of OFCF structure, membership, and responsibilities.
205: Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children 1.
Memo Series Overview  Requirements  Frequently Asked Questions  Reports  Reporting to the Federal Government Did Wisconsin Make the target.
AT-RISK STUDENT ELIGIBILITY AND REQUIREMENTS State Compensatory Education Resource information from TEA.
Epinephrine Auto-Injector Use – Other State Statutes and Legislation SB1197 Workgroup Joe Hilbert Director of Governmental and Regulatory Affairs May 27,
AB490 + San Francisco County’s Interagency Agreement.
411: Overview of Child Welfare and Fiscal. The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Resource Center Agenda Introductions Overview of the Child Welfare System and.
Interstate Compact for Juveniles Amendment Training for Rules Effective April 1, 2014.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA) Office of Non-Public Education Office of Innovation and Improvement Office of Special.
What is the Interstate Compact? The Compact is a uniform law, adopted in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and the U.S. Virgin Islands, for the purpose.
Rules Round-Table Discussion 2013 Annual Business Meeting.
Department of Human Services
Session III: ICJ Working with ICPC Presenters: Rose Ann Bisch (MN) Carla Fults (AAICPC)
Washington – Oregon ICPC Border Agreement Training.
Kenny A vs State Principles Georgia’s Child Welfare System must actively promote the opportunity for children to grow up with in a family. Family contacts.
“State Authorization” of Distance Education Challenges/Barriers/Opportunities Shellie L. Haut September 16, 2015.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
ICAMA & ICPC Liz Oppenheim Summit of the States on Interstate Cooperation National Center for Interstate Compacts June 1-2, 2006.
Special Education Compliance Monitoring. 3 Phases of Compliance Monitoring Review Pre-Site phase Pre-Site phase On-Site phase On-Site phase Post-Site.
11/28/12 1 CALIFORNIA FOSTERING CONNECTIONS TO SUCCESS ACT Version 2.0 Assembly Bill 12.
Public Children Services Association of Ohio SAFE CHILDREN, STABLE FAMILIES, SUPPORTIVE COMMUNITIES.
How to Survive A RCCL Relicensure Tanya Coleman, MSW Specialist Surveyor Supervisor Stronger Families for a Stronger Georgia February/March 2016.
Subsidy Monitoring Visits Tony Turner. 6/24/20162 Purpose: Ensure compliance with grant rules and approved application Provide technical and programmatic.
April 29-30, Review information related to the RF monitoring system Ensure that the agency meets its ongoing obligation to have a monitoring system.
Juvenile Legislative Update 2013 Confidential Records and Protected Disclosures.
Juvenile Legislative Update 2013 Confidentiality of Records and Interagency Sharing of Educational Records.
Bridges.
Introduction to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
Overview of Foster Care
A court dedicated to protecting children and promoting families
Completing the circle: concurrent planning and the use of Family Finding, Blended perspective meetings, and family group decision making processes.
Congregate Care in Ohio
Washington – Oregon ICPC Border Agreement Training
The Role of Education/Special Education Decision Makers
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
Confidential Records and Protected Disclosures
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
The Office of Residential Child Care (ORCC) and Office of Provider Management (OPM) Standardization Project Presenters: LaMarva E. Ivory, ORCC Director.
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services January 23, 2015
Division of ACF / Assisted Living Surveillance
4 Domains Child Welfare, Juvenile Education and Mental/Health
Ongoing Assessment and Permanency
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
DRAFT - FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
DIVISION E—HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES EXTENDERS
WI Act 185 Implementation Update
Establishing Oversight Mechanisms
Background checks are required by state and federal law prior to CA/DCYF staff authorizing an individual (other than a parent) to have unsupervised access.
Presented By: Eric G. Rodriguez
Psychotropic Medication Use by Children in Texas Foster Care:
Extended court jurisdiction
Foster Care to 21 Carl E. Ayers, MSW
Florida’s New Guardianship Assistance Program
Family First Protection Service Act (FFPSA)
Presentation transcript:

HB 446/SB 142 Standards for Out-of-State Placement of Ohio Children Stakeholder Meeting April 6, 2010

