Search Incident to Arrest MNPD Training Academy Recruit Session 42 David Veile.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Search and Seizure (for Peace Officers). Fourth Amendment The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides that persons, houses, rights and effects.
Advertisements

Criminal Procedure for the Criminal Justice Professional 11th Edition
Criminal Procedure for the Criminal Justice Professional 11th Edition
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007 Chapter 5 Arrests and Searches Without Warrants.
Criminal Procedure for the Criminal Justice Professional 11 th Edition John N. Ferdico Henry F. Fradella Christopher Totten Prepared by Tony Wolusky The.
Arrest, Search, and Seizure
Criminal Justice Process: the investigation – Chp 12 Arrest – Suspect taken into custody 4 th Amendment: The right of the people to be secure in their.
Search Incident & Protective Sweeps Chimel: Search Incident Objectives: –Protect the police from danger – Preserve evidence Types of arrests –The arrest.
Law enforcement officers conduct searches every day in an effort to find evidence that can be seized and used in court to prosecute people who have violated.
1 Chapter 14 Obtaining Physical and Other Evidence.
Police and the Rule of Law Chapter 7 In Your Textbook John Massey Criminal Justice.
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CLASS FOUR. Today’s Topics Search Incident to Arrest Pretext Arrest Plain View and Plain Touch Automobile Searches Exigent Circumstances.
Legal Aspects of Criminal Investigation: Arrest, Search and Seizure
The Courts and the Constitution
Featured Programs Awards Publications Products Catalog LRE Network Contact Print This | Page Feedback | ShareThisPage Feedback Criminal Law Rules on Search.
Review of Exceptions to Warrant Rule Vehicles Open fields Anything with consent Abandoned property Inventory Plain view.
Search & Seizure Stephanow th Amendment. CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS in TEXAS =3952&TEMPLATE=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm.
The Fourth Amendment What are Your Rights? Search and Seizure:
Terry Search/Stop & Frisk © Grounds –Lawful stop based on Reasonable Suspicion that criminal activity has just occurred, is occurring, or will occur in.
Chapter 2 Legal Aspects of Investigation © 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. LEARNING OBJECTIVES Explain the historical evolution.
Search and seizure. Purposes of a search Fruits of the crime (e.g., stolen property) Instrumentalities of the crime (e.g., a gun, burglary tools) Circumstantial.
Policing Legal Aspects Go to this Site. Due Process Most Due Process requirements are in either: –evidence and investigation –arrest –interrogation All.
Plain View Doctrine  Allows a police officer to seize evidence found in “plain view” during a search without a warrant. Also, when officers are carrying.
Chapter Four Other Search & Seizure Issues All Images © Microsoft Corporation Written by Karmel Tanner May 2010.
Pre-Trial Procedures Search and Seizure.  The law seeks to balance individual’s right to privacy and need for police to conduct a thorough investigation.
Law & Justice Chapter 12 Criminal Investigations.
Rights of the Accused Search & Seizure Search & Seizure Right Against Self Incrimination Right Against Self Incrimination Right to Counsel Right to Counsel.
Amendments in Action Search and Seizure. The 4 th Amendment “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against.
 What is the exclusionary rule  Explain stop and frisk  What is the plain view doctrine  What did Miranda v Arizona require police to do  What happens.
1 Chapter 14 Obtaining Physical and other Evidence Obtaining Physical and other Evidence.
LS100 Eight Skills Prof. Jane McElligott.  A Miranda Warning is a statement police must read to a suspect prior to interrogation of the suspect once.
Criminal Justice Process: The Investigation. Criminal Justice Process The criminal justice process includes everything that happens to a person from arrest.
The Fourth Amendment and the Home By Laura Zajac.
Authority of the Police Chapter Two All Images © Microsoft Corporation Written by Karmel Tanner May 2010.
3.2 – Police Powers – Searching Suspects and property 1 answers/police-powers-and-your-rights/getting- searched.
“ Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Criminal Evidence Chapter Six: Warrantless Arrests and Searches This multimedia product and its contents are protected.
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated;
4 th Amendment: Search and Seizure. The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects personal privacy, and every citizen's right to be free from.
Investigative Constitutional Law Charles L. Feer, JD, MPA Bakersfield College Department of Criminal Justice Investigative Constitutional Law.
The Investigation.  Right to remain silent  Right to an attorney  No interrogation should take place before they read  Are a result of the US Supreme.
Investigative Constitutional Law Charles L. Feer, JD, MPA, Bakersfield College Department of Criminal Justice Investigative Constitutional Law.
Chapter 11: Investigative Constitutional Law LawTech Custom Publishing, Inc. Copyright 2010 Investigative Constitutional Law.
Fourth Amendment And Probable Cause. By the end of this presentation you should be able to understand; ◦Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution ◦How.
1 Book Cover Here Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved Chapter 7 Search Incident to a Lawful Arrest, Hot Pursuit Criminal Justice Procedure.
© 2015 Cengage Learning Chapter 7 CTE S&B:17.04/17.07 Police and the Constitution: The Rules of Law Enforcement Chapter 7 CTE S&B:17.04/17.07 Police and.
Land Mark Supreme Court Cases Assignment
CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS: THE INVESTIGATION Chapter 12.
Criminal Procedure Practice Exam 11:30 am – 12:30 pm: Practice Exam 12:30 pm – 1:00 pm: Review DO NOT OPEN YOUR EXAM BOOKLET UNTIL INSTRUCTED TO DO SO.
CJ I / Critical Thinking 3/13/16 Why do you think it is important that law enforcement agencies have limited authority? What do you think are the key benefits.
Is there a state action? (i.e. search by police, not private party) Is the search conducted by a state or federal actor? 4 th amendment doesn’t apply to.
1 Book Cover Here Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved Chapter 5 Automobile Searches: exceptions to the warrant requirement Criminal Justice.
What are our rights and how do we protect them?. How do we balance our personal rights against the right of society to be safe and secure?
4th Amendment "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall.
Chapter 5 Legal Issues in Criminal Investigation.
Evidence Collection at the Crime Scene and Constitutional Law
Rules of Evidence.
Turn in any late work. Get a book.
Amendments in Action Search and Seizure.
Chapter 10: Investigative Constitutional Law
Chapter 3 Searches.
Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement
Chapter 8 Police and Constitutional Law
The Fourth Amendment and the Home
Amendments in Action Search and Seizure.
Fourth Amendment And Probable Cause.
Search and Seizure Concepts
Bell Work (Think of your response and be prepared to share)
Pre-Trial Procedures Search and Seizure.
Authority of the Police
Presentation transcript:

