3-4 March 2009Advanced QED Methods for Future Accelerators Introduction and Scope I. Bailey Cockcroft Institute / Lancaster University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Photon Collimation For The ILC Positron Target Lei Zang The University of Liverpool Cockcroft Institute 24 th March 2007.
Advertisements

Liverpool Accelerator Physics Group International Linear Collider (ILC) R&D The Cockcroft Institute The University of Liverpool is the lead organisation.
Helical Collaboration I.R. Bailey, P. Cooke, J.B. Dainton, K. Hock,L.J. Jenner, L.I. Malysheva, L. Zang (University of Liverpool / Cockcroft Institute)
Mike Jenkins and Ian Bailey. Positron Requirements of a New Collider CLIC SLCILC LHeC 6.0x10 12 e + /s 3.9x10 14 e + /s 4.0x10 16 e + /s 1.1x10 14 e +
Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
GUINEA-PIG: A tool for beam-beam effect study C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay Daresbury, April 2006.
CARE07, 29 Oct Alexej Grudiev, New CLIC parameters. The new CLIC parameters Alexej Grudiev.
31st May 2007LCWS1 Robust Spin Polarisation Status Helical Collaboration I.R. Bailey, P. Cooke, J.B. Dainton, L.J. Jenner, L.I. Malysheva (University of.
E166 “Polarized Positrons for Future Linear Colliders” John C. Sheppard E166 Co-spokesman SLAC: August 31, 2004.
Liverpool Accelerator Physics Group International Linear Collider (ILC) R&D The Cockcroft Institute The University of Liverpool is the lead organisation.
Software Tools The heLiCal collaboration J.A. Clarke +, N.A. Collomb, O.B. Malyshev +, N.C. Ryder, D.J. Scott +, B.J.A. Shepherd + STFC ASTeC Daresbury.
Status of the HELICAL contribution to the polarised positron source for the International Linear Collider The positron source for the International Linear.
27 June 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit ILC BDS 27 June 06.
Software Tools The heLiCal collaboration A. Birch +, J.A. Clarke +, O.B. Malyshev +, D.J. Scott +, B.J.A. Shepherd + STFC ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory, Daresbury,
ILC BDS Collimation Optimisation and PLACET simulations Adina Toader School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester & Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury.
K. Moffeit 6 Jan 2005 WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at the International Linear Collider SLAC January 6-8, 2005 Polarimetry at the ILC Design issues.
ILC BDS Collimation Optimisation and PLACET simulations Adina Toader School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester & Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury.
20 March 2005Ken Moffeit LCWS1 Highlights from the MDI workshop Spin Rotation System for 2 IR’s Downstream polarimetry Ken Moffeit.
2 February 2005Ken Moffeit Spin Rotation scheme for two IRs Ken Moffeit SLAC.
Progress towards nanometre-level beam stabilisation at ATF2 N. Blaskovic, D. R. Bett, P. N. Burrows, G. B. Christian, C. Perry John Adams Institute, University.
Electron and Ion Spin Dynamics in eRHIC V. Ptitsyn Workshop on Polarized Sources, Targets and Polarimetry Charlottesville, VA, 2013.
The Detector and Interaction Region for a Photon Collider at TESLA
Software Tools Beam-Beam TESLA damping ring As part of a study to choose the optimum damping ring configuration for the ILC, the depolarisation effects.
Photon Collider at CLIC Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk LCWS 2001, Granada, Spain, September 25-30,2011.
Summary of the Working Groups - Polarization -  Technical Aspects Conveners: Gudrid Moortgat-Pick,Louis Rinolfi, Sabine Riemann, Valery Telnov International.
Incoherent pair background processes with full polarizations at the ILC Anthony Hartin JAI, Oxford University Physics, Denys Wilkinson Building, Keble.
Ian Bailey University of Liverpool / Cockcroft Institute Depolarization Effects and Other Aspects.
Polarimetry at the LC Source Which type of polarimetry, at which energies for LC ? Sabine Riemann (DESY), LEPOL Group International Workshop on Linear.
Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC Ji Qiang US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006.
12th April 2007Cockcroft Institute1 WP2.3 - Robust Spin Polarisation Status Helical Collaboration I.R. Bailey, P. Cooke, J.B. Dainton, L.J. Jenner, L.I.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, 2001 Polarized Proton Acceleration and Collisions Spin dynamics and Siberian Snakes Polarized proton acceleration.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
1 Options for low energy spin manipulation Ken Moffeit, SLAC 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 29 September to 3 October 2009 K. Moffeit, D.
Development of a Low-latency, High-precision, Intra-train Beam Feedback System Based on Cavity Beam Position Monitors N. Blaskovic Kraljevic, D. R. Bett,
November 14, 2004First ILC Workshop1 CESR-c Wiggler Dynamics D.Rubin -Objectives -Specifications -Modeling and simulation -Machine measurements/ analysis.
19 July 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit (via Eric Torrence) VLCW06 19 July 06.
1 Overview of Polarimetry Outline of Talk Polarized Physics Machine-Detector Interface Issues Upstream Polarimeter Downstream Polarimeter Ken Moffeit,
Spin Control and Transportation O. Adeyemi*, M. Beckmann**, V. Kovalenko*, L. Malysheva*, G. Moortgat-Pick*, S. Riemann**, A. Schälicke**, A. Ushakov**
Implementation and study of depolarizing effects in GUINEA-PIG++ beam-beam interaction simulation Advanced QED Methods for Future Accelerators 3 rd -4.
ERHIC with Self-Polarizing Electron Ring V.Ptitsyn, J.Kewisch, B.Parker, S.Peggs, D.Trbojevic, BNL, USA D.E.Berkaev, I.A.Koop, A.V.Otboev, Yu.M.Shatunov,
27 th March 2008Models of Polarisation at Linear Colliders Introduction and Scope I. Bailey Cockcroft Institute.
ILC EXTRACTION LINE TRACKING Y. Nosochkov, E. Marin September 10, 2013.
2 nd ICFA Beam Dynamics Mini-Workshop on Deflecting/Crabbing Cavity Applications in Accelerators Cockcroft Institute 1 – 3 September 2010.
Ken Moffeit SLAC LCWA09 1 Polarization Considerations for CLIC Ken Moffeit, SLAC 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 29 September to 3 October.
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
G.R.White: F.O.N. T. From Ground Motion studies by A.Seryi et al. (SLAC) ‘Fast’ motion (> few Hz) dominated by cultural noise Concern for structures.
IoP HEPP/APP annual meeting 2010 Feedback on Nanosecond Timescales: maintaining luminosity at future linear colliders Ben Constance John Adams Institute,
CESR as Light Source David Rubin for the CESR Operations Group Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics.
Problems of charge compensation in a ring e+e- higgs factory Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk 5 rd TLEP3 workshop, FNAL, July 25, 2013.
LC-ABD WP2.3 (robust spin polarisation) and WP5.1 (helical undulator) form the heLiCal collaboration. Ian Bailey on behalf of the Helical Collaboration.
LC-ABD: WP2.3 (robust spin polarisation) and WP5.1 (helical undulator). Helical Collaboration I.R. Bailey, P. Cooke, J.B. Dainton, L.J. Jenner, L.I. Malysheva.
Positron Source for Linear Collider Wanming Liu 04/11/2013.
FCC-ee Interaction Region design
Depolarisation Effects at the ILC Damping Ring
Overview of Polarimetry
AD & I : BDS Lattice Design Changes
CLIC Undulator Option for Polarised Positrons
GUINEA-PIG++ Workshop on Spin Simulation Tools, 9-11 Nov 2010, DESY
Beam-beam effects in SPPC and future hadron colliders
eRHIC with Self-Polarizing Electron Ring
Preliminary results on depolarization due to beam-beam interaction at SuperB Cecile Rimbault LAL - Orsay.
Study of e+ e- background due to beamstrahlung for different ILC parameter sets Stephan Gronenborn.
ILC Baseline Design: Physics with Polarized Positrons
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
Depolarization due to beam-beam interaction at SuperB
Low Energy Electron-Ion Collision
Crab Crossing Named #1 common technical risk (p. 6 of the report)
Summary and Plan for Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
Presentation transcript:

