1 1 Practice Final John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lesson 08 Linear Programming
Advertisements

Aggregate Planning.
6 | 1 Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Independent Demand Inventory Materials Management OPS 370.
Stochastic Inventory Modeling
1 1 © 2003 Thomson  /South-Western Slide Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
1 1 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Slides by JOHN LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
IES 303 Chapter 15: Inventory Management Supplement E
1 Minnesota State Lottery NASPL World Meet Conference Optimizing Retailer Visits.
Days Of Supply Protects the plant from variation between forecasted and actual usage between vessels, and vessel delays.
Chapter 19 Variable Costing and Performance Reporting.
Supply Chain Management
1 Managing Flow Variability: Safety Inventory The Newsvendor ProblemArdavan Asef-Vaziri, Oct 2011 The Magnitude of Shortages (Out of Stock)
Supply Chain Management Lecture 27. Detailed Outline Tuesday April 27Review –Simulation strategy –Formula sheet (available online) –Review final Thursday.
INDR 343 Problem Session
Supply Chain Coordination with Contracts
Inventory Management for Independent Demand
CHAPTER 7 Managing Inventories
Contracts for Make-to-Stock/Make-to-Order Supply Chains
Operations Management
Network Models II Shortest Path Cross Docking Enhance Modeling Skills Modeling with AMPL Spring 03 Vande Vate.
1 1 Summary of First Section: Deterministic Analysis John H. Vande Vate Spring, 2007.
Supply Contract Allocation Gyana R. Parija Bala Ramachandran IBM T.J. Watson Research Center INFORMS Miami 2001.
1 1 In-Bound Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.
1 1 Transportation & Supply Chain Costs John H. Vande Vate Spring, 2001.
Classifying optimization problems By the independent variables: –Integer optimization --- integer variables –Continuous optimization – real variables By.
Independent Demand Inventory Management
1 1 Revenue Management Dealing with Uncertainty John H. Vande Vate Spring 2006.
1 INVENTORY MODELS Outline Deterministic models –The Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) model –Sensitivity analysis –A price-break Model Probabilistic Inventory.
1 1 Managing Uncertainty with Inventory I John H. Vande Vate Spring, 2007.
Contents Introduction
Inventory Management MD707 Operations Management Professor Joy Field.
Inventory Management. Learning Objectives  Define the term inventory and list the major reasons for holding inventories; and list the main requirements.
Location planning and analysis
1 Chapter 6 –Inventory Management Policies Operations Management by R. Dan Reid & Nada R. Sanders 4th Edition © Wiley 2010.
1 Managing Flow Variability: Safety Inventory Operations Management Session 23: Newsvendor Model.
1 1 Exam 2 Bullwhip Effect John H. Vande Vate Spring, 2006.
Supply Chain Innovation at Geddy’s Asia - Pacific Consulting Group 1 st Round Room 4009 Momo (Chenyang) Liu Luis Carnero Randall (Jie) Miao Jun Karamon.
1 Linear Programming (LP) 線性規劃 - George Dantzig, 1947.
MBA 8452 Systems and Operations Management
1 1 Exam I John H. Vande Vate Spring, Question 1 … centers to minimize its total transportation costs from its 2 plants to its 5 markets. We.
1 1 Forecasting and Logistics John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.
Operations Research II Course,, September Part 3: Inventory Models Operations Research II Dr. Aref Rashad.
1 1 Modeling Inventory (Deterministic View) John H. Vande Vate Spring 2007.
1 1 Review of Part I Preparation for Exam John H. Vande Vate Fall 2009.
What types of inventories business carry, and why they carry them.
Spring 02 Vande Vate 1 1 Modeling Service When Transport is restricted to Load-Driven Pool Points in Retail Distribution John Vande Vate Spring.
1 1 Exam 1 John H. Vande Vate Spring, Process 80+ exams to grade Certainly errors, misunderstanding, … Happy to re-grade BUT –Only respond to.
1 1 Practice Final John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2005.
1 1 Wrap Up John H. Vande Vate Spring, Review of Topics Variability Basics –The big idea Forecasting –The 5 Laws of Forecasting –Actual/Forecast.
1 1 Milk Runs and Variability John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.
Transportation and Distribution Planning Matthew J. Liberatore John F. Connelly Chair in Management Professor, Decision and Information Techologies.
Week 14 September 7, 2005 Learning Objectives:
1 1 Practice Exam #1 John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.
1 1 Modeling Inventory (Deterministic View) John H. Vande Vate Spring 2008.
Homework 1- Gateway.
Managing Uncertainty with Inventory I
Inventory Models (II) under SC environment
OUTLINE Questions, Comments? Quiz Go over Quiz Go over homework
OUTLINE Questions, Comments? Quiz Results Target Strategy:
OUTLINE Questions, Comments? Quiz Target Comments Go over homework
BMW Project “Ship-to-Average“ by Matthias Pauli Thomas Drtil
Location Case Study Shanghai GM Service Parts Part II
OUTLINE Questions, Comments? Return Quiz Review Evaluating supplier
Chapter 12 Determining the Optimal Level of Product Availability
Transportation & Supply Chain Costs: Answers to Questions
Modeling Service When Transport is restricted to Load-Driven
Foundations and Evolutions
Slides by John Loucks St. Edward’s University.
Logistics Systems Analysis Mid-Term Review
Last year’s Final John Vande Vate Fall, 2009.
Presentation transcript:

1 1 Practice Final John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002

2 2 Question In the retailer game, we discovered that a discount of increases average weekly sales by  10% 31%  20% 73%  40% 181%  Any goods we don’t sell can be salvaged for $25/unit Accepting these values as given, should we ever sell at 40% off? If so, provide a clear description of when we would sell at 40% off. If not, provide a clear and compelling argument showing why we should not sell at 40% off.

