A Topological Extension of GR: Black Holes Induce Dark Energy Marco Spaans University of Groningen

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gerard t Hooft Spinoza Institute, Utrecht University Utrecht University and.
Advertisements

Quantum Field Theory for Gravity and Dark Energy Sang Pyo Kim Kunsan Nat’l Univ. & APCTP Co sPA2009, U. Melbourne, 2009.
Theories of gravity in 5D brane-world scenarios
Black Holes and Particle Species Gia Dvali CERN Theory Division and New York University.
Hot topics in Modern Cosmology Cargèse - 10 Mai 2011.
Rainbow Gravity and the Very Early Universe Yi Ling Center for Gravity and Relativistic Astrophysics Nanchang University, China Nov. 4, Workshop.
…new vocabulary from Hawking Chaps 9-11 Space-like, time-like variables…subject to Heisenberg time: an imaginery dimension; spacelike & timelike conjugate.
ASYMPTOTIC STRUCTURE IN HIGHER DIMENSIONS AND ITS CLASSIFICATION KENTARO TANABE (UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA) based on KT, Kinoshita and Shiromizu PRD
Cosimo Stornaiolo INFN-Sezione di Napoli MG 12 Paris July 2009.
T. K. Ng (HKUST) The Quantum Universe Modern picture of space-time, matter & forces What is reality in relatively and QM? (Twin paradox and Schrodinger.
Physics 133: Extragalactic Astronomy ad Cosmology Lecture 5; January
Gerard ’t Hooft Spinoza Institute Utrecht University CMI, Chennai, 20 November 2009 arXiv:
General Relativity Physics Honours 2008 A/Prof. Geraint F. Lewis Rm 557, A29 Lecture Notes 2.
Quantum Tunneling of Thin Wall Matthew C. Johnson, in collaboration with Anthony Aguirre.
Entanglement in Quantum Critical Phenomena, Holography and Gravity Dmitri V. Fursaev Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Dubna, RUSSIA Banff, July 31,
Astronomy and Cosmologies Wed.18.May 2005, last lecture, Spring 2005, Zita Age of the universe – finish H workshop Your questions on Cosmology and the.
Cosmic Microwave Radiation Anisotropies in brane worlds K. Koyama astro-ph/ K. Koyama PRD (2002) Kazuya Koyama Tokyo University.
Holographic Dark Energy Preety Sidhu 5 May Black Holes and Entropy Black holes are “maximal entropy objects” Entropy of a black hole proportional.
AdS4/CFT3+gravity for Accelerating Conical Singularities arXiv: arXiv: Mohamed Anber HET Bag Lunch Novemberr 12th.
Macroscopic Behaviours of Palatini Modified Gravity Theories [gr-qc] and [gr-qc] Baojiu Li, David F. Mota & Douglas J. Shaw Portsmouth,
InflationInflation Andrei Linde Lecture 1. Plan of the lectures: Inflation: a general outlook Basic inflationary models (new inflation, chaotic inflation,
CERN Colloquium, 28/04/11. Matter and Forces Current Paradigm FUNDAMENTAL FORCES: carried by elementary particles.
Space-time in the new millennium
Black Holes Matthew Trimble 10/29/12.
HOLOGRAPHY, DIFFEOMORHISMS, AND THE CMB Finn Larsen University of Michigan Quantum Black Holes at OSU Ohio Center for Theoretical Science September
Williams Research Gravity Pharis E. Williams 19 th Natural Philosophy Alliance Albuquerque, NM July, 2012.
Is Black Hole an elementary particle? By Hoi-Lai Yu IPAS, Oct 30, 2007.
Chapter 26 Relativity. General Physics Relativity II Sections 5–7.
Qing-Guo Huang based on arXiv: (to appear in PLB) done with F.L.Lin Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS State Key Laboratory of Theoretical.
Dark energy: the greatest mystery of the universe Syksy Räsänen Department of Physics and Helsinki Institute of Physics Arkadia.
Symmetry in Particle Physics
Gravitational Physics: Quantum Gravity and Other Theoretical Aspects Luca BombelliTibor Torma Arif Caixia Gao Brian Mazur approaches to quantum gravity:
A NONCOMMUTATIVE FRIEDMAN COSMOLOGICAL MODEL. 1.Introduction 2.Structure of the model 3.Closed Friedman universe – Geometry and matter 4.Singularities.
