Dark matter in split extended supersymmetry in collaboration with M. Quiros (IFAE) and P. Ullio (SISSA/ISAS) Alessio Provenza (SISSA/ISAS) Newport Beach.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Effective Operators in the MSSM Guillaume Drieu La Rochelle, LAPTH.
Advertisements

Gennaro Corcella 1, Simonetta Gentile 2 1. Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, INFN 2. Università di Roma, La Sapienza, INFN Phenomenology of new neutral.
Joe Sato (Saitama University ) Collaborators Satoru Kaneko,Takashi Shimomura, Masato Yamanaka,Oscar Vives Physical review D 78, (2008) arXiv:1002.????
Phenomenological Aspects of SUSY B-L Extension of the SM 1 Shaaban Khalil Centre for Theoretical Physics British University in Egypt.
Higgs Boson Mass In Gauge-Mediated Supersymmetry Breaking Abdelhamid Albaid In collaboration with Prof. K. S. Babu Spring 2012 Physics Seminar Wichita.
Intro to neutralino dark matter Pearl Sandick University of Minnesota.
Neutralino Dark Matter in Light Higgs Boson Scenario Masaki Asano (ICRR, University of Tokyo) Collaborator S. Matsumoto (Toyama Univ.) M. Senami (Kyoto.
Comprehensive Analysis on the Light Higgs Scenario in the Framework of Non-Universal Higgs Mass Model M. Asano (Tohoku Univ.) M. Senami (Kyoto Univ.) H.
Significant effects of second KK particles on LKP dark matter physics
Richard Howl The Minimal Exceptional Supersymmetric Standard Model University of Southampton UK BSM 2007.
Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) SM: 28 bosonic d.o.f. & 90 (96) fermionic d.o.f. SUSY: # of fermions = # of bosonsN=1 SUSY: There are no particles.
Dark Matter at the LHC Bhaskar Dutta Texas A&M University
The positron excess and supersymmetric dark matter Joakim Edsjö Stockholm University
The LC and the Cosmos: Connections in Supersymmetry Jonathan Feng UC Irvine Arlington LC Workshop January 2003.
The LC and the Cosmos: Connections in Supersymmetry Jonathan Feng UC Irvine American Linear Collider Physics Group Seminar 20 February 2003.
Enhancement of Line Gamma Ray Signature from Bino-like Dark Matter Annihilation due to CP Violation Yoshio Sato (Saitama University/Technical University.
Mia Schelke, Ph.D. Student The University of Stockholm, Sweden Cosmo 03.
6/28/2015S. Stark1 Scan of the supersymmetric parameter space within mSUGRA Luisa Sabrina Stark Schneebeli, IPP ETH Zurich.
QCD Effects on Direct Detection of Wino Dark Matter
Constrained MSSM Unification of the gauge couplings Radiative EW Symmetry Breaking Heavy quark and lepton masses Rare decays (b -> sγ, b->μμ) Anomalous.
Significant enhancement of Bino-like dark matter annihilation cross section due to CP violation Yoshio Sato (Saitama University) Collaborated with Shigeki.
SUSY Dark Matter Collider – direct – indirect search bridge. Sabine Kraml Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et de Cosmologie Grenoble, France ● 43. Rencontres.
Relating dark matter and radiative Seesaw neutrino mass scales without beyond SM gauge symmetry Xiao-Gang He 1. Introduction 2. Radiative seesaw and dark.
Center for theoretical Physics at BUE
2. Two Higgs Doublets Model
Wednesday, Apr. 23, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #24 Wednesday, Apr. 23, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu Issues with SM picture Introduction.
Aldo Morselli INFN, Sezione di Roma 2 & Università di Roma Tor Vergata 1 Report from Italy A. Morselli, A. Lionetto, A. Cesarini, F.Fucito, P.Ullio* INFN,
Supersymmetric Models with 125 GeV Higgs Masahiro Yamaguchi (Tohoku University) 17 th Lomonosov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics Moscow State.
Direct and Indirect Dark Matter Detection in Models with a Well-Tempered Neutralino Eun-Kyung Park Florida State University in collaboration with H. Baer.
Neutralino Dark Matter in Light Higgs Boson Scenario (LHS) The scenario is consistent with  particle physics experiments Particle mass b → sγ Bs →μ +