3 3 Question 2 Provide a brief, well-organized description of how you would implement a pricing strategy based on the optimization we developed in class for the Retail Game. Your description need not cover the issues of collecting or maintaining the data required to build the model. Instead, it should focus on the question of how to use the model in a retail business to manage the discount policy for a given item.

4 4 Question 3 In class we described how a model used by financial managers can be adapted to manage the supply chain impacts of release variability. This model proposed holding inventory of the part to buffer the supply chain from variations in customer demand.

5 5 Question 3 Under the model, the supplier normally ships the same quantity every day. When inventory rises to T, the model recommends curtailing shipments until it falls to t and when inventory falls to 0, the model recommends expediting shipments or sending an unusually large shipment to bring inventory levels back up to b.

6 6 Question 3 Consider the special case in which: a. there is no inventory holding cost (H = 0) b. because of space limitations, the maximum inventory level T for the part cannot exceed a given level M c. the cost of expediting and the cost of curtailing shipments are equal (E = C > 0) d. there is no bound on y, the difference between T and t (i.e., a = infinity)

7 7 Question 3 What is the optimal strategy in this special case? T = t = b =

8 8 Question 4 A clothing retailer believes demand for an item over the course of the Spring season is uniformly distributed between 1,000 and 2,000 units. The total landed cost of getting the product to the store is $10/unit. The product sells for $30/unit and any unsold units can be liquidated for $5/unit. The retailer must sign a single contract for the full season’s order.

9 9 Question 4 A. How large should the retailer’s order be? B. What are the retailer’s expected net profits from selling the item in the Spring?

10 Retailer’s Order Find Q, the order quantity Risk: $5/item unsold Reward: $20/item sold P = Probability demand is less than Q 20(1-P) = 5P P = 20/25 That happens at Q = 1,800

11 Retailer’s Profit

12 Question 5 We are developing a Location/Allocation approach to building Milk Runs between suppliers and an auto assembly plant. Our approach, however takes into account the variance in the daily volumes assigned to the routes. Specifically, we are given the means variances and covariances of the daily volumes suppliers ship along with the capacity of the trucks. We locate R route “anchors” in the Location Step.

13 Question 5 In the Allocation Step we wish to assign each supplier to a single route so as to  Minimize the total distance between the route anchors and the suppliers assigned to them (We are given the distances between supplier j and route r)  Ensure that the average volume assigned to a route does not exceed the capacity of the truck  Ensure that the variance in the volume assigned to each route does not exceed a given parameter.

14 Question 5 Formulate a linear mixed-integer programming model for the Allocation Step. Use the following parameters and sets: Set R; /* The set of Routes */ Set S; /* The set of Suppliers */ Param Avg{S}; /* The average daily cubic feet of product each supplier ships to the plant */ Param Sigma2{S}; /* The variance in the daily cubic feet of product each supplier ships to the plant */ Param Cap; /* The cubic capacity of each truck */ Param MaxVar; /* The maximum variance in the daily volume assigned to any route. By this we mean that the variance of the sum of the volumes assigned to the route may not exceed MaxVar */

15 Question 5 Param Cov{S,S}; /* The covariances in the daily cubic feet of product suppliers ship to the plant */ Param Dist{S, R}; /* The distance between each supplier and each route */

16 Solution Var Assign{S, R} binary; /*Assign supplier to route */ Var CoAssign{s in S, t in S, R: s < t} binary; /* Assign j and k to route r */ Minimize Distance: sum{s in S, r in R}Dist[s,r]*Assign[s,r]; S.t. VehicleCap{r in R}: Sum{s in S} Avg[s]*Assign[s,r] <= Cap;

17 Solution S.t. VarianceCap{r in R}: Sum{s in S}Sigma2[s]*Assign[s,r] + 2*Sum{s in S, t in S: s < t}Cov[s,t]*CoAssign[s,t,r] <= MaxVar; S.t. AssignOne{s in S}: Sum{r in R} Assign[s,r] = 1; S.t. DefineCoAssign1[s in S, t in S, r in R: s < t}: CoAssign[s,t,r] >= Assign[s, r] + Assign[t, r] –1; S.t. DefineCoAssign2{s in S, t in S, r in R: s < t }: CoAssign[s, t, r] <= Assign[s, r]; S.t. DefineCoAssign3{s in S, t in S, r in R: s < t }: CoAssign[s, t, r] <= Assign[t, r];

18