3-4 March 2009Advanced QED Methods for Future Accelerators Introduction and Scope I. Bailey Cockcroft Institute / Lancaster University

Practicalities Wireless network access –Connect to ‘STFC-guest’ network –Start web browser –You should be prompted for a username and password –Username and password available from reception Transport –Prepaid taxis to and from the Holiday Inn Runcorn will be available at the following times Tuesday 18:00 Wednesday 08:45 –We can assist with booking taxis to other destinations (airport, etc) –If you have any queries about transport please contact reception or Sue Waller office: S01 Tel: Workshop dinner –Halton Roon, Holiday Inn Runcorn at 19:00

Origin and aims of Workshop This workshop follows on from a small workshop on “Models of Depolarisaton in Linear Colliders” held at the CI last year The goal of that workshop was to evaluate models of depolarisation at the interaction point of future linear colliders and identify any further theoretical work required. The aim of this workshop is to gain a firmer understanding of the QED techniques available and applicable to processes in the intense fields expected at future accelerators.

ILC / CLIC ILCCLIC Center of mass energy (GeV) Luminosity (10 34 cm -2 s -1 )26 Particles per bunch (10 9 ) Bunches per pulse Bunch separation (ns) Bunch train length (ns)969, Pulses per second550 Beam power (MW)1014 Horizontal beam spread at IP (nm) Vertical beam spread at IP (nm) 5.71 ILC RDR Design Next generation e + e - colliders require ~10 14 e + /s

Spin Dynamics Photon emission Spin precession Generally most interesting spin dynamics effects occur in rings… However, even in a linear collider, both stochastic spin diffusion through photon emission and classical spin precession in inhomogeneous magnetic fields can lead to depolarisation. 1 mrad orbital deflection  30° spin precession at 250GeV. Largest depolarisation effects at ILC / CLIC are expected at the Interaction Points. HeLiCal collaboration is developing software tools to study evolution of polarisation from source to interaction point in linear colliders and elsewhere.

Depolarisation at the ILC / CLIC Beam-Beam Upstream Polarimeter Expect ΔP meas ~0.2% ? Require ΔP lw ≤0.5% Source (e - /e + ) Downstream Polarimeter Depolarisation effects ΔP lw /P~0.1% ? P~80%, 30% ΔP meas /P ~ 3% ΔP meas /P ~ 1% (5 GeV) 5 GeV → 250 GeV Precession ~ 360° Depolarisation ΔP~ order 0.1% Modelling evolution of spin states through the ILC.

Beam-Beam depolarisation T-BMT equation. Anomalous magnetic moment subject to radiative corrections because of strong bunch field  theoretical uncertainty… Uncertainties in depolarisation model grow with centre-of-mass energy. CAIN simulation of depolarisation during bunch collision Horizontal displacement (m)

Timetable Tuesday 3 rd March