2nd CLIC Advisory Committee (CLIC-ACE), CERN January 2008 Introduction to the CLIC Power Extraction and Transfer Structure (PETS) Design. I. Syratchev.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PETS components and waveguide connections CLIC Workshop 2007 David Carrillo.
Advertisements

5th Collaboration Meeting on X-band Accelerator Structure Design and Test Program. May 2011 Review of waveguide components development for CLIC I. Syratchev,
Choke-mode Damped X-band Structure for CLIC Main Linac Hao ZHA, Jiaru SHI CERN Sep 27, 2011 Jiaru Shi, LCWS11 Workshop, Granada1.
Choke-mode damped accelerating structures for CLIC main linac Hao Zha, Tsinghua University Jiaru Shi, CERN
CLIC drive beam accelerating (DBA) structure Rolf Wegner.
Compact Linear Collider. Overview The aim of the CLIC study is to investigate the feasibility of a high luminosity linear e-/e+ collider with a centre.
S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 1 of 38 Sasha Novokhatski SLAC, Stanford University Accelerator Session April 20, 2005 Low R/Q Cavities for Super.
INVESITGATION OF AN ALTERNATE MEANS OF WAKEFIELD SUPPRESSION IN CLIC MAIN LINACS CLIC_DDS.
CARE07, 29 Oct Alexej Grudiev, New CLIC parameters. The new CLIC parameters Alexej Grudiev.
ABSTRACT A damped detuned structure (DDS) for the main linacs of CLIC is being studied as an alternative design to the present baseline heavily damped.
CLIC MAIN LINAC DDS DESIGN AND FORTCOMING Vasim Khan & Roger Jones V. Khan LC-ABD 09, Cockcroft Institute /14.
Wakefield suppression in the CLIC main accelerating structures Vasim Khan & Roger Jones.
Design of Standing-Wave Accelerator Structure
Wakefield suppression in the CLIC main accelerating structures Vasim Khan & Roger Jones.
Different mechanisms and scenarios for the local RF
CLIC Drive Beam Linac Rolf Wegner. Outline Introduction: CLIC Drive Beam Concept Drive Beam Modules (modulator, klystron, accelerating structure) Optimisation.
HIGH RF POWER TESTING FOR THE CLIC PETS International Workshop on Linear Colliders 20 th October 2010 Alessandro Cappelletti for the CLIC team with.
ENGINEERING DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF PETS V. Soldatov¹, D. Gudkov¹, I. Syratchev², A. Samoshkin¹, G. Riddone², A. Olyunin¹, S. Atieh² 1 – JINR, Dubna,
RF particle acceleration Kyrre N. Sjøbæk * FYS 4550 / FYS 9550 – Experimental high energy physics University of Oslo, 26/9/2013 *k.n.sjobak(at)fys.uio.no.
INTEGRATION OF RF STRUCTURES IN THE TWO-BEAM MODULE DESIGN G. Riddone, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland A. Samoshkin, D. Gudkov, JINR, Dubna, Russia Abstract.
Development of Dielectric-Based Wakefield Power Extractors Chunguang Jing 1,2, W. Gai 1, A. Kanareykin 2, Igor Syratchev, CERN 1. High Energy Physics Division,
Drive Beam Linac Stability Issues Avni AKSOY Ankara University.
Preliminary design of SPPC RF system Jianping DAI 2015/09/11 The CEPC-SppC Study Group Meeting, Sept. 11~12, IHEP.
Course B: rf technology Normal conducting rf Part 5: Higher-order-mode damping Walter Wuensch, CERN Sixth International Accelerator School for Linear Colliders.
RF Power production at CTF3 X-band structure collaboration meeting,SLAC 6 th July 2009 Steffen Döbert, BE-RF  30 GHz power production  12 GHz power production.
Overview of CLIC main linac accelerating structure design 21/10/2010 A.Grudiev (CERN)
Analytical considerations for Theoretical Minimum Emittance Cell Optics 17 April 2008 F. Antoniou, E. Gazis (NTUA, CERN) and Y. Papaphilippou (CERN)