OOS Placement Methods 3 Types of Out-of-State (OOS) Placement Methods  Juvenile court “commitments” (ORC , , )  Juvenile court “detention holdings” (ORC , )  Child welfare “placements” (ORC , 5103)  Occurs through the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children (ICPC) law, administered by ODJFS. Some of these youth may also be adjudicated delinquent.  Settings: group home, residential center, parent, relative, adoptive home

Child Welfare Placement Process  OOS “placements” into residential centers and group homes are made by custodial agencies -- juvenile courts and public children services agencies (PCSA)  PCSAs must have placements approved by the other state’s ICPC administrator  Required paperwork: JFS 01661, JFS 02424, narrative, child information, child summary, reason for placement, case plan  For delinquent children placed in residential centers, documentation indicating placement is not available in the PCSA’s jurisdiction and the placement is in the best interest of the child and will not produce undue hardship on the child. Source: OAC

Child Welfare Placement Monitoring Requirements for the Ohio sending agency:  Case planning  Semiannual administrative reviews  Visitation  Request an OOS agency to provide supervision and services and submit written supervisory reports monthly  Contact the placement setting within 10 days of placement and at least every other month thereafter  Conduct monthly face-to-face visits with the child within the substitute care setting. The sending agency may request the supervising agency in the other state to conduct these visits (OAC )  Sending agencies may enter into agreements with licensed agencies or persons in the receiving state to conduct assessments and provide supervision for children in placement. (ORC VII, A, 3)

Focus of Concern Ohio children who are placed OOS into residential centers and group homes (i.e. child welfare placements pursuant to ORC , 5103).  Frequency: 275 placements during  Location: Indiana (91), Pennsylvania (62), Utah (62), and across 13 other states (60)  56% of placements occur in border states

Explanation of Concern Ohio children in OOS placement deserve to have Ohio’s high quality level of standards protect them.  Key issues: mechanical restraint, chemical restraint, physical restraint, isolation, confinement Ohio law and regulations do not ‘follow’ children in OOS placement. Instead, the other state’s laws apply, which usually offer less protections. While custodial agencies may stipulate in their contracts with OOS providers that all or some Ohio standards must apply to a child’s placement, this practice is optional, and there is no state enforcement or monitoring of these special contract stipulations.

Purpose of HB 446 Ensure that Ohio children who are placed in OOS residential centers and group homes are protected by Ohio law and regulation (i.e. “Ohio standards”)  The laws and regulations on children in substitute care settings are enforced by ODJFS, ODMH, and to a lesser extent, ODDD

HB 446 Provisions 1.ODJFS-ODMH Rule Making The rules must establish:  procedures for verifying if the OOS entity complies with Ohio standards;  a list of eligible OOS entities that are in compliance;  procedures for transferring a child back to Ohio if the OOS entity is determined to be out of compliance after the placement occurs;  fee structure for the OOS entities that seek to receive Ohio children for placement (perhaps application & ongoing monitoring fees), and;  any other procedure or requirement necessary.

HB 446 Provisions 2. Applicable Out-of-State Entities Any “agency, home, school, camp, institution, or other entity or residential facility”. This could be interpreted to include ALL substitute care settings, even kinship and adoptive placements.

HB 446 Provisions 3. Applicable Child Placement Methods  Juvenile court “commitments” (ORC , , )  Juvenile court “detention holdings” (ORC , )  Child welfare “placements” (ORC , 5103)  Occurs through the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children (ICPC) law, administered by ODJFS. Some of these youth may also be adjudicated delinquent.  Settings: group home, residential center, parent, relative, adoptive home

Other States CT, TX, GA, MN, NY, NJ, WV, KY, & PA each address OOS placements differently. Some: Require in-state visitation and contact standards to apply Require monthly written progress reports Require annual or semi-annual in-person caseworker visits by sending state Limit OOS placements to border states State agency director approval required Require state agency to submit annual report of OOS placement statistics to state legislature Certify that the receiving OOS entities meet in-state standards Subject OOS entities to inspections, evaluation, and approval by the sending state Establish an in-state real-time bed vacancy website

HB 446 Concerns (See handout)