BMP-Based Target Setting Presented by DWR at U4 Technical Subcommittee Meeting on August 25, 2010 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Alderwood Water & Wastewater District Draft Water Conservation Goal Kelly ORourke HDR December 17, 2007.
Advertisements

Summary of BMP Savings Calculator Sample Results SB X7 7 Urban Stakeholder Committee 22 October 2010 Richard A. Mills California State Water Resources.
Current Legal Developments on Ratemaking - A Primer on Budget-based Water Rate Structures 1 Paul D. Jones II, P.E. General Manager, Eastern.
Washington State Department of Health Division of Environmental HealthOffice of Drinking Water Mike Dexel Water Resources Policy Lead Municipal Water Law.
1 City of Sonoma Water Conservation Program Update June 2007.
City of Boulder Meeting Kyoto -- Carbon Emissions Reduction: Commercial Lighting.
Water Conservation in the San Diego Region Bill Jacoby San Diego County Water Authority North Bay Water Association April 2, 2004.
1 Water/Energy Relationship at SDG&E 17 April 2014San Diego Gas & Electric Presentation.
FUNDING FOR DEVELOPMENT OF STATEWIDE LAND COVER DATA Jennifer Tribo, Senior Water Resources Planner Hampton Roads Planning District Commission VGIN Advisory.
Designing Water Efficient Development: Options for Water Neutral Growth Mary Ann Dickinson President/CEO.
Water Conservation Annual Report. Mission Statement The mission of the Texas Water Development Board is to provide leadership, planning, financial assistance,
Urban Water Conservation Under 2009 Legislation Ryan S. Bezerra February 8, 2013.
Municipal and Industrial Conservation and Water Reuse Workgroup Elizabeth Lovsted Sr. Civil Engineer Urban Water Institute Annual Water Policy Conference.
Greenhouse Gas CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #13 August 26, 2009 SCAQMD Diamond Bar, California.
Catherine Elvert City of Palo Alto Utilities Communications Manager.
Commercial Sustainability Network of the Central Coast Elkhorn Slough Research Reserve Visitors’ Center April 11, 2005 Sharon Sarris, Principal Water Wisdom.
-1- Washington State Medicaid Inpatient Reimbursement System Study Phase 2 Study Methodology Redesign Update September 26, 2006.
Water Conservation on a Larger Scale Mary Ann Dickinson Executive Director California Urban Water Conservation Council September 28, 2006.
Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Residential Appliance Measure Updates Danielle Gidding Bonneville Power Administration.
Southern California Water Dialogue Meeting Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Alice Webb-Cole February 26, 2013.
Conservation Potential and California’s Urban Water Demand Gary Wolff, P.E., Ph.D. Principal Economist & Engineer April 2, 2004 Presentation.
California Urban Water Conservation Council March 1,
Presented by Deirdre Irwin Florida Water Star SM – A Water Efficiency Certification Program.
Water and Land Use: The Efficiency Connection Mary Ann Dickinson Executive Director California Urban Water Conservation Council.
Water Use Efficiency Implementation: Lessons Learned in California Tom Peters Mary Lou Cotton.
DRA Perspective on What Recycled Water Applications from Investor- Owned Utilities Should Contain and How They Should be Evaluated CPUC Water Recycling.
Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Residential Appliance Measure Updates Danielle Gidding Bonneville Power Administration.
LADWP WATER CONSERVATION IEPR Workshop August
2014 IRWM Drought Grants Sierra Water Workgroup Summit June Tracie L. Billington Department of Water Resources Financial Assistance Branch.
Potential Target Method #4 Using Density and ETo Factors Tom Hawkins DWR U4 Technical Subcommittee Meeting August 25, 2010.
Energizing Utilities to Embrace Demand Energizing Utilities to Embrace Demand Management South Florida Water Management District Water Summit December.