RF structure design KT high-gradient medical project kick-off Alberto Degiovanni TERA Foundation - EPFL.
LLRF for EUCARD Crab Cavities Graeme Burt (on behalf of Amos Dexter) Paris May 2011.
The CLIC decelerator Instrumentation issues – a first look E. Adli, CERN AB/ABP / UiO October 17, 2007.
Design of Microwave Undulator Cavity
CLIC08 workshop CLIC module layout and main requirements G. Riddone, on behalf of the CMWG Home page of the TBM WG:
The NLC RF Pulse Compression and High Power RF Transport Systems Sami G. Tantawi, G.Bowden, K.Fant, Z.D.Farkas, W.R.Fowkes J.Irwin, N.M.Kroll, Z.H.Li,
CLIC Power Extraction and Transfer Structure.
10/2007 M.Taborelli, TS-MME M.Taborelli Structure fabrication: dimensional tolerances Contributions of : G.Arnau-Izquierdo, A.Cherif, D.Glaude, R.Leuxe,
Bunch Separation with RF Deflectors D. Rubin,R.Helms Cornell University.
Modelling and Simulation of Passive Optical Devices João Geraldo P. T. dos Reis and Henrique J. A. da Silva Introduction Integrated Optics is a field of.
Hybrid designs - directions and potential 1 Alessandro D’Elia, R. M. Jones and V. Khan.
cern.ch CLIC MEETING (17-Dec-2010) CLIC TWO-BEAM MODULE LAYOUT (short introduction) BE / RF 1.
CLIC accelerating structures: study of the tolerances and short range wakefield considerations R. Zennaro CERN.
Peak temperature rise specification for accelerating structures: a review and discussion CLIC meeting
CLIC workshop ”Two beam hardware and integration” working group Module layout and main requirement G. Riddone, A. Samoshkin
TESLA DAMPING RING RF DEFLECTORS DESIGN F.Marcellini & D. Alesini.
I. Syratchev, HGW 2012, KEK, Japan The high power demonstration of the PETS ON/OFF operation with beam. I. Syratchev for CLIC team.
Conventional source developments (300Hz Linac scheme and the cost, Part-II) Junji Urakawa, KEK PosiPol-2012 at DESY Zeuthen Contents : 0. Short review.
CLIC Workshop 2008 TBTS status. PETS testing program and installation status. Igor Syratchev & Germana Riddone for the CLIC team.
Accelerating structure prototypes for 2011 (proposal) A.Grudiev 6/07/11.
X-band Based FEL proposal
Feasibility and R&D Needed For A TeV Class HEP e+e- Collider Based on AWA Technology Chunguang Jing for Accelerator R&D Group, HEP Division, ANL Aug
Structure Wakefields and Tolerances R. Zennaro. Parameters of the CLIC structure “CLIC G” (from A. Grudiev) StructureCLIC_G Frequency: f [GHz]12 Average.
A. Aksoy Beam Dynamics Studies for the CLIC Drive Beam Accelerator A. AKSOY CONTENS ● Basic Lattice Sketches ● Accelerating structure ● Short and long.
Wake-fields simulations and Test Structure
Abstract EuSPARC and EuPRAXIA projects
Vasim Khan & Roger Jones
CLIC Main Linac Cavity BPM Snapshot of the work in progress
Status of the CLIC main beam injectors
RF Power Generation and PETS Design
Brief Review of Microwave Dielectric Accelerators
Developments on Proposed
Summary of the test structure design
Tolerances: Origins, Requirements, Status and Feasibility
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
Measurements, ideas, curiosities
Bunch Separation with RF Deflectors
CEPC Main Ring Cavity Design with HOM Couplers
Progress in the design of a damped an
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
DTL M. Comunian M. Eshraqi.
CLIC Power Extraction and Transfer structure (PETS)
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
Presentation transcript:

2nd CLIC Advisory Committee (CLIC-ACE), CERN January 2008 Introduction to the CLIC Power Extraction and Transfer Structure (PETS) Design. I. Syratchev

2nd CLIC Advisory Committee (CLIC-ACE), CERN January TeV CLIC Decelerator sector CLIC module The CLIC Power Extraction and Transfer Structure (PETS) is a passive microwave device in which bunches of the drive beam interact with the impedance of the periodically loaded waveguide and generate RF power for the main linac accelerating structure. The power produced by the bunched (  0 ) beam in a constant impedance structure: Design input parametersPETS design P – RF power, determined by the accelerating structure needs and the module layout. I – Drive beam current L – Active length of the PETS F b – single bunch form factor (≈ 1) Introduction

2nd CLIC Advisory Committee (CLIC-ACE), CERN January 2008 Combination factor For the given drive beam initial and final energies, the drive beam current is almost uniquely defined by the accelerating structure performance and DB generation arithmetic: Drive beam energy DB extraction efficiency (~0.9) RF transfer efficiency (~0.94) Accelerating structure Number of decelerating sectors in the linac: (Limited by radiation losses in combiner rings) #1. Drive beam current #2. PETS Power and length L T =Quad+BPM L PETS x m L Acc. Str. x n = L unit P PETS = P Acc. Str. x n/m (n/m-should be even number) Drive beam Main beam CLIC sub-unit layout: The equation for the power production now can be rewritten in terms of the PETS parameters (for simplicity the extraction length is taken = 0): #3. PETS aperture In the periodical structure, for the fixed iris thickness and phase advance: where a- radius of the structure and G – geometrical parameter. Now the PETS aperture can expressed as: The CLIC sub-unit general issues: -The CLIC sub-unit length is defined by the decelerator FODO lattice period. In turn, it is tuned to be equal to the even number of the accelerating structures length. -The space reserved for the PETS should satisfy: (L PETS x m)+L T ≤ L unit to ensure the highest effective gradient. - For any sub-unit layout chosen (m), the PETS active length should be maximized to reduce the impedance and thus to provide more stable beam transportation. Introduction

2nd CLIC Advisory Committee (CLIC-ACE), CERN January 2008 #4 RF power extraction (aperture) #3. PETS aperture (continued) Following the CLIC accelerating structure development (CLIC_G), simulations of the beam dynamics in the DB decelerator and the design considerations for the DB quadrupole and BPM, the following parameters were used to finalize the PETS design: Accelerating structure length: 0.25 m RF power per structure: 63.8 MW Transfer efficiency: 0.94 Sub-unit Length = 4xL structure: 1.0 m Quad. +BPM length: 0.4 m Combination factor (Nc) 12 Drive beam current: 100 A Accordingly, the tree possible sub-unit layouts can be envisaged: m = 1,2 and 4, and the PETS active length: m=1 m=2 m=4 Introduction PETS active length, m Extractor length ~ 3λ a/λ TE 11 TM 01 TM 02 a/λ PETS apertures range Extraction method ClassicalChoke-typeQuasi-optical Beam aperture0.49 TE 12 b>a 0.75 b>a Extraction length ~0.5 λ~3 λ~4 λ> 5 λ Design specifics two feed Wrap around Four feed Double choke The choice of the PETS aperture to a great extent, strictly determine the type of the RF power extraction method. The only constrain should be applied to the extractor aperture: b ≥ a. For the range of the specified PETS apertures, the power extraction length should be ~ 3λ. Now the PETS active lengths can be re-iterated:

2nd CLIC Advisory Committee (CLIC-ACE), CERN January 2008 PETS active length, m E surf. MV/m Introduction #5 RF constrains (aperture) Grudiev A PETS active length, m 20% Margin Pt 1/3 /C CLIC_G target PETS target X-75 klystron #6 Beam stability (aperture) The transfers wakes can significantly distort the drive beam and cause heavy beam losses. The wake potential in a finite length structure with a high group velocity is: The best scenario to suppress wake field effects will be to reduce the wake amplitude and to increase the group velocity. In a periodical structure the wake effect ~ a -3 x L and the group velocity ~ a. a -3 x L x m PETS active length, m 1-  PETS Accelerating structure x4 135 MW 250 ns Quad Drive beam Main beam 100 A 2.4 GeV  0.24 GeV (0.87 km) Deceleration: ~6MV/m 1.2 A 9 GeV  1500 GeV (21 km) Acceleration: 100 MV/m Finally, as a result of multiple compromises, the PETS aperture a/λ = 0.46 was chosen.

2nd CLIC Advisory Committee (CLIC-ACE), CERN January 2008 Introduction Frequency, GHz Radial Inclined Flat (actual choice) #7 Phase advance #8 Iris thickness #9 PETS cross-section mm 2.0 mm Iris 2.0 mm Phase/cell The lower phase advances and thinner irises favor the beam stability Frequency, GHz Transverse Impedance  Frequency = GHz  Aperture = 23 mm  Active length = (34 cells)  Period = mm (90 0 /cell)  Iris thickness = 2 mm  Slot width = 2.2 mm  R/Q = 2222 Ω/m  V group= 0.459C  Q = 7200  Pt 1/3 /C = 13.4  E surf. (135 MW)= 56 MV/m  H surf. (135 MW) = 0.08 MA/m (ΔT max (240 ns, Cu) = 1.8 C 0 ) In its final configuration, PETS comprises eight octants separated by the damping slots. Each slot is equipped with HOM damping loads. This arrangement follows the need to provide strong damping of the transverse modes. PETS parameters:

2nd CLIC Advisory Committee (CLIC-ACE), CERN January 2008 E max (135 MW)=56 MV/m H max (135 MW)=0.08 MA/m PETS regular iris shape and matching cell To reduce the surface field concentration in the presence of the damping slot, the special profiling of the iris was introduced. As a result, compared to the circularly symmetric geometry, the 20% field amplification was achieved. The special matching cell was designed to provide the most compact and efficient connection between the regular PETS part and the RF power extractor. PETS machining test bar Special matching cell Electric field RF power density

2nd CLIC Advisory Committee (CLIC-ACE), CERN January 2008 E max (135 MW)=41.7 MV/mH max (135 MW)=0.07 MA/m PETS RF power extractor reflection isolation HFSS simulations

2nd CLIC Advisory Committee (CLIC-ACE), CERN January 2008 The PETS tolerances issues P G t/2 Fabrication errors, micron Power, norm. Pt G Fabrication and assembly errors can detune the PETS synchronous frequency and thus affect the power production: 2R Assembly errors (R), micron PETS machining test bar fabricated in IMP (Italy) Metrology results translated into the frequency error: If the hypothetical PETS will be constructed of such 8 identical bars, the expected power losses will be 0.03%. The fabrication accuracy of ± 20 μm is sufficient enough and can be achieved with a conventional 3D milling machine.

2nd CLIC Advisory Committee (CLIC-ACE), CERN January 2008 OFF: 20 msec ON: 20 sec RF power contour plot Coordinate along the PETS ON OFF Wedge radial position, mm Power norm. Phase, degree RF phase Output power Max.fields amplitudes on the wedge surface Wedge radial position, mm E, MW/mH, MA/m Wedge radial position, mm Power dissipated at the slot extremity Power MW Wedge radial position, mm Main beam acceleration Gradient, norm. OFF position Gradient (PETSONOV)Local termination of the RF power production in the PETS The net RF power generated by the beam at the end of the constant impedance structure will be zero if the structure synchronous frequency is detuned by the amount ±2βc/(1-β)L, where β – Vg /c and L - length of the structure. We have found that such a strong detuning can be achieved by inserting four thin wedges through four of the eight damping slots.

2nd CLIC Advisory Committee (CLIC-ACE), CERN January 2008 Distance, m (log) Wt, V/pC/m/mm (log) HFSS Frequency, GHz Re (Zt) V/A/m/mm (log) Reflected wave Wake model (single mode from HFSS) GDFIDL PLACET – the tool to simulate beam dynamics With slot No slot |E| HE EH PETS transverse wake. Introduction. 12 HFSS GDFIDL a/λ=0.46 3σ beam envelope Quadrupole number Computing tools: Moderate damping: Q(1-  ) ~ 20 -To provide the drive beam transportation without looses, heavy damping of the transverse HOW ( Q(1-  ) < 10 ) is absolutely needed. - In periodical structures with high group velocities, the frequency of a dangerous transverse mode is rather close to the operating one. The only way to damp it is to use its symmetry properties. To do this, only longitudinal slots can be used. In the presence of the longitudinal slots, the transverse mode field pattern is dramatically distorted so that a considerable amount of energy is now stored in the slots. The new, TEM-like nature of the mode significantly increases the group velocity, in our case from 0.42c to almost 0.7c.

2nd CLIC Advisory Committee (CLIC-ACE), CERN January 2008 PETS transverse wake damping and beam stability With introduction of the lossy dielectric material close to the slot opening, the situation improves further. The proper choice of the load configuration with respect to the material properties makes it possible to couple the slot mode to a number of heavily loaded modes in dielectric. This gives a tool to construct the broad wakefields impedance. The transverse wakepotential simulations in a complete PETS geometry (GDFIDL). Snapshot of the electric field pattern at the moment when the bunch left the structure RF load Dielectric with moderate losses The computer code PLACET was used to analyze the beam dynamic along the decelerator in the presence of strong deceleration and calculated wakefields. The results of the simulation clearly indicate that the suppression of the transverse wakefields obtained, is strong enough to guarantee the beam transportation without losses With HOM Without HOM Q effective ~ 2 Dielectric with heavy losses