Search Incident to Arrest MNPD Training Academy Recruit Session 42 David Veile

Introduction The law prefers warrants based on probable cause. Situations often arise in which the time and effort needed to obtain a warrant would place an unreasonable frustration on law enforcement. Courts have therefore carved out certain exceptions to the search warrant requirement.

Chimel v. California Suspect was arrested for burglary of a coin shop. Officers then searched his entire house and found stolen coins in a drawer in his bedroom.

Court said : When an arrest is made, it is reasonable for the arresting officer to search the person in order to remove any weapons that he or she might use in order to resist arrest or escape. In addition, it is entirely reasonable for the arresting officer to search for and seize any evidence on the arrestee’s person in order to prevent its concealment or destruction.

The area into which an arrestee might reach in order to grab a weapon or evidence is included. A gun on a table or in a drawer next to an arrested suspect can be as dangerous as one in his clothing.

Purposes of Search Incident to Arrest There are only two legitimate purposes for which an officer may search a person incident to arrest: –Search for and remove WEAPONS that the arrestee might use to resist or escape, or –Search for and seize EVIDENCE in order to prevent its concealment or destruction.

What may be seized? Weapons that the arrestee may use to injure the officer or effect an escape. Fruits of the crime for which the arrest is made. Instrumentalities used to commit the crime. Contraband Evidence of a crime

An officer may seize not only evidence tending to establish the crime for which the arrest is made, but also evidence of other crimes. The officer need not have a specific object in mind. Even if the arrest is for an offense that could not produce any evidence, the officer may still conduct a search for weapons and evidence.

Full Scale Search Whenever an officer makes a lawful custodial arrest, they are entitled to make a full-scale search of the arrestee’s person incident to that arrest. –The officer does not need to show any standard of proof that weapons or evidence might be found.