Dimensionalities of Space-Time Yu, Hoi-Lai 16 th Oct NTHU.
A NONCOMMUTATIVE CLOSED FRIEDMAN WORLD MODEL. 1.Introduction 2.Structure of the model 3.Closed Friedman universe – Geometry and matter 4.Singularities.
Frédéric Henry-Couannier CPPM/RENOIR Marseille The Dark Side of Gravity and our Universe.
CLOSING THOUGHTS David Gross KITP/UCSB COSMO-02 THANKS Evalyn, John and Sean FOR A CLASSY CONFERENCE.
Some Cosmological Consequences of Negative Gravitational Field Energy W. J. Wilson Department of Engineering and Physics University of Central Oklahoma.
The Limiting Curvature hypothesis A new principle of physics Dr. Yacoub I. Anini.
Seesaw for the Higgs boson Xavier Calmet Université Libre de Bruxelles.
Big bang or freeze ?. conclusions Big bang singularity is artefact Big bang singularity is artefact of inappropriate choice of field variables – of inappropriate.
The false vacuum bubble : - formation and evolution - in collaboration with Chul H. Lee(Hanyang), Wonwoo Lee, Siyong Nam, and Chanyong Park (CQUeST) Based.
A NONCOMMUTATIVE CLOSED FRIEDMAN WORLD MODEL 1.Introduction 2.Structure of the model 3.Closed Friedman universe – Geometry and matter 4.Singularities 5.Concluding.
Dark Energy Expanding Universe Accelerating Universe Dark Energy Scott Dodelson March 7, 2004.
Quantum cosmology with nontrivial topologies T. Vargas Center for Mathematics and Theoretical Physics National Central University.
Search for Quantum Gravity Using Atom Interferometers Charles Wang, University of Aberdeen, UK Robert Bingham, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK Tito.
In fond memory of Professor A.K. Raychaudhuri who passed away on June 18, 2005.
5th Italian-Sino Workshop on Relativistic Astrophysics Taipei - Hualien 29 May Fitting the luminosity data from type Ia supernovae by means of the.
Black Hole Universe -BH in an expanding box- Yoo, Chulmoon ( YITP) Hiroyuki Abe (Osaka City Univ.) Ken-ichi Nakao (Osaka City Univ.) Yohsuke Takamori (Osaka.
General Relativity and Cosmology The End of Absolute Space Cosmological Principle Black Holes CBMR and Big Bang.
First Steps Towards a Theory of Quantum Gravity Mark Baumann Dec 6, 2006.
Entanglement in Quantum Gravity and Space-Time Topology
CPT and Lorentz violation as signatures for Planck-scale physics Discrete08.
Random volumes from matrices Based on the work with Masafumi Fukuma and Sotaro Sugishita (Kyoto Univ.) Naoya Umeda (Kyoto Univ.) [arXiv: ][JHEP.
1 The Re-Physicalization of Physics by Albrecht Giese Hamburg, Germany Puebla The Re-Physicalization of Physics.
1 Bhupendra Nath Tiwari IIT Kanpur in collaboration with T. Sarkar & G. Sengupta. Thermodynamic Geometry and BTZ black holes This talk is mainly based.
Based on Phys. Rev. D 92, (R) (2015) 中科大交叉学科理论研究中心
Cosmology : a short introduction Mathieu Langer Institut d’Astrophysique Spatiale Université Paris-Sud XI Orsay, France Egyptian School on High Energy.
ETSU Astrophysics 3415: “The Concordance Model in Cosmology: Should We Believe It?…” Martin Hendry Nov 2005 AIM:To review the current status of cosmological.
University of Oslo & Caltech
Machian General Relativity A possible solution to the Dark Energy problem and an alternative to Big Bang cosmology ? Robin Booth Theoretical Physics Imperial.
Macroscopic Quantum Geometry Craig Hogan University of Chicago and Fermilab.
DPG Conference, Hamburg
Dept.of Physics & Astrophysics
Dark Energy in the Local Universe
Solutions of black hole interior, information paradox and the shape of singularities Haolin Lu.
Primordial BHs.
Quantum Spacetime and Cosmic Inflation
A Topological Extension of GR: Black Holes Induce Dark Energy
Bianchi type-III quantum cosmology T Vargas National Central University I.-Introduction In the standard cosmological model, the universe is described by.
Presentation transcript:

A Topological Extension of GR: Black Holes Induce Dark Energy Marco Spaans University of Groningen

General Relativity Equivalence principle: Einstein’s local interpretation of Mach’s global principle. GR not invariant under local conformal transformations → singular metric fluctuations on the Planck scale: Wheeler’s (1957) quantum foam of wormholes. GR elegant and succesful, preserve in quantum gravity. The Einstein equation G μν = 8πG N T μν does not specify local and global topology.

The Equivalence Principle: Macro- versus Microscopic paths Need to specify what path to take quantum- mechanically.

Put Differently: The Feynman (1948) Path Integral A particle/wave travels along many paths as an expression of the superposition principle: connect any A to any B.. ∫ paths e iS leads to a semi-classical world line and a large scale limit for GR. But, how to distinguish paths on L Planck ? Observers cannot tell paths apart locally due to errors! This talk: Choose paths that can be identified despite quantum uncertainty in geometry; paths fundamental and rooted in topology ; Spaans 1997, Nuc.Phys.B 492, 526.

↔ Space-time on the Planck scale ( cm) is a fabric woven of many paths: shape → connectivity.

Physics: Multiplicity Scrutinize down to Planck scale: strong coupling between observer and observee. To identify a path, which is distinct under continuous deformation of space-time, one needs a proper example to compare to. Thought: It takes one to know one. So topological fluctuations on L Planck take the form of multiple copies of any path through quantum space-time (i.e., in 4D). Idea: Topological dynamics on L Planck because no distinct path can (remain to) exist individually under the observational act of counting, thus building up quantum space-time.

Mathematics: Loop Algebra Use 3D prime manifolds P: T 3, S 1 xS 2, S 3 to construct a topological manifold, with the S 1 loop as central object: Two distinct paths from A to B together form a loop. T 3, three-torus (Χ=0→LM), provides topologically distinct paths through space-time. Superposition by Feynman. S 1 xS 2, handle (LM), can accrete mass as well as Hawking (1975) evaporate (so BH~wormhole in 4-space). The handle represents Wheeler’s quantum foam. S 3, unit element (simply connected, large scale limit). Minimal set. Physical principle: find the paths that thread Planckian space-time (Feynman+Wheeler). Mathematical principle: topological constructability (primes+homeomorphisms) ; Spaans 2013, J.Phys 410,

Constructing Space-Time Topology Define Operators T (annihilation) and T* (creation): TP ≡ nQ, n=number of S 1 loops and Q is P with an S 1 contracted to a point (dimension-1). T*P ≡ PxS 1 (dimension+1). [T,T*] = 1 (non-commuting). NS 3 = S 3, NT 3 = 7T 3, NS 1 xS 2 = 3S 1 xS 2. N≡T*T+TT* (symmetric under T ↔ T*): counting. Repeated operations with N allow one to build a space- time with Planck scale heptaplets of three-tori and Planck mass triplets of handles embedded in 4-space.

Equation of Motion: Counting = Changing n[T 3 ](m) = 7 m for discrete m=0,1,2,…; topological time t=(m+1)T Planck and a continuous interval (m+) ≡ (m,m+1). n[S 1 xS 2 ](m+1) = 3n[S 1 xS 2 ](m) +Form(m+) -Evap(m+) -Merg(m+) → n[S 1 xS 2 ](m) = 3 m if F,E,M small (drives inflation), 2n[S 1 xS 2 ](m) = Evap(m+) if F,M and δn[S 1 xS 2 ] small; for every Planckian volume, independent of BH location. Matter degrees of freedom F,E,M modify the number of handles: GR part of quantum space-time through longevity and transience of all BHs.

Topologically distinct paths, under homeomorphisms, between any two points: Use T 3, S 1 xS 2 and S 3 Build a lattice of three-tori, with spacing L Planck, to travel through 4D space-time as an expression of the superposition principle and attach Wheeler’s handles: Quantum paths that connect points are then globally identified through non-contractible loops. Multiply Connected Space-Time

Topological Induction of BHs Solution 2θ(m) = Evap(m+), for the number θ of BHs in a time slice of width ~T Planck : Space-time responds globally to local BHs by inducing Planckian BHs. Wave function of the universe collapses when BH forms. Planckian BHs evaporate in about T ev ~T Planck. Macroscopic BHs θ living longer than a Hubble time generate a globally stable quantum foam density Λ. Extension of Einstein gravity and Mach’s principle: Global topology and geometry determine (changes in) Planck scale topology and the motions of matter, and vice versa. Λ = θ m Planck / L f 3, with L f the size of the universe when the first long-lived BH, so with T ev [m']>T univ [m], forms: L f is frozen in when one has a global 4-space topology in the sense of Mach and the quantum foam stabilizes.

Dark Energy Cosmological observations suggest an accelerated expansion of the universe, usually attributed to some form of vacuum energy Λ: Einstein’s cosmological constant in the form of dark energy (Riess ea 98, Perlmutter ea 98, etc.), with ρ 0 ~ g cm -3. This while θ~10 19 today. Topological induction then requires the dark energy to follow the number of macroscopic BHs in the universe. Induced Planckian BHs require an increase in 4-volume for their embedding: L f ≈2x10 14 cm from ρ 0 and θ. Observed star/BH formation history of universe yields: Λ(z)/Λ(0)~(1+z) -0.36, z<1; a ~30% decline: w ≈ -1.1, not constant, consistent with observations (Aykutalp & Spaans 12). In fact, w = ± 10% (Hinshaw ea 12; Planck: Ade ea 13).

Summary Use the topological freedom in GR to implement the superposition principle through the notion of globally distinct paths for particles to travel along. The S 1 loop dynamics of three-tori and handles generate such paths: multiply to identify. Leads to the creation of Wheeler’s Planckian BHs by macroscopic BHs, i.e., a testable form of dark energy. What if (many) primordial BHs evaporate until today? Inflation driven by induced mini BHs: n≥55 e-foldings, n~ln(L f /L Planck ) 1/2 ~lnθ 1/6. Further scrutiny of the lattice of three-tori is necessary: fluctuations with n s =1-r ≈ ln(7)/n = 0.96 and macroscopic temporal displacement in the CMB with amplitude 1/14.