Approaching Water Sustainability through Water/Wastewater Reductions William Fifty and Laura Lokey-Flippo USACHPPM - Surface Water and Wastewater Program.
2011 RTF Projects RTF Input on SOW Outlines: - Deemed Measure Reviews - Measure Life Guidelines -Measure Cost Guidelines Regional Technical Forum April.
Peter Brostrom California Department of Water Resources Office of Water Use and Efficiency Branch October 15, 2010.
Department of Water Resources Sacramento, CA October 11, 2010.
Elk Grove Water District – Finance Meeting Water Rate Update and Connection Fees Habib Isaac – Principal Gregg Tobler – Task Manager January 30, 2013.
Guidelines Revisions Defining What RTF Means by “Savings” December 17,
Santa Rosa A Conservation Success Story Department of Interior Roundtable April 8, 2010 Chris Brown California Urban Water Conservation Council.
Water Conservation and Water Demand Management Progress with the Strategy Implementation 16 September 2010.
DWR’s Second Alternative Proposal for Method 4 Peter Brostrom Department of Water Resources Water Use and Efficiency Branch August 25, 2010.
WUE Comprehensive Review Urban Conservation Projections Presentation To Water Plan Update Advisory Committee August 17, 2005.
Estimating future scenarios for farm-watershed nutrient fluxes using dynamic simulation modelling – Can on-farm BMPs really do the job at the watershed.
Sixth Power Plan A Public Utility Point of View Bill Gaines, Director, Tacoma Public Utilities Craig Smith, Assistant General Manager, Snohomish PUD Northwest.
Conservation Cal Water’s Approach with the California Public Utilities Commission Darin Duncan, Bear Gulch District Manager Low-Income Oversight Board.
SBx7-7 The New Terrain Chris Brown Greening Our Water Infrastructure Petaluma April 9, 2010.
Peter Brostrom Water Use and Efficiency Branch California Department of Water Resources.
1 Summary of Reviews: Workpapers Approved by the California Technical Forum Part 2 Meeting: California Technical Forum January 28, 2016 Jeff Hirsch/Kevin.
Draft Stormwater Proposal Home Builders Association of Virginia Richmond, Virginia June 29, 2009.
California Water Plan April 14, 2005 Agricultural Water Use Efficiency Technical Analysis.
Draft Seventh Power Plan Meets RTF. Key Finding: Least Cost Resource Strategies Rely on Conservation and Demand Response to Meet Nearly All Forecast Growth.
RTF Management Updates Jennifer Light Regional Technical Forum February 17, 2016.
Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) City of Patterson’s April 19, 2016.
Water Audits and Best Management Practice Life Cycle Cost Analyses for Army Medical and Health Care Facilities Presented By: Lisa Raysby Hardcastle, P.E.
1 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Water Use Efficiency Master Plan Elizabeth Lovsted, PE Senior Civil Engineer January 16, 2016.
Understanding Cost Implications of the Pennsylvania Department of Health’s Regionalization Process for its Tobacco Control Program Illana Ron 1, Jennifer.
Vicki Lake, Unit SupervisorContra Costa Climate Leaders Workshop Division of Statewide Water Management May 9, 2016
1 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Drought Response – Implementing the New Landscape Requirements Elizabeth Lovsted, PE Sr. Civil Engineer.
LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER ENERGY EFFICIENCY POTENTIAL STUDY Demand Analysis Working Group (DAWG) September 25, 2014.
Elizabeth Lovsted, P.E. February 15, 2017
Commercial Water Conservation Programs
Adel M. Abdallah David E. Rosenberg
Water Conservation in the 2016 Region C Water Plan
Worst drought on record so far this year!
Matthew S. Dickens Resource Conservation Manager
Water Pricing, Customer Usage: It’s Complicated…..
Matthew S. Dickens Resource Conservation Manager
Urban Water Use Efficiency Policy-2016 and Beyond
Paul D. Jones II, P.E., General Manager August 25, 2016
NARUC Winter Policy Summit
Water Conservation Regulations: Guide or Be Guided
Presentation transcript:

BMP-Based Target Setting Presented by DWR at U4 Technical Subcommittee Meeting on August 25,

Baseline and Targets Statewide baseline estimated by 20x2020 report – 192 GPCD Required target, 80% of baseline – 154 GPCD Reduction required by 2020 – 38 GPCD 2

Why BMP-Based Targets? Takes into account – Prior conservation – Population density and weather – CII intensity – Unaccounted for water Savings data available from the 20x2020 study to design the approach and ascertain statewide savings 3

Objectives of the 20x2020 Study Assess whether California can achieve a 20% reduction in per-capita use by 2020 Identify the mix of measures and approaches required to reach above goal The study goes beyond BMPs to identify potential sources of savings 4

Sources of Savings in the 20x2020 Study Water Use Efficiency Comprehensive Evaluation (WUECE) used to develop savings estimates Savings under Basic Measures capture – plumbing codes, cost-effective and grant funded BMPs, their interactive effect, plus ET controllers Savings under Additional Measures capture – Impact of exceeding BMP coverage goals – Lower levels of unaccounted for water – Irrigation restrictions – Recycling and CII PBMPs 5

Table 7 From 20x2020 Report Savings From Basic Measures Code8 80% of local CE11 Grant funded4 Efficient clotheswashers3 Residential ET controllers3 TOTAL (basic measures)28 Savings From Additional Measures Accelerated coverage goals9 Recycling3 Water loss control (40 g/conn./day)6 Irrigation restrictions (2 days/week)16 Miscellaneous PBMPs2 TOTAL (additional measures)37 6

Our Approach to the Problem Identify BMPs that are easily quantifiable – or simplify the quantification method relative to what was used in the WUECE Assess whether selected BMPs achieve the 20% savings goal by 2020 – If not, evaluate the impact of Additional Measures Develop an overall scaling factor to ensure state reaches its mandated goal 7

Exploratory Analyses Suggest… Models and data exist to quantify the impact of most BMPs – CII savings will be quantified as 10% of baseline CII GPCD. WUECE’s methods were more complex Increasing coverage goals in some instances is desirable – It raises savings, preserves equity, and simplifies the calculation methodology 8

Components of the Savings Calculation BMP 1.2 Water Loss Control – Savings shall be calculated on the basis of reaching a loss goal <=40 gals/conn/day (from Additional Measures in the 20x2020 report) BMP 1.3 Metering – Assume all urban connections are metered prior to 2020: savings 20% of pre-metered use BMP 3.1 Residential Assistance Program – Estimate savings potential without including LF showerheads in the calculation: gpd (mf/sf) at 15% decay 9

Components of the Savings Calculation BMP 3.2 Residential Landscape Surveys – Evaluate savings potential per the MOU: 15% savings at 10% annual decay BMP 3.3 High Efficiency Clothes Washers – 14.4 gpd savings; washer life 14 years; 10% freeridership BMP 3.4 WSS toilets – Savings depends on toilet type, program type, and location: see BMP database document 10

Components of the Savings Calculation BMP 4 Commercial, Institutional, Industrial – Estimate savings as 10% of baseline CII GPCD BMP 5.1 Water budgets for dedicated irrigation – Evaluate savings potential per the MOU: 19% savings at 10% annual decay BMP 5.2 Landscape surveys for mixed use CII accounts – Captured in BMP 4 11

Components of the Savings Calculation For WSS, CII urinals, LF showerheads and HE clothes washers calculate savings potential based on assumed 2020 saturation goals – Saturation of 3.5 (or greater) g.p.f. toilets <= 5% by 2020 – Saturation of non-efficient CII urinals <= 5% – Saturation of non-LF showerheads <= 5% – Saturation of (WF=6) HE clothes washers >= 85% 12

Model and Data Requirements Models to estimate saturation rate of residential and CII WSS, LF showerheads, urinals and HE clothes washers at midpoint of baseline already exist – These models factor in the effect of plumbing codes and past active programs – Unit savings assumptions from the MOU Data and methods already exist in the MOU for evaluating the remaining BMPs 13

How Does the Approach Work Statewide The 20x2020 models suggest that our calculation approach reduces 2020 usage by 36 GPCD – This is after including a correction for the simplified CII savings methodology we are proposing relative to the WUECE The target derived from the proposed calculations would be further lowered by 2 GPCD to ensure state reaches its goal 14