Dark Matter Particle Physics View Dmitri Kazakov JINR/ITEP Outline DM candidates Direct DM Search Indirect DM Search Possible Manifestations DM Profile.
DARK MATTER CANDIDATES Cody Carr, Minh Nguyen December 9 th, 2014.
1 Supersymmetry Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) January 14, 2005, at KEK.
Right-handed sneutrino as cold dark matter of the universe Takehiko Asaka (EPFL  Niigata University) Refs: with Ishiwata and Moroi Phys.Rev.D73:061301,2006.
INVASIONS IN PARTICLE PHYSICS Compton Lectures Autumn 2001 Lecture 8 Dec
Summary of indirect detection of neutralino dark matter Joakim Edsjö Stockholm University
SUSY in the sky: supersymmetric dark matter David G. Cerdeño Institute for Particle Physics Phenomenology Based on works with S.Baek, K.Y.Choi, C.Hugonie,
Neutrino mass and DM direct detection Daijiro Suematsu (Kanazawa Univ.) Erice Sept., 2013 Based on the collaboration with S.Kashiwase PRD86 (2012)
CONSTRAINED MSSM AND RECENT ASTROPHYSICAL DATA Alexey Gladyshev (JINR, Dubna & ITEP, Moscow) SEMINAR AT KEK THEORY GROUP November 1, 2004.
Supersymmetry Basics: Lecture II J. HewettSSI 2012 J. Hewett.
Supersymmetric B-L Extended Standard Model with Right-Handed Neutrino Dark Matter Nobuchika Okada Miami Fort Lauderdale, Dec , 2010 University.
Monday, Apr. 7, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #20 Monday, Apr. 7, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu Super Symmetry Breaking MSSM Higgs and Their.
Gennaro Corcella 1, Simonetta Gentile 2 1. Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, INFN 2. Università di Roma, La Sapienza, INFN Z’production at LHC in an extended.
Type II Seesaw Portal and PAMELA/Fermi LAT Signals Toshifumi Yamada Sokendai, KEK In collaboration with Ilia Gogoladze, Qaisar Shafi (Univ. of Delaware)
J. KalinowskiDark matter in U(1) extended SUSY1 Dark matter in the U(1) extended supersymmetric model Jan Kalinowski S.Y. Choi, H.E. Haber and P.M. Zerwas,
Lecture 7. Tuesday… Superfield content of the MSSM Gauge group is that of SM: StrongWeakhypercharge Vector superfields of the MSSM.
1 Aslı Sabancı University of Helsinki and Helsinki Insititute of Physics (HIP) Electric Dipole Moments in U(1)’ Models DESY Theory Workshop (Collider Phenomenology)
M. Frank, K. H., S.K. Rai (arXiv: ) Phys.Rev.D77:015006, 2008 D. Demir, M. Frank, K. H., S.K. Rai, I.Turan ( arXiv: ) Phys.Rev.D78:035013,
Dirac neutrino dark matter G. Bélanger LAPTH- Annecy based on G. B, A.Pukhov, G. Servant CERN-PH-TH/
DARK MATTER Fisica delle Astroparticelle Piergiorgio Picozza a.a
Elba -- June 7, 2006 Collaboration Meeting 1 CDF Melisa Rossi -- Udine University On behalf of the Multilepton Group CDF Collaboration Meeting.
Phys. Lett. B646 (2007) 34, (hep-ph/ ) Non-perturbative effect on thermal relic abundance of dark matter Masato Senami (University of Tokyo, ICRR)
The Case of Light Neutralino Dark Matter
An interesting candidate?
Direct Detection of Vector Dark Matter
Gluon Contribution to Dark Matter Direct Detection
Dark Matter Phenomenology of the GUT-less CMSSM
Physics Overview Yasuhiro Okada (KEK)
John Kelley IceCube Journal Club 27 February 2008
Neutral and charged Higgsino as carriers of residual SUSY effects.
MSSM4G: MOTIVATIONS AND ALLOWED REGIONS
The MESSM The Minimal Exceptional Supersymmetric Standard Model
SUSY Dark Matter in light of CDMS/XENON Results
Supersymmetric Dark Matter
Physics Overview Yasuhiro Okada (KEK)
Analysis of enhanced effects in MSSM from the GUT scale
Physics Overview Yasuhiro Okada (KEK)
Probing bino-wino coannihilation DM at the LHC
How Heavy can Neutralino Dark Matter be?
Can new Higgs boson be Dark Matter Candidate in the Economical Model
Presentation transcript:

Dark matter in split extended supersymmetry in collaboration with M. Quiros (IFAE) and P. Ullio (SISSA/ISAS) Alessio Provenza (SISSA/ISAS) Newport Beach 12 August 2006