Full Search of Arrestee’s Body Includes evidence “on the body” : –hair samples –fingernail clippings

Full Search of Arrestee’s Body... Also includes evidence “immediately associated” with the arrestee’s body: –clothing (includes pockets) –billfolds –jewelry –watches –pagers

Full Search of Arrestee’s Body... Includes other personal property and unlocked containers that the arrestee is carrying or has under his/her immediate control. –packages –bundles –luggage is more stringent cannot be remote in time and place from arrest--- U.S. v. Chadwick

Search of area within arrestee’s immediate control And the area into which an arrestee might reach in order to grab a weapon or evidentiary items must, of course, be governed by a like rule. A gun on a table or in a drawer in front of one who is arrested can be as dangerous to the arresting officer as one concealed in the clothing of the person arrested.

There is ample justification, therefore, for a search of the arrestee’s person and the area “within his immediate control”-- constructing that phrase to mean the area from within which he might gain possession of a weapon or destructible evidence.

Determination of GRAB AREA The determination of the area which is inside the arrestee’s “immediate area of control” depends on several factors: –Size and shape of room –Size and agility of arrestee –Whether arrestee was handcuffed –Size and type of evidence being sought...

If a person is arrested out of doors, a search of that person’s house or apartment cannot be justified by search incident to arrest. However, if it is necessary for an arrested person to go into a different area of the premises from that in which he was arrested, the officer, for his own protection, may accompany him and search if necessary.

Officers may not deliberately move an arrested person near a place they want to search to activate the search incident to arrest.

Search of Motor Vehicles When a police officer has made a lawful custodial arrest of the occupant of an automobile, he may, as a contemporaneous incident of that arrest, search the PASSENGER COMPARTMENT of that automobile. New York v. Belton

The police may also examine the contents of any containers found within the passenger compartment, for if the passenger compartment is within reach of the arrestee, so also will containers in it be within his reach. Such a container may be searched, whether it is open or closed.

Containers include: glove compartments consoles boxes bags clothing any object capable of holding another object

Interior Passenger Compartment Only the interior passenger compartment may be searched- NOT THE TRUNK The search of any containers must be substantially contemporaneous with the custodial arrest of the vehicles occupant

Other Requirements for Search Incident to Arrest Lawful Custodial Arrest –In Tennessee- an officer may ONLY perform a search incident to arrest when conducting a CUSTODIAL ARREST. An officer MAY NOT conduct a search incident to an arrest by citation. Knowles v. Iowa- United States Supreme Court Walker v. State- TN Supreme Court

Who may conduct the search? If practical, the arresting officer. Why? If the arresting officer transfers an arrested person to another officer, the second officer may again search the suspect.

Use of Force (335) Law enforcement officers searching a person incident to arrest may use the amount of force reasonably necessary to protect themselves, prevent escape, and prevent the destruction or concealment of evidence

Search Incident to Arrest Purpose: To protect the officer from weapons that may be used to resist arrest or make an escape To recover evidence that may be destroyed Scope: The search of a person pursuant to a custodial arrest, which includes : Evidence on the arrestee’s person Arrestee’s clothing, pockets, etc. Items within arrestee’s immediate area of control (grab area), including purses, unlocked containers, etc. If suspect was inside a vehicle, it includes the interior passenger compartment of the vehicle, and any unlocked containers. (NOT THE TRUNK)

Protective Sweep (332) There may be circumstances justifying an officer’s going into other areas of the premises. Pursuant to a custodial arrest, for their own protection, officers may look into other rooms to see if other persons are present if they have reasonable suspicion that there may be someone else there.

Search must be contemporaneous with arrest As close in time to the arrest as is practically possible. Sometimes, it is not feasible for an officer to search immediately upon making an arrest. –Female searches, dangerous environment, poor lighting...

Under the “protective sweep,” an officer must have reasonable suspicion that there is another person on the premises that might pose a threat to the officer. This is not considered a “search,” because the officer is not looking for evidence; However, an officer who observes any seizable items may seize it under the “plain view” doctrine.

An officer MAY NOT search other rooms of the premises under a protective sweep unless the officer can articulate reasonable suspicion that there is someone else there.

Scope & Purpose of Protective Sweep Purpose: –To protect arresting officers from attack by other persons on the premises Scope: –Anywhere that a person might be found, IF THE OFFICER HAS REASONABLE SUSPICION THAT THERE IS SOMEONE ELSE THERE WHO MAY POSE A DANGER TO THE OFFICER