Plan: ● Some “trivia” about SUSY ● Split Extended-SUSY high energy setup ● Split Extended-SUSY “low” energy setup ● Dark matter and Split Extended SUSY ● Prospects for direct and indirect detection ● Conclusions

Some “trivia” about supersymmetry ● Historical motivation to introduce SUSY are: ● MSSM with R-parity provides a stable weakly interacting particle, a viable Dark Matter candidate ● New trend is to ignore the hierachy problem and “split” the SUSY spectrum (Harkani-Hamed and Dimopulos, Giudice and Romanino 2004) ● The Split-SUSY Dark Matter phenomenology well known (e.g. Masiero, Profumo and Ullio 2004) ● Hierachy problem ● Grand unification ● Connection with string theory

Split Extended SUSY high energy setup (Antoniadis et al. 2005) ● Intersencting branes ● Gauge bosons are in the N=2 SUSY representation ● Higgs sector is a N=2 hypermultiplet ● Matter fields are in a N=1 SUSY representation ● At one loop all the SUSY scalars and winos acquire soft masses ● Due to grand unification this scale is order GeV

Split Extended SUSY low energy setup: Higgs sector ● The lagrangian in terms of N=1 superfield reads: ● After a straightforward computation the Higgs potential reads:

Split Extended SUSY low energy setup: Higgs sector ● The unphysical would-be goldstone bosons After the minimization mass eigenstates are: ● The CP-odd Higgs boson: with mass m A

Split Extended SUSY low energy setup: Higgs sector ● The CP-even Higgs bosons: with mass: ● The charged Higgs boson: with mass:

Split Extended SUSY low energy setup: charginos and neutralinos ● There is only a chargino i.e. the Higgsino like one ● m LC ~  ● The neutral extra fermions are the two Higgsino states and two bino states Neutralino mass matrix is:

Split Extended SUSY low energy setup: charginos and neutralinos ● There is only a chargino i.e. the Higgsino like one ● m LC ~  ● The neutral extra fermions are the two Higgsino states and two bino states Neutralino masses are independent from tan  Neutralino masses are in the form:

Split Extended SUSY low energy setup: charginos and neutralinos ● There is only a chargino i.e. the Higgsino like one ● m LC ~  ● The neutral extra fermions are the two Higgsino states and two bino states Lightest Neutralino eigenstate has the form: This means no coupling with the Z boson!

Split Extended SUSY low energy setup: summary of free parameters ● We are left with four free parameter: M,  m , tan  ● We will make the simplifying assumption m  ->¥ ● In this limit the radiative corrections are the same for the split-susy scenario (Giudice and Romanino 2004). Having the GUT constraint set the scalar masses to be ~O(10 13 ) GeV we expect to find ~170 GeV ● In the end the free parameter are only 3

Dark matter and Split Extended SUSY: relic abundance ● Neutralino thermal relic abundance is settled by annihilations in gauge bosons and coannihilation with Lightest Chargino Higgsino like region

Dark matter and Split Extended SUSY: relic abundance ● Neutralino thermal relic abundance is settled by annihilations in gauge bosons High mixing region

Dark matter and Split Extended SUSY: relic abundance ● We introduce the finetuning indices: ● We have a huge finetuning in the High-Mixing region

Dark matter and Split Extended SUSY: direct detection ● The goal is to to measure the energy deposited in elastic scatterings on target nuclei by dark matter ● Only the diagram with Higgs boson exchange is present then we can scan only the high mixing region ● Since two binos are present the plot is tan  independent

Dark matter and Split Extended SUSY: direct detection

Dark matter and Split Extended SUSY: indirect detection ● To predict antimatter fluxes from annihilation in the Dark Matter Galactic halo we need the local CDM distribution. We will refer to a “Burkert” halo profile (cored) ● To understand the discovery potential of positron and antiproton flux measurements, an useful quantity is : ● The goal is observe neutralino annihilation product We will refer to PAMELA experiment for antiprotons and positrons searches and to GAPS experiment for antidiuterons search

Dark matter and Split Extended SUSY: indirect detection ● Due to the absence of a spin-dependent coupling neutrino flux is negligible ● Only a portion of the High mixing of the WMAP allowed region can be scanned with this techniques ● The situation is better with less conservatives DM halos

Dark matter and Split Extended SUSY: indirect detection

Conclusions ● We find some regions in the parameter space where the thermal relic abundance of the Lightest Neutralino is in the WMAP range ● Only a portion of this area can be scanned at future experiments ● Complementarity between different experiments is crucial to distinguish this model from split-SUSY